- Jun 30, 2015
- 1,470
- 1,509
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
Bought an Extar EP-9 pistol.
But it doesn't look like a pistol; it looks like a sub-machinegun... Because it is classified as a pistol by the manufacturer and the stock on it is actually technically not a stock but a "brace", it is legal to own without the special NFA tax stamp and paying $200.
So legally, it is a semi-automatic 9mm pistol.
I had no need for such a firearm. But the democrats in Seattle decided that any rifle that is semi-automatic should be classified as an "assault rifle" and subject to increased fees, checks, and age to be able to legally purchase.
So I decided to buy a firearm that, according to their nonsensical new regulations, is less dangerous and scary than my grandfather's 1939 .22 rifle.
Both are shown below:
Haven't had a chance to shoot the new pistol yet, but it should be a bunch of fun.
Decided to give it a custom camouflage job just to make it more militaristic and scary to the gun-grabbers...
But it doesn't look like a pistol; it looks like a sub-machinegun... Because it is classified as a pistol by the manufacturer and the stock on it is actually technically not a stock but a "brace", it is legal to own without the special NFA tax stamp and paying $200.
So legally, it is a semi-automatic 9mm pistol.
I had no need for such a firearm. But the democrats in Seattle decided that any rifle that is semi-automatic should be classified as an "assault rifle" and subject to increased fees, checks, and age to be able to legally purchase.
So I decided to buy a firearm that, according to their nonsensical new regulations, is less dangerous and scary than my grandfather's 1939 .22 rifle.
Both are shown below:
Haven't had a chance to shoot the new pistol yet, but it should be a bunch of fun.
Decided to give it a custom camouflage job just to make it more militaristic and scary to the gun-grabbers...