Investigative Judgment (Seventh day Adventists)

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Clearly this is extremely unbiblical. The false teaching of "Investigative Judgment" denies Christ's COMPLETED work of redemption.

First define terms.

Does your definition of "Redemption" allow redemption to be complete while the Gospel is still 'incomplete'?

If so - then we are using different definitions.

In Romans 2:13-16 and in Rev 14:6-7 we are told that the Gospel includes the future judgment. The full scope of the term "Gospel" is not "complete" until all its parts are complete.

IF we are Redeemed via the Gospel - if the Gospel encompasses the full meaning of Redemption -- then Redemption is not fully complete until the Gospel is full and complete.

Just stating the obvious.

1. ALL the Redeemed will spend eternity with God in heaven and the New Earth.
2. NONE of the Redeemed will be in the lake of fire or suffer the second death.
3. Redemption for ALL mankind was "purchased" full and complete on the cross. The "Atoning sacrifice" of the Day of Atonement Lev 16 -- the Lamb of God slain, the sin offering slain... and NOW in that Day of Atonement model Christ is our High Priest which is "the main point" for NT saints that "read" Hebrews 8:1-5.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

liberty of conscience

created anew
Dec 3, 2018
374
125
Visistate
Visit site
✟12,005.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Cases of the Righteous have already been decided!

No. Texts already cited.

Ecc_3:17 I said in mine heart, God shall judge the righteous and the wicked: for there is a time there for every purpose and for every work.

The Adventist Church teaches that "all" must pass through the Investigative Judgment to determine whether or not they will be saved.

Again, not so.

The teaching of the scripture, in regards this phase of the Judgment of God (Investigative) is only for those who profess Christ (from the days of Adam unto the last), and with this, the Testimony of Jesus agrees. It is not for those who never professed.

"... It is while men are still dwelling upon the earth that the work of investigative judgment takes place in the courts of heaven. The lives of all His professed followers pass in review before God. All are examined according to the record of the books of heaven, and according to his deeds the destiny of each is forever fixed. {COL 310.2} ..." - Christ's Object Lessons (1900), page 310.2

Adventists claim the Investigative Judgment started in 1844
The Bible makes this assertion, and we merely "Amen" it, see Leviticus 16 & 23; Ezra 6:14, 7:1-28; Daniel 7:9-10,22, 8:13-14,26, 9:24-27; Revelation 9:15, 14:6-7, etc.

but the Bible clearly shows that the cases of the righteous have already been decided long prior to the Investigative Judgment:

Not so, you have simply substituted 'Bible' when in reality it is simply 'you' (private interpretation; which you are warned against, see 2 Peter 1:20).

Let's see that:

Thief on the cross:
Jesus declared to the thief on the cross, "Today shalt thou be with me in paradise." (Luke 22:43). How could Jesus make a determination on the case of the thief prior to the Investigative Judgment?

Simple. God reads the heart, and it was a promise in that day of Jesus which would be fulfilled in future, since Jesus becomes his advocate when the name of the thief comes up in the time of searching the dead in Christ (Hebrews 9:27) in the books. The thief would not enter paradise (3rd Heaven) until after Jesus comes into His kingdom, which is not yet here, and won't be until Jesus puts on the kingly robes and crown (Revelation 19:11-16).

The "investigation" is not for God, but for angels (ten thousand times ten thousand that surround God and go through the books which they open, for angels cannot read the heart), see Daniel 7:9-10.

The thief's case was determined some 1800 years before the "Investigative Judgment" when he repented and accepted Jesus on the cross.

No, the thief was promised. The fulfillment of the promise was yet to come. God knoweth the future.

This proves that Christ needs no Investigative Judgment

You are mistaken here. Christ Jesus knows the future and hearts of men. The investigation is for the angels who cannot read the heart, and only know the future as God reveals it (Daniel 10:21).

...to determine who will be with Him in heaven. Why would He treat us any differently than He treated the thief on the cross?

God doesn't treat us any differently. As all the professed dead in Christ from from Adam unto the last must be examined (Hebrews 9:27), and soon it will move unto the living (Ezekiel 9). The promise is unto all who come unto Him. However, the angels cannot tell who is real and who is false without the written record, which reveals the heart.

Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob:
The Bible says Abraham was justified (accounted righteous) by faith (Rom. 4:2-5). Nearly 1800 years before the Investigative Judgment supposedly began Jesus declared:

Justification. Indeed. But that does not negate the many scriptures provided already, in which there are some who were 'justified' and yet go back. What skews your understanding is the error of OSAS.

The books being opened in the time of judgment will see what is written of the thief and of Abraham and those in the hall of faith. They will pass.

Matt. 8:11..........
"And I say unto you, that many shall come from the east and west, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven."
See above.

Jesus did not need an Investigative Judgment to determine the cases of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, so why does He need one to determine our destiny?
You are confusing the several parts of redemption and the several phases of judgment, and merely make them all one and the same.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and those in the hall of faith, also appear in the judgment (by proxy, records), and that record will reveal what is written in Hebrews 11. They will pass.

Do not confuse God's foreknowldge with the events that are needful in time to arrive at the end result.

If you are true and in Christ Jesus, you have nothing to fear either, for you will be found written in Christ Jesus even as they.

Enoch:
Adventists claim that Enoch was taken to heaven (Gen. 5:24). How did God know Enoch could be taken to heaven without an investigation?

Moses:
Adventists claim that after Moses sinned and died he was resurrected and taken to heaven (Jude 9). If everyone's sins are not blotted out until after the investigative judgment, then how could Moses enter heaven?

Elijah:
The Bible says that "Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven" (1 Kings 2:11). How could God take Elijah before the Investigative Judgement was completed?

Yes, Enoch, Moses, Elijah, and even the "Firstfruits" are in Heaven already:

[1] Enoch, who never saw death but was translated directly and glorified [Genesis 5:24; Hebrews 11:5 KJB],

[2] Elijah, who never saw death but was translated, going up in a fiery chariot and glorified, appearing in the New Testament with resurrected Moses, in “glory” [2 Kings 2:1,11; Matthew 17:3; Mark 9:4; Luke 9:30,31 KJB],

[3] Moses, who died, was buried by Jesus, and resurrected by Jesus/Michael and taken to Heaven, after seen alive in the New Testament, in “glory” [Matthew 16:28, 17:1-12; Mark 9:1-13; Luke 9:27-36; John 11:25; 2 Peter 1:16-18; Romans 5:14; Jude 1:9 KJB],

[4] the firstfruits/wavesheaf specially resurrected martyrs who were buried around Jerusalem at Jesus' own resurrection, and taken back to Heaven with Him in triumph [Isaiah 26:19; Matthew 27:52,53; Ephesians 4:8; Psalms 68:18 KJB]:

Christ Jesus did not lead “captivity captive” [the “firstfruits” 1 Corinthians 15:20,23 KJB, the “wavesheaf” Leviticus 23:10-12 KJB; see Matthew 27:52-53 KJB] until His own Resurrection, “the third day” [Luke 24:21 KJB],

Ephesians 4:8 KJB - Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.

All they, holding their title/deed of inheritance in the name of their Deliverer and Redeemer – Jesus Christ.

They are also given as types of that which is to come (2 Peter 1:16-21), and are in that sense special cases, or exceptions of order. Moses did not enter heaven without contestation over himself between Jesus and satan, see Jude. Persons have entered heaven without the blotting out of sin (like prophets in vision), but that doesn't mean that the event of blotting out of the sin record doesn't need to take place, for presently their sins are covered by the blood until such time as the blotting out of the sin record.

Again, their own lives are also seen to pass the judgment (being in Christ Jesus) when the books of record are opened in the time of judgment, and it will be seen God was right in what He did in their cases.

Care to explain those problems with what you are proposing as an "Investigative Judgment"?
Sure, covered by the blood.

Job_9:12 Behold, he taketh away, who can hinder him? who will say unto him, What doest thou?

Ecc_8:4 Where the word of a king is, there is power: and who may say unto him, What doest thou?

Will you say to God, that He can't do what He did? Will you answer Him when He asks you about your actions and thoughts?
 
Upvote 0

liberty of conscience

created anew
Dec 3, 2018
374
125
Visistate
Visit site
✟12,005.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
...Example: When did Christ enter the Holiest?

Seventh-day Adventists teach that Jesus entered two times into the Most Holy Place of the heavenly sanctuary--once at His ascension, and once again in 1844 at the beginning of the aypical Day of Atonement.

False. Seventh-day Adventists teach that Jesus Christ upon his ascension entered "once" into the real Sanctuary of Heaven, the Holy Place. The Sanctuary of Heaven has two rooms (House of the LORD), [1] Holy Place and [2] Most Holy Place. Jesus entered the House. He did not enter into the Master Room until later, but Jesus was in the same House.

IT IS IN THE BIBLE that Christ entered only once:

Heb. 9:12...……..
"But by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us."
Indeed. Into the Sanctuary, through the front door. Which first room is "the Holy place", not the Most Holy Place, which came afterward behind another veil/door.

Heb. 10:12...……..
"But this man {Christ}, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God."
The text is true, and in the context of the Heavenly sanctuary, that Throne that is in the Holy Place is represented by the Table of Shewbread, that sits on the sides of the "north" (Exodus 26:35, etc).

The table of shewbread, is the symbol of the Throne of God in the Holy Place, as it was covered in Gold, had a crown [for Kings] molding [Exodus 25:24-25], and two places for bread, 6 and 6, a place for the Father and Son on the throne, as the Son lives by the word [bread] of the Father, we are to live by the word [bread] of Jesus [John 6:57; Revelation 3:21 KJB], of which the Tree of Light in the Holy place has 6 branches [Exodus 25:32,33,35,37:18,19,21 KJB] out of the central stock, even as it represents the Holy Spirit [Revelation 1:4, 3:1, 4:5, 5:6, 22:17 KJB], and this light [2 Peter 1:19 KJB] coming from Him, is the Spirit of Prophecy [Revelation 19:10 KJB] working in holy men, as they are moved by the Holy Ghost [2 Peter 1:20-21 KJB], thus the number 6 is the number of man [Genesis 1:26-31 KJB].

Thus see Revelation 1, 4 & 5, etc. It is the imagry of the Holy Place, not the Most Holy place.

I do not agree my friend. All I am seeing from him and you is SDA teachings.

I am sure you are sincere in what you have been taught, it is just that I do not believe that what you accept is what I understand the Scriptures to be saying.

There are just too many discrepancies and errors and non-Biblical items in SDA theology for me to take them seriousely.
Only because you rely upon misrepresentations of what we teach from scripture as it actually reads.

Notice:

Jesus indeed entered once for all, but into Where specifically in Hebrews 9:12?

It was into the Sanctuary, the Holy place, through the First veil alone, not through the Second then:

Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us. Hebrews 9:12

See Hebrews 9:2-3:

For there was a tabernacle made; the first, wherein was the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the sanctuary. Hebrews 9:2

And after the second veil, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all; Hebrews 9:3

Paul is clear about the typology, First comes the First {part of the} Tabernacle, wherein was the Candlestick and the Table, even along with the Altar of Incense:

Now when these things were thus ordained, the priests went always into the first tabernacle, accomplishing the service of God. Hebrews 9:6

Where is Jesus standing in Acts 7 {part of the Church of Ephesus} and where is He seen walking in Revelation 2:1?

Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus write; These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, who walketh in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks; Revelation 2:1

Which of the two compartments of the Tented Sanctuary is that? It is verily the First, not the Second. Hebrews 9:12 {as also vs 24 "agia" and vs 25, "ta agia"} simply reads ta agia, which is the Sanctuary, and not agia agion, the Holy of Holies.

Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; Hebrews 9:25

Paul is very clear about the separation of the two veils. It never says Jesus entered through the Second Veil, and did not then need to at His 2nd Ascension, being from the Mt of Olives. We see Jesus ascending in Psalms 24 and compare Revelation 4 and 5 {compare to Acts 1-2 and Psalms 133; Exodus 29:7; Leviticus 8:12; also needed to be 12, Exodus 28:21-22, 29:5, 39:14; then the Holy Spirit was sent - Revelation 5:6}. Revelation 4 speaks of the First Veil:

John is looking from earth (Isle of Patmos), which is the Courtyard into the First Door/Veil, which is looking into the Holy Place:

After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter. Revelation 4:1

Thus John is taken in the Holy Place, the First 'Tabernacle' of Heaven, revealing the 7 lamps which sat directly across from {before} the Table of Shewbread which was Crowned, and had two stacks, representing the Throne of God in the Holy Place:

And out of the throne proceeded lightnings and thunderings and voices: and there were seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God. Revelation 4:5

Revelation 3:8, in the period of the 6th Church, thousand{s} of years {1800+ yrs} later from the First Church of Ephesus, another door/veil is seen opened in Heaven, while the first was closed, and this is also witnessed in Daniel:

And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write; These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth; Revelation 3:7

I know thy works: behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name. Revelation 3:8

I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. Daniel 7:13

Jesus was presented once as the Sacrifice, once for all (Revelation 5:6), yes, but if any mean by that, that Jesus was not again brought into the presence of the Father since His Ascension from the Mt of Olives, that would be incorrect, since the Father had to move from the Most Holy Place to meet Jesus (Psalms 24; Revelation 4:2, "A throne was set (put into place, which means it wasn't in that spot before, it was somewhere else, and then the Father sits, which mean He wasn't sitting there in that palce before that moment") and since Jesus and the Father moved later from the Holy Place in the Heavenly into the Most Holy Place in 1844 (Daniel 7:9-10, 8:13-14,26; Revelation 9:15, 14:6-7, &c), and the Father went first, with the Son coming after as is apparent from Daniel and Revelation (in the 6th church, Philadelphia, and a door closes (first door into the Holy) an another door opens (second door into the Most Holy Place) all in the same House of the LORD.

Jesus didn't stand in the Holy of Holies in the Heavenly in the first Church age of Ephesus, but rather began to do so in the 6th Church Age of Philadelphia.

Jesus will also move again back into the Holy Place, not as Mediator, that door will have been shut forever {Luke 13:25; Daniel 12:1 &c}, but coming as King of Kings, before coming out unto this earth, Hebrews 9:28 and Leviticus 16, even as 2 Kings 11:11-12.

It is quite apparent from Revelation 20 that the Scapegoat portion of Leviticus 16 & 23 is still yet to take place.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
False. Seventh-day Adventists teach that Jesus Christ upon his ascension entered "once" into the real Sanctuary of Heaven, the Holy Place. The Sanctuary of Heaven has two rooms (House of the LORD), [1] Holy Place and [2] Most Holy Place. Jesus entered the House. He did not enter into the Master Room until later, but Jesus was in the same House.

Indeed. Into the Sanctuary, through the front door. Which first room is "the Holy place", not the Most Holy Place, which came afterward behind another veil/door.

The text is true, and in the context of the Heavenly sanctuary, that Throne that is in the Holy Place is represented by the Table of Shewbread, that sits on the sides of the "north" (Exodus 26:35, etc).

The table of shewbread, is the symbol of the Throne of God in the Holy Place, as it was covered in Gold, had a crown [for Kings] molding [Exodus 25:24-25], and two places for bread, 6 and 6, a place for the Father and Son on the throne, as the Son lives by the word [bread] of the Father, we are to live by the word [bread] of Jesus [John 6:57; Revelation 3:21 KJB], of which the Tree of Light in the Holy place has 6 branches [Exodus 25:32,33,35,37:18,19,21 KJB] out of the central stock, even as it represents the Holy Spirit [Revelation 1:4, 3:1, 4:5, 5:6, 22:17 KJB], and this light [2 Peter 1:19 KJB] coming from Him, is the Spirit of Prophecy [Revelation 19:10 KJB] working in holy men, as they are moved by the Holy Ghost [2 Peter 1:20-21 KJB], thus the number 6 is the number of man [Genesis 1:26-31 KJB].

Thus see Revelation 1, 4 & 5, etc. It is the imagry of the Holy Place, not the Most Holy place.

Only because you rely upon misrepresentations of what we teach from scripture as it actually reads.

Notice:

Jesus indeed entered once for all, but into Where specifically in Hebrews 9:12?

It was into the Sanctuary, the Holy place, through the First veil alone, not through the Second then:

Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us. Hebrews 9:12

See Hebrews 9:2-3:

For there was a tabernacle made; the first, wherein was the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the sanctuary. Hebrews 9:2

And after the second veil, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all; Hebrews 9:3

Paul is clear about the typology, First comes the First {part of the} Tabernacle, wherein was the Candlestick and the Table, even along with the Altar of Incense:

Now when these things were thus ordained, the priests went always into the first tabernacle, accomplishing the service of God. Hebrews 9:6

Where is Jesus standing in Acts 7 {part of the Church of Ephesus} and where is He seen walking in Revelation 2:1?

Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus write; These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, who walketh in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks; Revelation 2:1

Which of the two compartments of the Tented Sanctuary is that? It is verily the First, not the Second. Hebrews 9:12 {as also vs 24 "agia" and vs 25, "ta agia"} simply reads ta agia, which is the Sanctuary, and not agia agion, the Holy of Holies.

Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; Hebrews 9:25

Paul is very clear about the separation of the two veils. It never says Jesus entered through the Second Veil, and did not then need to at His 2nd Ascension, being from the Mt of Olives. We see Jesus ascending in Psalms 24 and compare Revelation 4 and 5 {compare to Acts 1-2 and Psalms 133; Exodus 29:7; Leviticus 8:12; also needed to be 12, Exodus 28:21-22, 29:5, 39:14; then the Holy Spirit was sent - Revelation 5:6}. Revelation 4 speaks of the First Veil:

John is looking from earth (Isle of Patmos), which is the Courtyard into the First Door/Veil, which is looking into the Holy Place:

After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter. Revelation 4:1

Thus John is taken in the Holy Place, the First 'Tabernacle' of Heaven, revealing the 7 lamps which sat directly across from {before} the Table of Shewbread which was Crowned, and had two stacks, representing the Throne of God in the Holy Place:

And out of the throne proceeded lightnings and thunderings and voices: and there were seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God. Revelation 4:5

Revelation 3:8, in the period of the 6th Church, thousand{s} of years {1800+ yrs} later from the First Church of Ephesus, another door/veil is seen opened in Heaven, while the first was closed, and this is also witnessed in Daniel:

And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write; These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth; Revelation 3:7

I know thy works: behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name. Revelation 3:8

I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. Daniel 7:13

Jesus was presented once as the Sacrifice, once for all (Revelation 5:6), yes, but if any mean by that, that Jesus was not again brought into the presence of the Father since His Ascension from the Mt of Olives, that would be incorrect, since the Father had to move from the Most Holy Place to meet Jesus (Psalms 24; Revelation 4:2, "A throne was set (put into place, which means it wasn't in that spot before, it was somewhere else, and then the Father sits, which mean He wasn't sitting there in that palce before that moment") and since Jesus and the Father moved later from the Holy Place in the Heavenly into the Most Holy Place in 1844 (Daniel 7:9-10, 8:13-14,26; Revelation 9:15, 14:6-7, &c), and the Father went first, with the Son coming after as is apparent from Daniel and Revelation (in the 6th church, Philadelphia, and a door closes (first door into the Holy) an another door opens (second door into the Most Holy Place) all in the same House of the LORD.

Jesus didn't stand in the Holy of Holies in the Heavenly in the first Church age of Ephesus, but rather began to do so in the 6th Church Age of Philadelphia.

Jesus will also move again back into the Holy Place, not as Mediator, that door will have been shut forever {Luke 13:25; Daniel 12:1 &c}, but coming as King of Kings, before coming out unto this earth, Hebrews 9:28 and Leviticus 16, even as 2 Kings 11:11-12.

It is quite apparent from Revelation 20 that the Scapegoat portion of Leviticus 16 & 23 is still yet to take place.

What is more than apparent is that the teachings of Hiram Edson and Ellen G. White, became the basis of Seventh-day Adventism, which eventually spawned its own offshoots, including Armstrongism and the Branch Davidians.

Galatians 1:9 ......….
"As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed."

When YOU as an SDA try to mix WORKS with GRACE, set dates for Christs return, promote annihilation of the body/soul and the many other non-biblical practices you teach, what is then apparent is that you are promoting "ANOTHER GOSPEL".
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
False. Seventh-day Adventists teach that Jesus Christ upon his ascension entered "once" into the real Sanctuary of Heaven, the Holy Place. The Sanctuary of Heaven has two rooms (House of the LORD), [1] Holy Place and [2] Most Holy Place. Jesus entered the House. He did not enter into the Master Room until later, but Jesus was in the same House.

Indeed. Into the Sanctuary, through the front door. Which first room is "the Holy place", not the Most Holy Place, which came afterward behind another veil/door.

The text is true, and in the context of the Heavenly sanctuary, that Throne that is in the Holy Place is represented by the Table of Shewbread, that sits on the sides of the "north" (Exodus 26:35, etc).

The table of shewbread, is the symbol of the Throne of God in the Holy Place, as it was covered in Gold, had a crown [for Kings] molding [Exodus 25:24-25], and two places for bread, 6 and 6, a place for the Father and Son on the throne, as the Son lives by the word [bread] of the Father, we are to live by the word [bread] of Jesus [John 6:57; Revelation 3:21 KJB], of which the Tree of Light in the Holy place has 6 branches [Exodus 25:32,33,35,37:18,19,21 KJB] out of the central stock, even as it represents the Holy Spirit [Revelation 1:4, 3:1, 4:5, 5:6, 22:17 KJB], and this light [2 Peter 1:19 KJB] coming from Him, is the Spirit of Prophecy [Revelation 19:10 KJB] working in holy men, as they are moved by the Holy Ghost [2 Peter 1:20-21 KJB], thus the number 6 is the number of man [Genesis 1:26-31 KJB].

Thus see Revelation 1, 4 & 5, etc. It is the imagry of the Holy Place, not the Most Holy place.

Only because you rely upon misrepresentations of what we teach from scripture as it actually reads.

Notice:

Jesus indeed entered once for all, but into Where specifically in Hebrews 9:12?

It was into the Sanctuary, the Holy place, through the First veil alone, not through the Second then:

Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us. Hebrews 9:12

See Hebrews 9:2-3:

For there was a tabernacle made; the first, wherein was the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the sanctuary. Hebrews 9:2

And after the second veil, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all; Hebrews 9:3

Paul is clear about the typology, First comes the First {part of the} Tabernacle, wherein was the Candlestick and the Table, even along with the Altar of Incense:

Now when these things were thus ordained, the priests went always into the first tabernacle, accomplishing the service of God. Hebrews 9:6

Where is Jesus standing in Acts 7 {part of the Church of Ephesus} and where is He seen walking in Revelation 2:1?

Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus write; These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, who walketh in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks; Revelation 2:1

Which of the two compartments of the Tented Sanctuary is that? It is verily the First, not the Second. Hebrews 9:12 {as also vs 24 "agia" and vs 25, "ta agia"} simply reads ta agia, which is the Sanctuary, and not agia agion, the Holy of Holies.

Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest entereth into the holy place every year with blood of others; Hebrews 9:25

Paul is very clear about the separation of the two veils. It never says Jesus entered through the Second Veil, and did not then need to at His 2nd Ascension, being from the Mt of Olives. We see Jesus ascending in Psalms 24 and compare Revelation 4 and 5 {compare to Acts 1-2 and Psalms 133; Exodus 29:7; Leviticus 8:12; also needed to be 12, Exodus 28:21-22, 29:5, 39:14; then the Holy Spirit was sent - Revelation 5:6}. Revelation 4 speaks of the First Veil:

John is looking from earth (Isle of Patmos), which is the Courtyard into the First Door/Veil, which is looking into the Holy Place:

After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter. Revelation 4:1

Thus John is taken in the Holy Place, the First 'Tabernacle' of Heaven, revealing the 7 lamps which sat directly across from {before} the Table of Shewbread which was Crowned, and had two stacks, representing the Throne of God in the Holy Place:

And out of the throne proceeded lightnings and thunderings and voices: and there were seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God. Revelation 4:5

Revelation 3:8, in the period of the 6th Church, thousand{s} of years {1800+ yrs} later from the First Church of Ephesus, another door/veil is seen opened in Heaven, while the first was closed, and this is also witnessed in Daniel:

And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write; These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth; Revelation 3:7

I know thy works: behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name. Revelation 3:8

I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him. Daniel 7:13

Jesus was presented once as the Sacrifice, once for all (Revelation 5:6), yes, but if any mean by that, that Jesus was not again brought into the presence of the Father since His Ascension from the Mt of Olives, that would be incorrect, since the Father had to move from the Most Holy Place to meet Jesus (Psalms 24; Revelation 4:2, "A throne was set (put into place, which means it wasn't in that spot before, it was somewhere else, and then the Father sits, which mean He wasn't sitting there in that palce before that moment") and since Jesus and the Father moved later from the Holy Place in the Heavenly into the Most Holy Place in 1844 (Daniel 7:9-10, 8:13-14,26; Revelation 9:15, 14:6-7, &c), and the Father went first, with the Son coming after as is apparent from Daniel and Revelation (in the 6th church, Philadelphia, and a door closes (first door into the Holy) an another door opens (second door into the Most Holy Place) all in the same House of the LORD.

Jesus didn't stand in the Holy of Holies in the Heavenly in the first Church age of Ephesus, but rather began to do so in the 6th Church Age of Philadelphia.

Jesus will also move again back into the Holy Place, not as Mediator, that door will have been shut forever {Luke 13:25; Daniel 12:1 &c}, but coming as King of Kings, before coming out unto this earth, Hebrews 9:28 and Leviticus 16, even as 2 Kings 11:11-12.

It is quite apparent from Revelation 20 that the Scapegoat portion of Leviticus 16 & 23 is still yet to take place.

What is more than apparent is that the teachings of Hiram Edson and Ellen G. White, became the basis of Seventh-day Adventism, which eventually spawned its own offshoots, including Armstrongism and the Branch Davidians.

Galatians 1:9 ......….
"As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed."

When YOU as an SDA try to mix WORKS with GRACE, set dates for Christs return, promote annihilation of the body/soul and the many other non-biblical practices you teach, what is then apparent is that you are promoting "ANOTHER GOSPEL".
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No. Texts already cited.

Ecc_3:17 I said in mine heart, God shall judge the righteous and the wicked: for there is a time there for every purpose and for every work.



Again, not so.

The teaching of the scripture, in regards this phase of the Judgment of God (Investigative) is only for those who profess Christ (from the days of Adam unto the last), and with this, the Testimony of Jesus agrees. It is not for those who never professed.

"... It is while men are still dwelling upon the earth that the work of investigative judgment takes place in the courts of heaven. The lives of all His professed followers pass in review before God. All are examined according to the record of the books of heaven, and according to his deeds the destiny of each is forever fixed. {COL 310.2} ..." - Christ's Object Lessons (1900), page 310.2

The Bible makes this assertion, and we merely "Amen" it, see Leviticus 16 & 23; Ezra 6:14, 7:1-28; Daniel 7:9-10,22, 8:13-14,26, 9:24-27; Revelation 9:15, 14:6-7, etc.



Not so, you have simply substituted 'Bible' when in reality it is simply 'you' (private interpretation; which you are warned against, see 2 Peter 1:20).

Let's see that:



Simple. God reads the heart, and it was a promise in that day of Jesus which would be fulfilled in future, since Jesus becomes his advocate when the name of the thief comes up in the time of searching the dead in Christ (Hebrews 9:27) in the books. The thief would not enter paradise (3rd Heaven) until after Jesus comes into His kingdom, which is not yet here, and won't be until Jesus puts on the kingly robes and crown (Revelation 19:11-16).

The "investigation" is not for God, but for angels (ten thousand times ten thousand that surround God and go through the books which they open, for angels cannot read the heart), see Daniel 7:9-10.



No, the thief was promised. The fulfillment of the promise was yet to come. God knoweth the future.



You are mistaken here. Christ Jesus knows the future and hearts of men. The investigation is for the angels who cannot read the heart, and only know the future as God reveals it (Daniel 10:21).



God doesn't treat us any differently. As all the professed dead in Christ from from Adam unto the last must be examined (Hebrews 9:27), and soon it will move unto the living (Ezekiel 9). The promise is unto all who come unto Him. However, the angels cannot tell who is real and who is false without the written record, which reveals the heart.



Justification. Indeed. But that does not negate the many scriptures provided already, in which there are some who were 'justified' and yet go back. What skews your understanding is the error of OSAS.

The books being opened in the time of judgment will see what is written of the thief and of Abraham and those in the hall of faith. They will pass.

See above.

You are confusing the several parts of redemption and the several phases of judgment, and merely make them all one and the same.

Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and those in the hall of faith, also appear in the judgment (by proxy, records), and that record will reveal what is written in Hebrews 11. They will pass.

Do not confuse God's foreknowldge with the events that are needful in time to arrive at the end result.

If you are true and in Christ Jesus, you have nothing to fear either, for you will be found written in Christ Jesus even as they.



Yes, Enoch, Moses, Elijah, and even the "Firstfruits" are in Heaven already:

[1] Enoch, who never saw death but was translated directly and glorified [Genesis 5:24; Hebrews 11:5 KJB],

[2] Elijah, who never saw death but was translated, going up in a fiery chariot and glorified, appearing in the New Testament with resurrected Moses, in “glory” [2 Kings 2:1,11; Matthew 17:3; Mark 9:4; Luke 9:30,31 KJB],

[3] Moses, who died, was buried by Jesus, and resurrected by Jesus/Michael and taken to Heaven, after seen alive in the New Testament, in “glory” [Matthew 16:28, 17:1-12; Mark 9:1-13; Luke 9:27-36; John 11:25; 2 Peter 1:16-18; Romans 5:14; Jude 1:9 KJB],

[4] the firstfruits/wavesheaf specially resurrected martyrs who were buried around Jerusalem at Jesus' own resurrection, and taken back to Heaven with Him in triumph [Isaiah 26:19; Matthew 27:52,53; Ephesians 4:8; Psalms 68:18 KJB]:

Christ Jesus did not lead “captivity captive” [the “firstfruits” 1 Corinthians 15:20,23 KJB, the “wavesheaf” Leviticus 23:10-12 KJB; see Matthew 27:52-53 KJB] until His own Resurrection, “the third day” [Luke 24:21 KJB],

Ephesians 4:8 KJB - Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.

All they, holding their title/deed of inheritance in the name of their Deliverer and Redeemer – Jesus Christ.

They are also given as types of that which is to come (2 Peter 1:16-21), and are in that sense special cases, or exceptions of order. Moses did not enter heaven without contestation over himself between Jesus and satan, see Jude. Persons have entered heaven without the blotting out of sin (like prophets in vision), but that doesn't mean that the event of blotting out of the sin record doesn't need to take place, for presently their sins are covered by the blood until such time as the blotting out of the sin record.

Again, their own lives are also seen to pass the judgment (being in Christ Jesus) when the books of record are opened in the time of judgment, and it will be seen God was right in what He did in their cases.

Sure, covered by the blood.

Job_9:12 Behold, he taketh away, who can hinder him? who will say unto him, What doest thou?

Ecc_8:4 Where the word of a king is, there is power: and who may say unto him, What doest thou?

Will you say to God, that He can't do what He did? Will you answer Him when He asks you about your actions and thoughts?

MUCH, MUCH too long of a post with way too many questions to respond to for me.

I will however say that Ellen G. White was a false prophet and as an SDA follower you are supporting her theology which was false.

I guess my biggest problem with SDA is the teaching of WORKS to be saved. . Christians DO NOT believe in salvation maintained by good works nor do they believe in a license to sin.

If it were possible to lose salvation, which it is not possible, it's because they choose to stop believing in Jesus which however, true believers DEPART NOT (1 John 2:19).

This in turn teaches a dictator god and another Jesus who is not of the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
First define terms.

Does your definition of "Redemption" allow redemption to be complete while the Gospel is still 'incomplete'?

If so - then we are using different definitions.

In Romans 2:13-16 and in Rev 14:6-7 we are told that the Gospel includes the future judgment. The full scope of the term "Gospel" is not "complete" until all its parts are complete.

IF we are Redeemed via the Gospel - if the Gospel encompasses the full meaning of Redemption -- then Redemption is not fully complete until the Gospel is full and complete.

Just stating the obvious.

1. ALL the Redeemed will spend eternity with God in heaven and the New Earth.
2. NONE of the Redeemed will be in the lake of fire or suffer the second death.
3. Redemption for ALL mankind was "purchased" full and complete on the cross. The "Atoning sacrifice" of the Day of Atonement Lev 16 -- the Lamb of God slain, the sin offering slain... and NOW in that Day of Atonement model Christ is our High Priest which is "the main point" for NT saints that "read" Hebrews 8:1-5.

First, there is NO such thing as "Investigative Judgment," it is an exclusive teaching of Seventh-Day Adventists which is not found in the Bible.

It is the unbiblical teaching that Jesus entered into the Holy of Holies in 1843 to begin his work of Investigative Judgment, or better stated, the process of deciding who is "worthy" to enter heaven or not.

In sharp contrast, the Word of God teaches that NO ONE is worthy of Heaven.
Romans 3:23...……...
"ALL have sinned and come short of the approval of God"

Christ's work of redemption was FINISHED long ago, and is not continuing today as Adventists falsely teach.

That my dear friend is the OBVIOUSE which you continue to sarcastically say.
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This judgment is witnessed in Matthew 18 and elsewhere:

Matthew 18:27 KJB - Then the lord of that servant was moved with compassion, and loosed him, and forgave him the debt.

This debtor was loosed by the compassion of the Lord and all his past sins were forgiven him by the Lord.

Yet, we see by the very texts in continuing, these sins, though forgiven, were not yet blotted out, but remained for the Lord to deal with, and could be re-instated if unfaithful of the grace bestowed, or uncaring of the responsibility given in newness.

We see that "all" the "debt" was "forgiven", but because of the servants attitude and behaviour in probationary time, failed of the grace of received, and was to then pay all.

Matthew 18:32 KJB - Then his lord, after that he had called him, said unto him, O thou wicked servant, I (the King who owns all things) forgave thee (debtor, who owes all things) all that debt, because thou desiredst me:

Notice, the previous debt is re-instated to his account, in addition to that which the servant committed since then.

Matthew 18:34 KJB - And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him.

"wages" of sin is death.

NOPE!

You have allowed the SDA false teaching to completely alster Matthew 18.
YOU have changed it into what YOU want it to say instead of simply reading it as it is written to us.
Jesus was not teaching that God’s power can be manipulated by man’s will, or that men can obligate God to do anything. Jesus was saying that if we are faithful to expose sin, and try to restore those involved out of love, then He will be with us in that endeavor. The idea is that when the church follows Christ’s command to discipline its members, it is conforming its actions to what God has already commanded and approved.

To assume that this passage gives believers some sort of blank check for anything it asks God for does not fit the context of the passage, and would be contradictory to the rest of Scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Indeed.

Good.

In this you are gravely mistaken, and have the Roman Catholic theology of an ethereal 'god', a 'mystic perfume' which pervades the universe (pantheism, or panentheism).

Standard 'pentecostal' misuse of John 4:24 (KJB). God is a spirit. So are angels, men, according to scripture. They have bodies.

Good Angels are called “ministering spirits” [Psalms 104:4; Hebrews 1:7,14 KJB], while fallen angels are called “evil spirits” [Luke 7:21, 8:2; Acts 19:12,13 KJB], and “unclean spirits” [Matthew 10:1; Mark 1:27, 3:11, 5:13, 6:7; Luke 4:36, 6:18; Acts 5:16, 8:7; Revelation 16:13 KJB], of whom it is said that we [as Christians] “... wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

Of course, each text is true and correct in what they say/teach, [though generally misunderstood by many], as any angel [good or evil] has not “flesh and blood” as we of man-kind have, that is “bodies terrestrial” [1 Corinthians 15:40 KJB] and “of the earth, earthy” [1 Corinthians 15:57 KJB], but rather they have “celestial bodies” [1 Corinthians 15:40 KJB], being an “heavenly” [1 Corinthians 15:48,49; Hebrews 11:16 KJB], for God has given to each kind [angel and man], “a body as it hath pleased him” [1 Corinthians 15:38 KJB], for “[a]ll flesh is not the same flesh” [1 Corinthians 15:39 KJB], and there are “celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial” [1 Corinthians 15:40 KJB].

Paul says that we, Christians, are not looking to be “unclothed” [2 Corinthians 5:4 KJB], but rather, “to be clothed upon with our house which is from heaven” [2 Corinthians 5:2 KJB], “so be that being clothed we shall not be found naked” [2 Corinthians 5:3 KJB; nakedness here is the sleep of death, the doing and knowing nothing of the grave; Ecclesiastes 9:5,6,10, etc. KJB], being “clothed upon, that mortality might be swallowed up of life” [2 Corinthians 5:4 KJB], that “mortal” shall put on, and be swallowed up of, “immortality” [1 Corinthians 15:53,54 KJB].

Jesus' own body in His resurrection is a real glorified body, in which He participated in eating, speaking, touching, etc., and is the very same body that he ascended up into Heaven with, not faded into the aether nor dematerialized into vaporous nothing.

The “stone” [Matthew 28:2; Mark 16:3,4; Luke 24:2; John 20:1 KJB] upon the tomb had to be rolled back by Gabriel, to let Jesus free. Jesus did not phase through it, He got up and walked out of the opening [Matthew 28:1-7; Mark 16:1-8; Luke 24;1-9; John 20:1-13 KJB]. Additionally, in Jesus' death there was an earthquake [Matthew 27:51 KJB] which “opened” [Matthew 27:52 KJB] many of the tombs of the martyred saints around Jerusalem, so that those martyred saints therein, could come “out” [Matthew 27:53 KJB] in their resurrection when Jesus was resurrected [1 Corinthians 15:20,23 KJB]. They did not phase through them either.

The disciples were able to hold onto Jesus' glorified flesh, when they held Him by the feet [Matthew 28:9; John 20:17 KJB], and He drew near to two on the road to Emmaus, and walked and talked with them [Mark 16:12; Luke 24:15 KJB], and entered their house, sat down and broke bread with them [Luke 24:30,35 KJB]. Jesus verily “vanished out of their sight” [Luke 24:32 KJB], but please notice, it does not say he *poofed* into nothing. To “vanish out of … sight” is simply to be “invisible”, not incorporeal, as a mythological and paganistic 'shade'. They got up and left to go back to Jerusalem, and Jesus was with them the whole time, unseen. Jesus did not phase through a wall, nor a locked door, that first day [John 20:19 KJB], nor a week later [John 20:26 KJB]. He simply entered with them [Luke 24:32-36 KJB], and was “invisible” until He revealed Himself, even as He had been with the two earlier on the road to Emmaus and they did not recognize Him, until He showed Himself to them at their house.

Jesus asks them to “handle” [Luke 24:38; Ephesians 5:30 KJB] Him, having “flesh and bones”, “hands and feet” [Luke 24:39,40 KJB], and He eats with the disciples [Luke 24:41-43 KJB]. Jesus even asks Thomas to put his finger and hand into the very wounds that Jesus still had [John 20:27 KJB]. He also shewed Himself at the sea of Tiberias [John 21:1-25 KJB], and also

Jesus later ascends [Mark 16:19; Luke 24:51; John 20:17; Acts 1:2-11; Ephesians 4:8-10; Revelation 12:5; Psalms 24:1-10 KJB] into Heaven with the “same” [Acts 1:11 KJB] glorified body, even the “form” [Daniel 3:25; Philippians 2:6, etc & Exodus 33:23 KJB] thereof. This same body, and all its descriptive parts, is seen in Heaven in Revelation 1:13-16, 2:1,18 KJB, having the glory He had before coming in humanity [John 17:5 KJB]. He went to “prepare a place” [John 14:2,3 KJB], a very real place, for those who believe unto the end.

That Heavenly city, having precious foundations, whose builder and make is God [Hebrews 11:10 KJB], is real and will come down from Heaven above, and is filled with all manner of beauty and creation, “cherubim and seraphim, “elders”, “creatures”, stones, gold, pearls, eternal gates. We will have “crowns”, “palms”, “harps” and “white raiment”, being able to drink from the “river of water of life”, and to eat from “the tree of life” in the middle of the garden of the Heavenly Eden. There is the true Temple and true Ark of God, and His Ten Commandments. The Father Himself [and Son] rules from a very real “throne”, and a description of Him may be seen in Daniel 7:9; Matthew 10:18; Revelation 4, etc KJB.

Satan has attempted to etherealize and vaporize the reward of God and Heaven into non-things, gaseous clouds of non-entity, incorporeal vanity, and he has highly succeeded in this, but only because God's people reject knowledge sent from God [Hosea 4:6 KJB].

The angels, like the Cherubim and Seraphim, the shining ones, are “ministering spirits” [Hebrews 1:14 KJB], called a “flaming fire” [Psalms 104:4 KJB], and “ministers a flame of fire” [Hebrews 1:7 KJB], and their “countenances” are “like lightning”, as “burning coals of fire”, and “burning lamps”, and wearing “white raiment” which are very “bright”. Even Satan can transform himself into an “angel of light” [2 Corinthians 11:14 KJB]. Does this mean that angels have no substance, no body and are merely wispy aether? Not at all. The bodies they have, are “celestial” [1 Corinthians 15:40 KJB], and those which are good, are led by the Spirit, and are thus spiritual bodies [1 Corinthians 15:44 KJB], being in subjection to God, and are not subject to death [yet the wicked angels will be soon]. Even we, as Christians, are to be “ministering spirits” also:

Hebrews 12:23 KJB - To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,

Scripture teaches that God, the Father, is actually "in Heaven" (a specific location), and that Jesus ascended bodily (glorified body of flesh and bones) to that location (3rd Heaven, having to pass through the distance of the first 2 heavens; see Luke and Acts).

Mat_6:9 After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.

Mat_16:17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

Luk_11:2 And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth.

Jesus did not arise into the air and poof into nothingness. He actually went to His Father, a place (a real world), with a real throne, who upon it sits the real body of the Father.
He, the Father, is a "Person", even His person (Job 13:8; Hebrews 1:3), of which Jesus (the Son) is the "express image" of.

As for the rest, see "His person" (Job 13:8); "form of God" (Philippians 2:6), "shape" (John 5:37), "image" (Genesis 1:26,27; Hebrews 1:3), "likeness" (Genesis 1:26,27), "being" (Acts 17:28), has a very real movable "Throne" on which He sits (Daniel 7:9-10; Revelation 4-5, &c), has "the hair of his head like the pure wool" (Daniel 7:9), "whose garment was white as snow" (Daniel 7:9), has a "right hand" (Revelation 5:1; Acts 7:55-56), able to be looked upon, "to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone" (Revelation 4:2), having His own "nature" (Galatians 4:8).

See also "back parts" (Exodus 33:23), and even a "divine nature" (2 Peter 1:4), see also "under his feet" (Exodus 24:20).

The angels are also called 'spirits' and "persons" ("fellows"; Hebrews 1:9), "young man" (Mark 16:5; Daniel 9:21; &c), and yet have real celestial (Heavenly) "bodies" with unfallen angelic "flesh" (1 Corinthians 15:35-58; Jude 1:7, Genesis 17-19, &c) an unfallen heavenly "nature" (Hebrews 2:16), where as we have bodies terrestrial (dust).

The Son is also a "person" (Hebrews 1:3; 2 Corinthians 2:10; Matthew 27:24; Deuteronomy 27:25; &c).

So is the Holy Ghost (John 14:16; &c)

Mankind are also called 'spirits' (1 Peter 3:19; Hebrews 12:23) and yet are real tangible beings, with bodies (made of dust).

Philippians 2:6; Daniel 3:25; Genesis 18:4, 19:2; Exodus 24:10-11; Psalms 18:9; John 5:37; Exodus 33:23,20,22; Daniel 7:9-10,13; Ezekiel 1:1,8,26-28; Acts 7:55-56; Psalms 24:1-10; John 20:17; 1 Peter 3:22; Matthew 18:10; Revelation 1:13-20, 2:1, 4:1-11, 5:1-14; Hebrews 1:13; Colossians 1:3-6; Numbers 12:8; Isaiah 45:23, 48:3; Revelation 3:16; Psalms 89:34; Psalms 104:33, 146:2; Acts 17:28; Genesis 1:26-27; Colossians 1:15; &c.

Well. I believe that I have gone about as far as I can with you. I have asked you shorten your responces and FOCUS one ONE subject at a time but to no aveal.

You are not discussing or debating Scriptures but simply copy and pasting SDA doctrine.

As a result I can no longer respond to your posting. Good day and I do hope you will grow in knowledge and grace my friend.
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The judgment does not cause anyone to go from being lost to saved... and it does not cause anyone who is saved to be become lost. The judgment is the Matt 7 action that Christ describes as that of looking at the tree. "By their fruits you shall know them" -- Looking at the tree does not change the tree.

However the Bible shows that OSAS is a false doctrine in places like MAtthew 18 "Forgiveness revoked" and in Romans 11.




"This is the FIRST resurrection"

Rev 20
they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years. 5 The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were completed. This is the first resurrection. 6 Blessed and holy is the one who has a part in the first resurrection; over these the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with Him for a thousand years

The second coming event (Rev 19) and the first resurrection (Rev 20:1-6) are what start the 1000 year millennium clock ticking.

Those in the first resurrection are saints.. "Blessed and holy" and over them the second death has no power at all. No wicked are raised in that "first resurrection" event of the "Blessed and holy".

After the 1000 years you have the second resurrection... OVER THESE the second death DOES have power. And the second death is the lake of fire.

There are no saints raised in the second resurrection.

======================================

In Daniel 7 (which apparently you are not reading) the judgment event described there takes place sometime after the downfall of the roman empire and after the 1260 years of dark ages... but before Christ comes and sets up His kingdom on Earth (According to Daniel 7... which apparently you are not reading).

Rev 22 points out that when Jesus appears His "reward is with Him" the judgment of Daniel 7 is over.

Rev 14 says that while nations are still on the Earth the time Comes when the Gospel message includes the message "the hour of His judgment HAS come"... no longer "WILL come".

that happens before the Rev 19 second coming which means it happens before the Great White Throne Judgment of Rev 19.

Is it is that Daniel 7 "pre-advent" judgment that I refer to -- meanwhile you are pointing to the judgment in Rev 20 that happens after the millennium

"But by his own blood he entered in ONCE into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us." -Hebrews 9:12
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
from Tuesday at 10:19 PM #105

===========================


Daniel 7
“I kept looking
Until thrones were set up,
And the Ancient of Days took His seat
;
His vesture was like white snow
And the hair of His head like pure wool.
His throne was ablaze with flames,
Its wheels were a burning fire.
10 “A river of fire was flowing
And coming out from before Him;
Thousands upon thousands were attending Him,
And myriads upon myriads were standing before Him;
The court sat,
And the books were opened.

The Ancient of Days --- sinless
Those attending Him -- sinless

"Investigate" facts recorded in books
The court sat ... the books were opened
-- the action of the sinless beings described there.
Myriads standing before Him - are standing for service - His angels.

PreAdvent "Judgment"
21 “I was watching; and the same horn was making war against the saints, and prevailing against them, 22 until the Ancient of Days came, and a judgment was made in favor of the saints of the Most High, and the time came for the saints to possess the kingdom.

Saints are subjects in the future judgment
and a judgment
was made in favor of the saints

13 “I kept looking in the night visions,
And behold, with the clouds of heaven
One like a Son of Man was coming,
And He came up to the Ancient of Days
And was presented before Him.
14 “And to Him was given dominion,
Glory and a kingdom,
That all the peoples, nations and men of every language
Might serve Him.
His dominion is an everlasting dominion
Which will not pass away;
And His kingdom is one
Which will not be destroyed.

Everyone in that courtroom - sinless beings.


First, there is NO such thing as "Investigative Judgment," it is an exclusive teaching of Seventh-Day Adventists which is not found in the Bible.

wishful thinking .... again.

Tell you what -- since you are so interested in making statements that you have already been shown are refuted by scripture... lets not have it buried 7 pages deep in the thread - lets start out with it.

ok .. so now "that just happened" -- A moment ago #1
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No I do not.

I have to believe that all of it is true -- and that avoiding Romans 11 and Matthew 18 and Hebrews 6 and 1Cor 6 and John 15 and ... just to cling to OSAS "anyway" is not even remotely "sola scriptura" testing of doctrine.



I gave you the Bible details in both chapters that are glaring and obvious...details that OSAS does not survive as demonstrated in your own comments about those chapters and how that failed when we "review the details".

Your solution? "Let's talk about Ellen White".

surely that has to be a bit "less than satisfying" for you if you are one who believes in sola scriptura testing.

Bob, from your own posted words you have shown and proven that you do not accept the Bible as it is.

YOU have resorted to believing Mrs. Whites explination over the Word of God.

Please read carefully and understand what Ellen White says to us from her book, The Great Controversy. In the chapter which deals with the event "that was foretold in prophecy to take place at the termination of the 2300 days in 1844," Ellen G. White writes...

"Attended by heavenly angels, our great High Priest enters the holy of holies, and there appears in the presence of God, to engage in the last acts of His ministration in behalf of man - to perform the work of investigative judgment, and to make an atonement for all who are shown to be entitled to its benefits.

"...So in the great day of final atonement and investigative judgment, the only cases considered are those of the professed people of God. The judgment of the wicked is a distinct and separate work, at a later period" (The Great Controversy, 1950 edition, page 480).

"As the books of record are opened in the judgment, the lives of all who have believed on Jesus come in review before God. Beginning with those who first lived upon the earth, our Advocate presents the cases of each successive generation, and closes with the living. Every name is mentioned, every case closely investigated. Names are accepted, names rejected". (The Great Controversy, 1950 edition, page 483). "At the time appointed for the judgment –the close of the 2300 days, in 1844– began the work of investigation and blotting out of sins. All who have ever taken upon themselves the name of Christ must pass Its searching scrutiny. Both the living and the dead are judged 'out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works ". (The Great Controversy, 1950 edition, page 486).

"Though all nations are to pass in judgment before God, yet He will examine the cases of each individual with as close and searching scrutiny as if there were not another being upon the earth. Every one must be tested, and found without spot or wrinkle or any such thing". (The Great Controversy, 1950 edition, page 490).

"The Judgment is now passing in the sanctuary above. Forty years has this work been in progress. Soon – none know how soon – it will pass to the cases of the living." (The Great Controversy, 1884 edition, page 315).

THAT is what YOU believe and not one single word is found in the Bible.

You need to rethink your comment and position my friend.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Bob, from your own posted words you have shown and proven that you do not accept the Bible as it is.

Until you actually read my post and the details in the Bible texts

YOU have resorted to believing Mrs. Whites explination

Until you actually read my posts and find that I never quote Ellen White ..."you do"

Please read carefully and understand what Ellen White says to us from her book, The Great Controversy.

How is it that "read the Bible" is such a foreign concept for you???

I will be helping you with a focused thread on the Bible and the Investigative Judgment of Daniel 7

ok .. so now "that just happened" -- A moment ago #1
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
THAT is what YOU believe and not one single word is found in the Bible.
You need to rethink your comment and position my friend.

hint: Try quoting "me" and reading the Bible texts I post before leaping of that cliff.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Please read carefully and understand what Ellen White says to us from her book, The Great Controversy. In the chapter which deals with the event "that was foretold in prophecy to take place at the termination of the 2300 days in 1844," Ellen G. White writes...

"Attended by heavenly angels, our great High Priest enters the holy of holies, and there appears in the presence of God, to engage in the last acts of His ministration in behalf of man - to perform the work of investigative judgment, and to make an atonement for all who are shown to be entitled to its benefits.

"...So in the great day of final atonement and investigative judgment, the only cases considered are those of the professed people of God. The judgment of the wicked is a distinct and separate work, at a later period" (The Great Controversy, 1950 edition, page 480).

"As the books of record are opened in the judgment, the lives of all who have believed on Jesus come in review before God. Beginning with those who first lived upon the earth, our Advocate presents the cases of each successive generation, and closes with the living. Every name is mentioned, every case closely investigated. Names are accepted, names rejected". (The Great Controversy, 1950 edition, page 483). "At the time appointed for the judgment –the close of the 2300 days, in 1844– began the work of investigation and blotting out of sins. All who have ever taken upon themselves the name of Christ must pass Its searching scrutiny. Both the living and the dead are judged 'out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works ". (The Great Controversy, 1950 edition, page 486).

"Though all nations are to pass in judgment before God, yet He will examine the cases of each individual with as close and searching scrutiny as if there were not another being upon the earth. Every one must be tested, and found without spot or wrinkle or any such thing". (The Great Controversy, 1950 edition, page 490).

"The Judgment is now passing in the sanctuary above. Forty years has this work been in progress. Soon – none know how soon – it will pass to the cases of the living." (The Great Controversy, 1884 edition, page 315).

Let's play the game of I keep quoting Bible details that you must ignore to keep believing what you believe ... and you keep quoting Ellen White.

I will enjoy that.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
NOPE!

You have allowed the SDA false teaching to completely alster Matthew 18.
.

you refuse to even look at the details of Matthew 18 to make your case ... this has been pointed out to you multiple times already.

The judgment does not cause anyone to go from being lost to saved... and it does not cause anyone who is saved to be become lost. The judgment is the Matt 7 action that Christ describes as that of looking at the tree. "By their fruits you shall know them" -- Looking at the tree does not change the tree.

However the Bible shows that OSAS is a false doctrine in places like MAtthew 18 "Forgiveness revoked" and in Romans 11.

Matthew 18 -- Forgiveness Revoked
32 Then summoning him, his lord *said to him, ‘You wicked slave, I forgave you all that debt because you pleaded with me. 33 Should you not also have had mercy on your fellow slave, in the same way that I had mercy on you?’ 34 And his lord, moved with anger, handed him over to the torturers until he should repay all that was owed him. 35 My heavenly Father will also do the same to you, if each of you does not forgive his brother from your heart.”

OSAS does not survive Matthew 18

Romans 11
18 do not be arrogant toward the branches; but if you are arrogant, remember that it is not you who supports the root, but the root supports you. 19 You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.” 20 Quite right, they were broken off for their unbelief, but you stand by your faith. Do not be conceited, but fear; 21 for if God did not spare the natural branches, He will not spare you, either. 22 Behold then the kindness and severity of God; to those who fell, severity, but to you, God’s kindness, if you continue in His kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off. 23 And they also, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again

OSAS does not survive Romans 11

Keeping the text at a "sufficient distance" and ignoring the details in the posts - you simply "circle back" to repeat a failed accusation.

How "instructive" for the unbiased objective readers

Matt 18 details you seem to feel compelled to ignore.

Matthew 18 -- Forgiveness Revoked
32 Then summoning him, his lord *said to him, ‘You wicked slave, I forgave you all that debt because you pleaded with me. 33 Should you not also have had mercy on your fellow slave, in the same way that I had mercy on you?’ 34 And his lord, moved with anger, handed him over to the torturers until he should repay all that was owed him. 35 My heavenly Father will also do the same to you, if each of you does not forgive his brother from your heart.”

1. It is not his fellow man - his brother that he "owed" it is the king.
2. It is the king that returns his debt back to him.
3. It is Christ who says the Father will do just the same to those of his own forgiven children that refuse to forgive others just as they have already been forgiven.

No amount of ad hominem false accusation against members of this board or any denomination (not even the 5th largest denomination in the World - the Seventh-day Adventists) -- will change those Matthew 18 facts you are avoiding.

Sola scriptura testing - it worked during the Protestant Reformation -- and it is working for me at this very moment "still".
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Let's play the game of I keep quoting Bible details that you must ignore to keep believing what you believe ... and you keep quoting Ellen White.

I will enjoy that.

OK.

You quote the Bible and then I will explain the CONTEXTUAL correct meaning of what you post, and then you will not have to accept Mrs. Whites false teachings.

Sounds like a great plan to me!
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
OK.
You quote the Bible and then I will explain the CONTEXTUAL correct meaning of what you post,

That would be a real pleasure -- I look forward to it happening.

I am giving you an entire thread for that on Daniel 7 and I have given you that opening in Matthew 18 and in Romans 2 and in Romans 11 so far...

Feel free to start - at any time.
 
Upvote 0

Major1

Well-Known Member
Sep 17, 2016
10,551
2,837
Deland, Florida
✟203,785.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
you refuse to even look at the details of Matthew 18 to make your case ... this has been pointed out to you multiple times already.



Keeping the text at a "sufficient distance" and ignoring the details in the posts - you simply "circle back" to repeat a failed accusation.

How "instructive" for the unbiased objective readers

Matt 18 details you seem to feel compelled to ignore.

Matthew 18 -- Forgiveness Revoked
32 Then summoning him, his lord *said to him, ‘You wicked slave, I forgave you all that debt because you pleaded with me. 33 Should you not also have had mercy on your fellow slave, in the same way that I had mercy on you?’ 34 And his lord, moved with anger, handed him over to the torturers until he should repay all that was owed him. 35 My heavenly Father will also do the same to you, if each of you does not forgive his brother from your heart.”

1. It is not his fellow man - his brother that he "owed" it is the king.
2. It is the king that returns his debt back to him.
3. It is Christ who says the Father will do just the same to those of his own forgiven children that refuse to forgive others just as they have already been forgiven.

No amount of ad hominem false accusation against members of this board or any denomination (not even the 5th largest denomination in the World - the Seventh-day Adventists) -- will change those Matthew 18 facts you are avoiding.

Sola scriptura testing - it worked during the Protestant Reformation -- and it is working for me at this very moment "still".

You said...……...
"you refuse to even look at the details of Matthew 18 to make your case ... this has been pointed out to you multiple times already.".

That is totally untrue my friend.

YES you have posted it a number of times. I have no idea why but you have.

I considered your SDA explanation many years ago when I studied religions and their false teachings.

And I will say again to you that Matthew 18 does NOT teach what YOU want it to teach.

You have accepted Mrs. Whites explanation because you want to but Matthew 18 is NOT about SDA doctrine of Investigative Judgment as there is NO SUCH thing in the Bible. It is solely a SDA false doctrine which has NO Scriptural support.

Then you just did it again. Now you close your comment with "Sola Scriptura".
FOCUSE my friend. What do you want to discuss...…..
Investigative Judgment or Sola Scriptura???????????


 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I considered your SDA explanation many years ago when I studied religions and their false teachings.

And I will say again to you that Matthew 18 does NOT teach what YOU want it to teach.

That sort of pejorative villifying condemnation summary - is not Bible proof of anything at all.

You merely proved my point - when you were confronted with the Bible details of Matthew 18 - you hold them at a distance... flat out ignore them... pretend Ellen White wrote Matthew 18 so you can ignore it?? what sort of nonsense is that??

I am offering the Bible details in Matthew 18 -- and you respond with insults and accusations??

So far we have "you" falsely accusing and we have "you" quoting Ellen White. that's it... that is your entire "sola scriptura" position.

Must be "less than satisfying" for you. Or did you imagine that "we simply would not notice"??

Then you just did it again. Now you close your comment with "Sola Scriptura".

Indeed I keep pointing out the Matthew 18 details you are in such a rush to ignore.
 
Upvote 0