You are incorrect about what I believe. I do not believe that we are sinners who cannot stop sinning. In fact I believe everyone who claims they believe should aim for sinlessness in this life because that is what Jesus saved them for. I doubt you took the time to read what I said properly. I suggest you reread it.
Do you believe future sin is forgiven for a believer?
So what is your interpretation on 1 John 1:8?
What is your interpretation on Romans 7:14-24?
What is your interpretation on Romans 3:10, and Romans 3:23?
Also, if you do believe sinners can stop sinning, then what is the point if you believe King David was saved in his sins of adultery and murder?
Do you not see such a teaching as leading others INTO sin if you tell them King David was saved while he committed his sins of adultery and murder? Is this not making light of sin and it's true consequences as taught in the Bible?
Note: See again Numbers 35:16-18, Leviticus 20:10, 1 John 3:15, Proverbs 6:32, Matthew 5:28-30.
You said:
I never tell others they can sin and still be saved, I tell them although they have sinned they may still be reconciled to God if they will follow his word of grace. Please read what I wrote.
David was safe while God extended his mercy and thus he was saved in spite of his sin because God was determined to save him.
You are teaching a double message right now and you don't even know it.
You are teaching a contradiction.
Hand #1. - On the one hand, you say that you never tell others they can sin and still be saved.
Hand #2. - On the other hand, you admit that King David was saved in his sins of adultery and murder, giving your listeners or followers the impression that they can be like a King David and be saved while committing murder and adultery (as long as they later repent or seek forgiveness with God at some later time). This is still teaching a license for immorality.
Even if it is for a short amount of time. You are telling a person they can abide in grievous sin for a short amount of time and that is okay with God (whereby He will save them). He's got them even when they commit horrible sin for a little while. But God places no statutes of limitations in regards to time when it comes to the crime. God does not say in His Word that a person's sin is absolved as long as you commit this sin for a short amount of time (that is then followed by repentance).
The analogy of the pooping pup is not a good one because you are still thinking as a man and not as Christ thinks. You quote portions of his message with no regard to others.
So you are in disagreement with the parable?
I thought you said that you said before that a believer overcomes sin in this life?
That was the point of the parable.
God chastens the animal so as to get them to stop sinning.
But if they cannot stop sinning, then chastening serves no purpose but to be cruel to it's creation because it cannot change or stop sinning.
Even your accusation I have misquoted the Scripture concerning Spirit and letter [Torah] show your confusion.
I showed you by Scripture repeatedly that you did misquote 2 Corinthians 3:6 out of it's context. The context does not support what you say. Care to point out the context of that verse to show how it supports your interpretation on that verse?
My guess is that you will not do that because the context does not actually support you.
You said:
Whether murder is condemned in either the New or Old Testaments it is still from the Torah and there is no confusion at all so your accusation that I am misquoting Paul is totally incorrect.
Not all laws are the same between the Old Testament (the 613 Laws of Moses) vs. the laws (or commands) given to us by Jesus Christ and His followers in the New Testament. Certain laws have appeared to remain the same like the Moral Law. But there are no Judicial Laws (that enforces justice) given to God's people. Instead, God has given unbelieving governments (or your own nation) that responsibility. Jesus taught pacifism for his followers in the New Testament. Although, a person can still obey them, the ceremonial laws from the OT are also no longer in effect (Like the Saturday Sabbath, the dietary laws, circumcision, Passover, etc.). There are certain OT laws that are no more that are forbidden for us to obey (like the animal sacrifices, making vows, an eye for an eye, etc.). Hebrews 7:12 says the Law has changed.
Please note carefully that I do not believe Christians can't stop sinning, how can they continue if Christ and the Spirit are living in them [except they walk in the flesh and not the Spirit, in which case they need to repent and learn to walk in the Spirit]?
Again, what does it matter if you believe that if you also teach to others that King David was saved while he committed his sins of adultery and murder? The foundation is already destroyed. You are telling others they can sin and still be saved (Whether you want that to happen or not). To teach that a person can sin and still be saved is to teach the EXACT OPPOSITE of a person to stop sinning. So what you are saying here is contradiction. A double message.
You said:
Do you think that I have not experienced the temptations common to man? I have and each time Christ in me has overcome them. I walk free from sin by the grace of God and not by works of the flesh. I live to be totally sold out to God and to encourage others to walk in his grace.
Are you referring to the same kind of grace that David received in the fact that he was saved while he committed his sins of adultery and murder? If that is the kind of grace you are referring to, then that is not true Biblical grace, but it is turning God's grace into a license for immorality.
You said:
I have said before, and will say it again, do you not realise that forgiveness is the power not to sin again? We can all experience this power if we are willing to submit to God and resist the devil.
What do you make of those believers who say they cannot overcome grievous sin this side of Heaven but they believe they should strive to obey God? In other words, they do not think they can overcome grievous sin like lying, or lusting and yet they should strive to fight against these things. Yet, it is okay they do not overcome them because God still saves them because of their belief on Jesus. Do you think this belief is teaching a license for immorality?
It is no good trying to find fault with me, why not just ask God to help you be faultless?
I am not trying to find fault with you personally. I am fighting against your wrong belief that is not described in the Bible.
This is the power of the Gospel if you will accept it.
You mean the OSAS version of grace (or the Belief Alone version of grace) that is not taught in the Bible that says that King David was saved while he committed his sins of adultery and murder? Sorry. No thanks. Such a teaching is absolutely immoral to me. This version of grace is a violation of basic morality and you cannot even see why it is immoral. It's still sinning while under God's grace and it insults what Christ did for us on the cross.
I reiterate, the conundrum is that you either view David through the eyes of the Torah, which justly say he is guilty to be condemned,
Not at all. Grievous sin is condemnation in both the Old and New Testaments.
"For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: and as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law;" (Romans 2:12).
28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace? (Hebrews 10:28-29).
"For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins," (Hebrews 10:26).
28 "But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
29 And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
30 And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell." (Matthew 5:28-30).
The only difference is that God's people do not enforce justice in killing a person physically (i.e. capital punishment) if a fellow believer commits grievous sin. But you take words in the New Testament about how the Law kills (when it is talking about capital punishment) as being in reference to how we will not die spiritually if we commit sin.
You said:
or thought the eyes of God of whom David says, "Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven and whose sin is covered. Blessed is the man to whom The Lord imputes no iniquity and in whose spirit there is no guile. When I kept silent my bones waxed old through my roaring all day long for day and night you hand was heavy upon me: my moisture is turned to the drought of summer. Selah. I acknowledged my sin unto thee and my iniquity I hid not. I said, I will confess my transgression to The Lord and you forgave the iniquity of my sin. Selah." Psalm 32:1 to 5.
This is talking about past sins that are confessed. Nowhere does this teach that we can sin and still be saved.
You said:
Please read what I said before and understand, by the Torah David was not saved, but by the mercy of God he was simply because God was determined to save him.
This is the double message that Eternal Security likes to espouse. David was saved and yet he was not saved. Please pick a side and stick with it. You cannot preach a double message or a message that is contradictory. Either David was saved or he was not saved. God's laws applied to David back then and they related to a person being right with God if they kept the Law as a part of their faith. If they did not have faith and they did not love God and love others, their law keeping was only a show or a distortion of God's laws and the faith. This is what the Pharisees did with God's laws. They ignored the weightier matters of the Law like faith, justice, and mercy (See Matthew 23:23, and Luke 11:42). Jesus did not say, "Oh, it's okay you sin poor Pharisee, just believe in my sacrifice and my grace and do not worry about sinning, you will be forgiven and then you will be able to walk uprightly in time." Is that what Jesus said? No!
Jesus taught that you have to keep the commandments as a part of eternal life (See Matthew 19:17, and Luke 10:25-28). So we not only need God's grace (Which is how we are initially and ultimately saved, but we also need to obey as a part of that grace - as a part of the salvation process).
We all know what happens when God's Spirit stops striving with man [see Noah's flood], but Noah found grace in the eyes of God.
Noah was called a preacher of righteousness (2 Peter 2:5).
The global flood destroyed the world because it was an example to ALL who would live ungodly thereafter (2 Peter 2:5-6).
You said:
Can you not allow David to find grace in the eyes of God?
I believe David was saved in the end and that he was ultimately saved by God's grace. So that is not a problem for me. What is a problem for me is that you are teaching that David was saved while he committed his sins of adultery and murder (Whereby he would not have needed to seek forgiveness with God because he would have already been forgiven; And he would not have needed to cry out to God for the joy of his salvation back if he was already saved). Teaching that King David was saved in his sins of adultery and murder is teaching a license for immorality. It is wrong and you cannot even see it.
In any event, may God's love shine upon you today (even if we disagree strongly on this topic).