I'm sorry, I don't know. But my thesis rejects that we are dealing with kingdoms. I believe the 7 kings are kings... men.
Is both....God wants us to know the Last Beast is a MAN, this is why he basically says, the 7 Kingdoms (Beast Heads) are 7 Kings and 5 have fallen....one is and one is yet to come. The Last Bast will BOTH arise and fall unlike any of the other Beasts. God thus reduces the Kingdoms to Kings on purpose so we will look for a MAN not a Kingdom per se. Your instincts are right, it's not about Mountains or Kingdoms per se, it's about reducing the Kingdoms to Kings.
Thank you RT for watching and for your thoughts.
YW
I tend to think Apollyon is the beast and Satan combined but I am not dogmatic on that part. That's why I mentioned Apollyon but left it open for more study. But it does say in Rev. 9 that Apollyon is a king... as well as a military leader. Is he the seventh king? Or is he the seventh and eighth king merged? Is he neither? On this point I am still studying. The fact that the name Apollyon is a derivative of the word perdition is with no doubt significant and quite compelling.
The 7th is THE MAN..........The Anti-Christ/Little Horn/Beast. Apollyon is the 8th and is of the 7, in other words he was a Demonic being Satan placed over the whole Mediterranean Sea Region. He's not a man, but a Demonic entity. See Ephesians 6:12.
As to your interpretation of the beasts... it is because the math did not add up that I began the research I did. To make the math work, 2 more empires had to be added to Nebuchadnezzar's image. I never was comfortable with that view, which is the most accepted scholarly view. I never felt God would expect us to presume. If Egypt and Assyria were meant to be in the timeline of the empires, God would have added them above Babylon in the image. To me, they were added by scholars as an assumption. The math then is contrived in that way. If I were to choose which 2 empires in the world to add, I suppose it would be those 2 as they had much dealings with Israel. But it never felt right to me. God doesn't expect us to presume. He backs His encryptions up with other verses to decipher.
The logic behind this is really simple. God didn't want to confuse Daniel or anyone going forward, so He revealed who the Beasts were looking forward from Daniel's life on, there was no reason to mention the other two Beasts of the Region at that time, it added nothing to the Prophetic utterings of God nor His Prophets, it might even have made Daniel look like one of the soothsayers of the Kings Court. Thus we get the 4 Beasts and the Little Horn which = 5 Beasts in total from Daniel until the end of time as we know it.
In Revelation, Jesus is revealing everything to John looking back through time, the visions are future tense, he took John into the future, showed him the Seven Headed Beast and thus we now know all the players by looking back in time once we add in the two Beasts before Daniel's time. There was really no need of telling Daniel about those two Beasts, but when revealing the History of Israel and all the Beasts over her in ONE FIGURATIVE Beast out of the Sea both had to be added.
We don't have to presume anything, we can google each of those Kingdoms Maps and see they all ruled over Israel and all ruled over the Mediterranean Sea Region also, thus they arose from the Sea. God wanted Nebuchadnezzar to favor Daniel, thus he needed to think he was the TOP DOG (I thought about that a long time ago) thus he was the Greatest King of all time, the most pure, why tell this King he was 3rd ? Another thought, as each metal is shown, the metal gets harder and harder, so each Beast is more violent in nature.
Another aspect that does not pan out when viewing the 7 kings in Rev. 17:10-11 as 7 empires.. is that as you move into verse 11, you are picking up notes from other verses that deal with the beast as a personal being, not an empire.
Of course it's about Kings because the last Beast is a MAN, not a Kingdom per se, God wants us to know that. The Seven Headed Beast is about Seven Kingdoms and EACH had a Beast that FELL or lost Dominion, the last being the Anti-Christ who is cast straight into hell.
For instance... the fatal head wound being healed in Rev. 13, if it is not speaking of a man, but of Rome rising again, then how does it make sense of an image being formed that is made to speak? It's rather silly in a way, will the world build an image of Rome, Italy, the EU, a globe... and then give it a spirit to speak. It says the false prophet compels the world to build an image of the beast that had the fatal head wound and was healed. It is an image of a man. Not an empire.
Both are spoken of. A figurative 7 Headed Beast which was Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome, but then the Beast from the Sea suffered a Mortal Wound that made the Beast goes away for nigh 2000 years. For starters the Church can not be overcome by the gates of hell, we turned Rome from a BEAST to a Conveyor Belt of the Gospel of Jesus Christ !! Also, Israel was dispersed the world over and became as Dead Men's Bones !! Israel can't be Beasted over for nigh 2000 years because God sees her as Dead. This is why the Ottoman Empire is not a Beast nor was the British Empire. Israel had to be reborn just as Ezekiel prophesied, else there could have been no End Time Beast over them. When the Man of Sin/Anti-Christ Conquers Jerusalem/Israel/Mediterranean Sea Region the 7 Headed Figurative Beast will be REBORN, he will be BEASTING over Israel and the Mediterranean Sea Region again.
The Image is of the MAN..................There are THREE BEASTS..........Rev. 12 is Satan, Rev. 13 is the Anti-Christ and Rev. 17 is Apollyon. All wield power over Israel and the region thus the are BEASTS of prey so to speak in God's eyes. There is only one Man of Sin however. One FLESH BEAST, he is the one an Image is made unto
Kings have empires. But in these verses, when God says "and" there are 7 kings... I believe He is speaking of men because He is working His way towards information that deals with that man of sin who will be revealed as the son of perdition. (II Thess:2)
He is the Man of Sin, but as per the video, it has nothing to do with Apostasy, it means the Departure of the Church, the KJV changed the meaning into a FALLING AWAY after 1500 years of it meaning the Departure of the Church to go be gathered unto the Lord.
As to the beast's lineage... though the account I give of Alexander was lengthy... it all but barely scratched the surface of what is behind the Greek origins. Fascinating stuff that would take a series of documentaries just to cover that aspect. Since the lineage bleeds down into the royal houses of Europe, both east and west... I would not speculate at this point... whether he is a Turk, a Stewart or a Merovingian makes little difference to me for now.