Are you a "Moderate SDA"? IF so what do you mean by that?

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Like I said, don't parse words; you expect everyone to accept EGW on par with the Bible, as canon, that she cannot be questioned; that's popery!

I have yet to even quote Ellen White for anything -- your fiction regarding our discussion topic - does not hold up to the facts of the thread that we can all read.

Were we simply "not supposed to notice"??

Why keep doing that?
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
“Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.” Jer 23:5 (KJV unless otherwise stated)

Jeremiah predicts the first coming of Christ and the Jews accepting Him. That did not happen.

1. 490 years of Jewish probation ended at the time of Christ (shortly after His ascension into heaven) - the same event predicted by that 490 year timeline of Daniel 9

2. As Paul confirms in 1 Thess 2
14 For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea, for you also endured the same sufferings at the hands of your own countrymen, even as they did from the Jews, 15 who both killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out. They are not pleasing to God, but hostile to all men, 16 hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved; with the result that they always fill up the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon them to the utmost.

3. As Christ predicted in Matthew 23
32 Fill up, then, the measure of the guilt of your fathers. 33 You serpents, you brood of vipers, how will you escape the sentence of hell?
34 “Therefore, behold, I am sending you prophets and wise men and scribes; some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city, 35 so that upon you may fall the guilt of all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. 36 Truly I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation.

4. Thus we have switched from the "nation-church" model of evangelizing the whole World - to the "persecuted church" model of evangelizing the whole world.

Rom 2 "He is not a Jew who is one outwardly... but he is a Jew who is one inwardly"



==============================
Now it is the "second coming" that we look for and Christ wipes out the wicked at the second coming - and takes all the saints (including any saved-Jews that may exist at that time) to heaven.

In its explanation of Isa 11:4, the SDA bible commentary affirms Christ subdues his enemies and takes his kingdom at his return (the second coming), 1000 years before the phenomena of Rev 21:1-3. What it does not say is that Christ rules on Earth at the second coming.

Rather Christ "rules with a rod of iron" Rev 19 - at the second coming described in Rev 19. Ruling with a rod of Iron is always the term for no-mercy... only justice. And that is what the wicked get at the 2nd coming.. are dead during the millennium and then at the great white throne judgment which gets to them into the lake of fire... see Rev 20.

This is not sola-scriptura but private interpretation, which both dispensationalism as well as Covenantalism, replacement theology, also hold more or less.

Not true in real life. In real life I quote the Bible and showing that it makes the case.

Bible details matter.

As I stated previously, two advents were prophesied and the historicist-Adventist, Frank W. Hardy, affirms this in his thesis, concerning Dan 11, cited below:

“From a chiastic point of view the chapter directs attention to Christ's death on the cross at His first coming in vs. 22. From a linear point of view the same material shows some of the challenges to be faced by those who would base their faith on that event and the action He would finally take to rescue them at His second coming in 12:1.25 Thus, Dan 11 indicates that on two separate occasions Christ would personally invade human history.​


That is a bait-and-switch.

I never argue that the OT does not speak of the 2nd coming or events after the millennium. Certainly Isaiah 66:23 takes us all the way to the "New Heavens and New Earth"

But it is your quote from Jeremiah 23 that I addressed in my response. Not Daniel 11 or Daniel 12.

Details matter even in a discussion such as this.

This detail in now way is an argument against historicism.

The point being, which Ryan and Hardy miss as Adventists, is that the spring festivals represent Christ’s death

As all Adventist scholars point out - the events connected with the first coming of Christ are in the spring festivals... and those connected with the second coming of Christ are in the fall.

Being destined to reject Christ must be distorted

There is no "destined to reject Christ" in the actual Bible.

hint: Ninevah was not 'destined to be destroyed in 40 days'.
 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,027
130
Tucson
Visit site
✟223,911.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I have yet to even quote Ellen White for anything -- your fiction regarding our discussion topic - does not hold up to the facts of the thread that we can all read.

Were we simply "not supposed to notice"??

Why keep doing that?

That you would even consider using EGW as proof, which you did when you exclaimed, “we have not even gotten to the point where I would need to quote from what God told Ellen White,” exposes that you hold her work on par with the Bible. You need to consider how others are going take what you write or don’t write it at all.
 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,027
130
Tucson
Visit site
✟223,911.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jeremiah predicts the first coming of Christ and the Jews accepting Him. That did not happen.

1. 490 years of Jewish probation ended at the time of Christ (shortly after His ascension into heaven) - the same event predicted by that 490 year timeline of Daniel 9

2. As Paul confirms in 1 Thess 2
14 For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea, for you also endured the same sufferings at the hands of your own countrymen, even as they did from the Jews, 15 who both killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out. They are not pleasing to God, but hostile to all men, 16 hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved; with the result that they always fill up the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon them to the utmost.

3. As Christ predicted in Matthew 23
32 Fill up, then, the measure of the guilt of your fathers. 33 You serpents, you brood of vipers, how will you escape the sentence of hell?
34 “Therefore, behold, I am sending you prophets and wise men and scribes; some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city, 35 so that upon you may fall the guilt of all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. 36 Truly I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation.

4. Thus we have switched from the "nation-church" model of evangelizing the whole World - to the "persecuted church" model of evangelizing the whole world.

Rom 2 "He is not a Jew who is one outwardly... but he is a Jew who is one inwardly"



==============================
Now it is the "second coming" that we look for and Christ wipes out the wicked at the second coming - and takes all the saints (including any saved-Jews that may exist at that time) to heaven.

In its explanation of Isa 11:4, the SDA bible commentary affirms Christ subdues his enemies and takes his kingdom at his return (the second coming), 1000 years before the phenomena of Rev 21:1-3. What it does not say is that Christ rules on Earth at the second coming.

Rather Christ "rules with a rod of iron" Rev 19 - at the second coming described in Rev 19. Ruling with a rod of Iron is always the term for no-mercy... only justice. And that is what the wicked get at the 2nd coming.. are dead during the millennium and then at the great white throne judgment which gets to them into the lake of fire... see Rev 20.



Not true in real life. In real life I quote the Bible and showing that it makes the case.

Bible details matter.



That is a bait-and-switch.

I never argue that the OT does not speak of the 2nd coming or events after the millennium. Certainly Isaiah 66:23 takes us all the way to the "New Heavens and New Earth"

But it is your quote from Jeremiah 23 that I addressed in my response. Not Daniel 11 or Daniel 12.

Details matter even in a discussion such as this.

This detail in now way is an argument against historicism.



As all Adventist scholars point out - the events connected with the first coming of Christ are in the spring festivals... and those connected with the second coming of Christ are in the fall.



There is no "destined to reject Christ" in the actual Bible.

hint: Ninevah was not 'destined to be destroyed in 40 days'.

Wisdom reveals God does not have his prophets disagree with each other; Jeremiah cannot prophecy that the Jews were to accept Christ and Daniel prophecy the Romans “shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. Its end shall come with a flood, and to the end there shall be war. Desolations are decreed” (Dan 9:26). But that’s exactly what you do. You have Jeremiah say one thing and Daniel say another. This is the bane of Adventism. And as I previously stated, the prophets cannot conflict with the Hebraic cultic types that foreshadowed that the kingdom was to appear at the autumnal antitypes, which is exactly what you assert. You assert the appointed time of the kingdom was at the fulfillment of the spring antitypes, which is, as stated in my thread, defilement of the promises to Israel by asserting the promises were offered to the unclean who disavowed Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,027
130
Tucson
Visit site
✟223,911.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I never argue that the OT does not speak of the 2nd coming or events after the millennium. Certainly Isaiah 66:23 takes us all the way to the "New Heavens and New Earth"
But it is your quote from Jeremiah 23 that I addressed in my response. Not Daniel 11 or Daniel 12.
Details matter even in a discussion such as this.
This detail in now way is an argument against historicism.

Actually, you have two returns of Christ, just like the dispensationalists. The scriptures only account for 1 return.
 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,027
130
Tucson
Visit site
✟223,911.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There is no "destined to reject Christ" in the actual Bible.

hint: Ninevah was not 'destined to be destroyed in 40 days'.

See, open thesis! God didn’t know what the Ninevites would do.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
BobRyan said:
I have yet to even quote Ellen White for anything -- your fiction regarding our discussion topic - does not hold up to the facts of the thread that we can all read.

Were we simply "not supposed to notice"??

Why keep doing that?

That you would even consider using EGW as proof, which you did when you exclaimed, “we have not even gotten to the point where I would need to quote from what God told Ellen White,”

Me denying that I used the messages God gave to Ellen White as proof for anything I have stated in support of my position is "proof" to you - that I did it?

really?

And "that" is supposed to be "compelling"?

I find your logic "illusive" just then.

exposes that you hold her work on par with the Bible

I hold what God says to Moses, what God says to Paul, and what God says to Ellen White as being messages from "the same God".

Obviously.

You have left it to me to "state the obvious" ... again.

One who claims to accept the Bible - should then "read it" and accept what it claims as the source for the messages given to God's prophets.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tampasteve

Pray for peace in Israel
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Angels Team
CF Senior Ambassador
Site Supporter
May 15, 2017
25,353
7,327
Tampa
✟775,611.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
MOD HAT ON
241646_eb9a88c26801439d36712712051851a1_thumb.jpg
This is a faith community for SDA, please abide by the CF Faith Community Rules and this particular Faith Communities SOP:

Community Rules
In addition, if you are not a member of this faith group, you may not debate issues or teach against this group's theology. You may post in fellowship. Active promotion of views contrary to the established teachings of this group will be considered off topic. All posts within this faith community must adhere to the site wide rules.

MOD HAT OFF
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
“Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.” Jer 23:5 (KJV unless otherwise stated)

Jeremiah predicts the first coming of Christ and the Jews accepting Him. That did not happen.

1. 490 years of Jewish probation ended at the time of Christ (shortly after His ascension into heaven) - the same event predicted by that 490 year timeline of Daniel 9

2. As Paul confirms in 1 Thess 2
14 For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea, for you also endured the same sufferings at the hands of your own countrymen, even as they did from the Jews, 15 who both killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out. They are not pleasing to God, but hostile to all men, 16 hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved; with the result that they always fill up the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon them to the utmost.

3. As Christ predicted in Matthew 23
32 Fill up, then, the measure of the guilt of your fathers. 33 You serpents, you brood of vipers, how will you escape the sentence of hell?
34 “Therefore, behold, I am sending you prophets and wise men and scribes; some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city, 35 so that upon you may fall the guilt of all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. 36 Truly I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation.

4. Thus we have switched from the "nation-church" model of evangelizing the whole World - to the "persecuted church" model of evangelizing the whole world.

Rom 2 "He is not a Jew who is one outwardly... but he is a Jew who is one inwardly"



==============================
Now it is the "second coming" that we look for and Christ wipes out the wicked at the second coming - and takes all the saints (including any saved-Jews that may exist at that time) to heaven.

In its explanation of Isa 11:4, the SDA bible commentary affirms Christ subdues his enemies and takes his kingdom at his return (the second coming), 1000 years before the phenomena of Rev 21:1-3. What it does not say is that Christ rules on Earth at the second coming.

Rather Christ "rules with a rod of iron" Rev 19 - at the second coming described in Rev 19. Ruling with a rod of Iron is always the term for no-mercy... only justice. And that is what the wicked get at the 2nd coming.. are dead during the millennium and then at the great white throne judgment which gets to them into the lake of fire... see Rev 20.

This is not sola-scriptura but private interpretation, which both dispensationalism as well as Covenantalism, replacement theology, also hold more or less.

Not true in real life. In real life I quote the Bible and showing that it makes the case.

Bible details matter.

As I stated previously, two advents were prophesied and the historicist-Adventist, Frank W. Hardy, affirms this in his thesis, concerning Dan 11, cited below:

“From a chiastic point of view the chapter directs attention to Christ's death on the cross at His first coming in vs. 22. From a linear point of view the same material shows some of the challenges to be faced by those who would base their faith on that event and the action He would finally take to rescue them at His second coming in 12:1.25 Thus, Dan 11 indicates that on two separate occasions Christ would personally invade human history.​

That is a bait-and-switch.

I never argue that the OT does not speak of the 2nd coming or events after the millennium. Certainly Isaiah 66:23 takes us all the way to the "New Heavens and New Earth"

But it is your quote from Jeremiah 23 that I addressed in my response. Not Daniel 11 or Daniel 12.

Details matter even in a discussion such as this.

This detail in now way is an argument against historicism.

The point being, which Ryan and Hardy miss as Adventists, is that the spring festivals represent Christ’s death

As all Adventist scholars point out - the events connected with the first coming of Christ are in the spring festivals... and those connected with the second coming of Christ are in the fall.

Being destined to reject Christ must be distorted

There is no "destined to reject Christ" in the actual Bible.

hint: Ninevah was not 'destined to be destroyed in 40 days'.

Wisdom reveals God does not have his prophets disagree with each other;

How unexpected to find that we agree on something.

Jeremiah cannot prophecy that the Jews were to accept Christ

In fact there are many OT predictions/prophecies about the success that would be theirs if they were to follow God in obedience.

Moses outlined that path for them.
Jeremiah refutes the very speculation that you offer.

Jer 18
5 Then the word of the Lord came to me, saying,
6 O house of Israel, cannot I do with you as this potter? saith the Lord. Behold, as the clay is in the potter's hand, so are ye in mine hand, O house of Israel.
7 At what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy it;
8 If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them.
9 And at what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a kingdom, to build and to plant it;
10 If it do evil in my sight, that it obey not my voice, then I will repent of the good, wherewith I said I would benefit them.

While your foray into creative writing and speculation is somewhat interesting - I prefer the doctrine that is found in the actual Bible itself.


You have Jeremiah say one thing and Daniel say another.

Not true in real life.

In real life Israel is given 490 years to choose yea or nay when it comes to accepting God as their King and the mission of the Messiah.

In the end they choose against God's Plan. Isaiah 5:4 God asks "what more could I have done that I have not done?"

Matthew 23 "How I WANTED to spare your children.. but you would not"

"He came to His OWN and His OWN received Him not" John 1:11

Your calvinism is beginning to show in your rejection of these Bible truths.

This is the bane of Adventism.

Just not in real life.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
See, open thesis! God didn’t know what the Ninevites would do.

That is true that what you have stated is the case in the "open theism" model - but that is not what we believe. We believe in "closed foreknowledge" of God - He absolutely knows the future but we reject Calvinist predestination and also open theism.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I used to be a traditional and then a moderate and now a former adventist.

To be a moderate adventist means you don't believe all of what they teach and you want out but you stay for some reason or another.

Moderates pick and choose which points of doctrine they want to keep.

Joey

I thought that was "progressive"
 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,027
130
Tucson
Visit site
✟223,911.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
MOD HAT ON
241646_eb9a88c26801439d36712712051851a1_thumb.jpg
This is a faith community for SDA, please abide by the CF Faith Community Rules and this particular Faith Communities SOP:

Community Rules
In addition, if you are not a member of this faith group, you may not debate issues or teach against this group's theology. You may post in fellowship. Active promotion of views contrary to the established teachings of this group will be considered off topic. All posts within this faith community must adhere to the site wide rules.

MOD HAT OFF

As a former traditional Adventist, I posted here. If this is addressed to me then say so or message me.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Actually, you have two returns of Christ, just like the dispensationalists. The scriptures only account for 1 return.

Until you read the actual Bible where we see the 2nd coming event in Rev 19 and then again in Rev 22 another coming of Christ at the end of the Millennium. Where the New Jerusalem comes down out of heaven.

Since all humans on earth are dead as Christ approaches Earth at the end of the Millennium - no need for them to "get ready" for it.

I choose the Bible on this point.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
See, open thesis! God didn’t know what the Ninevites would do.

You say that as if you had proven it to be true -- as "if" quoting "you" is the same as quoting "me"??

You say "God did not know"... fine.

Where did I say "God did not know"???
Where did the Bible say "God did not know the future"?

How does simply inserting your own quote-of-you make it a compelling argument for promoting your position??
 
Upvote 0

Jerryhuerta

Historicist
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2018
1,027
130
Tucson
Visit site
✟223,911.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
MOD HAT ON
241646_eb9a88c26801439d36712712051851a1_thumb.jpg
This is a faith community for SDA, please abide by the CF Faith Community Rules and this particular Faith Communities SOP:

Community Rules
In addition, if you are not a member of this faith group, you may not debate issues or teach against this group's theology. You may post in fellowship. Active promotion of views contrary to the established teachings of this group will be considered off topic. All posts within this faith community must adhere to the site wide rules.

MOD HAT OFF

Again, is this a warning that my posts are unacceptable? There is no need to proceed if my posts are going to be band.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

tampasteve

Pray for peace in Israel
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Angels Team
CF Senior Ambassador
Site Supporter
May 15, 2017
25,353
7,327
Tampa
✟775,611.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
As a former traditional Adventist, I posted here. If this is addressed to me then say so or message me.
In general Mod Hat posts like this are made as a reminder of the rules when one or more people are straying from the forum SOP or there are minor violations. We do not generally call out individual users in a mod hat post like this. But, since you ask directly, only members of the faith group may debate, former members and guests may not. Questions are great and encouraged, debate is not allowed in the faith communities so as to keep the peace. Debate is allowed in other forums on CF, so sometimes individuals will agree to move a thread/discussion to an open forum.
Again, is this a warning that my posts are unacceptable? There is no need to proceed if my posts are going to be band.
No need to post several times, I simply had not logged in until this morning.
 
Upvote 0

Oh Hooey

Member
Nov 9, 2018
7
0
Crooked River Ranch, Oregon
✟8,307.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
As a moderate SDA .... I believe in all 28 Fundamental Beliefs of the church.
What I don't believe in - is forcing compliance of non-Fundamental Beliefs of the church.
I'm thinking that's what makes me a moderate rather than a conservative.

Not sure I should comment on the following since I am new here - but I'll give it a shot anyway - For me when someone says they are a former 'traditional Adventist' I assume they mean they are now a 'moderate Adventist'. Or at least - that could be one possibility.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I am not a moderate Adventist and I do not know what that means. I'm a progressive adventist, which means I have progressed past the point of even desiring the label. .

You are saying you are not a Seventh-day Adventist at all. But there are a number of SDAs that call themselves "progressive" and are not at all "ex-SDA". You know that right?
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Explain to me how the saints could be in heaven/paradise, the tabernacle of God the Father, and the tabernacle of God the Father be declared to be definitively with man only at the end of the thousand years according to the testimony of Christ above? The “desolate earth” doctrine is a fallacy founded upon the error of Replacement theology. Rather the illustration of Jerusalem coming down out of heaven is idiomatic of how we no longer have to come to “the heavenly Jerusalem” in a figurative sense, as Hebrews 12:22 states, when the tabernacle of God will be with man at the end of the thousand years, fulfilling “Thy kingdom come thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.”

*Henry Grattan Guinness, The Approaching End of the Age Viewed in the Light of History Prophecy and Science (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1878 ed.), 80

Sounds like a lot of guesswork there - and not at remotely SDA progressive or not.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
“Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.” Jer 23:5 (KJV unless otherwise stated)

Jeremiah predicts the first coming of Christ and the Jews accepting Him. That did not happen.

1. 490 years of Jewish probation ended at the time of Christ (shortly after His ascension into heaven) - the same event predicted by that 490 year timeline of Daniel 9

2. As Paul confirms in 1 Thess 2
14 For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus that are in Judea, for you also endured the same sufferings at the hands of your own countrymen, even as they did from the Jews, 15 who both killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out. They are not pleasing to God, but hostile to all men, 16 hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved; with the result that they always fill up the measure of their sins. But wrath has come upon them to the utmost.

3. As Christ predicted in Matthew 23
32 Fill up, then, the measure of the guilt of your fathers. 33 You serpents, you brood of vipers, how will you escape the sentence of hell?
34 “Therefore, behold, I am sending you prophets and wise men and scribes; some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city, 35 so that upon you may fall the guilt of all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. 36 Truly I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation.

4. Thus we have switched from the "nation-church" model of evangelizing the whole World - to the "persecuted church" model of evangelizing the whole world.

Rom 2 "He is not a Jew who is one outwardly... but he is a Jew who is one inwardly"



==============================
Now it is the "second coming" that we look for and Christ wipes out the wicked at the second coming - and takes all the saints (including any saved-Jews that may exist at that time) to heaven.

In its explanation of Isa 11:4, the SDA bible commentary affirms Christ subdues his enemies and takes his kingdom at his return (the second coming), 1000 years before the phenomena of Rev 21:1-3. What it does not say is that Christ rules on Earth at the second coming.

Rather Christ "rules with a rod of iron" Rev 19 - at the second coming described in Rev 19. Ruling with a rod of Iron is always the term for no-mercy... only justice. And that is what the wicked get at the 2nd coming.. are dead during the millennium and then at the great white throne judgment which gets to them into the lake of fire... see Rev 20.

This is not sola-scriptura but private interpretation, which both dispensationalism as well as Covenantalism, replacement theology, also hold more or less. As I stated previously, two advents were prophesied and the historicist-Adventist, Frank W. Hardy, affirms this in his thesis, concerning Dan 11, cited below:

“From a chiastic point of view the chapter directs attention to Christ's death on the cross at His first coming in vs. 22. From a linear point of view the same material shows some of the challenges to be faced by those who would base their faith on that event and the action He would finally take to rescue them at His second coming in 12:1.25 Thus, Dan 11 indicates that on two separate occasions Christ would personally invade human history.


1. Daniel 11 is not Jeremiah 23.
2. The OT prophets did not doom Israel to fail. The had two options - as Moses pointed out and as Joshuah pointed out.

I think your position holds some interesting speculation - but the sola scriptura foundation that sticks with the text - is the one I am interested in.


The point being, which Ryan and Hardy miss as Adventists, is that the spring festivals represent Christ’s death through the rejection by the builders.

Actually they are fulfilled in the first coming of Christ -- as even Paul notes in 1 Cor 5 "Christ our Passover has been slain".

Less guesswork - more Bible please.

Being destined to reject Christ must be distorted in order to interpret Jer 23:5

There is no "destined to reject Christ" in the OT - the Jews always had two options.. until their 490 year probation ended.

as Ryan did above: “Jeremiah predicts the first coming of Christ and the Jews accepting Him. That did not happen.” A number of the prophets substantiate that Christ was to be rejected

Not at all true. There was never "you must reject" or "you must fail".
 
Upvote 0