- Aug 11, 2017
- 22,569
- 7,362
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Well that is kind of what I was asking . I wasn't trying to insinuate you were making up a definition if that is how you saw my question I am sorry for the clumsy way I put it. Is that definition that you copired and pasted from your phone the one you would find most apt? If so then we will slightly disagree on the inclusion of "and fair" in the definition. My quarrel with the inclusion is more in terms of the meaning of the word "fair" than anything else, as in modern usage that word means something altogether different than it would have years ago when I would have found the definition of just you provided to be much more apt. When fair meant something more like equitable than equally distributed, I would have been more likely to accept it as being something included in the idea of being just. Still I will stick to my idea that just means giving others what they deserve and fair means giving others equal treatment regardless of what they deserve. We can agree to disagree on that but there is no sense in us spending our time telling each other how right we are and how wrong the other one is about the definition of just.
No offense taken friend. I’m also am often too quick with my replies and sometimes forget that a person’s demeanor can often be misinterpreted in text. Sometimes I forget to add things like brother or friend to convey the manner in which I’m addressing someone. I understand your point but to me it contradicts John 3:16 that a loving God who loves the world would not give everyone a chance to be saved. According to 1 Timothy 2:3-4 and 2 Peter 3:9 God wants everyone to repent and be saved and to come to the fullness of truth furthermore He wants no one to perish. It is my understanding that according to Calvinism no one can turn to God unless they are chosen by God. So how does this idea not render God as being responsible for the ungodly?
Upvote
0