??? Do you speak for all women? By what authority? You find advocating that women should feel it's OK to have their own children be slaughtered is 'compassion' and 'respect?'
Isn't it more compassionate and respectful for women struggling in hard times to give them those women real aid and choices, as many pro-life organizations do, to help with finances, resources, and skills in child rearing?
Not, "Oh well it's too much trouble for me to actually help you. Your best bet is to just have your kid ripped limb from limb - that will really make your life better." <- That's the opposite of compassion and respect.
Did you know that in approx 64% of abortion cases, the woman was pressured or coerced to get an abortion? Are those spouses, doctors, boyfriends, parents, employers, and others 'respecting' her by pressuring her to have her kid murdered? And 79% are not made aware of alternatives and other resources and choices. Is that being compassionate and helping give them more options?
http://www.theunchoice.com/pdf/FactSheets/ForcedAbortions.pdf
And based on a Guttmacher report as to self-reported reasons U.S. women abort, here are some findings:
Keeping sex a secret hardly sounds like the woman had 'no options.' Parental pressure and partner pressure certainly don't sound like 'no options' - and wouldn't punishing someone who forced or pressured a woman into murder make far more sense than advocating murder as a solution?
[Another interesting finding from the Guttmacher study:
1/3 of interviewed women said they considered adoption (they had a choice) but rejected it as "morally unconscionable option because giving one’s child away is wrong." So it wasn't their lack of choice, but a twisted social morality that promotes murder as OK but giving over your child to another family as wrong, that they were up against.]
Or look at some findings among Florida women who aborted their children in 2015 (in a study with much more credible than Guttmacher's):
.001% The pregnancy resulted from an incestuous relationship
.065% The woman’s life was endangered by the pregnancy
.085% The woman was raped
.288% The woman’s physical health was threatened by the pregnancy
.294% The woman’s psychological health was threatened by the pregnancy
.666% There was a serious fetal abnormality
6.268% The woman aborted for social or economic reasons
92.330% No reason (elective)
I think your speculation that the 'majority of women' have 'no choice' might actually be backwards.