LDS Celestial Marriage...100% false.

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,565
13,723
✟429,802.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
(Cont'd. from above)

The thing I was referring to in Christianity is the idea of "correctly dividing the word". It is a growing doctrine mainly in the evangelical churches and I believe it is a danger to all of Christianity, because it reduces the impact of the words of Christ, being of the Law of Moses and elevates the words of Paul, being of the doctrines of grace, which they feel are superior to the words of the Law of Moses, including at least most of the words of Christ in the 4 gospels.

What on earth are you talking about? I don't know whatever Evangelicals may or may not be doing these days (though I'd prefer to ask them myself), but "correctly dividing the word", as you've put it, has nothing to do with elevating anything over anything else. I don't know where that's coming from. "Rightly dividing the word" is from the scriptures themselves (2 Timothy 2:15), and is a reminder of how important it is to not just know the word, but to understand it and use it properly. (*cough*) This is why it ended up in our (Coptic Orthodox) liturgical prayers in precisely the place it is found there, in the seven short litanies, which read in part as follows (I've truncated them because they go on for a while, and I just want to show where the phrase is and its immediate environment):


Priest:
Make us all worthy, O our Master, to partake of Your Holies, unto the purification of our souls, our bodies, and our spirits,



that we may become one body and one spirit, and may have a share and an inheritance with all the saints who have pleased You since the beginning.



Remember, O Lord, the peace of Your one, only, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church—



Deacon:
Pray for the peace of the one holy catholic and apostolic orthodox Church of God.



People:
Lord have mercy.



Priest:
this, which You have acquired to Yourself with the precious Blood of Your Christ,



keep her in peace, with all the orthodox bishops who are in her.



Foremost remember, O Lord, our blessed and honored father, the archbishop, our patriarch, Abba (Tawadros the Second),



and his spiritual brothers, the Patriarch of Antioch Mar Ignatius (…), and the Patriarch of Eritrea Abouna (Antonios the First).



In the presence of a bishop:



and his partner in the liturgy, our father the bishop (metropolitan), Abba (...).



Deacon:
Pray for our high priest, Pope Abba (Tawadros the Second), pope and patriarch and archbishop of the great city of Alexandria,



and his spiritual brothers, the Patriarch of Antioch Mar Ignatius (Aphrem the Second), and the Patriarch of Eritrea Abouna (Antonios the First).



In the presence of a bishop:



and his partner in the liturgy, our father the bishop (metropolitan), Abba (...).



And concludes with:



and for our orthodox bishops.



People:
Lord have mercy.



Priest:
And those who rightly divide the word of truth with him,



grant them unto Your holy Church to shepherd Your flock in peace.



Remember, O Lord, the orthodox hegumens, priests, and deacons.

+++

In other words, here are some of the people we mutually recognize as "rightly dividing the word of truth" (teaching and understanding correctly, i.e., according to the Orthodox Christian faith), so we pray for them and all those who do the same with them. It is for the strengthening of the Orthodox people by our mutual recognition of one another (that we may become one body, as prayed earlier in the prayer), not to promote or demote any writing or concept over any other. Even the division you have mentioned, between "the law" and "grace", is artificial insofar as for Christians, Christ has fulfilled the Law, so it is not able to conflict with anything to begin with.

I know from interacting with Mormons here and elsewhere that your religion is more of a "Law-based" religion, but just like your building of temples, this is something that Christians simply do not do, and not because we have 'lost' anything that Mormonism has since 'restored', but because we "rightly divide the word of truth" and understand that such things are of the old covenant which the Lord God made with the Jews, and so are not binding upon Christians, who instead have other commands that go far beyond what the law of Moses says (cf. St. Hippolytus of Rome, as quoted earlier on the Acts of the Apostles). To the Christian, the Mormon approach is therefore at best a step backwards, and an implicit denial of Christ's fulfillment (and, I would argue, therefore of Him).
 
Upvote 0

Peter1000

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
7,876
488
71
✟124,865.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
Matthew 22 refutes Celestial Marriage
Matthew 22 refutes the giving in marriage after the resurrection. There will be marriage after the resurrection, but only for those that were married, "in the Lord" before the resurrection.
 
Upvote 0

Peter1000

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
7,876
488
71
✟124,865.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
That's the problem, you don't offer meat--I keep telling you offer veggie meat. He wasn't drinking until after he be came Mormon. He was fine until he became Mormon!
Don't know what my stepdaughter is doing now--she has not stopped by nor called nor answered her phone.
There is a lot more to this story than can be told in a 2 paragraph response. But if you are thinking that Mormonism drove him to drink, you are terribly mistaken.
 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,565
13,723
✟429,802.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
I dunno...I didn't even convert to Mormonism, and spending so much time learning about and discussing Mormonism here already drives me to drink. Cheers! :beercheers:

(NB: it's fasting time for Lent right now...I'll only be drinking water later.)
 
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,821
73
Las Vegas
✟255,978.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
.

You can say stupid all you want, but many men and women who love each other want to be together with their families for eternity, and there is only 1 church that gives them any hope of such an arrangement.

They are neither gullible nor preyed upon. These are God fearing, Jesus loving people with as much intelligence as you have.



There is another notable example way earlier on in the history of Christianity, about the Patriarch of Alexandria who did not believe the doctrine of the Patriarch of Rome or the Patriarch of Constantinople, and decided to take his ball and go home. After many years of trying to reconcile with the Mother Church, the Patriarch of Alexandria and the Patriarch of Antioch were excommunicated from the Church in 451, never, even until today to be reconciled.

This schism involved millions of people, who were torn away from the true church and taken into a new church without the blessings of Rome and Constantinople, which were preeminent 1 & 2. IOW they were the Mother (true) church and your leader took them out of the true church to a church that he and his bishops devised.

If this is what you think of JS, who didn't believe the Mother church, you better look a little closer to home and Dioscorus, who didn't believe the Mother Church, because Dioscorus has affected billions of people by now. Big difference, but the same reason to split.



It makes as much sense of you calling the restitution of all things, the second coming of Christ. If Paul meant the second coming of Christ he would have said, whom the heaven must receive until the second coming of Christ. OR whom the heavens must receive until the millennium of Christ. Either way why code it by calling it a restitution? He wouldn't because he knew it was not the second coming, but a restoring of all thing from the Chruch of Jesus Christ of the Adamic dispensation, the Church of Jesus Christ of the Abrahamic dispensation, the Church of Jesus Christ of the Israel, the Church of Jesus Christ of Davidic dispensation, the Church of Jesus Christ of Daniel dispensation, the Church of Jesus Christ of the First Century and finally to restore all things through the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, to help the world prepare for the second coming of Christ and the millennium of Christ.

Besides the sage words of you fathers amount to nothing but saying the scripture, they do not give us an interpretation of what the restitution of all things is, they just state that there will be one as the scripture says. As for Moses saying there will be a prophet like me, that refers to the Christ of the first century, that he would come, which he did.

Christ will indeed come a second time to rule and reign for 1,000 years, but before that happens there had to be a restitution/restoration of all things. JS, through the instructions of Jesus Christ accomplished that restitution and that restitution is still happening even today as the prophets of Jesus Christ continue to receive instruction from him.



I can understand your lack of knowledge about this subject, you have never heard it this way, but I ask you again, when was there an event that took place, where there was a restitution of all things? None, so your default around it must be that it will not happen until Jesus comes a second time. But I will tell you it has already happened and things are well on their way and we look forward to the second coming of Christ.



I have quoted you many scriptures from the bible about the apostasy and the restitution, so yes the bible does support JS in this effort.


The thing I was referring to in Christianity is the idea of "correctly dividing the word". It is a growing doctrine mainly in the evangelical churches and I believe it is a danger to all of Christianity, because it reduces the impact of the words of Christ, being of the Law of Moses and elevates the words of Paul, being of the doctrines of grace, which they feel are superior to the words of the Law of Moses, including at least most of the words of Christ in the 4 gospels.

This is a lot of hooey!! You do not offer anything other than multiple wives for men and an eternity of childbearing for women!! All churches offer being united with friends and family members forever----if they are saved also. Jesus said there is no sex and that is all you have to offer. All Christian's believe they will be with their family forever. We will all be one in Christ! You do not offer that---you offer men the power to be gods ruling over their own planet and fathering the whole planet---what you offer is unbridled lust for eternity for men---not in the least what God has planned for anyone.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,821
73
Las Vegas
✟255,978.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
There is a lot more to this story than can be told in a 2 paragraph response. But if you are thinking that Mormonism drove him to drink, you are terribly mistaken.


No---I'm sure there was more. I just say that it certainly didn't offer him what he needed to stay off it!
 
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,821
73
Las Vegas
✟255,978.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Matthew 22 refutes the giving in marriage after the resurrection. There will be marriage after the resurrection, but only for those that were married, "in the Lord" before the resurrection.


It doesn't say--AFTER the resurrection there will be no marriage---
Mar_12:25 For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; but are as the angels which are in heaven.
Where does it says--unless they were married "in the Lord by a Mormon priest before the resurrection?"
When they rise from the dead---period. no add ons.
 
Upvote 0

Peter1000

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
7,876
488
71
✟124,865.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
I don't think anyone here has anything against men and women loving each other and wanting to be with their families (I sure don't). Once again, it is a matter of your conflating satisfying that desire with teaching the truth that is the problem. You agreed in your other reply that things are not true just because they may make people happy. All I'm doing is extending that, which you already believe in, to apply to your religion and its false doctrines.

Your disortation is long and mostly off topic, so I will only conment on the topic.

Just because a couple is happy, it does not mean the doctrine is true. It also does not mean that it is false either. Eternal marriage is a biblical doctrine, I know you don't believe it is, but we do, and to us, that is all that matters. The doctrine that you can be married for the eternities and have family for the eternities is true, again, whether you believe it or not, it does not matter.

But for you to say that it is not true because the western church has some marriage vow that says until death do we part, and we have widows and widowers is not proof of anything except a church that doesn't actually understand the eternal doctrines of marriage, which has been lost in the apostasy and restored through the prophet JS.

Most of mankind will indeed be single in the eternities to come, but there will be a group that will have the pleasure to be married for all eternity in the highest levels of heaven. But you must be married "in the Lord", before the resurrection, as it says in Matthew 22.
 
Upvote 0

Peter1000

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
7,876
488
71
✟124,865.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
No---I'm sure there was more. I just say that it certainly didn't offer him what he needed to stay off it!
Yes they did, he just simply did not take advantage of what we have to offer.

As far as taking care of our people, there is no church in the land that does a better job than the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. So if he had a problem, all he needed to do is come to a responsible person in the church and he would have received instructions to help him.

Some people that receive instructions reject the help and turn away and curse the church for being too strict about how they help. Our help is predicated on temporal assistance + spiritual assistance, some totally reject the spiritual assistance.
 
Upvote 0

Peter1000

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
7,876
488
71
✟124,865.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
It doesn't say--AFTER the resurrection there will be no marriage---
Mar_12:25 For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; but are as the angels which are in heaven.
Where does it says--unless they were married "in the Lord by a Mormon priest before the resurrection?"
When they rise from the dead---period. no add ons.
The verbiage "they neither marry, nor are given in marriage" means that in the time period that this scripture is talking about, there will be no new marriages.

So what is the time frame that this scripture is talking about. The verbiage is "in the resurrection". What does that mean? To me that means any time after the resurrection has started. It is during this time that no new marriages will be performed.

However, this also begs the question: What about those people that are married before the resurrection is complete?
The answer is: If they are married before the resurrection is started, and they are married "in the Lord", they will remain as husband and wife, and can be heirs together in the grace of life. (1 Peter 3:7)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Peter1000

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
7,876
488
71
✟124,865.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
This is a lot of hooey!! You do not offer anything other than multiple wives for men and an eternity of childbearing for women!! All churches offer being united with friends and family members forever----if they are saved also. Jesus said there is no sex and that is all you have to offer. All Christian's believe they will be with their family forever. We will all be one in Christ! You do not offer that---you offer men the power to be gods ruling over their own planet and fathering the whole planet---what you offer is unbridled lust for eternity for men---not in the least what God has planned for anyone.
What a disortation of ignorance. You have read way too much stuff from non-friendly people to the Church of Jesus Chirst.
 
Upvote 0

Peter1000

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
7,876
488
71
✟124,865.00
Faith
Mormon
Marital Status
Married
I dunno...I didn't even convert to Mormonism, and spending so much time learning about and discussing Mormonism here already drives me to drink. Cheers! :beercheers:

(NB: it's fasting time for Lent right now...I'll only be drinking water later.)
Drink up, we have not even got to the deep parts yet.
 
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,821
73
Las Vegas
✟255,978.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
The verbiage "they neither marry, nor are given in marriage" means that in the time period that this scripture is talking about, there will be no new marriages.

So what is the time frame that this scripture is talking about. The verbiage is "in the resurrection". What does that mean? To me that means any time after the resurrection has started. It is during this time that no new marriages will be performed.

However, this also begs the question: What about those people that are married before the resurrection is complete?
The answer is: If they are married before the resurrection is started, and they are married "in the Lord", they will remain as husband and wife, and can be heirs together in the grace of life. (1 Peter 3:7)
 
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,821
73
Las Vegas
✟255,978.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others


OOOpppss--hit reply before writing one!

Mar_12:25 For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; but are as the angels which are in heaven.

Before the resurrection, this is in effect.

Rom 7:2 For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband.

After the resurrection:

Rev 19:7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.
Rev 19:8 And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.
Rev 19:9 And he saith unto me, Write, Blessed are they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he saith unto me, These are the true sayings of God.

Isaiah 54:5 - For thy Maker [is] thine husband; the LORD of hosts [is] his name; and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; The God of the whole earth shall he be called.
Eph 5:25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
Eph 5:26 That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,
Eph 5:27 That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.

Gal 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

We are all married to Christ after the resurrection---not each other. If that is not good enough for you and all you're interested in is having multiple wives with which to populate you own planet---you're in for a great big disappointment!!
 
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,821
73
Las Vegas
✟255,978.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
What a disortation of ignorance. You have read way too much stuff from non-friendly people to the Church of Jesus Chirst.


Nope---got it all from you folks, Brigham Young and JS.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,565
13,723
✟429,802.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Your disortation is long and mostly off topic, so I will only conment on the topic.

Just because a couple is happy, it does not mean the doctrine is true. It also does not mean that it is false either.

Of course.

Eternal marriage is a biblical doctrine

No it isn't.

I know you don't believe it is, but we do, and to us, that is all that matters. The doctrine that you can be married for the eternities and have family for the eternities is true, again, whether you believe it or not, it does not matter.

It's not that I say so; it's that this is an invention with no antecedent in the Christian Church.

But for you to say that it is not true because the western church has some marriage vow that says until death do we part, and we have widows and widowers is not proof of anything except a church that doesn't actually understand the eternal doctrines of marriage, which has been lost in the apostasy and restored through the prophet JS.

Here's the thing: you claim, based on nothing whatsoever, that it was lost and then restored. Well, for something to be lost, it would have had to have been found somewhere in Christianity before it was lost (in the 'great apostasy').

That being the case, you need to PROVE THAT IT WAS THERE.

By 'prove', I mean provide period sources that show that this was the early Christian Church's (pre-'Great Apostasy') belief and practice. If you cannot do that -- and I strongly suspect that you can't -- then you need to stop claiming something that is not provable. You are not on a Mormon messageboard right now, and nobody is going to take your word for it, or take your statement that you believe in it so it is true at all seriously if you cannot show any actual evidence of it having been present in the early Christian Church.

Most of mankind will indeed be single in the eternities to come, but there will be a group that will have the pleasure to be married for all eternity in the highest levels of heaven. But you must be married "in the Lord", before the resurrection, as it says in Matthew 22.

This is so incredibly confused. Here is what some of the fathers testify to concerning Matthew 22:30 --

"All the human race shall arise without bodies, as I told you that in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God." (The Revelation of St. John the Theologian [received on Mt. Tabor, not Patmos], a.k.a. the Apostle and the writer of Revelation)

"For there are some to whom it is not given to attain virginity; and there are others whom He no longer wills to be excited by procreations to lust, and to be defiled, but henceforth to meditate and to keep the mind upon the transformation of the body to the likeness of angels, when they 'neither marry nor are given in marriage,'" (St. Methodius of Olympus [+ c. 311] Discourse II)

This being the case, we may wonder how it is that any will be married when they are spirits (spirits are married in Mormonism?), not in fleshly bodies, and how they will be transformed in body into the likeness of angels and yet still preserve the earthly lusts which they had on earth. In a way, Peter (but in a very specific way), we too could say that marriage is eternal, insofar as Christ's conquering of death applies to married people, too (since marriage is just an attribute people have or not; we could put in any other adjective in that space and it would still apply: Christi's conquering of death applies to short people, black people, red-headed people, left-handed people, etc.), and so the western way of saying "til death do us part" concerning marriage is not exactly accurate -- but not because marriages 'continue on into eternity' or whatever, but because death is no longer a thing. Death has been conquered by Jesus Christ in His glorious resurrection. There now is no death for those who are in Christ Jesus. But this does not mean that we continue on as married people if we are married at death. In that sense, "til death do us part" is correct, because it represents the end of the earthly marriage. And there is no marriage after this, because as we both know from the indicated verse, no one will be married or given in marriage at the resurrection (i.e., there are no 'married couples' or 'singles' in heaven; those earthly categories simply do not apply in any case, as we will be like the angels, and angels are neither married nor single).

If angels were married or single, then Mormonism and JS would have a point, but they aren't, so it's wrong to present this as some great hope to people when it is contradicted by a reading of the Bible that "rightly divides the word of truth" (i.e., isn't shaped by Mormonism's preexisting novelties), and by the fathers, in this case including even one of the apostles themselves.
 
Upvote 0

Rescued One

...yet not I, but the grace of God that is with me
Dec 12, 2002
35,529
6,408
Midwest
✟80,125.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Christian Light of the World.jpg
Christian All about Jesus.jpg

Jesus has done MORE for me than any human ever has! When I go to be with God, the people who are there will be as grateful and blessed as I am. Men won't need seven or eight wives and women wouldn't like that anyway. :sick:
Christian Blessed and Grateful.jpg


Mormonism was a miserable experience for me because there were all those priesthood holders between me and God, a thousand rules to follow, a communion of WATER and bread, so many false teachings, etc.:swoon:
 
Upvote 0

Rescued One

...yet not I, but the grace of God that is with me
Dec 12, 2002
35,529
6,408
Midwest
✟80,125.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
What a disortation of ignorance. You have read way too much stuff from non-friendly people to the Church of Jesus Chirst.

I read no literature critical of Mormonism while I was a Mormon EXCEPT my KJV Bible.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,821
73
Las Vegas
✟255,978.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
I read no literature critical of Mormonism while I was a Mormon EXCEPT my KJV Bible.


He said that to me---but I got it from their own writings. I only look into an anti-Mormon site when I need to find a Mormon quote--then I read the actual Mormon writings myself. But it can be difficult to find what I want to know through the Mormon site, that is why I will look at the anti-site so I can find the info!
 
Upvote 0