Mathew 22 army

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Last edited:
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You have different places
Matthew
Mount of olives: Matthew 24:3 As Jesus was sitting on the Mount of Olives
Luke
Location not given

one to small group one to large group
Matthew
Disciples: Matthew 24:3 the disciples came to him privately
Luke
Disciples: Luke 21:5 Some of his disciples were remarking about how the temple

one at night one at day
Matthew
Time of day not mentioned when olivet discourse given
Luke
Time of day not mentioned when olivet discourse is given

the last one before "things happen " and one after "things happen" in text .
Not sure what you mean by this...........

In Matthew ,Jesus gave the olivet disourse 2 days prior to Passover:
Matthew 26:1-2 When Jesus had finished saying all these things, he said to his disciples, 2“As you know, the Passover is two days away—and the Son of Man will be handed over to be crucified.”
In Matthew, Judas went to the chief priests before Passover
Matthew 26:14 Then one of the Twelve—the one called Judas Iscariot—went to the chief priests
In Luke, after the discourse, Judas goes to the chief priests as Passover is near
Luke 22: 1-4 Now the Festival of Unleavened Bread, called the Passover, was approaching, 2and the chief priests and the teachers of the law were looking for some way to get rid of Jesus, for they were afraid of the people. 3Then Satan entered Judas, called Iscariot, one of the Twelve. 4And Judas went to the chief priests and the officers

______________________________________________________________________________

Resurrection Story differences:

In Matthew, there is one angel at the tomb
Matthew 28:5 The angel said to the women
In Luke, there are 2 men at the tomb
Luke 24:4 suddenly two men in clothes that gleamed like lightning stood beside them.

In Matthew, the women meet Jesus on the way to tell the disciples that Jesus has risen

Matthew 28:8-10 So the women hurried away from the tomb, afraid yet filled with joy, and ran to tell his disciples. 9Suddenly Jesus met them. “Greetings,” he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him. 10Then Jesus said to them, “Do not be afraid. Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.”
In Luke, the women DO NOT meet Jesus on the way to tell the disciples that Jesus is risen
Luke 24:9 When they came back from the tomb, they told all these things to the Eleven and to all the others

In Matthew, no disciples are mentioned as running to the tomb
In Luke, Peter runs to the tomb

Luke 24:12 Peter, however, got up and ran to the tomb

In Matthew, Jesus meets the disciples for the 1st time in Galilee
Matthew 28:16-17 16Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go. 17When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted
In Luke, Jesus meets the disciples for the 1st time in Jerusalem
Luke 24:36-37 While they were still talking about this, Jesus himself stood among them and said to them, “Peace be with you.” They were startled and frightened, thinking they saw a ghost

**But you would agree that these stories are the same, but for some reason, reject that the olivet discourse in matthew and Luke are the same. That's a double standard brother.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 19, 2017
3,485
1,045
Colorado
✟415,058.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I would add that all 3 Gospels are about that 1st century generation of Jews.
Matthew 24:34, Mark 13:30, Luke 21:32.

I think it is ludicrous and blasphemous to separate Luke from the other 2 Gospels.............


Matthew 23:36
“Assuredly, I say to you, all these things will come upon
this generation.

Matthew 24:34
“Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place.

Mark 13:30

“Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all these things take place.

Luke 11:30

“For as Jonah became a sign to the Ninevites, so also the Son of Man will be to this generation.

Luke 11:50
“that the blood of all the prophets which was shed from the foundation of the world may be required of this generation,

Luke 21:32
“Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all things take place.

I disagree.

Unfortunately, this is something that today's Church doesn't seem to ever understand as they look for enemies outside the Church, Politics, Atheists, or physical generation of hearers, etc. And fail to see the enemies of God that have subverted God's word and infused it with man's word masquerading as God's word. And all who oppose them as not holding to the authority of scripture, they kill (in the sense that they are not permitted to bring the gospel of life," which is the word. The same truth as demonstrated in Revelation 11 of the Beast from the pit killing the two witnesses "AFTER" they had finished their Witness. This is the spirit of Antichrist in the Holy Place bringing about the famine of hearing the word. the two witnesses brought life to the world by the Spirit through the word. She silenced it.

In her (the unfaithful Church) was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth because she killed the witness of God so that the saints were as dead there, until the Spirit calls them out. consider our example in the Old Testament congregation and what Christ said to them concerning the blood of the prophets.

Matthew 23:29-32
  • "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,
  • And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.
  • Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.
  • Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers."
In other words, they were of the same family of those who killed the prophets, the same spirits, with the same father, the Devil. The same cup that their fathers filled, they fill also. The same responsibility for killing God's servants their fathers had, they have also. You see, these people believed that they were doing God service by persecuting God's servants and eliminating them. same as the Church, Pastors, Ministers and Parishioners today. They all have the same spirit to fight against the Spirit of God witnessing the pure word. as saith the preacher, there is nothing new under the sun.

Matthew 23:35-38
  • "That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
  • Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.
  • O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
  • Behold, your house is left unto you desolate."
And indeed the Old Testament congregation's abomination has left it desolate. Indeed, all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel whom Cain slew, to the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, all fell upon that generation or family.

One might ask, how could one living in the time of Christ be responsible for the blood of Abel, whom Cain slew. It is because they are of the same family, the sam3e generation of evil, the same seed of the snake, the same generation of Vipers, with the very same spirit to kill the Lord's elect. Note God says to them all the righteous blood shed upon the earth shall come upon the. Just as God says of Babylon, because it is the congregation just as Christ spoke of.

Luke 11:49-50
  • "Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute:
  • That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation;"
Who is Christ talking to, and who did he send the prophets, and who killed them? was it the world, or the people within the congregation. Moreover, was the blood of Abel and all the prophets only required of people living at that specific time? Of course not, that makes no sense. The truth is that the generation Christ spoke of is the generation of evil, the generation of Vipers, the family/generation of the spirit of Antichrist which existed in the day of Abel unto today. The same that is the pseudo-christ spirit in the Lord's congregation that kills the lord's servants in the name of doing God service.

I understand perfectly why people cannot stomach the witness of the word when it contradicts their Church traditions and vaunted authors. As in the days of Christ, the congregation couldn't receive the witness of the truth because they were of a different generation. A different family with a different spirit than the one who thinks and loves to be taught His statutes through the word. The Spirit that hides God's word in our hearts that we might not sin against Him. The Spirit that hungers and thirsts after righteousness, not justification.

Revelation 17:6-7
  • "And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.
  • And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns."
The mystery or "secret of the imagery" is that the Woman represents the Church, and it is this entity that is drunken with the blood of the prophets. it is the unfaithful Church that has her lips dripping with the words of interposition to block God's precepts with the words of men. Or as God puts it, to have the lawless man (man of sin) rule in the Holy Temple. This is the killer responsible and this is how she slays the witnesses of God and must be judged. That the blood of all come upon her. And those within her gathered together to the Mount of Megiddo, or Armageddon, where God will finally deal with them once and for all. Even while they sit in Church thinking they are worshiping God, when they worship the false Christ, Pseudo Christ, Anti-Christ spirit that caused them to reject truth and lean upon the doctrines of men.
 
Upvote 0

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 19, 2017
3,485
1,045
Colorado
✟415,058.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
In order to be loosed though, that first requires he was previously bound. There is not much different about how satan is currently operating, as opposed to how he has been operating for the past 2000 years.
What is he doing now that he hasn't been doing for the past 2000 years? Is he deceiving anyone now? Did he manage to not deceive one single person for the past 2000 years? That would have to be the case if he was in the pit during that time.

You got wrong idea about the purpose of binding of Satan.

Christ did bind Satan so that He could establish His Kingdom of God through the Church. It was NEVER established to make all the whole world righteous or more peaceful, that is the error of Premillennialism and sometimes with PostMillennialism. The Kingdom of God, is in fact the prevailing influence in how the church runs their lives. It never was, and never will be the prevailing influence of how the "world" runs their lives. They are two separate and "distinct" Kingdoms, which are adversarial to one another.

So, get this, Satan was not bound for the world's sake. Rather, Satan was bound for the elect of the Kingdom of Heaven's sake. This is where you misunderstood. Satan was not bound so that the world is free of sin, war, famines, or where animals can sit together, etc. No, no! While the Church was being built, Satan STILL went about as a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour in the WORLD (unsaved). But FOR the true believers, Satan has no power over us to prevent us from being saved when Christ frees us THROUGH THE GOSPEL! Christ has wounded the head of the beast FOR US. Not for the world. Get it? Selah! Satan's power over us has been broke. For example, the great horn of the he-goat has been broken, Daniel 7. That is how Satan was bound for our sake UNTIL the building of the church, or the fulness of the Gentiles be coming in, THEN Satan will be loosened once again and deceive the nations. In other words, the Salvation ends. Christ has wounded the head of this Beast for us. Not for the world.

This has nothing to do with how the world should looks like with Satan being bound.

John 17:9
  • "I pray for them: I pray not for the world but for them which thou hast given me; for they are thine."
If you look at church history, the "visible" church over the years killing and doing all manner of evil, this has always been the case, and always will be as long as we are on this sin cursed earth. We have been dealing with "this generation" of evil until all things are fulfilled in the end. This is why the church makes up of two groups of people, the corporate or external Covenant church, and then there is the true Covenanted church. Just as God said about Israel, "They are not all Israel, which are of Israel," meaning, there was a corporate Israel, and a true Israel of God. And 'according to this verse' only one was the "true" Israel in God's definition. Likewise, some people of the external church could have wantonly killed, but that didn't mean they were the true church anymore than all Israel was Israel. Nor did it mean that Satan was not bound. It means that Satan was not bound "for them," because it is unlikely they were God's elect.
 
Upvote 0

The Times

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2017
2,581
805
Australia
✟90,081.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Questions to ponder upon.....

We need to establish all the players and their functions, within a historical chronological context and then to focus on the crescendo leading all to the actual narrative, which is the wedding supper itself.

What is the marriage supper?

The right to legally enter into a Covenant with God, through the Son.

When did the marriage commence, in order to start bidding guests?

After the Cross, the call was made......

The Spirit and the bride say, "Come!" And let the one who hears say, "Come!" Let the one who is thirsty come; and let the one who wishes take the free gift of the water of life. (Revelation 22:17)

Remember, at the wedding in Galillee, Jesus said my time has not yet come.

How long does the marriage supper last for?

When the bridegroom exits his chamber to finally meet his spiritual bride, at his brilliant coming. Towards the end, when the wedding is fully furnished with guests, to then awaiting the grand entry of the bridegroom.

Who are they that made light of it, and went their ways, one to his farm, another to his merchandise?

The 5000 men and their families, totalling some 20,000 people of Israel as a nation (preach to the Jews first), who abandoned Jesus at the Cross, inclusive of most disciples. As it is written strike the shepherd and his sheep will flee him.

Who were the "THEM" that WERE bidden to come?

The Jewish nation as a priestly nation, under the old covenant, the stone that the builders rejected.

Who are the remnant and who do they serve?

Those builders whom still cleaved to the desolate house and who fell out of favour from God and started to serve Satan's agenda as the flood of people, who would persecute the pregnant woman who carried the gospel.

Who are his servants and who do they serve?

They are the founding disciples, that originally preached the gospel to the old covenant priestly administration, within their physical temple walls.

Who are other servants and who do they serve?

Those 72 apostles and more, who would carry on where the disciples left off, as the third of the stars/messengers (12 founding disciples) were brought down to the ground, who were beaten, imprisoned and killed, at the behest of the false prophet, which under the 1st beast, tried to put a halt to the gospel and they prevailed not, until the consummation (end), and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate. (Daniel 9:27)

It certainly was poured upon the remnant of the desolated house, who would finally after the end of the 40 years trial given to them, to finally be ousted by force, through a physical agency, the armies that finally done away with them and their desolate house.

What was the remnant function after the Cross?

To prevent the spread of the gospel. They tried to kill the child (gospel) before it was delivered (spread) into the world.

What was the servants function after the Cross?

To preach to the house of Israel first.

Were the remnant ever God's servants, within the context of the Old Covenant?

Yes, they were the builders that rejected their own Messiah.

How did the remnant slew the servants? Spiritually/Physically?

Since truth was not in the remnant, therefore the only way they could slew the servants, was to physically prevent them from preaching Jesus.

Who is the King?

Jesus Christ, the King of kings.

What did the King do, after they killed his servants and also the other servants?

Well, he didn't send more servants, because they beat, imprisoned and killed them, but towards the end of the 40 year trial from his Cross, he would deal with them as he dealt with the disobedient children of Israel in the 40 year exodus.

If the King sent forth his servants and also other servants (72 Apostles and more) after his foundational 12 disciples servants, then who are the third group he sent, who are identified as his armies?

Well, they cannot be his servants (12 stars) or the other servants (72 Apostles) he initially sent to the remnant. The third group must not be servants, but a worldly agency that served the King's purpose, in claiming them to be his armies, they accomplished his will.

Is the King's Army his servants and also other servants? Yes/No?

Absolutely NOT!

Is the function of his and also other servants the same as his armies?

Absolutely not!

Servants are inviting guests to the wedding, through preaching the Gospel.

The armies function is to destroy those who murder his servants and also other servants and to burn down their city.

What is the city before the Cross?

Physical Jerusalem.

What is the city after the Cross?

Heavenly New Jerusalem.

There is given by God 40 years representing the trial of the walking in the wilderness, for the remnant of national Israel, to find the promised land, the promised land through faith in Jesus Christ and as subjects of his Cross.

If the King sent two groups of servants, on two separate occasions, before sending as the third his armies after the Cross, since the wedding supper for the bridegroom had come after the Cross, post Pentecost, then there is a time frame of 40 years (tribulation) given after the Cross before God finally brings judgment on the remnant of Israel as a nation of priests (Pharisees and Sadducees), who had physically imprisoned and to murdered those servants, as they were the flood of people Satan sent out after the Woman (Church), who wanted to deliver the gospel and the Dragon, sent out his servants, the flood called the remnant, who chased those who had the testimony of Jesus from city to city, to put a halt to the Gospel.

Paul of Tarsus was one of those remnant believe it or not and Jesus ceased him on the road to Damascus and saved him and used him as a conduit to preach to the Gentiles. Satan's flood became the remnant after the Cross, they drew a third of the messengers of the gospel to the ground, meaning they halted their commission and yet, the Woman (Church) was given metaphorical wings, that allowed her to continue to preach, even after the 1st Beast was slain physically, along with his false Pharisical Prophet, by the armies that the King arranged to take them out of the way permanently, until the image of the 1st beast (the beast that was and was not) re-emerges at another appointed time, after Satan is released from his bottomless Pitt, to deceive the Gentile nations once more. These Gentiles nations include the country in the Middle East calling itself Israel.

Who were the one's who were bidden and after the 40 year tribulation, ending in 70AD, were deemed by God to be unworthy to be invited to his Son's wedding?

The Jews as a nation, under the now sacked levitical priestly administration, within the outward temple Jerusalem city, that became a desolate house after the Cross. (Prophetically this was declared in Isaiah 22:14-25)

The old priestly administration replaced with the Royal Kingly Priesthood of Melchizedek Jesus Christ, where Eliakim was a symbol of.

Eliakim name means "God will raise up", which depicts Christ Jesus who God raised up, as having the key to the house of David, that is what he shuts no one can open and what he opens no one can shut.

What is a wedding garment?

It is the life long sanctifying white robe, that cloths us with Christ, as his anointed bride.

Notice within the congregation Jesus calls the servants and not the armies, in order to excommunicate the unsanctified gate crasher to the wedding, though he was called to faith to the wedding by the preaching of the gospel, yet the King did not approve of him, because his spiritual attire was below the mark of what the King was looking for.

Hence, the phrase many are called to faith, yet only the few wise virgins will be chosen to enter as guests to the wedding supper of the Lamb of God.

It is evident that John is writing events after the fact, in a cryptic and symbolic manner, whilst he was on a prison colony on the island of Patmos. This would highly suggest that Israel as a nation of priests was destroyed and John was wanting to restart the commission to preach yet again to many people and many tongues, by sending a letter to each of the seven notaries (bishops) in Asia Minor to continue as now it was safe to do so, as the five kings have fallen and one is (Agrippa II), albeit without a country and without Jazebel (old priestly administration) at his side to persecute the Church.

Satan was chained because the 1st beast and the old priestly administration was destroyed to the physical burning fire that literally destroys. Satan is not literally done away with at this point in time but just chained from doing anything to the Woman (Church).

So, since Agrippa II is the sixth king in exile and without a kingdom, sitting in Rome, John says to the seven messengers in Asia Minor, you can go ahead now and preach all you like, without any persecution.

Therefore the book of revelation is tied to when the letters were sent to the seven literal bishops, and this would place it well after 70AD and possibly around 90-100AD, where Full Preterist dating of the book of revelation falls apart, because they make it around 68 AD before the fact. Obviously during these turbulent times, exchanging letters would expose the Church in hiding and certainly a declaration like this would not be made....

Then I was told, "You must prophesy again about many peoples, nations, languages and kings." (Revelation 10:11)

@TribulationSigns I believe that Matthew 22 cannot be generalised and solely compartmentalised to one party only, that party being the servants. We must really scrutinise the versus in the manner I have attempted at doing on my first attempt of doing so.

I am not saying I am right or wrong, but if I am presenting something compelling, please don't just shrug it off because it doesn't fall within your esctahological views. Please understand that characters have functions and functions are played out as events in time and when we don't understand them, we loose focus on the intended purpose that the author was trying to communicate across to his immediate audience.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 19, 2017
3,485
1,045
Colorado
✟415,058.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
@TribulationSigns I believe that Matthew 22 cannot be generalised and solely compartmentalised to one party only, that party being the servants.

I understand what you were trying to say, but I disagree. I still stand by my testimony. Thank you for your thoughts.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: The Times
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

DavidPT

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
8,602
2,107
Texas
✟196,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As to the topic of this thread-----I have been thinking about this some more.

Matthew 22:7 But when the king heard thereof, he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city.

I would think in this parable the king is meaning the Father. According to this verse these destroyed are murderers, and eventually get their city burned up.

Revelation 18:8 Therefore shall her plagues come in one day, death, and mourning, and famine; and she shall be utterly burned with fire: for strong is the Lord God who judgeth her.
9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning,
10 Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas, that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.

Revelation 18:24 And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.


Let's do some comparing.


And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth. I'm pretty certain that would make them murderers.


saying, Alas, alas, that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come. I'm pretty certain that would involve a city. Doesn't matter that the city might not be meaning a literal city here. It still involves a city.


and she shall be utterly burned with fire. I'm pretty certain that equals the city getting burned up. But if not meaning a literal city what gets burned up then?

Per Revelation 18 though, none of that has a thing to do with the events of 70 AD. In Matthew 22:7 Jesus said this in the parable----and he sent forth his armies.

In 70 AD it was the Romans that destroyed Jerusalem. If the king is meaning the Father in the parable, since when would His armies be the Romans? I would instead think His armies are meaning His angels. Where we see in Revelation 19, not only are His armies His angels, so is His bride.

Revelation 19:7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.
8 And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.

Revelation 19:14 And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.


This is as far as I got in my recent thinking on some of these things.
 
Upvote 0

The Times

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2017
2,581
805
Australia
✟90,081.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
A simple deductive analysis to the problem at hand @DavidPT would lead us to this.....

The King send two batches of servants, identifying them as His Servant and OTHER servants.

Those servants are commissioned to make disciples for Jesus.

The third player he sends are obviously not servants but armies (plural), to destroy the remnant and their city (singular).

Who are the remnant?

The builders of the Old Covenant Temple who rejected the stone (Jesus) and had rejected both batches of commissioned servants. It obviously is deduced that the remnant are ethnic Jews who continued to refuse to embrace Jesus Christ and who were clinging to the sacked old covenant priestly administration and their literal Temple, within their literal City Jerusalem, where context is the 1st Century.

The King is not destroying members within his own Church establishment, rather is destroying those who refused to join his Church establishment (1st Century context).

The armies that destroyed the remnant ethnic Jews who refused to join Christ's new Church establishment on earth, under his Royal Melchizedek Priesthood (Eliakim prophesy), were not the remnant, certainly they were not his servants.

These armies were worldly agencies that executed the will of the King, after the prescribed 40 years trial period after the Cross.

The term armies in the plural is also indicative that the Roman armies on D/J (Deliverance/Judgement) Day, was comprised of a worldly coalition of nations under the banner of Rome. This is historical fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: claninja
Upvote 0

DavidPT

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
8,602
2,107
Texas
✟196,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A simple deductive analysis to the problem at hand @DavidPT would lead us to this.....

The King send two batches of servants, identifying them as His Servant and OTHER servants.

Those servants are commissioned to make disciples for Jesus.

The third player he sends are obviously not servants but armies (plural), to destroy the remnant and their city (singular).

Who are the remnant?

The builders of the Old Covenant Temple who rejected the stone (Jesus) and had rejected both batches of commissioned servants. It obviously is deduced that the remnant are ethnic Jews who continued to refuse to embrace Jesus Christ and who were clinging to the sacked old covenant priestly administration and their literal Temple, within their literal City Jerusalem, where context is the 1st Century.

The King is not destroying members within his own Church establishment, rather is destroying those who refused to join his Church establishment (1st Century context).

The armies that destroyed the remnant ethnic Jews who refused to join Christ's new Church establishment on earth, under his Royal Melchizedek Priesthood (Eliakim prophesy), were not the remnant, certainly they were not his servants.

These armies were worldly agencies that executed the will of the King, after the prescribed 40 years trial period after the Cross.

The term armies in the plural is also indicative that the Roman armies on D/J (Deliverance/Judgement) Day, was comprised of a worldly coalition of nations under the banner of Rome. This is historical fact.



The number of Jews killed in 70 AD, it was pretty astronomical wasn't it? Were any of those innocent women and children? The text indicates the armies are sent to destroy the murderers. If some of the Jews killed in 70 AD were not murderers though, how does that agree with the text in Matthew 22 then?
 
Upvote 0

The Times

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2017
2,581
805
Australia
✟90,081.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
The number of Jews killed in 70 AD, it was pretty astronomical wasn't it? Were any of those innocent women and children? The text indicates the armies are sent to destroy the murderers. If some of the Jews killed in 70 AD were not murderers though, how does that agree with the text in Matthew 22 then?

The King deemed that all had (past tense), have (present tense), will have (future tense) a hand in it.

40 years exodus was enough time for one generation to condemn the several generations following it.

40 years from the Cross leading up to 70AD is that one generation times worth afforded to it, to condemn the several following it.

Deuteronomy 5:9-10
for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.

God's mercy extended to the 40 year trial, after which those past, present and future to be remnant condemned themselves. So called, innocent woman and children who rejected and would also come to reject the Messiah, according to God's wisdom, since the Church was persecuted and chased out, would also in time come to hate the Father and his Son as well.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The number of Jews killed in 70 AD, it was pretty astronomical wasn't it? Were any of those innocent women and children? The text indicates the armies are sent to destroy the murderers. If some of the Jews killed in 70 AD were not murderers though, how does that agree with the text in Matthew 22 then?

Christ, does in fact, warn that children will be killed as well.

Luke 19:43 For the days will come upon you when your enemies will barricade you and surround you and hem you in on every side. They will level you to the ground—you and the children within your walls. They will not leave one stone on another, because you did not recognize the time of your visitation from God.”

Luke 23:29-30 Look, the days are coming when people will say, ‘Blessed are the barren women, the wombs that never bore, and breasts that never nursed.’ At that time ‘they will say to the mountains, “Fall on us!” and to the hills, “Cover us!”’c
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Times
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In 70 AD it was the Romans that destroyed Jerusalem. If the king is meaning the Father in the parable, since when would His armies be the Romans?

Considering Babylon was God's 'war club', it is not unreasonable for Rome to be God's weapon.
Jeremiah 51:20
“You are My war club, My weapon for battle. With you I shatter nations; with you I bring kingdoms to ruin.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Times
Upvote 0

The Times

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2017
2,581
805
Australia
✟90,081.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
“that the blood of all the prophets which was shed from the foundation of the world may be required of this generation,

40 years exodus was enough time for one generation to condemn the several generations following it.

40 years from the Cross leading up to 70AD is that one generation times worth afforded to it, to condemn the several following it.

Deuteronomy 5:9-10
for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments

Condemned they stood!
Condemned they fell!


Their final stance at Masada was an act of suicide, where they slaughtered their own woman and children.

What does that say about that generation?

According Semitic saying.....

"God had taken it from them"

They were completely and utterly bankrupted.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: claninja
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Revelation 18:24 And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.

Jesus holds unfaithful Israel as responsible for the blood shed of the servants, he even states their punishment will occur during their generation:

Matthew 23:34 Because of this, I am sending you prophets and wise men and teachers. Some of them you will kill and crucify, and others you will flog in your synagogues and persecute in town after town. And so upon you will come all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah son of Berekiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. Truly I tell you, all these things will come upon this generation.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Times
Upvote 0