I'm gonna assume that you screwed up your "At "best" such an accusation is of the form
"The judge was just fine - until grilled and under pressure made to make an inaccurate statement... had we not grilled him under such pressure there would have been no problem with the selection".
Taking an otherwise innocent person and grilling them to the point that they make an error -- then circling back to claim you finally have something on them - is transparently devious. Which is "the best" that you are arguing for.
sounds like more creative writing and not even remotely part of the bar exam. Why not stick with real life?
" And your repeat was your other post wasn't to your lack of creative writing. Lol
I stick with facts. You should try it.
Upvote
0