No prosperity no progress
Right, and?
Are you stepping away from the subject now and just making a general comment?
Upvote
0
No prosperity no progress
OK, that explains it. Thanks.He was right to gather more for those who didnt gather enough. He didnt gather more than he needed so he had more for himself, but gathered to give to others.
It means our abundance isnt for us but for others.OK, that explains it. Thanks.
So, going with that then, ending up with nothing extra is the point as long as we are helping others along the way.
Are we talking faith of economic rationalism?
I personally am talking about scamming preachers that take money from the poor, or anyone for that matter, promising them gain in return...you know, liars, thieves...etc.
OK, that explains it. Thanks.
So, going with that then, ending up with nothing extra is the point as long as we are helping others along the way.
Yes. The scripture says that Paul is testing their love. Love is every believers goalAnd you would say this principle applies to all Christians?
No I don't. I am a lead pastor and use the Holy Spirit. My mentors are not anyone people usually put in that category. If you look at my first post on this thread it sums my take up pretty well.Do you use a property preacher, and if so, could I ask who?
It's a good marketing strat. Nearly every church is just in it for your wallet, so one good way for them is to learn the craft of psychology. The tricks that "psychics" use to make their clients believe their words.Why is it that prosperity preachers dont teach us to give out of love rather than material gain? Why is our motivation for giving so that we may receive material blessing rather than for sharing love with others? Is love not our motivation in these churches?
Great questions. It seems they ignore Phil 2:1-11 and Jesus' words about suffering for righteousness as well as Paul's rejoicing in his suffering and poor circumstances. Conspicuously absent is Jesus' command to seek first the kingdom of God rather than material wealth and "don't keep your treasures on earth where thieves break in and steal, and moth and rust destroy." Also passages like "woe to you who are rich for you have received your consolation (Luke 6:4)" don't get preached, I reckon.Why is it that prosperity preachers dont teach us to give out of love rather than material gain? Why is our motivation for giving so that we may receive material blessing rather than for sharing love with others? Is love not our motivation in these churches?
As others alluded to here, prosperity is not a bad word. The Hebrew word for "prosper" translates to: To advance, to make progress, to succeed, or to be profitable (financially). Notice that financial prosperity is last on the list (but it is there). To say prosperity is bad is to say advancing the kingdom of God is bad, or making progress in our Christian walk is bad, or succeeding in overcoming the enemy is bad. All because some people focus on the wrong part?
The word prosperity itself isn't bad. We just need our priorities straight. And that is no different than any other biblical principle.
yesIf I'm not mistaken the OP is referring to the prosperity scammers, not the simple term "prosperity".
Yes. The scripture says that Paul is testing their love. Love is every believers goal
The context is that there be financial equalitySo, this is why context is so important. Yes, love is the goal, you are not likely to meet anyone who preaches on that more than me, but the principles of God are not adversarial.
In 2 Cor 8, just a few verses before your quote Paul says: "8 I speak not by commandment, but I am testing the sincerity of your love by the diligence of others."
A few verses later he says that he is giving them advice to finish what they started. It is strongly implied that they began a campaign to help others and ran into issues and stopped.
Paul's challenge here - to this specific church, not to everyone - is designed to do exactly what I outlined. Learn to give cheerfully. Don't let money be an idol. That paves the way God to transform you into someone who CAN be content with little OR much. The method isn't for everyone, the lesson is.
In reality what we have here is a man of God, the spiritual leader of the church, a preacher, challenging his congregation to give more. To give until it hurts (but not to the point where you are hurting worse than those you are giving to). When that happens today people freak out and shout prosperity preacher. Wait, but this is different you say? Paul is telling them to give to the poor. He sure is - by using another church giving to HIM as the example (see verses 1-6). However, what I have seen and heard in my own experience is this: where the money is going to doesn't matter. As soon as people are challenged to give they stop right there, freak out, and call the minister names. Why? Because the issue isn't money or prosperity. The issue is the LOVE of money. And, poor folks can love money just as much as rich folks, and they can be real mean and argumentative about it.
I believe god does prosper us in all ways.
No it is not. The context is that it is NOT a commandment, that it is a test to a specific congregation and he is advising them to do this, not telling them they must.The context is that there be financial equality
Its a test. Do you think its ok to fail such a test?No it is not. The context is that it is NOT a commandment, that it is a test to a specific congregation and he is advising them to do this, not telling them they must.
It's not the test you are saying that it is. You're reading the instructions and calling that the test. People fail it every day. The Corinthians had already failed it at least once. That is why Paul issued this challenge to them.Its a test. do you think its ok to fail such a test?
Here is the Lords command. Note also that both Paul and God are testings others.It's not the test you are saying that it is. You're reading the instructions and calling that the test. People fail it every day. The Corinthians had already failed it at least once. That is why Paul issued this challenge to them.
The test not financial equality - that is the challenge. The test is giving from the right heart. Because of the nature of the challenge, they will only do it if their hearts are right (your aren't going to give that much away if you love money more than God) thus passing the test.