Legal infanticide: Virginia Republicans defeat Democratic bill allowing abortions after labor begins

MournfulWatcher

In the beginning was the Word.
Feb 15, 2016
392
444
United States
✟110,673.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I'd like to know something; when this bill and the New York one describe permission for abortion up til birth, does this mean killing the child or removing it live? I've heard that third trimester abortions are essentially C-section and allows the child to live.
 
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
166,466
56,160
Woods
✟4,665,297.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
!

Has that ever been allowed?

If they don't see that as murder, when are they going to legalize knocking off *anyone* we don't happen to like?

Yes, Thank God!

Curious, anyone here condone that?
Nobody that is a member of OBOB does as far as I know. It goes against our Faith.
 
Upvote 0

Davidnic

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2006
33,112
11,338
✟788,967.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
In another area of the forums I posted this about this bill:

As the culture abandons God the old pagan tropes return. I was explaining to my students the other day how they've grown up in a nominally Christian world. That means that we don't really understand all the horrible things that Christianity suppressed, eliminated, or changed. And a huge example is the status of children who were disposable in many cultures before Christianity. A good book on the topic is:

When Children Became People: The Birth of Childhood in Early Christianity

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000RY04A0/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1

But as truth is rejected in favor of relativism...the pagan "morality" returns. Old evils are new again.
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Nobody that is a member of OBOB does as far as I know. It goes against our Faith.

I can't imagine anyone even loosely connected to the Christian faith even coming close to endorsing this.
 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,565
13,722
✟429,592.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Thank you for the book recommendation, Davidnic. I'll have to pick that up.

p.s. to answer Kenny'sID's question, the Orthodox Church to which I belong is very, very much against abortion (in sharp contrast to the dominant religion of Egypt). In fact, inspired by this thread, I plan on making a thread detailing our historical stance on this issue (on the OO board, Voice In The Desert) later today, as I've just found an excellent resource on that which I believe sheds some interesting light on what a lot of people who are more lax on this issue think of as "modern" arguments regarding personhood.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: anna ~ grace
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
166,466
56,160
Woods
✟4,665,297.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,821
9,817
✟312,047.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I was explaining to my students the other day how they've grown up in a nominally Christian world.

I've seen the phrase "cut-flower civilisation." The flowers (things like valuing human life) have been removed from the plant of Christianity, and they are still beautiful. But they are slowly dying...
 
Upvote 0

Markie Boy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2017
1,641
977
United States
✟402,041.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
And I still have to argue with fellow "Catholics" that we can support pro-abortion candidates - even if they have a nice immigration policy.

And our priest will never talk about this, as we may offend someone.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
19,297
16,132
Flyoverland
✟1,236,301.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
This is why I vote Republican.
And I totally get that. I grew up Democrat but had to leave that party behind. I can't see voting for a Democrat except maybe for Dan Lapinski, and maybe Colin Peterson. The ideological purity of the Democrats will not allow them to remain much longer. They are a party of death even if they rarely have a good policy.

Republicans do better, even if they are far from perfect themselves. I would happily vote for 'other' as both parties are a mess. It's just that now one is totally bonkers immoral and the other only halfway there. I can't see how any Christian could vote for such immorality and still pretend to be Christian.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: anna ~ grace
Upvote 0

Markie Boy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2017
1,641
977
United States
✟402,041.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Yes - me too. What blows my mind is when I argue with Catholics and they throw all these other issues like the environment and renewable energy and social justice in the mix at the same level as life.

I try to explain that if you can't get the pro-life thing right, how can you ever have a good social justice logic. They still don't get it. What makes I harder is when the clergy won't send the right message, and it sort of leaves us abandon.

We have a pro-life float and group in the 4th of July parade every year. Our priest has never joined us, or encouraged others to that I'm aware of.
 
Upvote 0