This Will Not Work

ml5363

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
518
219
41
Tennessee
✟28,267.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi all,

I just don't understand when people say that things will never work that seem to work pretty well in other places. Why is that?

Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Slovenia and France are all nations that offer 'free' higher learning, (this means college or university level education). These are all reasonably well off countries as far as the standard of living of their people.

There are literally dozens of nations that offer some kind of 'free' overall medical care.

Are we really just not as smart as them? Can we really not figure out how to do good things for our citizenry as they have done? Why is it that we can build the strongest and most expensive military to fight wars and kill people, but we can't figure out how to help people better?

God bless,
In Christ, ted


I think population. Has a lot to do with it
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,062
4,740
✟837,898.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Looks like a good platform. Will no doubt need to be balanced with spending cuts elsewhere. Maybe if the US could pull its troops out of expensive overseas conflicts (Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen), that would help?

Yes, we are already pulling out of Syria and probably Afghanistan. The cost of these few thousand are now relatively small. Historically, we already spent about 3 trillion dollars. With regard to Yemen, I expect that the Saudis are paying for our advisors. these withdrawals will not even punt dent in the debt increases caused by the individual tax cuts of last year.
 
Upvote 0

ml5363

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
518
219
41
Tennessee
✟28,267.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes, but it's not quite so simple. More people would be covered, and existing people would be covered for more things.


Ithink yes more would have Insurance, quality would be lower. And longer wait times. say for example, you have a practice that sees 20 patients.. with everyone having insurance , now your patient load may jump up 30..40,, etc.. heck even 5 extra patients would cause less time with orginial patients.

Also if it is like Medicaid, some Drs opt out of that insurance because it doesn't pay enough...this would prob be more of an issue if all is covered by "government"
 
Upvote 0

hedrick

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 8, 2009
20,250
10,567
New Jersey
✟1,148,308.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
To me it's at least as important that if health care doesn't have to be paid by employers, it decreases the cost of having people.
If medical costs in the U.S. were reigned in universal health care would be feasible.
Doing that requires controlling drug costs. Any attempt to do that is going to face essentially infinite resources in lobbying, PR and political dirty tricks.
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,062
4,740
✟837,898.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
There is no question that these services can be provided by the government. In the US, the people aren't willing to have the much higher tax rates required to support the additional services. An increase in the top individual rates would be insufficient.

As an aside, I'd be fine with providing these services, and with the tax rates needed to pay for them.
I would add drug treatment, day care and nursing care to the list of services that should be provided by the government, plus greatly extending job training (this could paid for by businesses).

Hi all,

I just don't understand when people say that things will never work that seem to work pretty well in other places. Why is that?

Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Slovenia and France are all nations that offer 'free' higher learning, (this means college or university level education). These are all reasonably well off countries as far as the standard of living of their people.

There are literally dozens of nations that offer some kind of 'free' overall medical care.

Are we really just not as smart as them? Can we really not figure out how to do good things for our citizenry as they have done? Why is it that we can build the strongest and most expensive military to fight wars and kill people, but we can't figure out how to help people better?

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Sparagmos
Upvote 0

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
34,202
19,056
44
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,503,935.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I wasn't talking about government-provided insurance, though; I was talking about government-provided healthcare. As in, the government runs the hospitals, pays the doctors, subsidises the medications etc. directly.

And if you have to train more doctors to adequately care for your population... doing so might be a good thing?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Allandavid
Upvote 0

ml5363

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
518
219
41
Tennessee
✟28,267.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I wasn't talking about government-provided insurance, though; I was talking about government-provided healthcare. As in, the government runs the hospitals, pays the doctors, subsidises the medications etc. directly.

And if you have to train more doctors to adequately care for your population... doing so might be a good thing?

The VA gere in states have a bad rap of negativity, not sure this could be done with government and not have the same results
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,062
4,740
✟837,898.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The VA gere in states have a bad rap of negativity, not sure this could be done with government and not have the same results

Folks like to point to the VA.

Let's use Medicare as the example. Democrats are suggesting a phased in "Medicare for All"
 
Upvote 0

Ringo84

Separation of Church and State expert
Jul 31, 2006
19,228
5,252
A Cylon Basestar
Visit site
✟121,289.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Tigger45

Pray like your life depends on it!
Site Supporter
Aug 24, 2012
20,730
13,156
E. Eden
✟1,270,986.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
To me it's at least as important that if health care doesn't have to be paid by employers, it decreases the cost of having people.

Doing that requires controlling drug costs. Any attempt to do that is going to face essentially infinite resources in lobbying, PR and political dirty tricks.
It is a multidimensional challenge which would include redefining lobbying contributions and term limits to help get our representatives to actually represent ‘we the people’.
 
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,062
4,740
✟837,898.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The numerical gymnastics are indeed impressive.

US companies were greatly hurt by their competitive position before the tax cuts. There are many reasons in addition to rates, which are relatively easy for governments to affect. US companies pay for many types of insurance for workers. US companies have much less governmental R&D support than elsewhere, especially in Asia. Government services also help companies; for example government provided day care.

In any case, I do NOT favor increases in corporate tax rates, although the closing of some loopholes Would be a good idea.

US Corporate Tax Rates Now Among the Lowest in the World: Report


But I will say that the support (or at least not outright opposition) to M4A here on CF is a pleasant surprise. I think that people have been mistreated by corporate health insurance for so long that the dam is beginning to break, but time will tell.
Ringo
 
Upvote 0

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,396
15,479
✟1,106,853.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The first two particularly the second should not be. There is no such thing as free, and moreover people are more likely to care if they have to pay for it. In other words, not all people are like this, but like college people that pay for it or at least have to maintain a certain GPA for a scholarship they will pull their own weight and want to do well.
Right now there are programs for medical personnel and teachers to get at least part of their education cost forgiven if they work in particular parts of the country.
An example might be that a structural engineering student might be required to volunteer summer breaks working in the field on an infrastructure project and after graduation work with the Army Corp of Engineers for two to five years.
And yes they must maintain a responsible GPA, imo, at the very least 2.0.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,396
15,479
✟1,106,853.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
As I understand it, if you set up a government run health system it would actually be much cheaper than what you have now, where medical providers try to profit from insurance companies...
And insurance companies make billions in profits every year. 20 million going to one CEO of just one health insurance company, several years ago, pretty much says it all.
 
Upvote 0