The Holy Bible Teaches Globe Earth.

SeventyOne

Well-Known Member
May 2, 2015
4,675
3,188
✟167,098.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Marital Status
Married
Sure it is. Flat earth is completely false. In order to even believe it you have to force yourself to reject 2000 years of globe earth readings of the Bible. You have to reject modern scholarly works as well as all the writings of the earliest of church fathers. The flat earth movement has no root in Christianity. This means flat earth is not Biblical. You can post youtube links and articles written by 21st century con-artists, but you cannot use any Christian sources to support flat earth because none of them agree with the flat earth myth. So if you cannot support your view from Christian sources then what does that say?

..Think

Ok, I'm done. You are just another in a long line of non-critical thinkers on the topic. I just don't understand this type of intellectual dishonesty.
 
Upvote 0

FEZZILLA

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2003
1,031
131
53
Wisconsin
✟16,495.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
The scripture readings and Psalter in the 1928 Book of Common Prayer are Tyndale's, basically the same as the Matthew Bible.
Bingo! You are 150% correct and you only have to be 100% correct to be fully correct. I just add on the extra 50% as added emphasis ;)

It is very hard to come across the 1539 Great Bible. I've been pushing Greatsite to make the facsimile of it but the curator says there isn't enough demand for it. You can buy the 1841 English Hexapla at Greatsite which has the NT of the Great Bible. You can buy a facsimile of the entire 1540 Great Bible in two volumes, and you can get the 1928 BCP which contains the Psalter from the Great Bible.

Myles coverdale and Thomas Cranmer, along with Thomas Cromwell made that one happen. Basically all Coverdale did is supply the Matthews Bible and Cranmer, being the smart scholar he was, and knowing King Henry XIII would not allow any works of William Tyndale to be read in church or anywhere else for that matter, just told the king they made a new revision to the Matthew's Bible and the king didn't know any better. King Henry approved the Matthew's Bible because he didn't know it was the work of William Tyndale. Then he authorized the Great Bible in 1539 and got a sister version of the 1537 Matthew's Bible. LOL!!!! Even the 1568 Bishop's Bible contains most of Tyndale's renderings. I swear that would make for a real good movie if the movie follows the script from Ruth Magnusson Davis' book "The Story of the Matthew's Bible: That Which We First Received." Great book with insights into the Matthew's Bible ;)
81WEZCPoZfL.jpg
 
Upvote 0

FEZZILLA

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2003
1,031
131
53
Wisconsin
✟16,495.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Ok, I'm done. You are just another in a long line of non-critical thinkers on the topic. I just don't understand this type of intellectual dishonesty.
Intellectual dishonesty? Are you serious? You have supplied no Christian sources to support you vague claim that the Bible teaches flat earth. All you came here with was conspiracy theory which everyone who still has a clear thinking mind knows is not true nor is it a good source of information. I used nothing but the very best of Christian sources and you say I'm intellectually dishonest?? So you deny those sources. Every atheist does. Fortunately atheist have no say on the matter because they didn't write Scripture nor do they have a part in the ministry. The Christian is subject to Christian interpretation only. We don't accept outside sources.
 
Upvote 0

FEZZILLA

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2003
1,031
131
53
Wisconsin
✟16,495.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
As a side note: don't all Christians on this forum have to agree with the Apostle's Creed & Nicene Creed before they can post? Those are the forum rules and they are broken when you reject tradition. For the Nicene Creed was written by the same church fathers being rejected by some on this forum.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Speedwell
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,711
3,761
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟242,764.00
Faith
Atheist
As a side note: don't all Christians on this forum have to agree with the Apostle's Creed & Nicene Creed before they can post? Those are the forum rules and they are broken when you reject tradition. For the Nicene Creed was written by the same church fathers being rejected by some on this forum.
Whatever your views on Evolution or Creationism may be... I really DO hope you are aware that ALL of these "church fathers" were geocentrists.

So I guess you believe in earth, unmovable in the center of the universe, and the sun revolving around it?
 
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
10,655
4,711
59
Mississippi
✟250,292.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Genesis 1 has nothing to do with flat earth nor is there any ancient witnesses who support your 21st century interpretations.
View attachment 250363

Genesis 1 has everything to do with the flat earth. The sun and moon are both stated as being a created light. Science states the moon is a sun light reflector.

God states He creates a raqia and places this over the earth to separate waters. One area of water the oceans (below) and another area of water above the raqia.
Then when God creates His lights sun, moon and stars He places these created lights in the raqia. Making the location of the sun, moon and stars in the same location inside the raqia above the earth.
Not only are they in the same location as each other but Genesis 1:20 states they (sun, moon ,stars) are in the same location where birds fly Genesis 1:20.

Also in Genesis 1 there is no mention of the creation of an outer space just heaven and earth.
Psalms 19:1 confirms this when that verse states The heavens (sky) declare the glory of God; And the firmament (raqia) shows His handiwork.
The raqia,sky shows Gods handiwork because that is where the sun, moon and stars are and not in a made up outer space.

That is a simple fact, i see every day and night when it is not cloudy I see a sun, moon and stars that are above the earth some 500 to 1000 miles overhead moving along in the raqia.

That is why Paul says in Acts God is not far away, and God is not far away. He is as has been said before in the Bible, sitting above the earth, sitting above the raqia .
God is sitting above the earth looking down on us from above the raqia. That is why Ezekiel look up through the raqia and was able to see God on His throne.
 
Upvote 0

FEZZILLA

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2003
1,031
131
53
Wisconsin
✟16,495.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Genesis 1 has everything to do with the flat earth. The sun and moon are both stated as being a created light. Science states the moon is a sun light reflector.

God states He creates a raqia and places this over the earth to separate waters. One area of water the oceans (below) and another area of water above the raqia.
Then when God creates His lights sun, moon and stars He places these created lights in the raqia. Making the location of the sun, moon and stars in the same location inside the raqia above the earth.
Not only are they in the same location as each other but Genesis 1:20 states they (sun, moon ,stars) are in the same location where birds fly Genesis 1:20.

Also in Genesis 1 there is no mention of the creation of an outer space just heaven and earth.
Psalms 19:1 confirms this when that verse states The heavens (sky) declare the glory of God; And the firmament (raqia) shows His handiwork.
The raqia,sky shows Gods handiwork because that is where the sun, moon and stars are and not in a made up outer space.

That is a simple fact, i see every day and night when it is not cloudy I see a sun, moon and stars that are above the earth some 500 to 1000 miles overhead moving along in the raqia.

That is why Paul says in Acts God is not far away, and God is not far away. He is as has been said before in the Bible, sitting above the earth, sitting above the raqia .
God is sitting above the earth looking down on us from above the raqia. That is why Ezekiel look up through the raqia and was able to see God on His throne.
I already refuted this nonsense here
What Is The Firmament?

As for the moon and its light, the Bible does not say the moon is the source of light. But the moon does give light to the earth. 2000 years of Bible scholarship agree.

Flat earthers are obsessed with the pseudepigrapha book of Enoch. Lets see what it says about the moon shall we.

“Then Uriel showed me another order (concerning) when light is beamed into the moon, from which (direction) of the bright sun it is beamed. During all the seasons when the moon is made to run its cycle, the light is being beamed into it (the moon) facing the sun until the illumination (of the moon) is complete in the course of fourteen days; and when it is lit completely, it radiates light in the sky” (Enoch 78:10-11).
45008527_574231843032048_5902516251439136768_n (1).jpg
 
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
10,655
4,711
59
Mississippi
✟250,292.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I already refuted this nonsense here
What Is The Firmament?

As for the moon and its light, the Bible does not say the moon is the source of light. But the moon does give light to the earth. 2000 years of Bible scholarship agree.

Flat earthers are obsessed with the pseudepigrapha book of Enoch. Lets see what it says about the moon shall we.

“Then Uriel showed me another order (concerning) when light is beamed into the moon, from which (direction) of the bright sun it is beamed. During all the seasons when the moon is made to run its cycle, the light is being beamed into it (the moon) facing the sun until the illumination (of the moon) is complete in the course of fourteen days; and when it is lit completely, it radiates light in the sky” (Enoch 78:10-11).
View attachment 250439

I have showed using the Bible only, how your belief is false and you continue to use outside sources, to make your points.

Why because you can not use the Bible to show the earth, is as the science lie states, a spinning globe.

“But in those days, after that tribulation, the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light;

Again i use the Bible to prove you are wrong. the Bible states that the moon will not give it's light.
 
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
10,655
4,711
59
Mississippi
✟250,292.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I already refuted this nonsense here
What Is The Firmament?

That was a big failure your firmament manifesto , there are three heavens though.
The first one is the raqia where the sun, moon and stars are located.
The second one is above the raqia and waters above the raqia, more than likely where the dead in Christ are now.

The third one where God the Father and The Christ are also where Paul was taken to, the third heaven.
 
Upvote 0

FEZZILLA

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2003
1,031
131
53
Wisconsin
✟16,495.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
That was a big failure your firmament manifesto , there are three heavens though.
The first one is the raqia where the sun, moon and stars are located.
The second one is above the raqia and waters above the raqia, more than likely where the dead in Christ are now.

The third one where God the Father and The Christ are also where Paul was taken to, the third heaven.
You say "your manifesto" as if I spoke on my own authority. You, on the other hand, spoke on your own authority.

One of my main objectives here is to prove that flat earthers do not have a single authority to stand on. You and others who preach this flat earth are preaching in your own authority. Your flat earth movement cannot be traced much past 200 years. FE has no root, no origin, in Christianity. And this is all I have to prove here. So all you are doing is Jim Jonesing your way through this discussion, placing yourself as an authority but yet your testimony goes against 2000 years of sound doctrine.


2 Thessalonians 2:15,

"Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle" (KJV).

2 Timothy 4:3-4

"For a time is coming when people will no longer listen to sound and wholesome teaching. They will follow their own desires and will look for teachers who will tell them whatever their itching ears want to hear. They will reject the truth and chase after myths" (NLT).

2 Timothy 4:3-4

"3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables" (KJV).



2 Timothy 3:13

"But the evil men and deceivers will grow worse and worse, while they deceive and are deceived themselves" (NMB).


Should Christians Lie To Gain New Converts?

"But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God" (KJV).

Here are a few more translations of this verse as I want the reader to understand this verse very clearly.

"Instead, we have renounced shameful secret things, not walking in deceit or distorting God’s message, but commending ourselves to every person’s conscience in God’s sight by an open display of the truth" (HCSB).

"But we have renounced the secret things of shame, not walking in craftiness nor handling the word of God deceitfully, but by expressing the truth and commending ourselves to every man’s conscience in the sight of God" (MEV).

"We reject all shameful deeds and underhanded methods. We don’t try to trick anyone or distort the word of God. We tell the truth before God, and all who are honest know this" (NLT).

Christians don't lie to gain new converts. We never do evil hoping good will come from it.

Warning Against Apostasy -- Hebrews 5:11-14; 6:1-12


Hebrews 5:11-14 Modern English Version (MEV)

Warning Against Apostasy
11 Concerning this we have much to say that is hard to explain, since you have become hard of hearing. 12 For though by now you should be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles of the oracles of God and have come to need milk rather than solid food. 13 Everyone who lives on milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a baby. 14 But solid food belongs to those who are mature, for those who through practice have powers of discernment that are trained to distinguish good from evil."


Hebrews 6:1-12 Modern English Version (MEV)

6 Therefore, leaving the elementary principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on to maturity, not laying again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, 2 of instruction about washings, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. 3 This we will do if God permits.

4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if they fall away, to be renewed once more to repentance, since they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and subject Him to public shame. 7 For land that drinks in the rain that often falls upon it and bears a crop useful to those for whom it is cultivated receives a blessing from God. 8 But land that bears thorns and thistles is rejected and near to being cursed. Its destiny is to be burned.

9 But though we speak in this manner, we are persuaded of better things for you, things that accompany salvation, 10 for God is not unjust so as to forget your work and labor of love that you have shown for His name, in that you have ministered to the saints and continue ministering. 11 We desire that every one of you show the same diligence for the full assurance of hope to the end, 12 so that you may not be lazy, but imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises."



Hebrews 5:11-14,Hebrews 6:1-12 New Matthew Bible (NMB)

11 About this we have many things to say, which are hard to explain because you are dull of hearing. 12 For when as concerning the time you ought to be teachers, yet you need us to again teach you the first principles of the word of God, and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat. 13 For everyone who is fed with milk is inexpert in the word of righteousness. For he is but a babe. 14 But strong meat belongs to those who are of full age, who through regular use have their wits exercised to judge both good and evil also.

He continues with the thing that he began in the latter end of chapter 5, and exhorts them not to faint, but to be steadfast and patient, seeing as God is trustworthy and faithful in his promise.
6 Therefore let us leave the questions that belong to the beginning of a Christian life, and let us go on to maturity, and not now again lay the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God, 2 of baptism, of doctrine, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection from death, and of eternal judgment. 3 And so will we do, if God permits.

4 For it is not possible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted of the good word of God and of the power of the world to come, 6 if they fall, to be renewed again to repentance, seeing they have (as concerning themselves) crucified the Son of God afresh, making a mock of him. 7 For that earth which drinks in the rain that comes oft upon it, and brings forth herbs meet for those who tend it, receives blessing from God. 8 But that ground which bears thorns and briars is reproved, and is near to cursing: whose end is to be burned.

9 Nevertheless, dear friends, we trust to see better of you, and things that accompany salvation, though we speak this way. 10 For God is not unrighteous, that he should forget your work and labour that proceeds of love – which love you have shown in his name, you who have ministered to the saints, and still minister. 11 Yea and we desire that every one of you show the same diligence to secure your hope right to the end: 12 that you faint not, but follow those who through faith and patience inherit the promises.
425.jpg
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

FEZZILLA

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2003
1,031
131
53
Wisconsin
✟16,495.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Whatever your views on Evolution or Creationism may be... I really DO hope you are aware that ALL of these "church fathers" were geocentrists.

So I guess you believe in earth, unmovable in the center of the universe, and the sun revolving around it?
Early Church Fathers Speak Out

Outline:

Introduction
1.St.Augustine (354-430 A.D.)
2.St.Jerome (334 - 420 A.D.)
3.St.Ambrose (337-397 A.D.)
4. Origen (185-254 A.D.)
5. Clement of Alexandria (150-215 A.D.)
6. Clement of Rome (35 - 99 A.D.)
7. Origen Explains Clement’s Comment
8. Flavius Josephus (37-100 A.D. -- *Note: Josephus wasn't a church father but included here due to his relevance on the issue).


INTRODUCTION

The early church fathers were the successors of the Apostles. While they weren't Scripture, they studied the Scriptures with the Apostles and then passed on that knowledge to their successors. This is called the Apostolic Succession and knowledge of the Gospel is part of that succession. The writings of the early church fathers are valuable for understanding early Christian beliefs and practices. They were all well seasoned in reading Hebrew and Greek, as well as Latin. Simple little things like defining a Hebrew word were not hard for them. The only time these early church fathers struggled to understand and interpret Scripture was when they spoke about prophecies which were not written for their time. Apart from that simple matters like the shape of the earth were easy for them.

Now many flat earthers will reject the early church fathers only for the reasons that the early church fathers don't accept their strange fire. The FE movement cannot trace their beliefs past 200 years which means what they preach is indeed strange fire and unknown to the ancient Jews and Christians. We traditional Christians can trace back all of our beliefs back to the Apostles who were eye witnesses to the life, death, and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ. There are no gaps in our ecclesiastical lineage which is how we know the FE movement is strange fire.

So here I will start at the 4th century and work my way down to the 1st century.
____________________________________________________________________
1. St.Augustine (354-430 A.D.)

It is very clear that Augustine believed in a spherical earth. The following citations are taken from Augustine’s book The Literal Meaning of Genesis, Vol.1. (Ancient Christian Writers, Vol.41).

“But if the light first created enveloped the earth on all sides, whether it was motionless or travelling round, it could not be followed anywhere by night, because it did not vacate any place to make room for night. But was it made on one side, so that as it travelled it would permit the night to follow after from the other? Although water still covered all the earth, there was nothing to prevent the massive watery sphere from having day on one side by the presence of light, and on the other side, night by the absence of light. Thus, in the evening, darkness would pass to that side from which light would be turning to the other” (p.33).

Here Augustine is speaking about the light God created. He speaks with confidence concerning his own knowledge of the shape of the earth. He sees an earth that is spherical and rotating. He may not of had all the knowledge he would have wanted to know, but the shape of the earth is spoken with confidence.

Wikipedia has a Flat Earth page which claims Augustine was a flat earther based on his skepticism of antipodes. But Augustine never doubted the sphericity of the earth. He just didn't think that just because the earth is spherical that it immediately follows the opposite side of the earth is peopled. He was proven wrong by Columbus. The wiki page, however, is proven wrong by Augustine's words here.

“Now we are seeking to know whether the Creator, who has ordered all things in measure, and number, and weight, has assigned to the mass of waters not just one proper place around the earth, but another also above the heavens, a region which has been spread around and established beyond the limits of the air” (p.47).

Augustine understands that in Scripture the waters of the earth span all around the earth. From Genesis 1 alone he gets a round, spherical earth with the firmament which spans to and beyond interstellar space.

2. St.Jerome (334 - 420 A.D.)

Jerome is the one who translated the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures into Latin. This new Latin translation would be called the Vulgate and the most well used Bible in Christian history to date. There is an English translation of the Latin Vulgate which is called the Douay-Rheims Bible. Isaiah 40:22 reads:

"It is he that sitteth upon the globe of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as locusts: he that stretcheth out the heavens as nothing, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in."

3. St.Ambrose (337-397 A.D.)

Bishop Ambrose was the one who brought Augustine to Christ. This could not have been an easy feat since Augustine was the most educated human being in the world and highly skeptical of the Bible. So Ambrose was a very special holy man who was able to open Augustine’s eyes and find Jesus. The first citation is from On Virginity, translated by Daniel Callam.

“For the soul has its flights, as has been said: “Who are these that fly like clouds and like doves with their young?” You see, the soul has spiritual flights which, in a brief moment, circle the whole globe” (XVII.108).

“circle [Strong’s H2328 - H2329]...the whole globe.” Now the verse cited was not about spiritual flights of the souls of the deceased and it was something that was meant for future readers to understand. But Ambrose knew the earth was a globe.

The rest of the quotations come from his book Hexameron, which is a commentary on Genesis chapter 1. The rest of his quotations come from The Fathers Of The Church series translated by John J. Savage,

“Consequently, the year, too, has the stamp of a world coming to birth, as the splendor of the springtime shines forth all the more clearly because of the winter’s ice and darkness now past. The shape of the circles of years to come has been given form by the first dawn of the world” (p.12).

Ambrose is speaking about the birth of the earth on the first day of creation. Now it isn’t quite clear if he is speaking about sphericity of the earth or the earth’s movement around the sun.

In the next quotation, Ambrose defines what the immovable earth means.

“How the disposition of the earth therefore depends upon the power of God, you may learn also where it is written: ‘He looketh upon the earth and maketh it tremble,’ and elsewhere: ‘One again I move the earth.’ Therefore, the earth remains immovable not by its balances, but is moved frequently by the nod and free will of God, as Job, too, says: ‘The Lord shaketh it from its foundations, and the pillars thereof tremble.’ And elsewhere: ‘Hell is naked before him and there is no covering for death. He stretched out the north over the empty space and hangeth the earth upon nothing. He bindeth up the waters in his clouds. The pillars of heaven fled away and are in dread at his rebuke. By his power the seas are calmed, by his wisdom is struck down the sea-monster, and the gates of heaven fear him.’
By the will of God, therefore, the earth remains immovable. ‘The earth standeth for ever,’ according to Ecclesiastes, yet is moved and nods according to the will of God. It does not therefore continue to exist because based on its own foundation. It does not stay stable because based on its own props. The Lord established it by the support of His will, because ‘in his hand are all the ends of the earth.’ The simplicity of this faith is worth all the proffered proofs.
Let others hold approvingly that the earth never will fall, because it keeps its position in the midst of the world in accordance with nature. They maintain that it is from necessity that the earth remains in its place and is not inclined in another direction, as long as it does not move contrary to nature but in accordance with it. Let them take occasion to magnify the excellence of their divine Artist and eternal Craftsman. What artist is not indebted to Him? ‘Who gave to women the knowledge of weaving or the understanding of embroidery?’ However, I who am unable to comprehend the excellence of His majesty and His art do not entrust myself to theoretical weights and measures. Rather, I believe that all things depend on His will, which is the foundation of the universe and because of which the world endures up to the present” (pp.22-23).


So the immovable earth is an expression that means how the earth, which is suspended in space over nothing, will not fall or drift away from the laws God ordained for it; that the earth maintains its position in the solar system without corruption, as the laws ordained are fixed laws and will not change.

More on the shape of the earth,

“However, in the circular quality of a sphere these elements are confused and lose the impulse of their course, inasmuch as a sphere is turned around in its orb and hence the elements above change place with the elements beneath and vise-versa” (p.23).

The circular quality of a sphere [Strong’s H2328 - H2329]. This sphere is turned (Job 38:14). We can see how Ambrose is reading and interpreting Scripture.

The next citation from Ambrose’ Hexameron deals with how the skeptics of the Bible claim that the earth cannot be a sphere because water could not remain on it.

“And first of all these interpreters wish to destroy the profound impressions which frequent reading of the Scriptures have made in our mind, maintaining that waters cannot exist above the heavens. That heavenly sphere, they say, is round, with the earth in the middle of it; hence, water cannot stay on that circular surface, from which it needs must flow easily away, falling from a higher to a lower position. For how, they say, can water remain on a sphere when the sphere itself revolves?” (p.52).

Sounds like a modern argument from flat earthers, doesn’t it? This just goes to prove that there were skeptics of the Bible then who doubted the earth was round and believed it was flat.

This one deals with how he arrives to the spherical earth concept. He begins the paragraph with “Scripture points out”, and then cites from Isa.40:22,

“And further on: ‘Who sitteth upon the globe of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as locusts, who stretcheth out the heavens as an arch?’ Who, then, ventures to put his knowledge in the same plane with that of God?” (p.231).

Ambrose is clearly not reading from modern lexicons. He had easy access to the knowledge of Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and old Latin. He knew how to read and properly translate Scripture. His reading of Isa.40:22 uses the word globe instead of circle. This has to do with the type of circle Isaiah 40:22 is actually referring to. Therefore the circle of Isaiah 40:22 which Ambrose is reading was understood to be a 3D circle -- a globe.

4. Origen (185-254 A.D.)

Origen of Alexandria was a Ante-Nicene church father who wrote On First Principles, which is the very first book on Theology ever written by a Christian. The following quotation is taken from the John C. Cavadini edition.

“Certainly what some say of this world, that it is corruptible because it was made, and yet does not go to corruption because the will of God, who made it and preserves it from being mastered by corruption, is stronger and more powerful than corruption, may more rightly be believed of that world which we have above called a “fixed” sphere, because by the will of God it is in no way “subject to corruption” (cf.Rom 8:20, 21), for the reason that it has not admitted the causes of corruption" (On First Principles, Book II, Chapter III, p.113).

Origen continues:

". . . . and the entire condition of the world we know, in which the spheres of the planets are said to be, is left behind and superseded, there exists above that sphere which is called "fixed" an abiding place for the pious and blessed, in as it were a "good land" and a "land of the living," which the "meek" and gentle will receive for an inheritance. To this land or earth belongs that heaven which, with its more magnificent circuit, surrounds and confines it, and this is the true heaven and the first to be so called" (On First Principles, Book II, Chapter III, p.114).

The spheres of the planets is a clear reference that Origen's reading of Scripture revealed that our earth is a sphere.
download.jpe
 
Upvote 0

FEZZILLA

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2003
1,031
131
53
Wisconsin
✟16,495.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
5. Clement of Alexandria (150-215 A.D.)

Clement was a 2nd century church father. The following is taken from his writing called The Instructor, which I’m citing from the very last page of Book III entitled To The Paedagous:

“And when the seasons, in their circling course,
Winter and summer, spring and autumn, each
Should come, according to well-ordered plan;
Out of a confused heap who didst create
This ordered sphere, and from the shapeless mass
Of matter didst the universe adorn;--
Grant to me life, and be that life well spent,
Thy grace enjoying; let me act and speak
In all things as Thy Holy Scriptures teach”
(Ante-Nicene Christian Library, Vol.1).


And the Holy Scriptures taught Clement about the sphere of the earth and the circular course (rotation) of the 4 seasons.

6. Clement of Rome (35 - 99 A.D.)

Clement of Rome is mentioned in the Bible (Php.4:3) and was consecrated by St.Peter to lead the church in Rome. His mention in Php.4:3 was by St.Paul who obviously also placed him in high esteem. He is the first of the early church fathers after the Apostles of Christ (or the first to leave a surviving Epistle behind). His words my not be Scripture, but they weigh heavy on how Scripture is interpreted. Quotations are taken from The Ancient Christian Writers series Vol.1. His Epistle To The Corinthians was written in 97 A.D. which is only one or two years after the Apostle John penned Revelation!

“Thus, by His transcendent might He established the heavens, and by His incomprehensible understanding He ordered them: the earth He separated from the water now encircling it, and firmly grounded it on the unshakable foundation of His own will” (33:3).

This means that only water would have been seen encircling the globe.

In the next quotation, Clement speaks about the rotation of the earth:

"The heavens revolve by His arrangement and are subject to Him in peace. Day and night complete the revolution ordained by Him, and neither interferes in the least with the other" (20:1-2).

The next statement by Clement challenges everything modern people of the 21st century think they know about what the early Christians knew. This comment is about antipodes:

“The ocean, impassable for men, and the worlds beyond it are governed by the same decrees of the Master” (20:8).

Clement is speaking about antipodes which, in his time, was defined as people who lived on the other side of the earth, or who plant their footsteps opposite to ours. St.Augustine had trouble believing Clement and others about people living on the opposite side of the world. But as it turns out Clement of Rome was correct.

Back in the 1st century, crossing the oceans to other worlds was not by any means an easy feat and even seemingly impossible. But nevertheless, God still made the seemingly impossible very possible during the rise of Christendom when ship building would become more advanced and eventually Christians would make it over to the other side of the earth.

I have a much more extensive write-up about Clement of Rome which includes Augustine's skepticism about antipodes recorded in his book "City of God."
_____________________________________________________________________
7. Origen Explains Clement’s Comment:

“Clement indeed, a disciple of the apostles, mentions those whom the Greeks call “people of the opposite earth,” and speaks of other parts of the world which none of our people can reach, nor can any of those who live there cross over to us; and these parts themselves he called “worlds,” when he says, “The ocean is impassable to men, and the worlds beyond it are governed by the same ordinances of God the Ruler” (On First Principles, Chapter III verse 6).

Who you gonna believe: 20th century liberal scholars or 1st a century church father appointed by the Apostle Peter?

8. Flavius Josephus (37-100 A.D.)

Josephus was a Jewish historian who wrote the Antiquity of the Jews in 70 A.D. We have seen how the earliest of Christian church fathers understood Scripture and now we will see how a Jewish historian understands Genesis.

“After this, on the second day, he placed the heaven over the whole world, and separated it from the other parts; and he determined it should stand by itself. He also placed a crystalline [firmament] round it, and put it together in a manner agreeable to the earth, and fitted it for giving moisture and rain, and for affording the advantage of dews” (Antiquity 1:30).

Josephus is describing how God, on the second day, placed a crystalline around the earth. This earth, not being held up by turtles or elephants or a whale, is determined by God to stand by itself (Job 26:7). You cannot place a firmament around the whole earth if the earth is flat or even a half-sphere. So here in the 1st century, both Josephus and Clement of Rome, refute modern liberal assumptions. Did Josephus know how to read Hebrew? Sure he did! He not only knew how to read Hebrew but was also a highly educated historian. So all these modern arguments which fool many have no weight in light of what we read from Josephus and Clement!
 
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,711
3,761
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟242,764.00
Faith
Atheist
Early Church Fathers Speak Out
***snip***
By posting this lengthy excerpts and apologetics, I can only assume that are you have retreated so far into automatic defense mode that you are no longer capable of reading and understanding a simple paragraph.

I have never denied that a lot of the early authors of Christianity did accept the concept of a spherical earth. Not all did - there are a few quite prominent figures who argued, on scriptural basis, for a flat earth.

But I didn't even mention that in my question. I explicitly referred to "geocentrism". I hope you haven't sunk so far as to make the common Flat Earther mistake of confusing these two?

So, all of these early church fathers and authors were geocentrists. Their model consisted of a spherical earth in the center of the cosmos, around which the sun, the planets and the stars rotated.
Models which differed from that, be it the Tychonic model (which still was geocentric), the Copernicean model or the later Kepplerian model didn't come up until the late middle / early modern age. And even then it took the church and the religious establishment quite some time to come to the level of acceptance that heliocentrism has today.

So, all these church fathers - every single of those that you cited - were geocentrists. How is that possible, when they get all their informations from the "Holy Bible" and the Bible teaches only correct cosmological models?

The answer of course is: they didn't get their cosmological models from holy texts or divine revelation. None of them did: not the early Christians nor to ancient Hebrews.

When you say that atheists/evolutionists claim that the Bible teaches a Flat Earth, it is false. Either because you misunderstood what they were really saying, or because they did indeed make this wrong statement, for whatever reasons.

The Bible - the books of the Old Testament - do not teach a Flat Earth. There is no book, no chapter, no verse that is a portrayal or an explanation of the shape of the earth.
But the OT uses a Flat Earth model (for the most part). The authors of the biblical books were no astronomers, no cosmologists, no scientists. They used as the basis for their worldview the best available model of their time: the babylonian cosmology. Which used a Flat Earth.

The early christian authors as well weren't astronomers, cosmologists or scientists. They didn't get their worldview from an exclusive understanding of the Bible or from direct divine revelation. They again used the best available science of their time: the cosmologies of the greek philosophers. Which used a spherical earth in a geocentric system.

And when the church finally got to accept the correctness of the heliocentric view of the solar system... they again didn't do it because of an improved interpretation of the old Biblical texts. Again, they used the best available science of their time.

You are arguing for a correct model. But you do so on an incorrect premise, based on your own personal conspirarcy theory. In this regard, you aren't any different from the Flat Earthers.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,711
3,761
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟242,764.00
Faith
Atheist
You cannot place a firmament around the whole earth if the earth is flat or even a half-sphere.
Say, have you ever placed a fence around your whole propertry? I dare say you would state it just that way... and you didn't even place a dome over it.

That's the problem with your interpretation. You don't look at a verse and try to find out what it is describing... which very often is ambiguous. You start with the assertion that your interpretation is correct, and thus the verse must be describing it.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
So, all these church fathers - every single of those that you cited - were geocentrists. How is that possible, when they get all their informations from the "Holy Bible" and the Bible teaches only correct cosmological models?

The answer of course is: they didn't get their cosmological models from holy texts or divine revelation. None of them did: not the early Christians nor to ancient Hebrews.

When you say that atheists/evolutionists claim that the Bible teaches a Flat Earth, it is false. Either because you misunderstood what they were really saying, or because they did indeed make this wrong statement, for whatever reasons.
Because the Bible does not teach any cosmological model. It does not teach a spherical Earth or a flat Earth, it does not teach heliocentrism or geocentirsm. Just because it is possible to decode one of those models from the phenomenological language of the Bible does not mean that the Bible teaches it. When the Bible actually teaches something, the text is plain; "Thou shalt not steal," "Love they neighbor as thyself." Those are teachings. You might convince yourself that you are able to figure out from a vague reference to the shape of the Earth that the author of Deutero-Isaiah thought the Earth was a sphere. You may even be right, but that does not make it a biblical teaching.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Freodin
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

FEZZILLA

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2003
1,031
131
53
Wisconsin
✟16,495.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
By posting this lengthy excerpts and apologetics, I can only assume that are you have retreated so far into automatic defense mode that you are no longer capable of reading and understanding a simple paragraph.

I have never denied that a lot of the early authors of Christianity did accept the concept of a spherical earth. Not all did - there are a few quite prominent figures who argued, on scriptural basis, for a flat earth.

There is not one prominent church father who read flat earth from Scripture. You won't be able to come up with any quotes either because from the 2nd century to the 19th century there were only roughly 5 flat earthers or less. Clement of Rome is the most important one out of the church fathers and he read spinning globe from Scripture.

But I didn't even mention that in my question. I explicitly referred to "geocentrism". I hope you haven't sunk so far as to make the common Flat Earther mistake of confusing these two?

Some church fathers believed the sun traveled around the earth and some believed otherwise. It all depends on whether they took their knowledge from Job and David who said the sun is stationary (Job 38:12, 14; Psalms 19:4), or whether they took their knowledge from Solomon (Ecc.1:5) which seems to indicate a moving sun. Fortunately Ecclesiastes is not a Book of Prophecy but rather Solomon's personal journal of his life's journey.

So, all of these early church fathers and authors were geocentrists. Their model consisted of a spherical earth in the center of the cosmos, around which the sun, the planets and the stars rotated.

Not all of them believed that.

Models which differed from that, be it the Tychonic model (which still was geocentric), the Copernicean model or the later Kepplerian model didn't come up until the late middle / early modern age. And even then it took the church and the religious establishment quite some time to come to the level of acceptance that it heliocentrism has today.

I agree that is probably the case. Too bad they didn't fully grasp Job 38:12, 14. The earth rotates facing the dayspring...the sun being fixed in its position. But that's a tricky one for ancient minds to understand without a modern knowledge of astronomy that later Christians established. Atheists had nothing to do with the rise of modern science. Psalm 19 is also very deeply figurative but in the spiritual message being said there, the sun is also fixed in its place. From there the light of the sun moving over the earth figuratively speaks about the coming Messiah and the light the Gospel will shine in a dark place.

So, all these church father - every single of those that you cited - were geocentrists. How is that possible, when they get all their informations from the "Holy Bible" and the Bible teaches only correct cosmological models?

God reveals what He knows is of utmost importance to humanity and science was not one of those things God focused on. The Jews were not God. They did have opinions...beliefs which were not true. But the sun's fixed position is mentioned in the Bible but it took a long time before that was fully grasped. But the Bible is not a science textbook nor is it meant to be read like a science textbook. What advanced science is in the Bible is proof enough that Scripture is Divinely inspired. Job 26:7 has the earth suspended over nothing which could not have been known apart from Divine inspiration. Isaiah 60:8 has foresees the invention and use of the airplane which takes the Jews back to Israel (Isaiah 60:10; Deuteronomy 30:1-10 ) after being scattered all over the world (Leviticus 26:33-35, Deuteronomy 4:25-28; 28:15-68. So with this kind of accuracy (not to mention hundreds of other fulfilled prophecies) there is no excuse for unbelief (Romans 1:18-32).

When you say that atheists/evolutionists claim that the Bible teaches a Flat Earth, it is false. Either because you misunderstood what they were really saying, or because they did indeed make this wrong statement, for whatever reasons.

That is completely false! I've debated atheists now for 16 years straight. They have always said the Bible teaches flat earth which is a deliberate lie refuted here.

The Bible - the books of the Old Testament - do not teach a Flat Earth. There is no book, no chapter, no verse that is a portrayal or an explanation of the shape of the earth.

(Sigh)

1 Samuel 2:8
Job 26:10
Job 37:12
Psalm 18:15
Psalm 19:4
Psalm 24:1
Psalm 89:11
Psalm 93:1
Psalm 96:10
Proverbs 8:27
Proverbs 8:31
Ecclesiastes 1:6
Isaiah 18:3
Isaiah 34:1
Isaiah 40:22
Jeremiah 10:12
Jeremiah 51:15



The early christian authors as well weren't astronomers, cosmologists or scientists.

Absolutely true. Their understanding of Scripture would pave the way for science.

They didn't get their worldview from an exclusive understanding of the Bible or from direct divine revelation. They again used the best available science of their time: the cosmologies of the greek philosophers. Which used a spherical earth in a geocentric system.

Absolutely false. The globe earth verses in the Bible antedate the first recorded Greek thought that the earth could be spherical which was in 500 B.C. Biblical globe earth goes back as far as 2000 B.C.! Even Jeremiah's two globe earth verses are 600 B.C. So no, the church fathers did not borrow from the Greeks.

And when the church finally got to accept the correctness of the heliocentric view of the solar system... they again didn't do it because of an improved interpretation of the old Biblical texts. Again, they used the best available science of their time.

Both Galileo and the Pope where in a rough place. Galileo was no denier of God as atheists seem to think he was. He was like me..he understood Scripture well enough to see that his view of cosmology didn't really contradict Scripture. So the Galileo episode will always remain the great misunderstanding since neither atheists or Christians want to deal with the issue honestly. Truth is, the Bible teaches both moving sun and stationary sun. Fortunately the moving sun is not a prophetic text and the stationary sun is prophetic text.
 
Upvote 0

Speedwell

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2016
23,928
17,625
81
St Charles, IL
✟347,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
What advanced science is in the Bible is proof enough that Scripture is Divinely inspired.
There is no "advanced science" in the Bible. Trying to prove the divine inspiration of scripture in that way is nonsense, a discredit to the Bible and to the Christian faith.
 
Upvote 0

FEZZILLA

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2003
1,031
131
53
Wisconsin
✟16,495.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Say, have you ever placed a fence around your whole propertry? I dare say you would state it just that way... and you didn't even place a dome over it.

That's the problem with your interpretation. You don't look at a verse and try to find out what it is describing... which very often is ambiguous. You start with the assertion that your interpretation is correct, and thus the verse must be describing it.
You can place a dome over it but not around it. Josephus was not talking about placing a fence around the yard analogy.

“After this, on the second day, he placed the heaven over the whole world,"

This could be argued either way.

"and separated it from the other parts; and he determined it should stand by itself."

"stand by itself is a reference to Job 26:7 which completely destroys the flat earth view.

"He also placed a crystalline [firmament] round it,"

The firmament goes over...as in over our heads, high up; and it goes around the whole earth. Again flat earth view destroyed! For your yard analogy is around but not around and over. You are looking down instead of up.

"and put it together in a manner agreeable to the earth, and fitted it for giving moisture and rain, and for affording the advantage of dews” (Antiquity 1:30).
 
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,711
3,761
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟242,764.00
Faith
Atheist
Sorry... you claim that Josephus' texts "teaches" a globe earth, because it is impossible to place something "around" the earth if the earth was flat... which obviously it isn't... and then you use a verse to promote the idea that the old Hebrews were globe believers by citing a verse that states the earth is placed on pillars?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

FEZZILLA

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2003
1,031
131
53
Wisconsin
✟16,495.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Sorry... you claim that Josephus' texts "teaches" a globe earth, because it is impossible to place something "around" the earth if the earth was flat... which obviously it isn't... and then you use a verse to promote the idea that the old Hebrews were globe believers by citing a verse that states the earth is placed on pillars?
The word pillars is not to be taken literally. The word pillars in that verse describes saints.

1 Tim.3:15: “But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.”

The next verse describes James, Peter and John as pillars:

Gal.2:9: “And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.”



✅1 Samuel 2:8,

"He reyseth vp the poore out of the duste, and lyfteth vp the begger from the dong hill: to set them among princes, and to enheret them with the seate of glory. For the pyllers of the earth are the Lordes, and he hath set the rounde worlde vpon them" (1537 Matthew-Tyndale Bible).

"He reyseth vp the poore out of the dust, and lyfteth vp the begger from the dong hyll: to sett them amonge princes, and to enherett them with the seate of glorye. For the pillers of the erth are the lordes, and he hath sett the rounde worlde vpon them" (1539 Great Bible).

"Raising up the weak from the dust, he will raise up the needy from the dung-hill to sit with the noble, and he will cause them to inherit a throne of glory, for to Jehovah the castings of the earth, and he will put the habitable globe upon them" (1876 Julia E. Smith Bible).


Latin Vulgate: "suscitat de pulvere egenum et de stercore elevat pauperem ut sedeat cum principibus et solium gloriae teneat Domini enim sunt cardines terrae et posuit super eos orbem"

✅Word: Orb, from H8398 תֵּבֵל têbêl

Latin Definition of Orbis
https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/t...6hnusTYD8mHw43RBeMXPrUhSivlIpU-uG4xVxxD9qKYtA


Hebrew Lexicons for H8398 תֵּבֵל têbêl,


✅The New Strong's Exhaustive Expanded Concordance of the Bible. H8398

"8398. têbêl, tay-bale'; from H2986; the earth (as moist and therefore inhabited); by extension, the globe; by implication, its inhabitants; specifically, a particular land, as Babylonia, Palestine:—world [35x] habitable part, [1x].

The word signified, first, the solid material on which man dwells, and that was formed, founded, established, and disposed by God; and secondly, the inhabitants thereof. See TWOT 835h; BDB--385c, 1061d."


✅ Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon
46503575_10161103243135223_6829675694939701248_n.jpg



✅Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament.

TWOT 835h תֵּבֵל têbêl, tay-bale'; world.

"This noun is used in three basic situations. First, the noun is employed to represent the global mass called earth, including the atmosphere or heavens (cf. Ps.89:12; II Sam 22:16; et al.). têbêl is often in parallelism or apposition with 'eres (I Sam 2:8; Isa.26:9; 34:1; et al.) when 'eres is used in its broadest sense of "the world." The "world" was created by God, not false gods (Jer.10:12; Ps.93:1) and it belongs solely to him (Ps.24:1). God's eternality is illustrated by his existence before the creation of "world" (Ps.90:2) and his wisdom (perhaps a personification of Christ) was present prior to the world's creation (Prov. 8:26, 31). Creation itself gives a "worldwide" witness to God's glory (Ps.19:4 [H 5]) which should result in Yahweh's praise (Ps.98:2). Yahweh will judge this "world," making it empty (Isa.24:4), though in the millennium God will cause Israel to blossom and fill the whole world with her fruit (Isa.27:6).

Second, têbêl is sometime limited to "countries" or "the inhabitable world." This meaning is more closely related to the root meaning. It refers to the world where crops are raised. This is observed in the judgment message against the king of Babylon (not Satan) for violently shaking the "world" or "inhabitable world" (Isa.13:11; 14:17). Lightning is said to enlighten the "world"---undoubtedly referring to a limited land area (Ps.77:18 [H 19]; 97:4).

Third, têbêl may also refer to the inhabitants living upon the whole earth. This is demonstrated by the parallelism of têbêl with I' umim (Ps.9:8 [H 9]) and 'ammim (Ps.96:13; 98:9). The context of these references is Yahweh's judgment upon the world's inhabitants---a judgment both executed in righteousness and instructive of Yahweh's righteousness (Isa.26:9; 34:1).

In several passages the sense of têbêl as the globular earth in combination with its inhabitants is clearly observed. Everything belongs to Yahweh as his creation (Ps.50:12). Yahweh alone controls this world (Job 34:13; Nah 1:5) and his power is over all the earth which always responds to his presence (Job 37:12; Ps.97:4)".


✅New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology & Exegesis, Volume 4:

"9315. têbêl תֵּבֵל Nom. fem., world (#9315).

OT Found 36x exclusively in poetic texts, the word conveys the cosmic or global sense in which 'eres is also sometimes used; i.e., the whole earth or world considered as a single entity. It sometimes occurs in parallelism with 'eres (Jer.10:12; Lam.4:12). Twice it is used together with 'eres, either to express "the whole earth" (Job 37:12), or perhaps in the sense of the inhabited earth (Prov.8:31). It is used frequently in contexts that associate it with Yahweh's creative act and that, as a result, express the stability or durability of the earth (1 Sam.2:8; Ps.89:11 [12]; 93:1; 96:10). It is used when the whole population of the world is referred to (Ps.24:1; 33:8; 98:7; Isa. 18:3; 26:9; Nah.1:5). Isaiah uses têbêl more than any other prophet, mostly in the context of universal judgment (Isaiah 13:11; 24:4; 34:1; cf. Ps.96:13; 98:9).

Land, earth: --> damd (ground, piece of land, soil, realm of the earth, #141); --> 'eres (earth, land, #824); --> têbêl (world, #9315)."

_________________________________________________________
Summary of Hebrew Lexicons on H8398: תֵּבֵל têbêl,

✅Strong's: "; by extension, the globe;"

✅Gesenius': ",the habitable globe,"

✅TWOT: "First, the noun is employed to represent the global mass called earth"<--- AND---> "In several passages the sense of têbêl as the globular earth in combination with its inhabitants is clearly observed."

✅New International: "the word conveys the cosmic or global sense in which 'eres is also sometimes used; i.e., the whole earth or world considered as a single entity."

Where do we see a flat earth?
 
Upvote 0