Hello Childeye the 2nd,
Perhaps you may want to consider switching your news sources, as you seem to be lacking information that Mueller investigative council exposed quite early.
So what I said was not a false narrative.
Thanks for the response. I've looked at what you've presented. I am aware of the three examples from Mueller including one deemed pro-Hillary propaganda sponsored by Russia. Please notice that it was Machiavellian such as Muslims for Hillary or gays and lesbians for Hillary. So all three examples were actually anti-Hillary.
In the Business insider article of nine examples, I saw two examples of anti-Trump rallies that notably displayed the caveat of being "alleged to be sponsored by Russia". And that left one (1) anti Trump rally supposedly called "Charlotte against Trump" that was supposed to have taken place about ten days after the nationwide worldwide protests of Donald Trump's election. I have run a search on "Charlotte against Trump" and get nothing. So I cannot evaluate as to whether it is Machiavellian or if it even happened. And the five days of protest around the entire world and country right after Trump's election where business insider claims Russian involvement I find to be highly doubtful. I did not see where the NBC article it links to is claiming any Russian involvement at all.
Again, what I said was not propaganda. Russia from the beginning tried to sow discord among us. They succeeded in mobilizing it. Yes, the left bought into it more than the right but both sides need to be wary of this. BTW: I did not say one word here against Hillary Clinton so that in and of itself is a false narrative.
Respectfully, even the report you cite from Business insider said the propaganda was decisively anti-Hillary/pro Trump:
"Although the Russians organized some rallies in opposition to Trump's candidacy, most were supportive." So this evidence you gave actually disputes your claim that Russia was not against Hillary and Pro Trump.
Of course I agree that both sides need to be wary of it, but claiming that the left bought into it more than the right is not sound reasoning since it was decisively Pro Trump/Anti-Hillary. It was therefore aimed at the right. Hillary wanting sharia law is meant to incite the right, not the left.
I never said that you said something against Hillary Clinton. I said that it's a false narrative to try and convince people that Russia was not for Trump.
I fail to see the logic behind this mutually exclusive statement here. I believe it short sighted to say they wanted one candidate or another.
Respectfully, the point of a mutually exclusive statement is to establish a true dichotomy to reason upon logically. In other words to reason on a false dichotomy is to form conclusions on false information. The statement doesn't say they wanted one candidate or the other. The statement is meant to infer that Russia is either for Trump and against Hillary or they are not for Trump and against Hillary. That's a true dichotomy.
It's my opinion Trump has been alot tougher on Russia than Hillary would have been but that is simply my subjective opinion, since we'll never know her as President. Russia stands to gain much more by dividing Americans than backing a particular leader and I'll double down on that reality rather than believe Putin cares one bit if a Democrat or a Republican is in the White House.
United we stand, divided we fall. Everyone knows that or at least they should unless they want to wind up on the refuse heap of other nations that didn't pay attention to history.
If your opinion is that Hillary would be softer on Russia than Trump while recognizing that we don't know what Hillary would have done, then you're simply displaying a bias. But this lack of any evidence to support your bias shouldn't be counted as any reason to deny that Trump said he was for lifting sanctions and that Russia was for Trump.
I don't just respond to let's stand united just because. I stand united with the Truth against the lies that divide would us who stand upon the Truth. The Truth is authoritative and not subjective. So it only takes honesty to see it and humility to accept it.