- Dec 25, 2003
- 42,058
- 16,810
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
You keep using repeatability wrong.How do you "know" humans are not a separate act of creation?
Can you prove that with repeatability in a lab?
Upvote
0
You keep using repeatability wrong.How do you "know" humans are not a separate act of creation?
Can you prove that with repeatability in a lab?
The pyramids were not built by slaves. We even have records of payments to the construction gangs.I heard somewhere when I was a kid that the pyramids WERE built by aliens. I forget where I heard it though. Its hogwash though. The pyramids were built by Egyptian slaves. But we know that slaves built the pyramids by history.
Nothing is ever proven by science. There's no such thing as scientific proof.It was nonsense. I'm ashamed to admit that I believed it at one point. But yeah a lot of what I was taught has been disproven by science. Except for things like Germ Theory which has been proven by science.
A lot of laymen don't understand what repeatability means in a scientific context.This notion that evolution “has to be demonstrated in a lab or I won’t believe it” is clearly misguided. And clearly so. Thinking adults cannot possibly really believe this. No reasonable person denies, for example, that the Chicago Cubs won the 2016 World Series.
The evidence for this is overwhelming, just as is the evidence for evolution. And neither can be replicated.
The same way I know that I am not a separate act of creation two weeks ago. My existence is adequately explained by the normal processes of human reproduction, and there is plenty of evidence that there was nothing unusual about my origins -- even though I cannot reproduce my own birth in the lab. Is it possible that I was created two weeks ago with all of my memories intact, along with all of the accompanying evidence of my birth and childhood? Sure. But the same kind of possibility exists for everything else we "know" too, including things we replicate in the lab.
How about you -- how do you "know" that your mother gave birth to you?
Yeah you've heard it all before I'm sure. So I don't see the point in going off topic and arguing with you when you've heard it all before. Its just going to be a bunch of rehashing from Christian scientists that atheists have heard before and some scientists discredit.
There are plenty of scientists out there trying to prove that God created the universe so why don't their findings count as science to you?
Yet any scientist that comes up with an alternate theory and its immediately counted as science.
Wait I can predict your answer its because there is no God.
But if there is no God why have numerous people seen him?
They can't all be " nutjobs" like me.
People have actually seen Jesus in his glorified body. People have been legally dead for 30 minutes and have seen God. Yet people refuse to listen to these people and write them off as crazy. Why?
Science cannot explain why.
Just like science will never prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is no God.
It'll never prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is a God either. Part of believing in God is faith.
Right because atheists don't believe that there's a life after death.
I know I was an atheist for a good chunk of my life so I know the arguments for it.
But see I and other Christians do believe in a life after death. There is a Jesus. And if I want to ask him questions I have that right. There are some questions that only God can answer.
Like for example why I have schizo-affecive disorder
In some cases, the causes can be known, when they are somatic or drug induced. But in the actual "natural" psychiatric disorder, it is still unknown, indeed.Science hasnt come even close to answering why. Its a chemical imbalance in my brain but what caused that chemical imbalance? Why does it affect so much of the population? There are plenty of bipolar and schizophenic people in the world.
I'm grateful for the medicine that has come out because without it I probably would be locked up in a mental hospital for the rest of my life
But science cannot answer why
Scientists can't figure it out
But God knows why because God knows everything. And its one of the first questions I'm going to ask him. You can call me ignorant and stupid all you want. Laugh at me all you want. I know its true because like other "crazy" people I have seen God too.
Nothing is ever proven by science. There's no such thing as scientific proof.
Really? If nothing is proven by science than why do we get sick? Germ Theory says its because of germs. This can be replicated in a laboratory therefore science has proven it. Otherwise we get sick by something else. If DNA hasn't been proven by science than there are tons of innocent rapists and murderers in prison right now. Plus a lot of people are thinking that they're the father of babies when they're not really the father. I mean they say DNA tests are 99.99% accurate that's why its admissible in a court of law. If DNA wasn't proven by science it wouldn't be. So why do you claim science is not proveable beyond a reasonable doubt? Some science is. In fact most of it is.
I get quite upset when I see Creationists using this monstrous lie.i dont think so. there is no evidence that human and banana share a common descent. its just s belief.
Not "some scientists". But as good as all of them - be it christian, muslim, hindu, atheist,... scientists.
And also not "christian scientists". But "christian creationists".
Because they aren't doing any science...
Because it's not science....
It's religion.
No. It's because that what they do, is not science.
Plenty of people, claim to have seen plenty of things.
God(s) (not just your god, btw....), aliens, bigfoot, lochness monsters, leprechauns, angels, poltergeists, zombies, vampires,.......
But they can all be mistaken. Just like you likely assume about the people who claim to have seen aliens, poltergeists, bigfoot, sasquatch, leprechauns, unicorns, ...
Or Elvis Presley and Michael Jackson, years after they died.
For the same reason you don't pay much attention to those people who claim to have seen bigfoot, leprechauns, elves, Zeus, Elvis Presley,....
Science can provide you with lots of plausible explanation of how people can be mistaken about what they believe to have seen. Hallucination being just one of many such reasons.
Why is it, that you are only impressed by the claims of those who claim to have seen the god you happen to believe in, but happily handwave away at face value those who claim to have seen aliens, bigfoot, Elvis Presley, etc?
Could it perhaps be some sort of confirmation bias?
Or that there is no such things as golden flying unicorns.
Science doesn't waste time on trying to prove negative claims.
Yes. And that is exactly the reason why I can't bring myself to believe such a being exists.
Because there is literally nothing that you can't believe "on faith".
You can literally believe anything on mere faith.
I actually require good reasons to accept claims as accurate. And here you are saying quite explicitly that you require faith, because you have no such reasons.
This is also why you likely don't simply believe the claims of alien abductees at face value. You require something more then just their mere testimony.
The same goes for me and your god claims.
Same as above: what reason is there, to accept such a claim as accurate?
Then likely, you will not have given it much thought. Or you'ld realise that there is no such thing as arguments "for" atheism. Atheism doesn't require any arguments "for" it. Atheism is rather what you default to, when you don't accept the arguments for theism....
If you say so. I have no reason to believe that.
I'm sorry to hear that.
I have some people close to me that suffer from chronic psychosis. One of them in context of full blown schizofrenia. I know it can be quite disruptive and upsetting.
In some cases, the causes can be known, when they are somatic or drug induced. But in the actual "natural" psychiatric disorder, it is still unknown, indeed.
Scientists are working on that. Just like they have worked on loads of other things. Surely you realise that all things that are scientifically known in the present, were scientifically unknown at some point in history, right?
When you don't know something, the right course of action is rolling up your sleeves and working hard to find out. Not just assume things.
You and me both. Yes, without things like Abilify... those people close to me would not be able to live a normal life.
...yet
...yet
I'm not laughing.
I'm just saying: just because there are thing unknown in the present, doesn't mean they'll be unknown in the future.
If and when the answers come, they'll be provided by scientists, not priests or 3000 year old religious books.
But all this is besides the point of the thread, off course, which is about teaching science in schools.
Listen to what those of us educated in science are telling you. We don't prove things in science.Really? If nothing is proven by science than why do we get sick? Germ Theory says its because of germs. This can be replicated in a laboratory therefore science has proven it. Otherwise we get sick by something else. If DNA hasn't been proven by science than there are tons of innocent rapists and murderers in prison right now. Plus a lot of people are thinking that they're the father of babies when they're not really the father. I mean they say DNA tests are 99.99% accurate that's why its admissible in a court of law. If DNA wasn't proven by science it wouldn't be. So why do you claim science is not proveable beyond a reasonable doubt? Some science is. In fact most of it is.
why you keep talking about me rather then my claims? i already gave you a chance to show why evolution is a scientific theory, but you suddenly disappeared: Why evolution isn't scientificWhy do you keep making claims about science you don't understand?
I wonder who won the Nobel prize in chemistry this year?
Really? If nothing is proven by science than why do we get sick? Germ Theory says its because of germs. This can be replicated in a laboratory therefore science has proven it.
Otherwise we get sick by something else
If DNA hasn't been proven by science than there are tons of innocent rapists and murderers in prison right now.
Plus a lot of people are thinking that they're the father of babies when they're not really the father. I mean they say DNA tests are 99.99% accurate that's why its admissible in a court of law. If DNA wasn't proven by science it wouldn't be.
So why do you claim science is not proveable beyond a reasonable doubt? Some science is. In fact most of it is.
Because when I have engaged you about your claims, you have been unable to support them or even participate in rational discussion about them. Life is short and some things are not worth doing.why you keep talking about me rather then my claims?
its very easy- we need a faith to believe that all creatures share a common descent. its not a fact. where do you see anything wrong about this statement?I get quite upset when I see Creationists using this monstrous lie.
You see, I can accept anyone challenging the precise details of the evidence. That is an essential part of science.
More than that, I can accept anyone challenging the interpretation of the evidence. That is how hypotheses are tested and developed.
What I cannot accept is anyone simply denying that such evidence exists. I see four possible explanations for such behaviour.
I find insufficient evidence to decide between these alternatives in this instance. Perhaps xianghua, you can tell us in which category you fit, or offer an altenative explanation for your silly post.
- The perpetrator is a troll.
- The perpetrator has a wicked sense of humour.
- The perpetrator is a liar.
- The perpetrator has restricted intelligence.