Not Looking Good for Jussie Smollet

Ana the Ist said:

I will say the worst thing I've heard was in an article that interviewed people from the neighborhood. It seems like an extremely common opinion that it didn't happen as he said. I think one person said that half that area is black....the other half gay....

Click to expand...

The demographic is largely Caucasian. It is not half black. It borders Lake Michigan and the rent and housing prices reflect that. I don't believe it's half gay either. There are a lot of professionals and young families in the area.

Albion said:

No, I saw a list the other day, and I may have erred by using a number here that is actually too low.

Click to expand...

People might be utterly amazed at the amount of Fake hate crimes out there, this link is a couple years old but the shear amount of silliness is just amazing.

Fake Hate Crimes [OFFICIAL] : StumpSheet

There is also a fake hate crimes website out there but for some reason I can't access it: fakehatecrimes.org

Gigimo said:

People might be utterly amazed at the amount of Fake hate crimes out there, this link is a couple years old but the shear amount of silliness is just amazing.

Fake Hate Crimes [OFFICIAL] : StumpSheet

There is also a fake hate crimes website out there but for some reason I can't access it: fakehatecrimes.org

Click to expand...

The number of false reports is no more than false reports for other crimes. The list of hate crimes dwarfs this list, but that doesn't matter to those who seek to minimize and ignore bias attacks in the US.

SummerMadness said:

The number of false reports is no more than false reports for other crimes. The list of hate crimes dwarfs this list, but that doesn't matter to those who seek to minimize and ignore bias attacks in the US.

Click to expand...

Minimize?

Those just happens to be some of the most egregious laws/legislation on the books for it lets and forces the judge/jury come to a conclusion/ruling based on what "they think" the supposed perpetrator was thinking when the act was committed instead of being held to ruling on the actual merits/facts of the case. (That's called exercising/forcing biases into the justice system, naughty, naughty but typical of certain ideology). Now if the perp comes out and spills his/her guts about why or what they were thinking during the commission of that act then that's a different story.

Just think what could have happened to 2 innocent people if the hoax wasn't exposed?

(And unless I miss my guess not everybody would have been upset if innocent people went to jail to further the "hate crime" narrative, and I'd also bet they were upset when the hoax was exposed).

I dont think this one is done yet folks. Give it a little time.