Both days you remain oppressed by the cult of the doctrine of the inspiration of the scripture.So if I deposit a hundred thousand dollars in the bank tomorrow, then go rob it the next day of ten thousand, I'm okay?
Upvote
0
Both days you remain oppressed by the cult of the doctrine of the inspiration of the scripture.So if I deposit a hundred thousand dollars in the bank tomorrow, then go rob it the next day of ten thousand, I'm okay?
Cool school!The unique thing about this sedimentary rock is that its a picture of Mars.
Maybe the water that was removed from the earth in ...Sedimentary rock. Explain that with the great flood theory?
You still have not dealt with the transplant issue alone. Let alone the fact that over 5 miles of water would leave a mark.Maybe the water that was removed from the earth in ...
Genesis 1:7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
... was taken to Mars; then came back during the Flood?
Genesis 7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
Genesis 7:12 And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.
That is amazing. How have I missed that for so long. Thank you.
An unforeseen consequence of the creation of Genesis. One day the gullible would be forced to make up even more stories to explain away previous speculation. You should recommend AIG create and exhibit for that as well?Maybe the water that was removed from the earth in ...
Genesis 1:7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
... was taken to Mars; then came back during the Flood?
Genesis 7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
Genesis 7:12 And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.
Oops, that was wrong, that was on the same page as a comparison. My bad.That is amazing. How have I missed that for so long. Thank you.
What kind of mark?You still have not dealt with the transplant issue alone. Let alone the fact that over 5 miles of water would leave a mark.
That is weird, because when I Google searched the image it also said it was from Mars, but when I clicked on some of the images I found it was in Israel.Oops, that was wrong, that was on the same page as a comparison. My bad.
This is mars:
View attachment 254555
View attachment 254554
Erosion, you can't move in that much water and move it out without leaving a mark. Or was the water just pretend water and the deaths just pretend deaths since there is no evidence of any of it?What kind of mark?
Certainly not the kind of mark that would be expected if it was up to Mother Nature to clean up the mess.
But the water was siphoned off the earth and didn't go away naturally.
Are you sure you would even know what to look for in such a scenario?
Genesis 7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life,
But you have no idea what the earth looked like prior to the Flood, do you?Erosion, you can't move in that much water and move it out without leaving a mark.
Repeating a lie doesn't make it any less false. The creation story is myth.But you have no idea what the earth looked like prior to the Flood, do you?
We're living on an eroded earth that was in Genesis 1 considered "very good."
Besides ... and I can't emphasize this enough (and frankly I'm getting tired of repeating it) ... God cleaned up the mess.
If my memory serves me correctly, England was under attack by [whomever] and about to go down, when suddenly there was a lull in the fighting and England's invaders were repulsed by a powerful king who stepped in and pwned them.Legends are so cool. Have you read the one about King Arthur?
You're mything the point.Repeating a lie doesn't make it any less false. The creation story is myth.
The myth is the point. Aside from religious reasons, it's silly to categorize a myth as anything but.You're mything the point.
So why prefer one myth over another? The irony is, if the bible supported King Arthur, Camelot, Merlin and the knights of the round table, you'd be spouting this as gospel. This is why it's important to educate yourself in toto about reality. It makes one look less like a simpleton.If my memory serves me correctly, England was under attack by [whomever] and about to go down, when suddenly there was a lull in the fighting and England's invaders were repulsed by a powerful king who stepped in and pwned them.
That king was King Arthur and, I believe, his court was named "Camelot" or something.
(Gimme a break here. I'll be 65 next month!)
And if evidence supported it, you would too.The irony is, if the bible supported King Arthur, Camelot, Merlin and the knights of the round table, you'd be spouting this as gospel.