- Jan 28, 2002
- 27,475
- 45,435
- 67
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Married
Hi Saramae, I'm committed to making shorter replies to you than my last one was, so here goes.If we were always supposed to be obedient from the first place but were not able to do so then did God not foresee that this would happen? The way I see it, if he did not foresee human inability to do what he had asked in the first place, that would make him not all powerful and all knowing. If he did know and still chose to do it the first way initially but then later decided we could have his son so we could be saved, then he can’t be all loving/merciful, since there were people before Jesus that wouldn’t have been able to be saved.
And if they were able to be saved, then it wasn’t necessary to send his son here in the first place. So either everyone before Jesus went to hell and God decided to send his son to save the rest of us (in which case, he lacks foresight), or he was able to save them (by going to heaven), in which case sending his son here was either just symbolic or perhaps as a way to help lead people back to the correct path (by giving them more proof of his existence), but not required for heaven.
I’ve been trying to work this out for myself, but I feel like it just does not make sense at all.
1. God knew in eternity past how all of this would turn out, that our progenitors would disobey Him in the Garden of God, that all of us, their progeny, would also be sinners who fell short of God's expectations for us, and that He would need to send His Son here as a man to both live and die on our behalf to save us (the very first prophetic statement concerning Jesus and our redemption through Him occurs in Genesis 3, just FYI).
2. The New Testament tells us that God withheld judgment & condemnation from His OT saints (since they all died before the time of Jesus) until they could be justified/saved by Him in the very same way that we are today, by His grace (which was merited for us by the life, death and resurrection of His Son) through faith. As I said in an earlier post, just like we look back in faith to Jesus for our salvation, the saints in OT times looked ahead to His day in faith to their salvation. As Genesis 15 tells us, for instance, "Abraham believed in the Lord, and it was reckoned to Him as righteousness". There is also this prophetic statement concerning Jesus from Isaiah (one that I'm sure you've heard before):
3. God used the Bible and His prophets to "lead people back to the correct path" throughout Israel's existence, and He Himself lived among them much of the time (beginning in the Garden of Eden), so Jesus' principle purpose in coming here was neither symbolic nor as a guide. Rather, He came here to live and die for us/in our places 1. so that our sins could be paid for and forgiven, and 2. so that we could be reconciled to the Father and be able to live in His presence in the life to come. This is why one of Jesus' names is, the "Lamb of God".
2. The New Testament tells us that God withheld judgment & condemnation from His OT saints (since they all died before the time of Jesus) until they could be justified/saved by Him in the very same way that we are today, by His grace (which was merited for us by the life, death and resurrection of His Son) through faith. As I said in an earlier post, just like we look back in faith to Jesus for our salvation, the saints in OT times looked ahead to His day in faith to their salvation. As Genesis 15 tells us, for instance, "Abraham believed in the Lord, and it was reckoned to Him as righteousness". There is also this prophetic statement concerning Jesus from Isaiah (one that I'm sure you've heard before):
Isaiah 9
6 Unto us a Child is born,
Unto us a Son is given;
And the government shall be upon His shoulder.
And His name will be called
Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
7 Of the increase of His government and of peace
There will be no end,
Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom,
To order it and establish it with judgment and justice
From that time forward, even forevermore.
The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.
Those in OT times trusted God and looked ahead to the day their Savior (the Messiah) would appear. In fact, Jews living today, who neither understand nor believe that Jesus was the expected Messiah, are still looking forward to His arrival.6 Unto us a Child is born,
Unto us a Son is given;
And the government shall be upon His shoulder.
And His name will be called
Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
7 Of the increase of His government and of peace
There will be no end,
Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom,
To order it and establish it with judgment and justice
From that time forward, even forevermore.
The zeal of the LORD of hosts will perform this.
3. God used the Bible and His prophets to "lead people back to the correct path" throughout Israel's existence, and He Himself lived among them much of the time (beginning in the Garden of Eden), so Jesus' principle purpose in coming here was neither symbolic nor as a guide. Rather, He came here to live and die for us/in our places 1. so that our sins could be paid for and forgiven, and 2. so that we could be reconciled to the Father and be able to live in His presence in the life to come. This is why one of Jesus' names is, the "Lamb of God".
The reason why Lee didn't interview skeptics was because he was one of the greatest among them, an atheist "super skeptic", in fact, so he had no reason to interview others who believed what he did. His purpose back then was to use the power of his intellect, and his prowess as one of Chicago's leading investigative reporters, to leave no stone unturned/prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that atheism was correct, and Christianity was not (so the atheist side was actually well-represented by the former atheist author himself).As far as Case for Christ goes, a lot of people who review the book said that the author pretty much just interviewed religious experts and not skeptics, and skewed the argument heavily towards religion without giving skepticism a fair chance. I may read it still, but I also would like to see the other side presented fairly. Thanks for all of your help, by the way!
Yours and His,
David
p.s. - this one was a little bit shorter anyway
Last edited:
Upvote
0