Residential Bob
Active Member
- Dec 24, 2018
- 351
- 274
- 58
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
What did I say his argument was?It appears that you don't understand the argument Paul was making at all.
Upvote
0
What did I say his argument was?It appears that you don't understand the argument Paul was making at all.
Gal 3:16 Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring. It does not say, "And to offsprings," referring to many, but referring to one, "And to your offspring," who is Christ.
Gal 3:24 So then, the law was our guardian until Christ came, in order that we might be justified by faith.
Gal 3:25 But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian,
Gal 3:26 for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith.
Gal 3:27 For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
Gal 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
That one's been tried more than once. Paul said that offspring does not refer to many, but to One. Are you in favor of overruling Paul?"Offsprings" is not a word in English. The plural of "offspring" is "offspring."
And inasmuch as God had already promised Abraham that his "offspring" would be more numerous than the sand of the beach, we cannot say here that by "offspring" God was referring to only one person.
https://weekly.israelbiblecenter.com/gentiles-dogs-jewish-jesus/As noted in post #5, salvation was always by faith. That was the proven and explicit point when Jesus provided it to the Syro-Phoenician woman.
I suspect that Paul spent time reconciling that particular incident (and perhaps other incidents like the calling of Cornelius--which was the fulfillment of Isaiah 56) with the OT to determine how the mechanics of salvation works. What he concluded from that is what we read in Romans.