Not all. Read my file.once inside the event horizon, the singularity is the future of all trajectories.
Upvote
0
Not all. Read my file.once inside the event horizon, the singularity is the future of all trajectories.
God has nothing in common with satan. The satan has no origin in God. The satan is absolute nothingness.You can't have voluntary communion involuntarily.
So the option not to commune with God is a good
option to have, even if it creates evil results.
Satan is from God, though not of God.
Genesis 50:20
As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today.
Under General Relativity, black holes inevitably have a singularity - once inside the event horizon, the singularity is the future of all trajectories. But a BH singularity is an unknown, a state where GR breaks down, i.e. cannot describe that state.
God has nothing in common with satan. The satan has no origin in God. The satan is absolute nothingness.
It is possible, even probable, that the influence of quantum effects mean that the point at which GR fails can be described by a combination of GR and quantum mechanics; unfortunately we don't have such a combination yet.To make meaningful conversation I would say: The current idea I think is that singularities would not exist at all, but rather Hawking radiation would dissipate a black hole. They're currently looking for micro black holes which would emit bursts of Hawking radiation. The smaller the black hole the more rapid it dissipates, such that large black holes (if I'm not mistaken) would never shrink into singularities.
The Schwarzschild solution makes the event horizon a coordinate singularity (although it has a second singularity at the centre). There are several other coordinate choices that treat the EH as normal spacetime - see Singularities & Black Holes.I was under the impression that the Schwarzschild metric can only be used to describe what is outside the event horizon of a black hole. Is there some other metric that does. I would like to study it.
I created a theory about that. There are others that believe we are living in a black hole too: Black hole cosmology - Wikipedia
Nice to know! What did you think about it?
It gets even crazier once you follow the rabbit hole down that path!
Think about quantized energy in our Universe and how it fits into the picture.
How could this be happening at non-quantum scale!!
1997JApA...18..455N Page 457
.
Oh, they have written and spoken about it in published papers and conferences (e.g. Every Black Hole Contains a New Universe), but it's all very speculative & theoretical.... the Universe we know is actually the interior of a very very large black hole. Our Universe is one giant black hole and we're all in it!! Hello Black Hole neighbors!!
There are some scientists who do thinks that a "mini big bang" immediately follows the formation of a blackhole and no "singularity" ever forms. Of course we don't observe this event since the events all happen within the Event Horizon, completely unobservable.
Of course, these scientists never said anything about "mini universes" exists inside blackholes in the same sentence at the risk of being called crazy and jeopardizing their careers!
Of course, there are other hypotheses. If your file is the document attached in the OP, I'm not sure I've seen one quite so incoherent - maybe a translator is required?Not all. Read my file.
The Bible needs Church interpretation, because there is even Flat Earth (dome) in the Bible: "So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it." Genesis 1:7 NIV. I think, the Flat Earth in the Bible is God's "trolling" of the technological way of civilization.Odd. I thought I had read something else about that......
1 Peter 5:8
Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour.
Of course, there are other hypotheses. If your file is the document attached in the OP, I'm not sure I've seen one quite so incoherent - maybe a translator is required?
You better read the file, there is following text:It is possible, even probable, that the influence of quantum effects
Odd. I thought I had read something else about that...…
1 Chronicles 21:1
Then Satan stood against Israel and incited David to number Israel.
I was incoherent to me, so it's not trolling, but personal opinion. However, I'm not really qualified to give an authoritative opinion; I'd be very interested to hear how a suitably qualified physicist would describe it.Please prove, that file is incoherent. Otherwise, it is trolling.
People make many different arguments. They may be right, they may not. I was giving my understanding of the current consensus view.You better read the file, there is following text:
In addition, neither the holographic principle nor the Firewall nor the Hawking radiation stop us to get below the event horizon. “We present a simple model for stellar collapse and evaluate the quantum mechanical stress-energy tensor to argue that quantum effects do not play an important role for the collapse of astrophysical objects.” [25].
[25] Bruno Arderucio-Costa, William Unruh, “Model for Quantum Effects in Stellar Collapse”, Phys. Rev. D 97, 024005 (2018).
public unjustified critic is trolling. Present your proof of incoherence or make a public apology. I have dignity, you know.I was incoherent to me, so it's not trolling, but personal opinion. However, I'm not really qualified to give an authoritative opinion; I'd be very interested to hear how a suitably qualified physicist would describe it.
Why not ask a few and let us know what they think?
So, one might say, that x=3 is the same as to say x=5? The Absolute Truth is weapon of God, so do not reject its power. For my paper is needed, that we can get inside the Black Hole, and I found the paper, which backs it up. So, I have not made a single mistake. Therefore my paper must be accepted.People make many different arguments. They may be right, they may not. I was giving my understanding of the current consensus view.
If you post stuff on a public forum, it's an invitation to criticism. An appeal to personal dignity would be more impressive if you respected it in others.public unjustified critic is trolling. Present your proof of incoherence or make a public apology. I have dignity, you know.
Great, you must be so pleased. So when can we expect to see it published in a peer-reviewed journal of note?So, one might say, that x=3 is the same as to say x=5? The Absolute Truth is weapon of God, so do not reject its power. For my paper is needed, that we can get inside the Black Hole, and I found the paper, which backs it up. So, I have not made a single mistake. Therefore my paper must be accepted.
That text accompanies my papers:Great, you must be so pleased. So when can we expect to see it published in a peer-reviewed journal of note?