Why literal?

Mathetes66

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2019
1,031
867
Pacifc Northwest
✟90,217.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
“The aim of good interpretation is not a uniqueness but to get at the ‘plain meaning of the text,’ the author’s intended meaning, that his readers would understand.” Gordon Fee

The Bible was written in the language of men & can be understood if we follow the proper rules of language.

When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, one usually seeks no other sense, lest it result in nonsense.” In other words, "take every word at its primary, ordinary, usual, plain (literal) meaning unless the facts of the immediate context, studied in the light of related passages & axiomatic (self-evident or unquestionable) & fundamental truths, indicate clearly otherwise.” Dr. David L. Cooper, The Biblical Research Society

Example: John 16:29 His disciples said, “Lo, now You are speaking PLAINLY & are not using a FIGURE OF SPEECH.

Example: Matt 7:3 “Why do you complain about the splinter in your brother’s eye when you have a plank in your own eye?”

The use of figurative language here only enhances the plain meaning of the text. Even though this is figurative language, we have no trouble understanding what Jesus meant. His use of metaphors makes it even plainer, clearer.


Let Scripture interpret Scripture; Scripture best explains Scripture. In other words, the Scriptures must harmonize. The orthodox Christian view of the Bible is that it is not in error & does not contradict itself. Therefore when examining a passage we must approach it with an eye to what the whole Bible says about that topic.

It also includes that we should interpret difficult or seemingly confusing passages based on clear passages. (I Cor 14:33)

Understanding the Bible is not meant to be confusing or contentious but confirming what God actually said & what the writer of Scripture's meant in the culture, grammatical language & historical time in which it was written.

Let Scripture speak for itself. Neither add to it nor subtract from it. (Prov 30:4; Deut 4:2; 12:32) Let the Bible be your best commentary.

Example: Genesis 2:16,17 with Genesis 3:2,3--Can you figure out what Eve subtracted or left out of God's commandment? Can you figure out what she added to the commandment? That is what we are talking about. And the consequences we live with today.

Remember--one of the first interpreters of God's words was the serpent in the garden. Don't fall into his clever deceptions: quoting verses out of context, quoting partial verses & twisting them to mean something else, etc. (see Luke 4:1-14)


God says what He means & means what He says. This principle was driven home to me when a godly pastor told me when he did Bible study & had the group read the passage, he then asked, "What did the passage say? Inevitably, people would look up from the Scripture & give their opinion of what they thought it MEANT or meant to them. He would then say, "I didn't ask you what it meant or meant to you, I asked you what did it actually say." Then they would have to look down again & read it again & simply tell what it actually said. He smiled & said, "Now you are BEGINNING to do Bible study."
 
Upvote 0

Mathetes66

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2019
1,031
867
Pacifc Northwest
✟90,217.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Ask the reporter's questions: who is the intended audience, what is the topic, when is this occurring, where is it happening, how did people respond, how often, how much, what words do I need to find out their meaning, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stone-n-Steel
Upvote 0

Stone-n-Steel

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 29, 2018
465
346
Texas
✟224,710.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ask the reporter's questions: who is the intended audience, what is the topic, when is this occurring, where is it happening, how did people respond, how often, how much, what words do I need to find out their meaning, etc.

Have you seen this quote before?

“It shall greatly help ye to understand the Scriptures if thou mark not
only what is spoken or written, but of whom and to whom, with what
words, at what time, where, to what intent, with what circumstances,
considering what goeth before and what followeth after. ”
― Miles Coverdale (1488-1569)
 
Upvote 0
Oct 21, 2003
6,793
3,289
Central Time Zone
✟107,193.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Why use a literal interpretation when reading and exegeting the scriptures?

Yours in the Lord,

jm

Well, it's not an either or thing, it's a both and thing. The people and places in Scripture are literal. The Mosaic law and events such as wars are literal. Much of the Bible is literal. Mainly it is in the spiritual teachings of Scripture where figurative language is used, where thinking outside the box is required. Interpret the literal parts literally and the figurative parts figuratively. One of ours tasks in Bible study is sorting these out, so we are rightly dividing the word of God.
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,024
7,364
60
Indianapolis, IN
✟549,630.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Why use a literal interpretation when reading and exegeting the scriptures?

Yours in the Lord,

jm
My interpretive approach is the historical narrative approach, and the literal interpretation is always preferred in historic narrative.
 
Upvote 0

shadowhunter

+collaboratively study, ~ debate, -fight.
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2008
256
63
✟60,940.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The literal historical approach was promoted by Augustine, after the church had deified Mary (lost their first love), conquered the laity (Nicolaitans), adopted Jewish ritual into the ceremonies (Judaisers) and compromised with the government and the flesh (doctrine of Balaam). They demonstrated a complete lack of knowledge concerning scripture by their willingness to kill those they considered heretics, flying in the face of Jesus's command to love your enemies. Reminder... it was not just the age they lived in. Murder was murder since Cain.

They gave us a cartoon version of scripture where three wise men followed a bouncing star to Jerusalem, when the child was in Bethlehem. The real star was the child who rose out of Jacob (Nu 24:17). They followed the prophecy from the east (ancient). It took them to Jerusalem because they did not understand all of the prophecy. Herod's men found in the scriptures that he was to be born in Bethlehem.

The tradition of using the literal may not always be best. Satan tempted Jesus with the literal scripture, the Messiah could turn stone to bread. Jesus knew he was the stone that would become the bread. Satan tempted him to jump off a high place, but Jesus knew he had left the highest place to become incarnate.

Satan did the same with Adam. If you believe the literal, then Adam did not die, his eyes were opened, he became like God, and he knew good and evil, and you think the serpent told the truth. But if you apply all the scripture to it, he died spiritually that day, he became blind, his likeness to God was only in declaring good and evil for himself, and there after knowing only evil, being a slave to sin.

There are good reasons to look beyond the literal.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: mark kennedy
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,502
7,861
...
✟1,192,685.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The literal historical approach was promoted by Augustine, after the church had deified Mary (lost their first love), conquered the laity (Nicolaitans), adopted Jewish ritual into the ceremonies (Judaisers) and compromised with the government and the flesh (doctrine of Balaam). They demonstrated a complete lack of knowledge concerning scripture by their willingness to kill those they considered heretics, flying in the face of Jesus's command to love your enemies. Reminder... it was not just the age they lived in. Murder was murder since Cain.

They gave us a cartoon version of scripture where three wise men followed a bouncing star to Jerusalem, when the child was in Bethlehem. The real star was the child who rose out of Jacob (Nu 24:17). They followed the prophecy from the east (ancient). It took them to Jerusalem because they did not understand all of the prophecy. Herod's men found in the scriptures that he was to be born in Bethlehem.

The tradition of using the literal may not always be best. Satan tempted Jesus with the literal scripture, the Messiah could turn stone to bread. Jesus knew he was the stone that would become the bread. Satan tempted him to jump off a high place, but Jesus knew he had left the highest place to become incarnate.

Satan did the same with Adam. If you believe the literal, then Adam did not die, his eyes were opened, he became like God, and he knew good and evil, and you think the serpent told the truth. But if you apply all the scripture to it, he died spiritually that day, he became blind, his likeness to God was only in declaring good and evil for himself, and there after knowing only evil, being a slave to sin.

There are good reasons to look beyond the literal.

You may like this thread I created a while back.

Biblical Metaphors Shed Light on Ham's Sin in Noah's Tent.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Daniel Marsh

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2015
9,749
2,615
Livingston County, MI, US
✟199,553.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why use a literal interpretation when reading and exegeting the scriptures?

Yours in the Lord,

jm

Every text is not literal. One must take into account the type of literature they are reading.
 
Upvote 0