1 TIMOTHY 1:9 is supporting what I am saying brother. If you are breaking any of God's ten Commandments you stand guilty before God of breaking them. Let me ask you are simple question that may help. If someone is living a life of KNOWN UNREPENTANT SIN are they in a saved state before GOD or an UNSAVED state before God * HEBREWS 10:26-27?
there is no saved or unsaved in this life. we are not saved here. we are 'saved' from judgement in the next life. if you look at everytime the word "saved" is used in the Nt it speaks to a upcoming event unless Christ himself is speaking to someone, meaning Christ (as with the thief on the cross) made a judgement before the thief died. everyone else gets judged for their sin or 'saved' from them in the next life.
So once Saved (in the next life) a person can never loose said salvation. however in this life we choose to follow christ or we do not. If we follow Christ and walk the path of atonement means our sins are forgiven, not that we will never sin again. Here in this life Sin is just apart of life according to Paul in Romans
chapters 6,7 and 8. He goes on to explain That we are two distinct beings enclosed in one body. the old sinful self (Spirit) and the new man in christ. (soul) While the old person must sin/slave to sin until death, the new man is free to turn from sin. Meaning not that the new man will not be apart of sin, but the new man can not make way for, or excuse sin, but at the same time is not judge for sin the old man who was born as a slave to sin (which dies when this body dies) and the new man goes on to the resurrection and salvation from judgement free to live a sinless life, because of what Christ did on the cross.
Once we have been born again/living as the new man, means we have turned from sin, Which is the definition of repenting. so rather than enjoy or make excuse of our sins we turn from them and learn to hate and seperate the new born again person in Christ, from our old sinful self. If we sin/when we sin during this process we do not have to confess as if we are catholics confessing to a priest for every little thing. (there is no way for us to keep track of everything) If we struggle, yes we are to confess our sins one to another for accountability and help but we are not being made to confess everything we do wrong. again not possible.
Our want to separate our selves from sin is in fact repentance from sin and so long as we maintain this separation we are in a perpetual state of grace. as we are in a perpetual state of having turn 180* from sin!
It is when we embrace or make excuse of our sin do we need then repent, because the old man who is a slave to sin is taken back over and we both soul and spirit have embraced sin. again repentance is not confession. repentance is an internal 180* turn from sin so rather than embracing sin you turn and hate it, even if your spirit/old man is a slave to it and you sin every day of the rest of your life. So long as you turn/repent you need not beg for forgiveness for every little thing. remember it's not about us or what we do EG Forgiveness ritual or ceremony that makes us worthy or righteous before God. it is a gift of Grace given to those in whom God loves.
Which is why the whole verse and the context of 1tim 1 makes more sense when I say it supports me.
Look at what paul says before and after your cherry picked verse.
5
Love is the purpose of my command. Love comes from a pure heart. It comes from a good sense of what is right and wrong. It comes from faith that is honest and true. 6 Some have turned from these teachings. They would rather talk about things that have no meaning. 7 They want to be teachers of the law. And they are very sure about that law. But they don’t know what they are talking about.
8 We know that the law is good if it is used properly. 9 We also know that the law isn’t made for godly people. It is made for those who break the law. It is for those who refuse to obey. It is for ungodly and sinful people. It is for those who aren’t holy and who don’t believe. It is for those who kill their fathers or mothers. It is for murderers. 10 It is for those who commit sexual sins. It is for those who commit homosexual acts. It is for people who buy and sell slaves. It is for liars. It is for people who tell lies in court. It is for those who are a witness to things that aren’t true. And it is for anything else that is the opposite of true teaching. 11 True teaching agrees with the good news about the glory of the blessed God. He trusted me with that good news.
Did you see it? lets walk through together:
Paul starts in verse 5 stating love (as I am describing) is the purpose of his writing tim, and love is what determines right and wrong but some... have turned from those teachings (about love determining right and wrong) They/you want to be teachers of the law (instead of teaching the love aspect Paul and I are teaching) because you know the law and are very sure of the law. But you/they don't know what you are talking about.
verse 8 the law is good if used properly, but we also know the law is not made for godly people/ the people who follow christ and are in a perpetual state of grace because they are in repentance of sin. Rather the law is made for those who refuse to obey, it is for ungodly people/ people who are not in a state of grace/people who have not and do not repent. The law is only there to judge people like this and he goes on to give examples of people who embrace sin.
Can you see what happens when you take a legit verse out of context, verse how it can mean the exact opposite when you put it back together with everything else's said in the same breath?
Everything you said or rather everything you think 1 tim1:9 says... the opposite is true and we know the opposite is true because from verse 5-9 it supports everything I said from the law being obsolete to Love defining what is right and wrong. Paul even goes on to speak about people who do not teach the love as we teach but teach the law as being wrong for doing so..
What more in a exegesis could one want if one sought/seeks the truth?
Do you notice you have to give a sermon and then tag on a bible verse (cut from it context) to give what you say legitimacy? Do you see How I use whole blocks of text to do the talking for me?
Now if you argue my point to whom is your argument really directed? If I argue your point to whom is my argument directed?
Again I used 6 verses and simply explained what was literally on page, no crazy go here take this verse go there take that one do a hokie pokie and paste them together to get something new. I simply clarified what was on page and matched up what I said with what was already written.
Verses taking one single solitary verse out of it's original context isolate it and then build a narrative to describe all the thing this solitary verse could mean.
without a doubt if you only read 9 and then maybe conditioned to think 9 said what you claimed you could be made to think 10-13 also supports you. but the proble lies with everything before chapter 9. it contradict your idea of the law and who the law is meant for.