Being in the category doesn't make it the same thing. Couples therapy focuses on the relationship between the man and woman while psychotherapy is a long term process to help change an individual's behavior.
There is no evidence that this occurred.
You seem to be confusing psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. Psychotherapy is usually not long (less than 10 sessions) and can be used to address situations which may be impacting a couples relationship. In this case, Ford's recall of a sexual assault was considered pertinent.
Nope. I checked with psychologists.
Couples therapy is usually about 10-12 session but it really all depends on the problems. Some may be resolved in 6 sessions but some couples may be seen much longer. Psychotherapy usually last much longer than couples therapy but Psychologists usually won't say because it depends on how deep the problem is.
I have not "claimed" that, I suggested the possibility ... which is very different.
Sorry, I should have said "implied".
It "could" have but we have no indication that it did. As far as evidence shows, she recovered her memories during therapy. All else is just speculation.
"recovered her memories during therapy" ... that reflects what I said in my post that you first responded to.
No it doesn't. You wrote, "A member of my family went to a psychotherapist with a weight problem and came away thinking her obesity could have been the result of being sexually abused as a small child by her father. This false notion was conclusively disproved but the damage lingered. "
" Can be recovered" doesn't imply that they were. Most Psychologists know not to ask such questions.
It is also sad that good women had to go through what they went through. Yelling and screaming isn't corroboration but it is common to both left and right and hopefully our Christian brethren remember how Tea Party members disrupted town hall meeting, screaming and yelling so that most people couldn't ask questions or get responses.
The situation I described referred to memories recovered in therapy that the person believed were real.
Yes, but not mine.
And? Most people who try to relate an incident which occurred 30 years ago is faulty, including Kavanaugh's. In my investigation into work place incidents I stressed writing down the details as soon as possible. A few days, a week, a month, etc. affects the facts.
Except the women who alleged he assaulted them. Those that confirmed his drinking provided evidence that he has no problem lying to investigators.
We'll probably know what the truth is. I pray for them both.
That is just your speculation. There are many places that those memories originate. They could be fact or they could have been a dream she had after watching a suspended filled movie while a youth. Memories have a way of morphing into something which never occurred.
No matter how long the FBi investigation continued it would never have satisfied the Left. No witness has corroborated any of the allegations against Kavanaugh, except for vague "I heard someone say" comments. My favourite is the guy who said 'someone' told him about the Ramirez accusation but when that 'someone' was questioned the 'someone' denied knowing anything about it.
Your feeling is that Kavanaugh is guilty, my feeling is that he is innocent. Feelings are ok - much of life is based on whether we trust someone or not - but it is helpful to explore plausible explanations that support those feelings.
I totally see how that justifies the way Brett Kavanaugh was treated.huh...look who's still not considered "innocent until proven guilty":
Trump accuses Hillary Clinton of colluding with Russia as crowd chants 'lock her up'
this is from today.
tulc(wonders if someone is going to tell President Trump that?)
