The Restitution Of All Things A.K.A. Universalism

Status
Not open for further replies.

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
The Grandeur Of Gods Purpose

That God has a purpose is evident from Paul's words in Ephesians 1, verse 11, "...according to the purpose of the One Who is operating all in accord with the counsel of His will," and in Ephesians 3:11, "...in accord with the purpose of the eons, which He makes in Christ Jesus, our Lord."

The ultimate aim of God's purpose is that He might be All in all (1 Cor.15:28), and this objective must always be kept in mind whenever His purpose is being considered. There is, of course, a climax of grandeur in the consummation--in that final scene when all is achieved--but it is our submission that there is a grandeur running all through God's purpose, and that this grandeur is not confined to those scenes where tens of thousands and thousands of thousands are acclaiming Him, but is also to be found in many other places where events are less spectacular. There is, for instance, a grandeur of purpose to be found in Eden, in Bethlehem, at Golgotha, and on the road to Damascus.

In this short series of studies, we can only hope to cover a few of the scenes in the unfolding of God's great design. We shall not attempt to bring forth anything new, since all God's purpose was conceived and planned before any part of it was put into operation, but rather, through a succession of mental pictures, endeavor to portray to you, to make more vivid in your minds, the inherent grandeur contained in all our Father's wonderful operations.

To be continued-

-John H. Essex-
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The Grandeur Of Gods Purpose
-John H. Essex-
John H Essex
Unitarianism as an organized religious movement emerged during the Reformation period in Poland, Transylvania, and England, and later in North America from the original New England Puritan churches. In each country Unitarian leaders sought to achieve a reformation that was completely in accordance with the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament; in particular, they found no warrant for the doctrine of the Trinity accepted by other Christian churches.

Universalism as a religious movement developed from the influences of radical Pietism in the 18th century and dissent in the Baptist and Congregational churches from predestinarian views that only a small number, the elect, will be saved. Universalists argued that Scripture does not teach eternal torment in hell and with Origen, the 3rd century Alexandrian theologian, they affirmed a universal restoration of all to God.

In De Trinitatis erroribus (1531; “On the Errors of the Trinity”) and Christianismi restitutio (1553; “The Restitution of Christianity”) the Spanish physician and theologian Michael Servetus provided important stimulus for the emergence of Unitarianism. Servetus’ execution for heresy in 1553 led Sebastian Castellio, a liberal humanist, to advocate religious toleration in De haereticis . . . (1554; Concerning Heretics”) and caused some Italian religious exiles, who were then in Switzerland, to move to Poland.

One of the most important of these Italian exiles was Faustus Socinus (1539–1604). His acquisition in 1562 of the papers of his uncle Laelius Socinus (1525–62), a theologian suspected of heterodox views, led him to adopt some of Laelius’ proposals for the reformation of Christian doctrines and to become an anti-Trinitarian theologian. Laelius’ commentary on the prologue to the Gospel According to John presented Christ as the revealer of God’s new creation and denied Christ’s preexistence.

Faustus’ own Explicatio primae partis primi capitis Ioannis (first edition published in Transylvania in 1567–68; “Explanation of the First Part of the First Chapter of John’s Gospel”) and his manuscripts of 1578, De Jesu Christo Servatore (first published 1594; “On Jesus Christ, the Saviour”) and De statu primi hominis ante lapsum (1578; “On the State of the First Man Before the Fall”), were of subsequent influence, the first, particularly, in Transylvania and all three in Poland.

Unitarianism appeared in Poland in incipient form in 1555 when Peter Gonesius, a Polish student, proclaimed views derived from Servetus at a Polish Reformed Church synod. Controversies that ensued with tritheists, ditheists, and those who affirmed the unity of God resulted in a schism in 1565 and the formation of the Minor Reformed Church of Poland (Polish Brethren).

Gregory Paul, Marcin Czechowic, and Georg Schomann soon emerged as leaders of the new church. They were encouraged by Georgius Blandrata (1515–88), an Italian physician to the Polish-Italian bride of King John Sigismund, who aided the development of anti-Trinitarianism in Poland and Transylvania. In 1569 Racow was founded as the Polish Brethren’s central community.

Faustus Socinus went to Poland in 1579. He rejected Anabaptist insistence on immersionist adult baptism and affirmed that Jesus Christ was a man whom God had resurrected and to whom he had given all power in heaven and earth over the church. Socinus emphasized the validity of prayer to Christ as an expression of honour and as a request for aid. Through his ability in theological debate he soon became the leader of the Polish Brethren, whose adherents were frequently referred to as Socinians

After Socinus’ death his followers published the Racovian Catechism (1605). The hostility of their opponents, however, caused the destruction of the Socinians’ famous printing press and school at Racow (1632). In 1658 a legislative decree was enacted stating that by 1660 the Socinians must either become Roman Catholics, go into exile, or face execution. A few of these Polish exiles reached Kolozsvár, centre of the Transylvanian Unitarian movement, and some of their leaders moved to the Netherlands.

American Universalism
John Biddle (1615–62), an English Socinian, whose knowledge of the Greek text of the New Testament convinced him that the doctrine of the Trinity was not of scriptural origin, published his Unitarian convictions in Twelve Arguments Drawn out of Scripture . . . (1647) and other works; English readers, moreover, were exposed to Unitarian views through Socinian books published in the Netherlands.

Although the Toleration Act of 1689 excluded Unitarians, advocates of an Arian Christology (belief in Christ’s preexistence as a subordinate, divine, created being) soon appeared within the Church of England and among Dissenters.
This led some Anglicans to seek, without success, the rescinding of the requirement of subscription to the Anglican Thirty-nine Articles. Dissenting ministers, meeting in the Salters’ Hall in London in 1719, separated into two groups, one insisting on adherence to confessional documents, the other requiring only agreement with Scripture.

Of those in the second group, Presbyterians, General Baptists, and a few independents gradually moved during the 18th century with their congregations toward Unitarian views. The first English Unitarian congregation, Essex Street Chapel, was founded in London in 1774 by Theophilus Lindsey, who previously had been an Anglican clergyman.

The scientist and dissenting minister Joseph Priestley (1733–1804) influenced Unitarian ministers by his scriptural rationalism, materialist determinism, and emphasis on a humanitarian Christology. The scholar and theologian Thomas Belsham supported Priestley’s emphasis on a humanitarian Christology and opposition to Arian views.

The British and Foreign Unitarian Association was founded in 1825. In the 19th century Parliament was persuaded to repeal some of the laws against nonconformity, which freed the Unitarians for a more active church life. English Unitarians, moreover, were greatly influenced by James Martineau (1805–1900), who, after studies in Germany, was led to a religious epistemology emphasizing intuition.

In 1928 a union of the British and Foreign Unitarian Association with the National Conference (which included other Free Christian Churches) resulted in the founding of the General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches. Unitarianism is also present in Wales, Scotland, and the Non-Subscribing Presbyterian Church of Ireland.

Hosea Ballou (1771–1852) was the greatest 19th-century American Universalist leader. His A Treatise on Atonement . . . (1805) converted most Universalist ministers to a Unitarian view of God, an Arian Christology, and the view that, because sin is finite in nature and all of its effects will be experienced
in this life, all of mankind will be saved after death.

Ballou later abandoned his Arian belief in Christ’s preexistence. The Winchester Profession (1803), adopted by the General Convention of Universalists in the New England States at Winchester, N.H., was phrased in general terms to embrace differing Universalist views. In 1870, however, a resolution adopted by the General Convention required that the Winchester Profession be interpreted as requiring belief in the authority of Scripture and the lordship of Jesus Christ.

This restriction was rescinded in 1899. Ballou’s theology was dominant during the first half of the 19th century, when Universalist ministers founded congregations in many states. Opposed to Ballou’s theology, however, was a small group of ministers and laypersons, who left the denomination to form the Massachusetts Association of Universal Restorationists, which existed from 1831 to 1841.

Although both factions believed that there would be no eternal punishment for sinners after death, the Massachusetts restorationists embraced the position that there would be a limited punishment followed by a general restoration to God.

Adin Ballou (1803–90), a leading restorationist, was an outstanding advocate of the application of New Testament ethics to social issues. By the end of the 19th century most Universalists held restorationist views.

Clarence Skinner (1881–1949), dean of Crane Theological School, greatly influenced American Universalists by his emphasis on social issues and his reinterpretation of Universalism as referring not to salvation after death but to the unities and universals in human life (A Religion for Greatness, 1945). In 1935 the Universalists adopted a non-creedal Bond of Fellowship, which they revised in 1953. Clinton Lee Scott and Kenneth Patton affirmed religious humanism and emphasized drawing religious sustenance from the traditions of the world’s great religions.

Teachings

The Unitarian theologian Earl Morse Wilbur (1866–1956) advanced the thesis, now widely accepted, that the history of Unitarianism in Poland, Transylvania, England, and America gains unity from certain common themes. These themes are freedom of religious thought rather than required agreement with creeds or confessions, reliance not on tradition or external authority but on the use of reason in formulating religious beliefs, and tolerance of differing religious views and customs in worship and polity.

Unitarian Universalists are creedless and deny the authority of dogmas promulgated by church councils. Their teachings historically have included the unity of God, the humanity of Jesus, mankind’s religious and ethical responsibility, and the possibility of attaining religious salvation through differing religious traditions.

They emphasize the authority of the individual’s religious conviction, the importance of religiously motivated action for social reform, democratic method in church governance, and reason and experience as appropriate bases for formulating religious beliefs.

Their traditional concern for social issues has caused Unitarian Universalists to give active support to the demands for equality of blacks, feminists, and other groups. Gains in equality for women within the Unitarian Universalist Association were significant, but its predominantly white, middle-class membership remains an issue.

Although the nonadorantist Unitarians in Romania and Hungary are firmly Christian, in England, the United States, and Canada, the beliefs of Unitarians range from Unitarian Christianity to religious humanism; there are also aspirations toward becoming a universal religion.

Universalist teachings have changed also; whereas the restorationist theology that was dominant among American Universalists toward the end of the 19th century emphasized the salvation of all after death, many 20th-century Universalists affirm a naturalistic worldview and regard salvation as an aspect of present human experience.



In the American colonies Congregationalist ministers influenced by Arian Christology and by Arminian theology, gradually moved in the 18th century toward Unitarian views. Conflicts with supporters of Jonathan Edwards’ theological heritage resulted in the election at Harvard College of a liberal, Henry Ware, as Hollis Professor of Divinity in 1805.

When the liberal Congregationalists were accused of agreeing with Belsham’s strictly humanitarian Christology, the Unitarian clergyman William Ellery Channing defended them as Arians. Channing’s 1819 sermon “Unitarian Christianity,” a manifesto, presented both a recognition that the liberals would have to separate from the Congregational Church and a coherent theology. In 1825 the American Unitarian Association (AUA), an association of individuals, was organized.

Channing’s Arian Christology as well as his affirmations of the divine unity, the authority of Scripture rationally interpreted, and an optimistic view of human nature were dominant among early American Unitarians. His Lockean epistemology (modified by views of Scottish commonsense philosophers and the English Unitarian Richard Price), however, was challenged by such Transcendentalists as Ralph Waldo Emerson, in his “Divinity School Address” (1838), and Theodore Parker, in his sermon “The Transient and Permanent in Christianity” (1841), both of whom emphasized intuition and moral idealism.

Parker’s leadership in addressing issues of social reform, such as issues relating to the anti-slavery movement, made a lasting impact on Unitarians.

Although Transcendentalism divided the Unitarians, Henry Whitney Bellows, a prominent figure in Unitarianism after the Civil War, succeeded in organizing the National Conference of Unitarian Churches in 1865. A separatist Free Religious Association (FRA) was organized in 1867 by persons who, although holding a variety of views, were agreed in their opposition to the preamble of the National Conference’s constitution, which was virtually a Christian creed.

A Western Unitarian Conference, organized in 1852, also experienced a controversy over whether Unitarianism was to include persons whose views were not theistic and Christian.

In 1894 a revision in the constitution of the National Conference enabled members of the FRA to rejoin the Conference. Later religious humanism became the view of many Unitarians. A Commission of Appraisal (1934–36) recommended modifications in the structure and program of the AUA. Frederick May Eliot, chairman of the commission, was persuaded to become president of the AUA, and while in office he prepared the denomination for future growth.

In the 1930s a critical movement emerged, largely in response to a general crisis of faith in liberal thought; its leader was James Luther Adams, whose writings contributed significantly to Unitarian theology and social thought. Of particular importance for Unitarianism today are his studies of voluntary associations and their implications (On Being Human—Religiously, 1976).
ENCYCLOPÆDIA BRITANNICA
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
SCENE ONE

Our beginning scene is one of Spirit--Spirit existing in unique majesty. That Spirit is God. The apostle John declares that "God is spirit" (literally, spirit the God -- John 4:24). There is none beside Him. Brother Adlai Loudy, in his book, GOD'S EONIAN PURPOSE, describes this first scene as follows:

Come, my friends, and go with me
Away back to eternity!
Go back beyond the days of youth
Where everything that was, was truth.
Go back until within the past
You fail to find the place, at last,
Where "the beginning" you can see
Of the immense eternity.

Go back until there's not a trace
Of anything but God and space:
God all around--below, above,
Unlimited in power and love.

Away back there, removed from sight,
Where everything that was, was right.
Away back there, removed from sin,
Is where our story will begin.

Can you imagine this scene? God alone, abiding in glorious grandeur. Spirit, with nothing but Himself in which to dwell; Light, with nothing outside Himself on which to shine; Love, but with nothing, nothing whatever, to lavish itself upon.

Somewhere back there, when God was all in Himself, His wonderful purpose was conceived. The same apostle (John), who tells us that God (is) Spirit, also reveals that "God is Light" (1 John 1:5) and "God is Love" (1 John 4:8). These last two are figurative expressions, but full of meaning. Light, to be of value, requires something on which to shine, and love cannot express itself unless there is something, or someone to be loved. -John H Essex-
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
SCENE ONE

Our beginning scene is one of Spirit--Spirit existing in unique majesty. That Spirit is God. The apostle John declares that "God is spirit" (literally, spirit the God -- John 4:24). There is none beside Him. Brother Adlai Loudy, in his book, GOD'S EONIAN PURPOSE, describes this first scene as follows:
Somewhere back there, when God was all in Himself, His wonderful purpose was conceived. The same apostle (John), who tells us that God (is) Spirit, also reveals that "God is Light" (1 John 1:5) and "God is Love" (1 John 4:8). These last two are figurative expressions, but full of meaning. Light, to be of value, requires something on which to shine, and love cannot express itself unless there is something, or someone to be loved. -John H Essex-
Somewhere back there they missed a thing or two and speak leasingly.

Psalms 5:6  Thou shalt destroy them that speak leasing: the LORD will abhor the bloody and deceitful man.

and the Lord hath sent us to destroy it; by which they discovered themselves to be angels, and what their business was, to destroy Sodom; and which confutes the notion of the Jews, that they were sent on different errands; whereas it is clear from hence, these two were sent to do one and the same thing; Gen 18:2 And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground, [GILL]

Genesis 18:16 And the men rose up from thence, and looked toward Sodom: and Abraham went with them to bring them on the way.
Genesis 18:17 And the LORD said, Shall I hide from Abraham that thing which I do;
Genesis 18:23 And Abraham came near and said, "Would You also destroy the righteous with the wicked?

Genesis 19:1 And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground;

Genesis 19:13 For we will destroy this place, because the cry of them is waxen great before the face of the LORD; and the LORD hath sent us to destroy it.

Numbers 24:17  I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth.

Deuteronomy 2:15  For indeed the hand of the LORD was against them, to destroy them from among the host, until they were consumed.

Deuteronomy 7:10  And repayeth them that hate him to their face, to destroy them: he will not be slack to him that hateth him, he will repay him to his face.

Joshua 11:20  For it was of the LORD to harden their hearts, that they should come against Israel in battle, that he might destroy them utterly, and that they might have no favour, but that he might destroy them, as the LORD commanded Moses.

Isaiah 54:16  Behold, I have created the smith that bloweth the coals in the fire, and that bringeth forth an instrument for his work; and I have created the destroyer to destroy.

1 Chronicles 21:15  And God sent an angel unto Jerusalem to destroy it: and as he was destroying, the LORD beheld, and he repented him of the evil, and said to the angel that destroyed, It is enough, stay now thine hand. And the angel of the LORD stood by the threshingfloor of Ornan the Jebusite.

Psalms 118:12  They compassed me about like bees; they are quenched as the fire of thorns: for in the name of the LORD I will destroy them.

Psalms 145:20  The LORD preserveth all them that love him: but all the wicked will he destroy.

Jeremiah 23:1  Woe be unto the pastors that destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture! saith the LORD.

Isaiah 66:16  For by fire and by his sword will the LORD plead with all flesh: and the slain of the LORD shall be many.
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
DIVINE COUNSEL

"......having made known to us the mystery concerning His will, according to His good intention, which He proposed to Himself within Himself..." (Translation of Eph. 1:9 by Eddie Browne).
The heart of a man is his final counsellor for he is created according to God's likeness, the likeness of the God who counsels Himself within Himself in accordance with His (determinative) good intention. It is with man, as it is with God, that the heart is where all knowledge and emotion come together to determine what will become the acted-out person - - garbage in, garbage out.

The heart is that "place" in a man where intuition, cognitive thought and emotions come together to form a complex of self-creation. The result can range from utter vacuity of persona, all the way to the fullness of eternal personhood lived out in the aeons. The situation there in the heart amounts to a committee sort of thing - - I'm reminded of my dear friend, Ding Teuling's, definition of, and joke about a committee as:

"A group of the incompetent, chosen by the unwilling, to do the unnecessary."

That's a picture of what often goes on in the human heart. A committee of all kinds of internal and external input forms within the heart with each member possessed of its own unique confusion, which together builds to a critical mass of misinformation, disinformation and mixed feelings creating a cacophony of opinions out from which emerges the dysfunctional existential self which is in a state of desperate insecurity regarding its worth.

The human heart is the seminal spiritual Babylon the Great. One cannot be fully delivered from spiritual Babylon without dealing with its seed in one's own heart. With God, no such confusion exists. Peace reigns in the heart of divinity, for there all knowing and feeling are counselled by the divine passion. The divine passion is the all-wise and ultimately influential advisory board member.

What shall God do? How shall God act? According to the Divine Nature's passion, that's how. God's passion is that we shall have all of Him, and He shall have all of us. That passion allows for no disagreement in the Godhead. It is agreed that God shall have us all in the depths of our humanness and in the universality of our humanity.

How does the Lord make our hearts to be like His?

How does He quiet the maddening bedlam at our existential core? Upon our hearts descends the shadow of a cross, an awful, terrible cross that breaks through all our alienation, and persuades us as only it can, that God is FOR us.

After all is said and done, there, and only there, under the shadow of the cross am I convicted that God is really, yes really for me. There I know I am loved and I discover the all-determining passion of God. Jesus hushes the storm of internal voices that mix promise with disqualification to keep me in bondage to the useless effort of self-determination. -John Gavazzoni-
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
DIVINE COUNSEL

"......having made known to us the mystery concerning His will, according to His good intention, which He proposed to Himself within Himself..." (Translation of Eph. 1:9 by Eddie Browne).
The heart of a man is his final counsellor for he is created according to God's likeness, the likeness of the God who counsels Himself within Himself in accordance with His (determinative) good intention. It is with man, as it is with God, that the heart is where all knowledge and emotion come together to determine what will become the acted-out person - - garbage in, garbage out.
Yep, garbage in, garbage out!

Without a doubt, one of the most liberal faith movements, the official Unitarian Universalist Association website states, "Unitarian Universalism is a liberal religion that embraces theological diversity; we welcome different beliefs." Because the religion does not require a belief in God, Christ's divinity, or the trinity doctrine, most traditional Christian faith groups would classify them as a non-Christian cult.

The Unitarian Universalist faith willingly receives people of diverse beliefs (atheists, humanists, Christians, and pagans, to name a few) and promotes broad-minded acceptance of each individual's search for spiritual growth, truth, and meaning. Unitarian Universalist seekers are encouraged to "find their own spiritual path."

The Bible Is Not the Final Authority in Unitarian Universalism

While the Bible is an important text for some Unitarian Universalists, many seek guidance from other sacred books and religious traditions. According to the Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry (CARM), Unitarian Universalists generally agree that "human reason and experience should be the final authority in determining the spiritual truth.

Unitarianism is the belief that God exists in one person, not three. It is a denial of the doctrine of the Trinity as well as the full divinity of Jesus. Therefore, it is not Christian. There are several groups that fall under this umbrella: Jehovah's Witnesses, Christadelphianism, The Way International, etc. Another term for this type of belief is called Monarchianism.

In the context of universalism, the Unitarianism discussed here is that belief that denies the Trinity, the deity of Christ, the personhood of the Holy Spirit, eternal punishment, and the vicarious atonement of Jesus. Unitarian Universalists use many biblical concepts and terms but with non-biblical meanings. Unitarianism is not Christian.

What do the Christadelphians teach?

They believe the Bible is the infallible and inerrant word of God.
They teach there is only one God. (Isaiah 43-45)
They teach that Jesus had a sin nature like us.
They teach that Jesus will return and set up his kingdom on earth.
They believe that there has been an apostasy and that Christianity is a false religious system. (A tract titled “Christendom Astray Since the Apostolic Age, Detroit Christadelphian Book Supply)

They believe annihilation of the wicked.
Additionally, the Church of England's Doctrine Commission reported in 1995 that "[h]ell is not eternal torment", but "non-being". Some Protestant and Anglican writers have also proposed annihilationist doctrines.

ABRAVANEL'S SECOND DEATH Is ANNIHILATION.

Abravanel likewise held that the soul would be punished in Gehenna, but only for a time, proportionate to the extent of its faults, and that final annihilation constitutes the "second death."

Manasseh contended that Maimonides, learned in all the lore of Jewish antiquity, "understood the cutting off of the soul mentioned in the Scripture
to be none other than its annihilation.

Thus it was that the position of total destruction for the incorrigibly wicked—final extinction and deprivation of being.. [Froom, "Prophetic Faith,"] 2. 2 Cl 1: 7.

Esp. of eternal destruction as punishment for the wicked: Mt 7: 13;

In a way, the evangelical annihilationists represent more of a threat to the orthodox doctrine than the cultists and liberals. In the past, defenders of the traditional view could more readily attribute the annihilationist position to a cultic mind-set or to a general denigration of biblical authority.

While it is true that the doctrine of endless punishment for the wicked is the position traditionally held by the church throughout the centuries, this in itself does not make it correct. Of course, the fact that the church historically has interpreted the Scriptures to teach the doctrine of endless punishment ought to make us think long and hard before setting the doctrine aside. But when all is said and done, it is the teaching of Scripture that is determinative
. Copyright 1994 by the Christian Research Institute

They believe that baptism is necessary for salvation.
They deny the doctrine of the Trinity.
They deny that Jesus is God in flesh.
They deny that Jesus existed prior to his incarnation.
They deny the personhood and deity of the Holy Spirit.
It will surprise some readers to know that nowhere in Scripture are the words "immortal" and "soul" brought together. Immortality is God's own inherent nature, and His alone,"

Isaiah 55:1 Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price.
The second secret is that it is the source of the forgiveness of sins. It is not a debt settled by due payment. It is not a substitutionary offering whereby someone is paid a price so that others might then go free,"

Isaiah 53:4-5, "Surely our griefs He Himself bore, and our sorrows He carried; yet we ourselves esteemed Him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted. 5 But He was pierced through for our transgressions. He was crushed for our iniquities. The chastening for our well-being fell upon Him and by His scourging we are healed."

Isaiah 53:10 Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in his hand.

They deny salvation by grace through faith alone.
They deny the immortality of the soul.
They deny that a person exists after death.
They deny the existence of hell and eternal punishment.

They deny the existence of the fallen angel Lucifer as the devil.
Dualism added tο the worship οf the good being that of a supremely evil one, viz. Czernebog (the Black God) (Londonι Reriew, April. 1855, p. 11). It was in this Sclavonic soil that the Oriental dualism found a congenial home, and from it seems to have originated the dualism of the Cathari and other sects during the Middle Ages.

According to Christadelphian theology, Jesus had to die in order to save himself. Yet the Christadelphians also maintain that Jesus was without blemish or defect. Jude 4 says, "For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ."

In Matt.11:28 Jesus says, "Come to Me, all [believers] who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you rest." The rest He is referring to is rest in the resurrection and everlasting life. How is it that Jesus is the one who forgives sins (Luke 5:20) if Jesus is not God, the one who is offended? because Jesus was given authority by God to forgive sins (Matt. 28:19), then have you gone to Jesus and asked Him to forgive you of your sins? Remember, to do that, you must pray to Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
SCENE TWO

The scene changes, and we find that out of Himself (for all is out of Him, Rom.11:36), God creates another glorious Being, Whom John (in the Unveiling) declares to be "God's Creative Original" (Rev.3:14), but Whom Paul designates as "The Son of His love" (Col.1:13).

What a wealth of meaning this latter phrase contains! We cannot pretend to be able to plumb its depths. The One so described, Who later became known as the Lord Jesus Christ, is, in fact, God's complement--that which makes God complete. That is to say, He bears the same kind of relationship to God as the first woman bears to the first man, only on a far, far grander scale. Just as Woman (Eve's original name--see Gen.2:23) was taken from man, and presented to man, Adam, as his complement, so Christ was created out of the Father, and God gave Himself the most wonderful gift of all eternity when He presented Himself with this One, Who could, and would, respond to His love to the uttermost.

From this point, we may perceive that God's purpose from beginning to end is so designed as to be concentrated in this "Son of His love." And further, (and this is a tremendous and sublime thought!) the achievement of His purpose is made to depend upon this one factor, that Christ would reciprocate God's love in every circumstance, and to the very utmost. Everything depends on that!

This One, God's Complement, thus becomes the channel for all God's subsequent operations. In every phase, God's purpose is worked out through this "Son of His love." In Colossians again we read that all is created "in Him," "through Him" and "for Him" (Col.1:16,17). Into this Original Creation of God, were placed, not only the seeds of all subsequent creation (John 1:3), but with them the love of God for the whole universe, for through this One every drop of God's love for His creatures has been poured. Christ is the channel through which this love reaches the rest. In very truth, He is the Way to the Father.

How wonderful it is that God's purpose was conceived in love! The fact that it is all centered in the Son of His love also ensures that it will be executed in love and find its consummation in love!

And at this time, when God created the Son of His love, He also made provision for Him (Christ) to have a complement, the ecclesia, which was to be His body, as intimately connected with Him as Woman was with Adam. For the ecclesia was chosen in Christ before the disruption of the world (Eph.1:4), and was given the gift of grace in Christ Jesus before times eonian (2 Tim.1:9). And also before times eonian, a promise of life was made to creation; this promise, too, was made in Christ Jesus, and (advancing our study considerably) Paul's apostleship was later to be in accord with this promise (2 Tim.1:1; Titus 1:2). For Paul's evangel is essentially one of life, with all that is necessary for the full enjoyment of it, namely, justification, peace toward God, and vivification for all.

So much, then, was involved in the creation of the Son of God's love, He is the Image of the invisible God, Firstborn of every creature, for in Him is all created (Col. 1:15). He is before all, and all has its cohesion in Him (v.17).

-John H. Essex The Grandeur Of God’s Purpose-
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
The following story is from a young women we met over 50 years ago. She has suffered the loss of a son who took his own life. Her great suffering goes on day by day. This is what she wrote recently.

Gracefully Broken!

I was in Dollar Tree last night and there was a lady and two kids behind me in the LONG line. One was a big kid, one was a toddler. The bigger one had a pack of glow sticks and the baby was screaming for them so the Mom opened the pack and gave him one, which stopped his tears.

He walked around with it smiling, but then the bigger boy took it and the baby started screaming again.

Just as the Mom was about to fuss at the older child, he bent the glow sticks and handed it back to the baby.

As we walked outside at the same time, the baby noticed that the stick was now glowing and his brother said "I had to break it so you could get the full effect from it."

I almost ran because l could hear God saying to me, "I had to break you to show you why I created you. You had to go through it so you could fulfill your purpose."

That little baby was happy just swinging that "unbroken" glow stick around in the air because he didn't understand what it was created to do which was "glow".

There are some people who will be content just "being" but some of us that God has chosen, we have to be "broken". We have to get sick. We have to lose a job. We go through divorce. We have to bury our spouse, parents, best friend, or our child because, in those moments of desperation, God is breaking us but when the breaking is done, then we will be able to see the reason for which we were created.. so when you see us glowing just know that we have been broken but healed by his Grace and Mercy!!!
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
SCENE TWO

The scene changes, and we find that out of Himself (for all is out of Him, Rom.11:36), God creates another glorious Being, Whom John (in the Unveiling) declares to be "God's Creative Original" (Rev.3:14), but Whom Paul designates as "The Son of His love" (Col.1:13).
"The first born from the dead"

Col 1:18  And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in everything he might be first.

You are lost in your translations since the is no endless torment.

The translation is that you will "Pay the penalty of everlasting destruction" to be annihilated so as to not be able to serve God or to enter His Kingdom.

Again you are lost in the translation of Gehenna. It is simply the grave. The fire and brimstone is what comes from God that proceeds out of His mouth to devour and annihilate and return you into the vapor of smoke. "Dust thou are and to dust you shall return.

However, some are ignorant of God's truth and have not submitted to the righteousness of God:

Romans 10:1-3 Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is that they may be saved. (2) For I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge. (3) For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and seeking to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted to the righteousness of God.


. 
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
The translation is that you will "Pay the penalty of everlasting destruction" to be annihilated so as to not be able to serve God or to enter His Kingdom.

Olethron Aionion (eternal destruction)

'Aion
, transliterated aeon, is a period of longer or shorter duration, having a beginning and an end, and complete in itself. Aristotle (peri ouravou, i. 9,15) says: "The period which includes the whole time of one's life is called the aeon of each one." Hence it often means the life of a man, as in Homer, where one's life (aion) is said to leave him or to consume away (Iliad v. 685; Odyssey v. 160). It is not, however, limited to human life; it signifies any period in the course of events, as the period or age before Christ; the period of the millenium; the mythological period before the beginnings of history. The word has not "a stationary and mechanical value" (De Quincey). It does not mean a period of a fixed length for all cases. There are as many aeons as entities, the respective durations of which are fixed by the normal conditions of the several entities. There is one aeon of a human life, another of the life of a nation, another of a crow's life, another of an oak's life. The length of the aeon depends on the subject to which it is attached.

It is sometimes translated world; world represents a period or a series of periods of time. See Matt 12:32; 13:40,49; Luke 1:70; 1 Cor 1:20; 2:6; Eph 1:21. Similarly oi aiones, the worlds, the universe, the aggregate of the ages or periods, and their contents which are included in the duration of the world. 1 Cor 2:7; 10:11; Heb 1:2; 9:26; 11:3. The word always carries the notion of time, and not of eternity. It always means a period of time. Otherwise it would be impossible to account for the plural, or for such qualifying expressions as this age, or the age to come. It does not mean something endless or everlasting. To deduce that meaning from its relation to aei is absurd; for, apart from the fact that the meaning of a word is not definitely fixed by its derivation, aei does not signify endless duration. When the writer of the Pastoral Epistles quotes the saying that the Cretans are always (aei) liars (Tit. 1:12), he surely does not mean that the Cretans will go on lying to all eternity. See also Acts 7:51; 2 Cor. 4:11; 6:10; Heb 3:10; 1 Pet. 3:15. Aei means habitually or continually within the limit of the subject's life. In our colloquial dialect everlastingly is used in the same way. "The boy is everlastingly tormenting me to buy him a drum."

In the New Testament the history of the world is conceived as developed through a succession of aeons. A series of such aeons precedes the introduction of a new series inaugurated by the Christian dispensation, and the end of the world and the second coming of Christ are to mark the beginning of another series. Eph. 1:21; 2:7; 3:9,21; 1 Cor 10:11; compare Heb. 9:26. He includes the series of aeons in one great aeon, 'o aion ton aionon, the aeon of the aeons (Eph. 3:21); and the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews describe the throne of God as enduring unto the aeon of the aeons (Heb 1:8). The plural is also used, aeons of the aeons, signifying all the successive periods which make up the sum total of the ages collectively. Rom. 16:27; Gal. 1:5; Philip. 4:20, etc. This plural phrase is applied by Paul to God only.

The adjective aionios in like manner carries the idea of time. Neither the noun nor the adjective, in themselves, carry the sense of endless or everlasting. They may acquire that sense by their connotation, as, on the other hand, aidios, which meanseverlasting, has its meaning limited to a given point of time in Jude 6. Aionios meansenduring through or pertaining to a period of time. Both the noun and the adjective are applied to limited periods. Thus the phrase eis ton aiona, habitually renderedforever, is often used of duration which is limited in the very nature of the case. See, for a few out of many instances, LXX, Exod 21:6; 29:9; 32:13; Josh. 14:9 1 Sam 8:13; Lev. 25:46; Deut. 15:17; 1 Chron. 28:4;. See also Matt. 21:19; John 13:8 1 Cor. 8:13. The same is true of aionios. Out of 150 instances in LXX, four-fifths imply limited duration. For a few instances see Gen. 48:4; Num. 10:8; 15:15; Prov. 22:28; Jonah 2:6; Hab. 3:6; Isa. 61:17.

Words which are habitually applied to things temporal or material cannot carry in themselves the sense of endlessness. Even when applied to God, we are not forced to render aionios everlasting. Of course the life of God is endless; but the question is whether, in describing God as aionios, it was intended to describe the duration of his being, or whether some different and larger idea was not contemplated. That God lives longer then men, and lives on everlastingly, and has lived everlastingly, are, no doubt, great and significant facts; yet they are not the dominant or the most impressive facts in God's relations to time. God's eternity does not stand merely or chiefly for a scale of length. It is not primarily a mathematical but a moral fact. The relations of God to time include and imply far more than the bare fact of endless continuance. They carry with them the fact that God transcends time; works on different principles and on a vaster scale than the wisdom of time provides; oversteps the conditions and the motives of time; marshals the successive aeons from a point outside of time, on lines which run out into his own measureless cycles, and for sublime moral ends which the creature of threescore and ten years cannot grasp and does not even suspect.

There is a word for everlasting if that idea is demanded. That aiodios occurs rarely in the New Testament and in LXX does not prove that its place was taken by aionios. It rather goes to show that less importance was attached to the bare idea of everlastingness than later theological thought has given it. Paul uses the word once, in Rom. 1:20, where he speaks of "the everlasting power and divinity of God." In Rom. 16:26 he speaks of the eternal God (tou aioniou theou); but that he does not mean the everlasting God is perfectly clear from the context. He has said that "the mystery" has been kept in silence in times eternal (chronois aioniois), by which he does not meaneverlasting times, but the successive aeons which elapsed before Christ was proclaimed. God therefore is described as the God of the aeons, the God who pervaded and controlled those periods before the incarnation. To the same effect is the title 'o basileus ton aionon, the King of the aeons, applied to God in 1 Tim. 1:17; Rev. 15:3; compare Tob. 13:6, 10. The phrase pro chronon aionion, before eternal times (2 Tim. 1:9; Tit. 1:2), cannot mean before everlasting times. To say that God bestowed grace on men, or promised them eternal life before endless times, would be absurd. The meaning is of old, as Luke 1:70. The grace and the promise were given in time, but far back in the ages, before the times of reckoning the aeons.

Zoe aionios eternal life, which occurs 42 times in N. T., but not in LXX, is not endless life, but life pertaining to a certain age or aeon, or continuing during that aeon. I repeat, life may be endless. The life in union with Christ is endless, but the fact is not expressed by aionios. Kolasis aionios, rendered everlasting punishment (Matt. 25:46), is the punishment peculiar to an aeon other then that in which Christ is speaking. In some cases zoe aionios does not refer specifically to the life beyond time, but rather to the aeon or dispensation of Messiah which succeeds the legal dispensation. See Matt. 19:16; John 5:39. John says that zoe aionios is the presentpossession of those who believe on the Son of God, John 3:36; 5:24; 6:47,54. The Father's commandment is zoe aionios, John 1250; to know the only true God and Jesus Christ is zoe aionios. John 17:3.

Bishop Westcott very justly says, commenting upon the terms used by John to describe life under different aspects: "In considering these phrases it is necessary to premise that in spiritual things we must guard against all conclusions which rest upon the notions of succession and duration. 'Eternal life' is that which St. Paul speaks of as'e outos Zoe the life which is life indeed, and 'e zoe tou theou, the life of God. It is not an endless duration of being in time, but being of which time is not a measure. We have indeed no powers to grasp the idea except through forms and images of sense. These must be used, but we must not transfer them as realities to another order."

Thus, while aionios carries the idea of time, though not of endlessness, there belongs to it also, more or less, a sense of quality. Its character is ethical rather than mathematical. The deepest significance of the life beyond time lies, not in endlessness, but in the moral quality of the aeon into which the life passes. It is comparatively unimportant whether or not the rich fool, when his soul was required of him (Luke 12:20), entered upon a state that was endless. The principal, the tremendous fact, as Christ unmistakably puts it, was that, in the new aeon, the motives, the aims, the conditions, the successes and awards of time counted for nothing. In time, his barns and their contents were everything; the soul was nothing. In the new life the soul was first and everything, and the barns and storehouses nothing. The bliss of the sanctified does not consist primarily in its endlessness, but in the nobler moral conditions of the new aeon, the years of the holy and eternal God. Duration is a secondary idea. When it enters it enters as an accompaniment and outgrowth of moral conditions.

In the present passage it is urged that olethron destruction points to an unchangeable, irremediable, and endless condition. If this be true, if olethros is extinction, then the passage teaches the annihilation of the wicked, in which case the adjective aionios is superfluous, since extinction is final, and excludes the idea of duration. But olethrosdoes not always mean destruction or extinction. Take the kindred verb apollumi to destroy, put an end to, or in the middle voice, to be lost, to perish. Peter says "the world being deluged with water, perished (apoleto, 2 Pet. 3:6); but the world did not become extinct, it was renewed. In Heb. 1:11,12, quoted from Ps. 102, we read concerning the heavens and the earth as compared with the eternity of God, "they shall perish" (apolountai). But the perishing is only preparatory to change and renewal. "They shall be changed" (allagesontai). Compare Isa. 51:6,16; 65:22; 2 Pet. 3:13; Rev. 21:1. Similarly, "the Son of man came to save that which was lost" (apololos), Luke 19:10. Jesus charged his apostles to go to the lost (apololota) sheep of the house of Israel, Matt. 10:6, compare 15:24, "He that shall lose (apolese) his life for my sake shall find it," Matt. 16:25. Compare Luke 15:6,9,32.

In this passage, the word destruction is qualified. It is "destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his power," at his second coming, in the new aeon. In other words, it is the severance, at a given point of time, of those who obey not the gospel from the presence and the glory of Christ. Aionios may therefore describe this severance as continuing during the millenial aeon between Christ's coming and the final judgment; as being for the wicked prolonged throughout that aeon and characteristic of it, or it may describe the severance as characterising or enduring through a period or aeon succeeding the final judgment, the extent of which period is not defined. In neither case is aionios, to be interpreted as everlasting or endless. -Dr. Marvin Vincent-

Marvin Vincent - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
SCENE THREE

But now the scene changes again, and we find creation proceeding. "Created by the Alueim were the heavens and the earth" (Gen.l:l).

Have you ever considered the incongruity of this statement? It is like saying, "Created by the Alueim were the Atlantic Ocean and a raindrop." The heavens are so infinitely vast; the earth, by comparison, so incredibly minute. Our globe is as a speck of dust in the expanses of creation. And yet, on this mere speck, God decided to enact many of the main events in the working out of His purpose for the universe. How honored this earth is!

In God's creation of the heavens is included all those spirit beings, whose number is nowhere given, but only hinted at as being exceedingly great.

That the heavens were created before the earth is evident from the statements in Job 38:4-7. "Whereat were you when I founded the earth?...When jubilate together the stars of the morning, and shouting are all the sons of the Alueim?" There were beings existing outside of the earth when the earth was founded.

But why was the earth created at all?

The celestial beings, who watched it develop, might have wondered. But we can now see it as the stage upon which a great drama was to be enacted - a drama which would even involve the death of the Son of God's love. But this is anticipating our study again, so we shall not pursue the matter now, but rather note certain other peculiar things which came into being.

For instance, in Genesis 1:2, we have the first mention of darkness. There was no darkness in either of our first two scenes. Isaiah tells us that darkness had to be created, and that God was responsible for its creation. In the same text (Isa.45:7) we learn that God also created evil. Evil is not inherent in God any more than darkness is; both had to be created. And if it is God Who creates evil, He must be responsible for the one who practices the most evil, namely, the Adversary. Yes, God's purpose required there to be a ruiner to harm (Isa.54:16), a serpent to deceive (Job 26:13).

It was, in fact, necessary for the Adversary to be greater and more powerful than any other created being in God's universe with the exception of the Son of God's love. No lesser being could hope to challenge the headship of the Lord Jesus, for any such would inevitably be challenged in turn by others; no lesser being could hope to deceive hosts of messengers and draw them away from God; no lesser being could sustain an unremitting opposition to God throughout the period covered by the eons.

Mention of the eons reminds us that, at the very commencement of His creative acts, God made them through Christ Jesus (Heb.1:2). The eons have both a beginning and an end, so that God's purpose might be enclosed within them, instead of being left loose in the boundlessness of eternity, thus ensuring that He will be able to bring it eventually to finality. That is why we speak of "God's Eonian Purpose" instead of "God's Eternal Purpose." The Scriptures call it "the purpose of the eons" (Eph.3:11). Though its results will last for eternity, God's purpose itself will come to an end in the consummation.

-John H. Essex- (The Grandeur Of God’s Purpose)
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Olethron Aionion (eternal destruction) 'Aion, transliterated aeon, is a period of longer or shorter duration, having a beginning and an end, and complete in itself.
Zoe aionios
eternal life, which occurs 42 times in N. T., but not in LXX, is not endless life, but life pertaining to a certain age or aeon, or continuing during that aeon. I repeat, life may be endless. The life in union with Christ is endless, but the fact is not expressed by aionios. Kolasis aionios, rendered everlasting punishment (Matt. 25:46), is the punishment peculiar to an aeon other then that in which Christ is speaking.
So which one are you?
You must mean sempiternity (philosophy) existence within time but infinitely into the future, as opposed to eternity, understood as existence outside of time.

Eternal comes from a different root derived by way of Middle English from the late Latin aeternalis and ultimately from aevum, Latin for age or eternity.
Sempiternal is derived from the late Latin Sempiternalis and ultimately from semper meaning always.
 
Upvote 0

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
SCENE THREE

But now the scene changes again, and we find creation proceeding. "Created by the Alueim were the heavens and the earth" (Gen.l:l).

Have you ever considered the incongruity of this statement? It is like saying, "Created by the Alueim were the Atlantic Ocean and a raindrop." The heavens are so infinitely vast; the earth, by comparison, so incredibly minute. Our globe is as a speck of dust in the expanses of creation. And yet, on this mere speck, God decided to enact many of the main events in the working out of His purpose for the universe. How honored this earth is!
Eternity in common parlance is an infinitely long period of time. In classical philosophy, however, eternity is defined as what exists outside time while sempiternity is the concept that corresponds to the colloquial definition of eternity.

Although it's often used the same way you'd use the word "eternal," in philosophy there is a distinction between those terms. "Eternal" implies something that is infinite outside the bounds of time, like God, while sempiternal is a more earthbound way to talk about forever.

semper , adv. root sam-; Gr. ἁμ-; v. semel and -per = παρά; cf. tantisper,
I.ever, always, at all times, forever (cf. usque). (as in Gr. ἀεὶ καθ̓ ἡμέραν, συνεχές, etc.; v. Lidd. and Scott's Lex. under ἀει): “ea mihi cottidie Aut ture aut vino aut aliqui semper supplicat,” Plaut. Aul. prol. 24; cf. Ter. Ad. 3, 1,

Of continuance within a definite time: “ego illum antehac hominem semper sum frugi ratus,” Plaut. As. 5, 2, 11; cf. id. Aul. 2, 2, 39: “quod tempus (aestatem) omnes Siciliae semper praetores in itineribus consumere consuerunt,” Cic. Verr. 2, 5, 12, § 29: quibus studiis semper fueris, tenemus, Cic. Rep. 1, 23, 37.—
Transf. (poet.), everywhere, in every place (like Engl. always): “proque toro terrae non semper gramen habenti, Incubat infelix,” Ov. M. 1, 633.

A Latin Dictionary. Founded on Andrews' edition of Freund's Latin dictionary. revised, enlarged, and in great part rewritten by. Charlton T. Lewis, Ph.D. and. Charles Short, LL.D. Oxford. Clarendon Press. 1879.

The word aeon /ˈiːɒn/, also spelled eon (in American English) and æon, originally meant "life", "vital force" or "being", "generation" or "a period of time", though it tended to be translated as "age" in the sense of "ages", "forever", "timeless" or "for eternity". It is a Latin transliteration from the koine Greek word ὁ αἰών (ho aion), from the archaic αἰϝών (aiwon).

In Homer it typically refers to life or lifespan. Its latest meaning is more or less similar to the Sanskrit word kalpa and Hebrew word olam. A cognate Latin word aevum or aeuum (cf. αἰϝών) for "age" is present in words such as longevity and mediaeval.[1]

aeternālis , e, adj. aeternus,
I.enduring forever, everlasting (often in inscrr.): “aeternali somno sacrum,” i. e. to death, Inscr. Grut. 752, 3: “domus,” Inscr. Orell. 4518: “luctus,” ib. 4604: “memoria,” ib. 200: “lex temporalis et aeternalis,” Tert. adv. Jud. 6.—Adv.: aeternālĭter , forever (late Lat.), Ad. ad H. Prud. March, p. 245.

A Latin Dictionary. Founded on Andrews' edition of Freund's Latin dictionary. revised, enlarged, and in great part rewritten by. Charlton T. Lewis, Ph.D. and. Charles Short, LL.D. Oxford. Clarendon Press. 1879.

aevum (archaic aevom ), i, n.; but m., Plaut. Poen. 5, 4, 14; Lucr. 2, 561; 3, 603 [αἰών; cf. αἰές or αἰέν, ἀεί, ἀίδιος; Goth. aivs = time, aiv = ever, aiveins = everlasting; Germ. ewig, Ewigkeit; Eng. aye, ever].

I. Lit. A. In gen., uninterrupted, never-ending time, eternity; per aevom, Lucr. 1, 634; 1, 950 al.—Hence of the future: “in aevum,” for all time, Hor. C. 4, 14, 3; so Plin. 35, 2, 2, and Vulg. Eccli. 41, 16: “nos peribimus in aevum,” ib. Bar. 3, 3.—
A Latin Dictionary. Founded on Andrews' edition of Freund's Latin dictionary. revised, enlarged, and in great part rewritten by. Charlton T. Lewis, Ph.D. and. Charles Short, LL.D. Oxford. Clarendon Press. 1879.

Annihilationism
As with other Jewish writings of the Second Temple period, the New Testament text distinguishes two words, both translated "Hell" in older English Bibles: Hades, "the grave", and Gehenna where God "can destroy both body and soul".

A minority of Christians read this to mean that neither Hades nor Gehenna are eternal but refer to the ultimate destruction of the wicked in the Lake of Fire in a consuming fire, but which because of the Greek words used in translating from the Hebrew text has become confused with Greek myths and ideas.

From the sixth century BC onward, the Greeks developed pagan ideas for the dead, and of reincarnation and even transmigration of souls. Christians picked up these pagan beliefs inferred by the Greek of immortality of the soul, or spirit being of a mortal individual, which survives the death of the body of this world and this lifetime, which is at odds and in contrast to the scriptural teaching that the dead go to the grave and know nothing and then at the end, an eternal oblivion of the wicked and an eternal life for the saints.

Scripture makes clear that the dead are awaiting resurrection at the last judgment, when Christ comes and also when each person will receive his reward or are part of those lost with the wicked.

The Greek words used for those Bibles written in Greek, came loaded with ideas not in line with the original Hebrew, but since at the time, Greek was used as basically English is used today to communicate between people across the world, it was translated into these Greek words, and giving an incorrect understanding of the penalty of sin.

In the Hebrew text when people died they went to Sheol, the grave and the wicked ultimately went to Gehenna which is the consuming by fire. So when the grave or the eternal oblivion of the wicked was translated into Greek, the word Hades was sometimes used, which is a Greek term for the realm of the dead.

Nevertheless, the meaning depending on context was the grave, death, or the end of the wicked in which they are ultimately destroyed or perish. So we see where the grave or death or eventual destruction of the wicked, was translated using Greek words that since they had no exact ones to use, became a mix of mistranslation, pagan influence, and Greek myth associated with the word, but its original meaning was simple death or the destruction of the wicked at the end.

Christian mortalism is the doctrine that all men and women, including Christians, must die, and do not continue and are not conscious after death. Therefore, annihilationism includes the doctrine that "the wicked" are also destroyed rather than tormented forever in traditional "Hell" or the lake of fire.

Christian mortalism and annihilationism are directly related to the doctrine of conditional immortality, the idea that a human soul is not immortal unless it is given eternal life at the Second Coming of Christ and the resurrection of the dead.

Such a belief is based on the many texts which state that the wicked perish:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
THE GRANDEUR OF GOD'S PURPOSE

PART TWO

SCENES OF DISRUPTION

SCENE FOUR

THE orderliness of creation has been superseded by disruption and chaos; light has given way to darkness; positive creation seems to have surrendered to purposeless desolation. What has happened? What is the reason for this?

There can be no doubt that the devastation described in Genesis 1:2 was the outcome of a previous rebellion among God's celestial creations against His authority, which He had vested in the Son of His love. It can be taken as an axiom that Satan will always attack God's purpose wherever he sees it revealed. The morning stars and sons of God may have sung in jubilation when they saw the foundations of the earth being laid, but there seems little doubt that many of the celestial beings, deceived by the Adversary, would have gloated with unholy triumph when they saw the chaos wrought in the earth as a result of the disruption which brought the first eon to an end.

Let us be quite clear upon one point. The disruption was not forced upon God, but was an essential and planned feature of His purpose.

God does not leave it to the Adversary to determine the means by which each eon shall come to an end, nor the moment when this shall occur. He Himself brought about the judgment of Noah's day long after the decadence of the second eon had been started by Adam's transgression; He will bring about the judgments at the close of the present eon and the judgment of the great white throne at the end of the next. Times and eras are ever within His own jurisdiction (Acts 1:7).

The darkness which had covered the whole scene of Genesis 1:2 began to be dispelled when the Spirit of God vibrated above the waters of the submerged chaos. Darkness is the evidence of alienation from God, and the partial reappearance of light signified the first step towards the re-establishment of communion with God. Let us note that it was God Who took this step; creation was powerless to effect it. Darkness was, however, not completely dispelled, but was allowed to alternate with light, crossing the stage (this earth) every twenty-four hours, so that creation should be continually reminded of its existence. It would be felt again, in a most intense form, at the crucifixion of God's Son, so much so that Christ would cry out to His Father from a sense of abandonment.

With the partial return of light, God was able to create a being with whom He could walk and talk, a being in His own image and according to His own likeness. In doing this, God in effect gave notice to the celestials that His purpose would from then on be conducted through humanity.
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Dear Paidion: The aidios chains of the Aidios God of Glory are wonderful chains indeed. For those who follow the Lamb in the withersoever they bind with love cords, for beings who will not yield (YET) they are cords of restraint. In either case, His Aidios chains ultimately lead to the God of ta panta!

It is clear every dimension of our Father, (heavens, earth & underworld) all confess IN/EN His mighty Name: “You Are Lord.” It is also clear all beings will experience reconciliation.

" For by him were all things created, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence. For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell; And, having made peace through the blood of his cross to reconcile the all things unto Himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven."
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hishandmaiden

The Humble Servant
Site Supporter
Jan 11, 2002
6,381
229
41
Singapore
✟35,969.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Is it not strange the long seasons that can elapse on the back-side of the desert? Year by year falls into the great abyss, and at the juncture where we can no longer speak, and the great struggle to do the will of God vanishes into weakness and death, the Bush appears pulsating with Deity. It is there at the asamuth of death and weakness the Living One speaks.

"Take off your shoes from off your feet"

Holy ground! The place where dust and Divinity meet! It is there in absolute weakness and inability, the Lord manifests Himself as the God who raises the dead. The road into the Tree of Life is by way of the flaming swords swirling in every direction. Those who reach for the Tree will suffer the loss of the hand, the fingers, the grasp of all they are! And as the process of the swirling swords rage upon these ones, great loss is inflicted, for nothing, no one, comes to the other side the same as it enters..NOTHING!...NOTHING!...NOTHING!

The great stages of the Living One's glory must be in degrees of doxa. We are changed from one degree of glory to another and another! It requires a thought beginning in the mind of the caterpillar that ultimately leads to the building of a cocoon from which caterpillars become butterflies, and dust moves from the road of life into the Divine One, described as "the Living", the "I am", not the I was, the I AM.

It is this Heavenly Road that grasps us, the Heavenly One, the Source leading to the Road, the sustaining Guide of the Road, and the Goal of the Road. All things lead to Him, through Him and for Him! And by Him all things consist. It has taken me over 70 years to go a journey that could be accomplished in 11 days, but dust and Divinity must meet; the goal is not all the story, the path is of equal value in the I AM! Each of us are on different stages of our Father's drawing hand, some so wrapped up in themselves they cannot see the bush that is aflame and is not devoured. It is just a common bush for many, but

"Earth's crammed with heaven, and every common bush afire with God; and only he who sees takes off his shoes. -Eliz. Barrett Browning-

I agree with you, brother. It is my belief that God will reconcile eventually to himself all things! For God is a God of love.

But that must be done through faith in Jesus' blood to wash away our sins.
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I agree with you, brother. It is my belief that God will reconcile eventually to himself all things! For God is a God of love.

But that must be done through faith in Jesus' blood to wash away our sins.

Dear His: The great cry for deliverance and being set free from the bondage of corruption continues again today. Will that cry be met by our loving Father? Yes! Yes! Yes!

"And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile the all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven."
 
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
"Be assured that from the first day we heard of you, we haven't stopped praying for you, asking God to give you wise minds and spirits attuned to his will, and so acquire a thorough understanding of the ways in which God works.

We pray that you'll live well for the Master, making him proud of you as you work hard in his orchard. As you learn more and more how God works, you will learn how to do your work.

We pray that you'll have the strength to stick it out over the long haul - not the grim strength of gritting your teeth but the glory-strength God gives. It is strength that endures the unendurable and spills over into joy, thanking the Father who makes us strong enough to take part in everything bright and beautiful that he has for us.

God rescued us from dead-end alleys and dark dungeons. He's set us up in the kingdom of the Son he loves so much, the Son who got us out of the pit we were in, got rid of the sins we were doomed to keep repeating.

We look at this Son and see the God who cannot be seen. We look at this Son and see God's original purpose in everything created.

For everything, absolutely everything, above and below, visible and invisible, rank after rank after rank of angels - everything got started in him and finds its purpose in him.

He was there before any of it came into existence and holds it all together right up to this moment.

And when it comes to the church, he organizes and holds it together, like a head does a body.

So spacious is he, so roomy, that everything of God finds its proper place in him without crowding.

Not only that, but all the broken and dislocated pieces of the universe - people and things, animals and atoms - get properly fixed and fit together in vibrant harmonies, all because of his death, his blood that poured down from the Cross. "

-The Message-
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
THE GRANDEUR OF GOD'S PURPOSE PART TWO SCENES OF DISRUPTION SCENE FOUR
THE orderliness of creation has been superseded by disruption and chaos; light has given way to darkness; positive creation seems to have surrendered to purposeless desolation. What has happened? What is the reason for this? There can be no doubt that the devastation described in Genesis 1:2 was the outcome of a previous rebellion among God's celestial creations against His authority, which He had vested in the Son of His love. It can be taken as an axiom that Satan will always attack God's purpose wherever he sees it revealed. The morning stars and sons of God may have sung in jubilation when they saw the foundations of the earth being laid, but there seems little doubt that many of the celestial beings, deceived by the Adversary, would have gloated with unholy triumph when they saw the chaos wrought in the earth as a result of the disruption which brought the first eon to an end.
Balaam's Donkey and the Angel
Num 22:22 And God's anger was kindled because he went: and the angel of the LORD stood in the way for an adversary against him. Now he was riding upon his ass, and his two servants were with him. 31 Then the LORD opened the eyes of Balaam, and he saw the angel of the LORD standing in the way, and his sword drawn in his hand: and he bowed down his head, and fell flat on his face.

In the same sense Peter and Judas were considered an adversary againtst the Lord.
Mat 16:23 Get thee behind me, Satan - The word “Satan” literally means “an adversary,” or one who opposes us in the accomplishment of our designs. He may have used it in the general sense which the word bore as an adversary or opposer; and the meaning may be, that such sentiments as Peter expressed then were opposed to him and his plans. His interference was improper. His views and feelings stood in the way of the accomplishment of the Saviour’s designs.[BARNES]

Get thee behind me, Satan - Υπαγε οπισω μου σατανα. Get behind me, thou adversary. This is the proper translation of the Hebrew word שטן Satan, from which the Greek word is taken. [CLARKE]

1Ki 11:14 And the LORD stirred up an adversary unto Solomon, Hadad the Edomite: he was of the king's seed in Edom.

what John says leaves out your devil theory

It was not a literal satan that fell, it was the figure of all superstitions about demons. The phrase “from heaven” is to be referred to the lightning, and does not mean that he saw “Satan” fall “from heaven,” but that he fell as quick as lightning [falls] from heaven or from the clouds.

Luk 10:18 And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.

And Paul said in 2Co 12:7 And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.

John 6:70 Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?

Is a devil - Has the spirit, the envy, the malice, and the treasonable designs of a devil. The word “devil” here is used in the sense of an enemy, or one hostile to him. [BARNES]

The case of tēi sarki can be either locative (in) or dative (for). What was it? Certainly it was some physical malady that persisted. All sorts of theories are held (malaria, eye-trouble, epilepsy, insomnia, migraine or sick-headache, etc.). Messenger of Satan (aggelos Satana). Angel of Satan, the affliction personified.[RWP]

Reading Isa 14:4, "That you shall take up this proverb against the **king of Babylon,** and say, How has the oppressor ceased! the golden city ceased!", it becomes clear that this is the king of Babylon and his nation that is being spoken of here.

While this mythological information is available to scholars today via translated Babylonian cuneiform text taken from clay tablets, it was not as readily available at the time of the Latin translation of the Bible.


Thus, early Christian tradition interpreted the passage as a reference to the moment Satan was thrown from Heaven. Lucifer became another name for Satan and has remained so due to Christian dogma and popular tradition.

The idea that there is a God in heaven above who fights against a god of the underworld, or hell, is not monotheism, however, it is the same duality found in other pagan faiths. Through His prophet Isaiah, God profoundly states, "I form light and create darkness, I make peace and CREATE evil; I am God, I do all these things" (Isaiah 45:7).

Isaiah 54:16  Behold, I have created the smith that bloweth the coals in the fire, and that bringeth forth an instrument for his work; and I have created the destroyer to destroy.


What John says leaves out your devil theory because according to him it hadn't happened before the book was written! John says, 'things which must shortly come to pass and things which must be hereafter. '

Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:

4:1 After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter.

Tell my why you are not foolish when you say you think your devil is cast down from heaven when you consider what Job says

Job 2:10 But he said unto her, Thou speakest as one of the foolish women speaketh. What? shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil? In all this did not Job sin with his lips.

Job19:21 Have pity upon me, have pity upon me, O ye my friends; for the hand of God hath touched me.

Job 42:11 Job says that all the evil which the LORD had brought upon him

The Satan doctrine is one of the most deceptive and corrupt doctrines to ever enter Christendom, and which has been embraced and promoted by false teachers for thousands of years in as much as from the hand of God only good can come, but against him, the Creator of the universe, no opposing being could originally exist but through their own fault they fell (John 8, 44; 2 Pet. 2, 4; Jude 6);when Christ shall appear to overthrow the kingdom of [death] (1 Cor. 15, 26; Heb. 2, 14; 1 John 2, 8). SEE Winer, 2, 385

In mainstream Judaism there is no concept of a devil like in mainstream Christianity or Islam. In Hebrew, the biblical word ha-satan means "the adversary" or the obstacle, or even "the prosecutor" (recognizing that God is viewed as the ultimate Judge)

Much "Satanic" lore does not originate from actual Satanists, but from Christians. Best-known would be the medieval folklore and theology surrounding demons and witches.

There is no unambiguous reference to the Devil in the Torah, the Prophets, or the Writings.
Carus P. History of the Devil and the Idea of Evil
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.