I can only assure you, I look at each of these racial concepts that the left has invented as closely as I can. I'm not dismissing them because of where they come from...I'm dismissing them based on the racist beliefs they contain and promote.
I've known about "whitesplaining" for some time. At it's core, it's an expansion of the ideas in "white fragility". White fragility, simply put, was a term used to describe whites who don't blankly accept accusations of racism against them. The idea was that being white somehow made whites oblivious of their own racism.
With whitesplaining, that obliviousness of whites is expanded to all racial topics. The basic concept is that white opinions aren't needed or wanted...because they're white...and whites aren't capable of understanding these things as well as non-whites. The only exception is when whites agree with non-whites...but that isn't really necessary for obvious reasons. If someone only believes my points can possibly have validity when I agree with them...they're basically saying that my opinion isn't wanted.
It's extremely racist. Everyone who defended the concept defended it's core racial bias...that's whites are "less than" non-whites in regards to racial opinions. I understand they have reasons why they think these things....I've just never found a valid reason for holding racist beliefs.
