Did God predestine the Fall?

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's the problem with the Penal Substitution Atonement doctrine.
The substitution of Christ for us is deeply imbedded in Holy Writ.

That a post modern SJW society mentality cannot accept the Cross is not surprising. In the victim class mentality the Cross is foolishness.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mark kennedy
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No, we are all cursed, that is the Pauline doctrine:

Sin came as the result of, 'many died by the trespass of the one man' (Rom. 5:15), 'judgment followed one sin and brought condemnation' (Rom. 5:16), the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man (Rom. 5:17), 'just as the result of one trespass was condemnation for all men' (Rom. 5:18), 'through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners' (Rom. 5:19).
You must be born again:

At one time we too were foolish, disobedient, deceived and enslaved by all kinds of passions and pleasures. We lived in malice and envy, being hated and hating one another. But when the kindness and love of God our Savior appeared, he saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out on us generously through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that, having been justified by his grace, we might become heirs having the hope of eternal life. (Titus 3:3-7)
I never said there was no such thing as free will or a time of decision, that's a strawman. The emphasis in the New Testament is on what God did and does, not your choice. So far I've yet to see Predestination seriously refuted as a formal doctrine. It would be hard to do since we get the word from Paul:

In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will, in order that we, who were the first to put our hope in Christ, might be for the praise of his glory. And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession—to the praise of his glory. (Eph. 1;11-14)
God predestined and foreknew what how we are saved, because righteousness can only come from him. Of course you have a choice, predestination isn't fate, it's the plans and purposes of God that have not changed since the foundation of the world. Who denies that we have a choice whether or not we 'put our hope in Christ', as Paul describes it? The issue here is justification by grace through faith and the washing, renewing and regeneration that comes from the Holy Spirit. Faith is not a work, Jesus being the author and finisher of our faith:

Looking unto Jesus, the author (originator) and finisher (perfecter) of our faith, who for the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. (Heb. 12:2)
I'm told by some that I'm not a very good Calvinist, I can live with that, I've also been told I'm not really a Creationist, I'm not buying that either. But if you want to consider this from the perspective of a solid Calvinist, try this guy:
  1. Based on 2 Timothy 2:25–26, how would you describe yourself before God granted you repentance? What language does Paul give to describe our condition?
  2. Is there true knowledge of God that does not spring from repentance? Can you think of examples in the Bible?
  3. How does the devil ensnare people? And how does God defeat their bondage to the devil? (God May Grant Repentance 2 Timothy 2:24–26 John Piper)
Faith and repentance are gifts of God, just like grace and the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. At some level you have a choice, when did God know what that would be is a pointless question. Salvation is based on a revelation only God can make to you (Romans 3:21-22). I have always been puzzled how people could turn the Sabbath or water baptism into works, yet somehow they manage. What I find absent in your arguments is the gospel, where does the cross and the work of the Holy Spirit fit into your ideas regarding salvation? Everything related to salvation whether justification, sanctification or works of righteousness are gifts of God.

Grace and peace,
Mark
An exhibition on the Gospel. How refreshing to see. Thanks!
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: mark kennedy
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,024
7,364
60
Indianapolis, IN
✟549,630.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
So another wards tulip, in regards to soteriology, isn’t essential doctrine a believer adheres to according to you? Not quite understanding what you said no to. But that’s what I get. Completely disagree with you on this. Calvinism in regards to the doctrines of grace, is the gospel according to scripture. One does not have to go through a systematic study on theology to come to understand and believe these great truths of the gospel. That’s certainly not how the Lord brought me to see these truths. So what merit can Arminianism or Roman Catholic or Orthodox bring to these truths of the gospel? They are completely opposed to the gospel of grace as you can see on many threads on this forum. The Spirit of God does not lead the elect to opposing views regarding essential soteriology doctrine. No believer will disagree with tulip
What I've learned is that justification by grace through faith is no disputed by any Christian systematic theology. The justification of grace through faith alone, does have it's controversial elements. TULIP is difficult to unpack, care must be exercised while unfolding the relevant doctrines. It speaks directly to soteriology, we all do what we have to to decide where we stand on the issues. I said I don't intend to impose my theology on anyone, not that I am ambiquise about what I think salvation includes with regards to sound doctrine. I do find merit in Arminianism, Catholic and Orthodox systems but can't embrace them as reliable systems, there is always something that gives me pause. I try to take into consideration where people are coming from and would never dream of dismissing a Christian profession as long as they hold to essential doctrine. I sometimes disagree, even with my fellow Calvinists, but most of the time it's with regards to our approach to things like apologetics and the ministry of the Word. These matters do no reflect any animosity whatsoever, they are an honest difference of opinion. Like I said, if you disagree I have no problem with you, go in peace. But I have benefited from Calvinism greatly and intend to pursue further study since it's the best of the systematic theologies I have found. You may or may not agree with my approach but I am not about to set Calvinism against other systems that I find merit in, even if I disagree with them on important points.

Grace and peace,
Mark
 
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,024
7,364
60
Indianapolis, IN
✟549,630.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
An exhibition on the Gospel. How refreshing to see. Thanks!
Yea we don't get near enough of that do we? Yet we persist, that remains the challenge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,024
7,364
60
Indianapolis, IN
✟549,630.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
You should care. It helps with humility.
There you go, been waiting to hear that one. The cross and the work of God in salvation is what prevails in the New Testament witness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0
Oct 21, 2003
6,793
3,289
Central Time Zone
✟107,193.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So another wards tulip, in regards to soteriology, isn’t essential doctrine a believer adheres to according to you? Not quite understanding what you said no to. But that’s what I get. Completely disagree with you on this. Calvinism in regards to the doctrines of grace, is the gospel according to scripture. One does not have to go through a systematic study on theology to come to understand and believe these great truths of the gospel. That’s certainly not how the Lord brought me to see these truths. So what merit can Arminianism or Roman Catholic or Orthodox bring to these truths of the gospel? They are completely opposed to the gospel of grace as you can see on many threads on this forum. The Spirit of God does not lead the elect to opposing views regarding essential soteriology doctrine. No believer will disagree with tulip

:wave: hello MDC, I understand both points of view. Thing is, God can/has/does save His elect even despite...inferior, flawed, erroneous systematics of whatever Christian group they may be learning from at the given time. With enough time, and serious study in the Scriptures, they may come to a truer understanding of Scripture, or Calvinism. I am with you in believing the doctrines of grace are the truest expression of the gospel according to Scripture. At the same time, because monergistic regeneration is the work of God alone, the extent of what follows so far as knowledge and metal ascension to propositions, well God knows, and I think it is real basic, so basic a child can understand. I confess to having come from years and years of Wesleyan doctrines drilled into my conscience, and by the sovereign grace and mercies of God, became a convinced Calvinist after a book's worth of details that led up to the moment.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

MDC

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2017
1,127
511
48
Texas
✟59,701.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
:wave: hello MDC, I understand both points of view. Thing is, God can/has/does save His elect even despite...inferior, flawed, erroneous systematics of whatever Christian group they may be learning from at the given time. With enough time, and serious study in the Scriptures, they may come to a truer understanding of Scripture, or Calvinism. I am with you in believing the doctrines of grace are the truest expression of the gospel according to Scripture. At the same time, because monergistic regeneration is the work of God alone, the extent of what follows so far as knowledge and metal assertion to propositions, well God knows, and I think it is real basic, so basic a child can understand. I confess to having come from years and years of Wesleyan doctrines drilled into my conscience, and by the sovereign grace and mercies of God, became a convinced Calvinist after a book's worth of details that led up to the moment.
I agree with you brother. Was raised with the majority of my family being Roman Catholic and part of my family under free will Baptist. No doubt Gods elect are among those groups. But when God saves them, He will most definitely bring them out from those groups as He did with me. I am convinced by Gods Spirit no believer will disagree with tulip. The brainwashing of these groups may be a hindrance but Gods Spirit will most definitely lead us to embrace the doctrines of grace
 
Upvote 0

Serving Zion

Seek First His Kingdom & Righteousness
May 7, 2016
2,335
900
Revelation 21:2
✟223,022.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The substitution of Christ for us is deeply imbedded in Holy Writ.
That's not what I am speaking against though.
That a post modern SJW society mentality cannot accept the Cross is not surprising. In the victim class mentality the Cross is foolishness.
Off-topic. You've got the wrong idea about me in order to say this.
 
Upvote 0

Serving Zion

Seek First His Kingdom & Righteousness
May 7, 2016
2,335
900
Revelation 21:2
✟223,022.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Read Acts 2:23. And Isaiah 53.
That's useful, but it doesn't support PSA (unless someone is not paying close attention to the words .. as they seem to do when they get in that bind).

.. has it occurred to you yet, that St. Peter specifically did not say "we nailed Him to the cross", but "you nailed Him to the cross"? ..
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Oct 21, 2003
6,793
3,289
Central Time Zone
✟107,193.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That's the problem with the Penal Substitution Atonement doctrine.

No, I said "to the outsider" meaning non-believers. I do not see whatever problem you have with PSA, rather I see where it solves former problems I had back when I held to UT. But please explain your thoughts if you don't mind.

It wasn't love that did that to Him, but the men that were unable to endure the light of His presence (John 1:11, Matthew 21:37-39, John 3:20).

Exactly, very true, and it is also true the son of perdition was prophesied by the prophets of old long before he was born. Could it have happened any other way?
 
  • Like
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

Serving Zion

Seek First His Kingdom & Righteousness
May 7, 2016
2,335
900
Revelation 21:2
✟223,022.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No, I said "to the outsider" meaning non-believers. I do not see whatever problem you have with PSA, rather I see where it solves former problems I had back when I held to UT. But please explain your thoughts if you don't mind.
What is "UT"? I'll explain once I know what that means.. (to help me with gauging the context of my speech).
Exactly, very true, and it is also true the son of perdition was prophesied by the prophets of old long before he was born. Could it have happened any other way?
I'd like to see the scriptures you are referencing.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 21, 2003
6,793
3,289
Central Time Zone
✟107,193.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What is "UT"? I'll explain once I know what that means.. (to help me with gauging the context of my speech).

Universal atonement, probably should have abbreviated UA, sorry only half awake today.

I'd like to see the scriptures you are referencing.

John 17:12 (refers to Judas)

PERDITION

per-dish'-un (apoleia, "ruin" or "loss," physical or eternal):

The word "perdition" occurs in the English Bible 8 times (John 17:12; Philippians 1:28; 2 Thessalonians 2:3; 1 Timothy 6:9; Hebrews 10:39; 2 Peter 3:7; Revelation 17:11,18). In each of these cases it denotes the final state of ruin and punishment which forms the opposite to salvation. The verb apolluein, from which the word is derived, has two meanings:

(1) to lose;

(2) to destroy.

Both of these pass over to the noun, so that apoleia comes to signify:

(1) loss;

(2) ruin, destruction.

The former occurs in Matthew 26:8; Mark 14:4, the latter in the passages cited above. Both meanings had been adopted into the religious terminology of the Scriptures as early as the Septuagint. "To be lost" in the religious sense may mean "to be missing" and "to be ruined," The former meaning attaches to it in the teaching of Jesus, who compares the lost sinner to the missing coin, the missing sheep, and makes him the object of a seeking activity (Matthew 10:6; 15:24; 18:11; Luke 15:4,6,8,24,32; 19:10). "To be lost" here signifies to have become estranged from God, to miss realizing the relations which man normally sustains toward Him. It is equivalent to what is theologically called "spiritual death." This conception of "loss" enters also into the description of the eschatological fate of the sinner as assigned in the judgment (Luke 9:24; 17:33), which is a loss of life. The other meaning of "ruin" and "destruction" describes the same thing from a different point of view. Apoleia being the opposite of soteria, and soteria in its technical usage denoting the reclaiming from death unto life, apoleia also acquires the specific sense of such ruin and destruction as involves an eternal loss of life (Philippians 1:28; Hebrews 10:39). Perdition in this latter sense is equivalent to what theology calls "eternal death." When in Revelation 17:8,11 it is predicated of "the beast," one of the forms of the world-power, this must be understood on the basis of the Old Testament prophetic representation according to which the coming judgment deals with powers rather than persons.

The Son of Perdition is a name given to Judas (John 17:12) and to the Antichrist (2 Thessalonians 2:3). This is the well-known Hebrew idiom by which a person typically embodying a certain trait or character or destiny is called the son of that thing. The name therefore represents Judas and the Antichrist (see MAN OF SIN) as most irrecoverably and completely devoted to the final apoleia.

Geerhardus Vos - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1915, James Orr General Editor)


The following is from an article by John Piper which connects Old Testament Scriptures concerning Judas with their fulfillment in the New:

3. God’s Role in the Murder of His Son
This brings us now to the third and final question — the most important one: Where was God when this happened? Or more precisely: What was God’s role or non-role in the most spectacular sin that ever happened — the murder of Jesus Christ?

To answer a question like that we should put our hands on our mouths and silence our philosophical speculations. Our opinions don’t count here. All that counts is what God himself has shown us in his word. And the first thing he shows us is that the details surrounding the death of Jesus are prophesied in God’s word hundreds of years before they happen.

The Scriptures prophesy that evil men will reject Jesus when he comes.
Matthew 21:42: “Jesus said to them [quoting Psalm 118:22], ‘Have you never read in the Scriptures: “The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone; this was the Lord’s doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes”?’”

The Scriptures prophesy that Jesus must be hated.
In John 15:25, Jesus quoted Psalm 35:19 and said, “The word that is written in their Law must be fulfilled: ‘They hated me without a cause.’”

The Scriptures prophesy that the disciples would abandon Jesus.
In Matthew 26:31, he quotes Zechariah 13:7: “You will all fall away because of me this night. For it is written, ‘I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock will be scattered.’”

The Scriptures prophesy that Jesus will be pierced but none of his bones will be broken.
John quotes Psalm 34:20 and Zechariah 12:10 and says, “One of the soldiers pierced his side with a spear. . . . For these things took place that the Scripture might be fulfilled: ‘Not one of his bones will be broken.’ And again another Scripture says, ‘They will look on him whom they have pierced’” (John 19:34–37).

The Scriptures prophesy that Jesus would be betrayed by a close friend for thirty pieces of silver.
In John 13:18, Jesus cites Psalm 41:9 and says, “I am not speaking of all of you; I know whom I have chosen. But the Scripture will be fulfilled, ‘He who ate my bread has lifted his heel against me.’”

And in Matthew 26:24, Jesus says, “The Son of Man goes as it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed!”

And in Matthew 27:9–10, it says, “Then was fulfilled what had been spoken by the prophet Jeremiah, saying, ‘And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him on whom a price had been set by some of the sons of Israel, and they gave them for the potter’s field, as the Lord directed me’” (Jeremiah 19:1–13; Zechariah 11:12–13).

And not only the Scriptures, but Jesus himself prophesies, down to the details, how he will be killed.
In Mark 10:33–34, he says, “See, we are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be delivered over to the chief priests and the scribes, and they will condemn him to death and deliver him over to the Gentiles. And they will mock him and spit on him, and flog him and kill him. And after three days he will rise.”

And on that last night, Jesus looked at Peter and said, “Truly, I tell you, this very night, before the rooster crows, you will deny me three times” (Matthew 26:34).

According to His Sovereign Will
From all these prophesies, we know that God foresaw, and did not prevent, and therefore included in his plan that his Son would be rejected, hated, abandoned, betrayed, denied, condemned, spit upon, flogged, mocked, pierced, and killed. All these are explicitly in God’s mind before they happen as things that he plans will happen to Jesus. These things did not just happen. They were foretold in God’s word. God knew they would happen and could have planned to stop them, but didn’t. So they happened according to his sovereign will.

And all of them were evil. They were sin. It is sin to reject, hate, abandon, betray, deny, condemn, spit upon, flog, mock, pierce, and kill the morally perfect, infinitely worthy, divine Son of God. And yet the Bible is explicit and clear that God himself planned these things. It is explicit not only in all the prophetic texts we have seen, but also in passages that say even more plainly that God brought these things to pass.

God Brought It to Pass
For example, in Isaiah 53:6, 10, it says, “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned — every one — to his own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all. . . . It was the will of the Lord to crush him; he has put him to grief.” So behind the spitting and flogging and mocking and piercing is the invisible hand and plan of God.

And I say that carefully and with trembling. This truth is too big and too weighty and too shocking to be glib about or to be cocky about. I choose to say that the invisible hand and plan of God are behind these most spectacular sins in all the universe — more grievous and more spectacular than the fall of Satan or any others. The reason I use these very words is because the Bible says it in those very words.

The Hand and Plan of God
In Acts 4:27–28, we have the clearest, most explicit statement about God’s hand and plan behind the horrific crucifixion of his Son.

Truly in this city there were gathered together against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever your hand (cheir) and your plan (boule) had predestined to take place.

Those are the two words I am using: the hand of God and the plan of God. It is a strange way of speaking — to say that God’s hand and plan have predestined something to happen. One does not ordinarily think of God’s “hand” predestining. How does a hand predestine? Here’s what I think it means: the hand of God ordinarily stands for God’s exerted power — not power in the abstract, but earthly, effective exertions of power. The point of combining it with “plan” is to say that it is not just a theoretical plan; it is plan that will be executed by God’s own hand.

This explains Isaiah 53:10: “It was the will of the Lord to bruise him; he has put him to grief.” Or more literally, with the King James Version, “It pleased the Lord to bruise him; he hath put him to grief.” The Lord bruised him. Behind Herod and Pilate and the Gentiles and the people of Israel was Jesus’s own Father who loved him with an infinite love.

The Gospel: God at Work in Death
Why should this matter to you? It should matter because if God were not the main Actor in the death of Christ, then the death of Christ could not save us from our sins and we would perish in hell forever. The reason the death of Christ is the heart of the gospel — the heart of the good news — is God was doing it. Romans 5:8: “God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” If you break God’s activity from the death of Jesus, you lose the gospel. This was God’s doing. It is the highest and deepest point of his love for sinners — his love for you.

“If you break God’s activity from the death of Jesus, you lose the gospel.”
Romans 8:3)
God condemned sin in Jesus’s flesh with our condemnation. So we are free.
  • Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us. (Galatians 3:13)
God cursed Jesus with the curse that belonged on us. So we are free.
  • For our sake [God] made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. (2 Corinthians 5:21)
God imputed our sin to him, and now we go free in God’s righteousness.
  • He was wounded for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities. (Isaiah 53:5)
God wounded him. God crushed him. For you and me. And we go free."

SOURCE
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's not what I am speaking against though.
There is only one type of substitution.

If the wages of sin is death then death is the penalty paid by Jesus Christ.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ToBeLoved
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's ok, but it's still not what I'm talking about.
Perhaps I missed it but you were questioning penal Substitution.

If so then is there any other type?
 
Upvote 0

Serving Zion

Seek First His Kingdom & Righteousness
May 7, 2016
2,335
900
Revelation 21:2
✟223,022.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Universal atonement, probably should have abbreviated UA, sorry only half awake today.
Ok, I see where you are coming from.
John 17:12 (refers to Judas)

PERDITION

per-dish'-un (apoleia, "ruin" or "loss," physical or eternal):

The word "perdition" occurs in the English Bible 8 times (John 17:12; Philippians 1:28; 2 Thessalonians 2:3; 1 Timothy 6:9; Hebrews 10:39; 2 Peter 3:7; Revelation 17:11,18). In each of these cases it denotes the final state of ruin and punishment which forms the opposite to salvation. The verb apolluein, from which the word is derived, has two meanings:

(1) to lose;

(2) to destroy.

Both of these pass over to the noun, so that apoleia comes to signify:

(1) loss;

(2) ruin, destruction.

The Son of Perdition is a name given to Judas (John 17:12) and to the Antichrist (2 Thessalonians 2:3). This is the well-known Hebrew idiom by which a person typically embodying a certain trait or character or destiny is called the son of that thing. The name therefore represents Judas and the Antichrist (see MAN OF SIN) as most irrecoverably and completely devoted to the final apoleia.

Geerhardus Vos - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1915, James Orr General Editor)


The following is from an article by John Piper which connects Old Testament Scriptures concerning Judas with their fulfillment in the New:

3. God’s Role in the Murder of His Son
This brings us now to the third and final question — the most important one: Where was God when this happened? Or more precisely: What was God’s role or non-role in the most spectacular sin that ever happened — the murder of Jesus Christ?

To answer a question like that we should put our hands on our mouths and silence our philosophical speculations. Our opinions don’t count here. All that counts is what God himself has shown us in his word. And the first thing he shows us is that the details surrounding the death of Jesus are prophesied in God’s word hundreds of years before they happen.

The Scriptures prophesy that evil men will reject Jesus when he comes.
Matthew 21:42: “Jesus said to them [quoting Psalm 118:22], ‘Have you never read in the Scriptures: “The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone; this was the Lord’s doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes”?’”

The Scriptures prophesy that Jesus must be hated.
In John 15:25, Jesus quoted Psalm 35:19 and said, “The word that is written in their Law must be fulfilled: ‘They hated me without a cause.’”

The Scriptures prophesy that the disciples would abandon Jesus.
In Matthew 26:31, he quotes Zechariah 13:7: “You will all fall away because of me this night. For it is written, ‘I will strike the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock will be scattered.’”

The Scriptures prophesy that Jesus will be pierced but none of his bones will be broken.
John quotes Psalm 34:20 and Zechariah 12:10 and says, “One of the soldiers pierced his side with a spear. . . . For these things took place that the Scripture might be fulfilled: ‘Not one of his bones will be broken.’ And again another Scripture says, ‘They will look on him whom they have pierced’” (John 19:34–37).

The Scriptures prophesy that Jesus would be betrayed by a close friend for thirty pieces of silver.
In John 13:18, Jesus cites Psalm 41:9 and says, “I am not speaking of all of you; I know whom I have chosen. But the Scripture will be fulfilled, ‘He who ate my bread has lifted his heel against me.’”

And in Matthew 26:24, Jesus says, “The Son of Man goes as it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed!”

And in Matthew 27:9–10, it says, “Then was fulfilled what had been spoken by the prophet Jeremiah, saying, ‘And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him on whom a price had been set by some of the sons of Israel, and they gave them for the potter’s field, as the Lord directed me’” (Jeremiah 19:1–13; Zechariah 11:12–13).

And not only the Scriptures, but Jesus himself prophesies, down to the details, how he will be killed.
In Mark 10:33–34, he says, “See, we are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be delivered over to the chief priests and the scribes, and they will condemn him to death and deliver him over to the Gentiles. And they will mock him and spit on him, and flog him and kill him. And after three days he will rise.”

And on that last night, Jesus looked at Peter and said, “Truly, I tell you, this very night, before the rooster crows, you will deny me three times” (Matthew 26:34).

According to His Sovereign Will
From all these prophesies, we know that God foresaw, and did not prevent, and therefore included in his plan that his Son would be rejected, hated, abandoned, betrayed, denied, condemned, spit upon, flogged, mocked, pierced, and killed. All these are explicitly in God’s mind before they happen as things that he plans will happen to Jesus. These things did not just happen. They were foretold in God’s word. God knew they would happen and could have planned to stop them, but didn’t. So they happened according to his sovereign will.

And all of them were evil. They were sin. It is sin to reject, hate, abandon, betray, deny, condemn, spit upon, flog, mock, pierce, and kill the morally perfect, infinitely worthy, divine Son of God. And yet the Bible is explicit and clear that God himself planned these things. It is explicit not only in all the prophetic texts we have seen, but also in passages that say even more plainly that God brought these things to pass.

God Brought It to Pass
For example, in Isaiah 53:6, 10, it says, “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned — every one — to his own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all. . . . It was the will of the Lord to crush him; he has put him to grief.” So behind the spitting and flogging and mocking and piercing is the invisible hand and plan of God.

And I say that carefully and with trembling. This truth is too big and too weighty and too shocking to be glib about or to be cocky about. I choose to say that the invisible hand and plan of God are behind these most spectacular sins in all the universe — more grievous and more spectacular than the fall of Satan or any others. The reason I use these very words is because the Bible says it in those very words.

The Hand and Plan of God
In Acts 4:27–28, we have the clearest, most explicit statement about God’s hand and plan behind the horrific crucifixion of his Son.

Truly in this city there were gathered together against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever your hand (cheir) and your plan (boule) had predestined to take place.

Those are the two words I am using: the hand of God and the plan of God. It is a strange way of speaking — to say that God’s hand and plan have predestined something to happen. One does not ordinarily think of God’s “hand” predestining. How does a hand predestine? Here’s what I think it means: the hand of God ordinarily stands for God’s exerted power — not power in the abstract, but earthly, effective exertions of power. The point of combining it with “plan” is to say that it is not just a theoretical plan; it is plan that will be executed by God’s own hand.

This explains Isaiah 53:10: “It was the will of the Lord to bruise him; he has put him to grief.” Or more literally, with the King James Version, “It pleased the Lord to bruise him; he hath put him to grief.” The Lord bruised him. Behind Herod and Pilate and the Gentiles and the people of Israel was Jesus’s own Father who loved him with an infinite love.

The Gospel: God at Work in Death
Why should this matter to you? It should matter because if God were not the main Actor in the death of Christ, then the death of Christ could not save us from our sins and we would perish in hell forever. The reason the death of Christ is the heart of the gospel — the heart of the good news — is God was doing it. Romans 5:8: “God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” If you break God’s activity from the death of Jesus, you lose the gospel. This was God’s doing. It is the highest and deepest point of his love for sinners — his love for you.

“If you break God’s activity from the death of Jesus, you lose the gospel.”
Romans 8:3)
God condemned sin in Jesus’s flesh with our condemnation. So we are free.
Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us. (Galatians 3:13)
God cursed Jesus with the curse that belonged on us. So we are free.
For our sake [God] made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. (2 Corinthians 5:21)
God imputed our sin to him, and now we go free in God’s righteousness.
He was wounded for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities. (Isaiah 53:5)
God wounded him. God crushed him. For you and me. And we go free."

SOURCE
No I do not support any doctrine that says "God wanted to crush Him". It was the humans that wanted to crush Him, because they could not endure the wrath of God that was coming upon them for their sin. It was their sin that crushed Jesus (John 19:11). But it pleased God to crush Him .. why?

Isaiah 53:10-11
He shall prolong His days, And the pleasure of the Lord shall prosper in His hand. The Righteous One, My Servant will make many righteous and He will bear their iniquities.

It is the children of wrath who do not know love, that come up with the idea that God had to "get even" with us for our sin (Romans 6:23), saying that God cannot forgive unless there is death .. (Mark 12:27) .. and they twist scriptures all out of context so that the real knowledge of who God is, is obscured and lost (Jeremiah 23:27).

If you look at 1 Corinthians 13:5, it says "Love does not keep account of wrongs" - and when you look at the expression "logizomai" - it means to "reckon, count credits, consider". It means that love does not count the wrongs we do and use them as some sort of currency .. as that doctrine is suggesting "wages of sin is death". They simply are reading it wrong and misrepresenting God altogether.

"The one who does not know love does not know God, for God is love".

But if anyone understands justice and love, godly justice that is of a holy nature, then we do not insist on "payback" for wrongs - it is only the sin of wrath that demands such a thing. It is a heart that cannot forgive unless they have inflicted suffering on the one who has caused them to suffer.

It is satisfactory for justice that wrongness has ceased, wrongs have been made right and that the sinner has learned to do good, because that is all that justice desires: the maintenance of right.

When a person, for instance was driving at speed exceeding the lawful limit and has caused an accident - if they have already become so remorseful that they have resolved to never do speeding again, then justice has already been perfectly effective. They ought to repair any damages they have caused, if it is possible. But the heart of the children of wrath demands that the speeding driver be fined or imprisoned so that there is some tangible punishment to satisfy their anger, not that it actually adds any value, but their wrathful heart will not be satisfied until some suffering is imposed upon the one who caused them to suffer.

That simply is not what love does, it isn't God's demand. It is the demand of the one who is the child of wrath, as Ephesians 2 mentions .. and who is that? .. it is those who are slaves of the "prince of the power of the air". The same spirit that operates in the "sons of disobedience" - those who do not obey The Word of Truth (hence: the heresies of 2 Peter 2:1 are "destructive" because they block the believers from the truth).

So, the doctrine:

Who is the one who still wants to punish us for our former sins when we have repented of them, that we are no longer doing those sins we once did? .. it is the mind of the fallen that thinks that way.

It is the doctrine of the fallen that makes God out to be the one who is holding our past against us, because they are blinded from seeing that we are sanctified in the moment (they themselves are slaves to their sin - they are the fallen ones), and they hold their judgement against us for the sin that they know they have seen us do, because they are unable to be satisfied unless they see a measure of wrath poured upon us for the suffering our disobedience has caused them.

Now, it isn't the flesh and blood that I am talking about, but what Ephesians 6 and 1 John 2:1 describes: that our adversary is one who holds God's law against us in the heavenly realms, and who, knowing God's Torah of righteousness, does not refrain from bringing charges against us for our wrongfulness.

It uses our conscience and our memory of our errors in light of conviction, to condemn us for the person we once were, and while we are unable to qualify for acquittal, it keeps us in bondage to our guilt (consider Romans 5:14 - why did the covenant of Moses break the power of death? .. then consider Hebrews 10:4 - why was it ultimately ineffective?).

Can you see how doctrine is built over time in order to break the hold that sin has over us, by equipping our faith with a confidence to stand firm in the power of The Holy Spirit by wearing the armour of God?

.. then why are we all still fighting and trying to dominate each other if Jesus' work has been victorious? .. it is because God is not the only one who is doing the work of growing The Kingdom (John 10:10, 1 John 4:1, 2 Peter 2:1-2, Matthew 13:27).

I have to explain a bit more about why the blood of Christ was needed to pay a price for the ransom.

The mind of the fallen is taken captive by their sin (Romans 6:16, Romans 7:14), and therefore prevented from coming to the light for fear that their deeds be exposed (John 3:19-21).

They aren't born as a captive, because they are babies and they are always obeying righteous instruction (as long as it seems right to them). There comes an age when they do sin, but rather than repenting, they conceal their sin with deceit or excuses .. whether it be shame where they cannot confess for fear of insufficient love, or an addiction to the sin that they cannot bear to give it up.. somehow they have been trapped in a way of thinking that they are not being truthful according to the light. They are spiritually dead and they need to be born again, because it is no longer the light of Christ that lives in them - The Spirit of Truth. They do not have fellowship with us because they are walking in the darkness, concealing their heart (1 John 1:7).

Again, I stress that children are not like that until they are taught to be fearful of authority. They are naturally obedient and honest, circumcised in the heart, and it is only when they are afraid of owning up to the truth because they might get a beating or made fun of, or some other kind of wrathful punishment, that is when they begin to walk in the darkness.

So because they are held captive in their fear, just as Adam and Eve were, afraid to own their sin and they are hiding from God. They have the mind of the children of wrath from Ephesians 2 - where they do not know genuine love. Their response is to blame the woman, blame the serpent, blame their friends.. but they just cannot trust God and say "Lord, I'm sorry, I ate the fruit! .. what shall I do?".

Jesus laid down His life to show that God does really want us to trust Him, to "turn to Him and be healed". That is how His blood serves as the ransom payment - where the devil has got a hold of us because of our fear of coming to the light, Jesus has destroyed the devil's hold over us by paying the penalty that the devil had demanded (ie: "in the day you eat of it, a dying you will die", "the wages of sin is death", "there can be no atonement without blood") so that we can turn to Him and be healed.

But if the truth is to be known, it isn't that God truly does need blood in order to do forgiveness - rather, it is our trusting in Him that enables us to be released from the condemnation .. and in order for that, we need to know that God is satisfied with our contrition so that we do not need to fear being consumed by His wrath.

That is how the rituals of sacrifice came to have an effect of justifying us in God's sight - we understand that God has received our contrition because we have demonstrated true remorse.

The devil's business is death (John 8:44) but God's business is life and in order for God to break up the works of the devil, He had to show forth His love perfectly to the end. That is how Jesus' blood pays the ransom, by the covenant we enter, whereby the life we live, we live no longer for ourselves but for Him .. and the substitution is bilateral - that Jesus gave up His body before He had completed all Messianic works, so that we would become individual parts of His body and He would continue His works through us.

(though, there has been a lot of distraction from that emphasis through the false doctrines since, so that Christians are now fighting each other rather than healing each other, and the church really isn't doing the works that Jesus wants it to be doing - Ephesians 5:29, James 4:1).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Serving Zion

Seek First His Kingdom & Righteousness
May 7, 2016
2,335
900
Revelation 21:2
✟223,022.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Perhaps I missed it but you were questioning penal Substitution.

If so then is there any other type?
It's about who is demanding the penalty - does God really demand blood? (see above - it is the adversary who made that demand, because of the power he has by having taken captive the minds of the fallen, to do his will).

We who are sanctified, the majority of the people of Jerusalem at the time, would not have crucified Jesus - we would have laid palm branches on the road for Him. But there were those who the devil had taken captive, who were enraged with envy, their sin empowered them to act wrongly against Him - and He laid down His life despite knowing that God would have supported Him if He had have asked, because He was justified by Torah (Matthew 26:53, John 14:30).
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Psalm 144:1
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
140,176
25,219
55
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,727,340.00
Country
United States
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
You are wrong about that.
1 And you were dead in the trespasses and sins
2 in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience-
3 among whom we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, carrying out the desires of the body and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind. - Ephesians 2:1-3
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

lesliedellow

Member
Sep 20, 2010
9,652
2,582
United Kingdom
Visit site
✟104,175.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
For those who believe in God predestine events, was the Fall one of them?

Yes, the Fall was preordained by God, and not merely foreknown. Nothing happens by accident in his Creation.
 
Upvote 0