Claim smaim. Support the so called science you advocate. Better still, continue to fail to do so, as we know you can't anyhow. No use pretending you did somewhere, sometime somehow either. That game wore thin log ago.
Numerous past posts by your goodself have demonstrated that one or other of the following likely holds true:
Winning has nothing to do with impressing people of your religion actually. It has to do with how well the support for your claims fares here.
Or you the wherewithal to post, explain, or defend the same.
In others words believing like all folks in the bible, that there actually was a creation. Gong!
Try to understand that rejecting belief based godless fairy tales labeled wrong has nothing to do with not being familiar with what they blather on about.
Not only has it not been supported it cannot be. You betray your religion even calling it science, when talking about origin fables.
My scientific education is sound. Feel free to ask for an explanation of any aspect of geology or evolutionary biology and I shall be happy to demonstrate this. Can you do the same? Time to put up, or shut up.
Do you really need to be reminded that there are numerous Christians (globally a majority) who have no trouble accepting evolution? You are entitled to hold your distinctive, specific faith based view. You are not entitled to ignorantly deny the findings of a science you do not understand and apparently are unwilling to understand.
I have no beliefs. Beliefs are for those lacking the confidence to accept the world as it is. They are an important crutch for many and I do not begrudge them their support. I find them unnecessary.
Lying is unseemly. Please desist.
I don't have a religion. Religion has an important function in society, but it is surplus to my requirements. Science is a methodology and that methodlogy has amassed a body of evidence that leaves little doubt as to the reality of evolution. Only someone determined to close their eyes and ears could fail to recognise this. Convince me otherwise. Put up or shut up.
Not my problem.
It is not any findings of science I deny, but that science has any findings on the key issues of the origins debate. It has belief based fables.
Science has beliefs, you have science.
The theory of life evolving from simple life forms is God opposing, God absent, and god awful.
Why pretend simple life form common ancestors are rocket science? They are religion and a belief based interpretation of evidences.
Whether you can see truth or accept it is not the issue.
There you go, denial is a trademark and signature of your religion.
A belief based methodology! They religiously apply a godless method of interpreting evidences as well as selecting what criteria can be called evidences.
Do you also write in English?
Distances to stars and to anything else in the far universe are based on time being the same.
No, if we want to get back down on earth what is important here, is that science claims a same nature in the past, and has used the present nature to model the past..including evolution.
Forces like the strong and weak nuclear forces, and etc etc etc.
No. I have pointed out that what nature IS like now doesn't matter when talking about nature in the past. That is, unless you first prove it was the same.
Prove it.
As is origin science.
That is what science does.
What I support here is the claim science doesn't know. Yet they pretend. Your quest was to support your belief based so called science claims. You failed.
That is what history and the bible describe it is not a scientific claim. Now if you have more than belief, we should see that.
No it is because I understand what it claims and why. If you understood we might bet more than would be clever banter.
All history and the bible is cast off by your narrow minded religion. OK.
Actually I have the silver bullet that shoots through the heart of so called science. I know their weakness and claims and what they can bring to the field of battle to support it. Diddly squat.
Much more than I'd like to actually. I only plunged into their cultish depths of madness and evil in order to defeat them.
Stop kidding yourself about the weak religion you posted in the name of science. It was a duck shoot for me.
No one can produce evidence fairy tales and baseless beliefs are wrong. All that needs to be done is show they are but beliefs.
They place the time that the KT layer was formed at 65 or 70 million years ago. I currently accept that the flood was about that time.
