What think ye of Ezekiel's Temple?

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
A “discipline” which liquidates 2/3 of those being disciplined without opportunity for them to repent can scarcely be characterized as discipline.

Zechariah 13:7 has already been fulfilled. Jesus cites it in Matthew 26:31 in fulfillment of His trial and crucifixion, and His disciples' abandonment.

There is historical evidence of the fulfillment of Zechariah 13:8 in the destruction of Jerusalem and Judea in 70 AD.

With the Abrahamic genome ubiquitous in the human planetary population, if Zechariah 13:8 is yet future, the death toll will be 2/3 of most of the earth's population at that time, the result being billions dead. Are the surviving 1/3 going to be responsible for cleaning up before the conjectured millennium?

Since all Jews through history, e.g. the house of David, will be present in the land, this number will include Judas and all of those responsible for Christ's death. Can we be assured that all of these will be among the 2/3 liquidated? If not, we'll be meeting them in heaven. What will be God's “liquidation criteria”?

The New Testament descriptions of the advance of history to its culmination make no mention of a futurized Zechariah carnage. Instead, history will unfold as it is now, with wheat and tares, believer and unbeliever, continuing together to the final judgment.

There will be no second chances or other opportunities for anyone to repent after Christ's appearance at the last trumpet.

This is contrary to numerous explicitly stated scriptures. But since yo have demonstrated that you will not submit to scripture, I am not even going to quote them.
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟784,067.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I quoted a scripture that explicitly says exactly what I pointed out. And you simply refuse to believe what it explicitly says. End of story. I am not going to continue this childish argument.

This is contrary to numerous explicitly stated scriptures. But since yo have demonstrated that you will not submit to scripture, I am not even going to quote them.

As you wish, brother.
Blessings.
 
Upvote 0

ebedmelech

My dog Micah in the pic
Site Supporter
Jul 3, 2012
8,998
678
✟187,689.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
This is really simple - just stop disregarding the questions Jesus answered which is " what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?

when you are willing to show the dates - the year and the month and the day that Jesus had returned from heaven

when you can show the dates of when this verse happened -
"30 Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory"

Jesus is saying the generation that sees these things happen - so IF the generation was the people standing in front of him when he said it - then you should be able to show when these things happened

If you cannot show when these things happened then you should be willing to acknowledge that Jesus was talking about the generation that does see these things happen and This generation will be the generation that sees Jesus coming and the end of the age

But since refusing to address these questions you do not understand that Jesus is addressing those questions
I think claninja answered it pretty well...so I won't bog down the thread.
 
Upvote 0

seventysevens

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2017
3,207
844
USA
✟38,043.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
I think claninja answered it pretty well...so I won't bog down the thread.
You are entitled to your opinion just as everyone is , even though there has been no real substantial proof of anything , just merely an opinion , anytime anyone selectively picks and chooses which scripture or even which words of a scripture they will acknowledge and disregard that which goes against their theology it reveals they subscribe to a view that it not fully supported by scripture - half-truths are just as false as fabricated truths
disregarding that Jesus return has nothing to do with the temple that was destroyed in 70 AD and has no merit about what Jesus taught about HIS Return
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
anytime anyone selectively picks and chooses which scripture or even which words of a scripture they will acknowledge and disregard that which goes against their theology it reveals they subscribe to a view that it not fully supported by scripture - half-truths are just as false as fabricated truths

The above is a perfect description of modern Dispensational Theology, which was brought to America by John Nelson Darby about the time of the Civil War.

It only works by ignoring the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in Hebrews 12:22-24, and 2 Corinthians 3:6-8.



The New Covenant: Bob George


.
 
Upvote 0

seventysevens

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2017
3,207
844
USA
✟38,043.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
The above is a perfect description of modern Dispensational Theology, which was brought to America by John Nelson Darby about the time of the Civil War.

It only works by ignoring the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in Hebrews 12:22-24, and 2 Corinthians 3:6-8.



The New Covenant: Bob George


.
your support of false doctrine is showing :)
You ignore about half of all scripture to make your doctrine work as been told to you many many times by many many people Jeremiah 31 will not be fulfilled until Jesus has returned , where is your proof of that - of course you have none , Hebrews - the same thing - that false doctrine comes from people who have chosen to teach cherry picked scriptures and even cherry picked words out of the verses . I do not follow dray teaching but since you feel the need to accuse you have to come up with something anything to avoid admitting the truth is ONLY found by accepting ALL scripture - your following false doctrine has caused blindness to the truth , following anti semitisim , you refuse to believe that God has caused Israel to be back in their land , you refuse and ignore much scripture in order to make false doctrine work - but it doesn't work - blindness has prevented you from seeing
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
your support of false doctrine is showing :)
You ignore about half of all scripture to make your doctrine work as been told to you many many times by many many people Jeremiah 31 will not be fulfilled until Jesus has returned , where is your proof of that - of course you have none , Hebrews - the same thing - that false doctrine comes from people who have chosen to teach cherry picked scriptures and even cherry picked words out of the verses . I do not follow dray teaching but since you feel the need to accuse you have to come up with something anything to avoid admitting the truth is ONLY found by accepting ALL scripture - your following false doctrine has caused blindness to the truth , following anti semitisim , you refuse to believe that God has caused Israel to be back in their land , you refuse and ignore much scripture in order to make false doctrine work - but it doesn't work - blindness has prevented you from seeing


Jer_31:31 "Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah—

Mat_26:28 For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.

Mar_14:24 And He said to them, "This is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many.

Luk_22:20 Likewise He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is shed for you.

1Co_11:25 In the same manner He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me."

2Co_3:6 who also made us sufficient as ministers of the new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.

Heb_8:8 Because finding fault with them, He says: "BEHOLD, THE DAYS ARE COMING, SAYS THE LORD, WHEN I WILL MAKE A NEW COVENANT WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AND WITH THE HOUSE OF JUDAH—

Heb_8:13 In that He says, "A NEW COVENANT," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.

Heb_9:15 And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance.

Heb_12:24 to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel.



Overview of Covenants: Abraham to Christ, David H J Gay

.
 
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But just not in his lifetime as Paul is the one who says that Jesus will destroy the man of lawlessness

And yet Paul states that his audience "NOW" knew what was restraining the man of sin. In other words, the man of sin was presently being restrained during the time of Paul.

2 Thessalonians 2:6 And you know what is restraining him NOW so that he may be revealed in his time.

Paul taught that Jesus return to earth will be in the future and not his lifetime

1.) Paul taught that Jesus' coming was future to him, but very soon. Paul taught that they were living in the last days:

1 Corinthians 7:29 But this I say, brethren, the time is short: it remaineth, that both they that have wives be as though they had none;

Romans 13:11-12 And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed. The night is far spent, the day is at hand

Romans 16:20 And the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly.

1 Corinthians 10:11 Now these things happened to them as an example, but they were written down for our instruction, on whom the end of the ages has come.

Hebrews 1:2 in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world

2.) Peter taught that Jesus' coming was future to him, but very soon. Peter taught that they were living in the last days:

Acts 2:16-17 But this is what was uttered through the prophet Joel: “‘And in the last days it shall be, God declares, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh,

1 Peter 1:20 He was foreknown before the foundation of the world but was made manifest in the last times for the sake of you

1 Peter 4:7 The end of all things is at hand; therefore be self-controlled and sober-minded for the sake of your prayers

3.) James taught that Jesus' coming was future to him, but very soon. James taught that the coming of Jesus was at hand:

James 5:8-9 You also, be patient. Establish your hearts, for the coming of the Lord is at hand. Do not grumble against one another, brothers, so that you may not be judged; behold, the Judge is standing at the door.

4.) John taught that it was the last hour:

1 John 2:18 Children, it is the last hour; and just as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have appeared. This is how we know it is the last hour

**We have ample scripture to show that the apostles believed they were living in the last days, the end of the age, and that it was the last hour. Is there any scripture that states Jesus would not come in the apostles life time, as you say?


you can believe what you want but there is no scripture that says that Jesus has returned from heaven back to earth and only when Jesus returns from heaven to earth is the time when Jesus destroys the man of lawlessness ,

I agree there is no scripture that states Jesus returned from heaven. There is however, plenty of scripture written in the 1st century that states Jesus was coming soon and quickly.

making assumptions that it has already happened without exact evidence is not a wise thing

Without evidence? The temple was destroyed in 70ad, no? If that is not a testament to Jesus' words, then I don't know what is.

The simple fact that you do not understand that Jesus return to earth has Nothing at all whatsoever to do with the temple in 70 AD being destroyed , you don't understand -

So let's break down what I do not understand then:

1.) Jesus points to the '2nd' temple building, in front of them, and states it will be destroyed:

Matthew 24:1-2 Jesus left the temple and was walking away when his disciples came up to him to call his attention to its buildings. “Do you see all these things?” he asked. “Truly I tell you, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.”

2.) At the mount of olives, the disciples inquire Jesus about this temple destruction:
Matthew 24:3 As Jesus was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him privately. “Tell us,” they said, “when will this happen, and what will be the SIGN of your coming and of the end of the age?”

Matthew 24:3: when will this happen? = Mark 13:4 Tell us, when will these things happen? = Luke 21:7 Teacher,” they asked, “when will these things happen?

Matthew 23:3 and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?” = Mark 13:4 And what will be the sign that they are all about to be fulfilled?” = Luke 21:7 And what will be the sign that they are about to take place?”

3.) Jesus then lists several events the apostles would experience (wars, persecution, false messiahs, earthquakes, famines, pestilence) that lead up to the siege and destruction of Jerusalem:
a.) False Messiahs
Matthew 24:4,23,25,26 Jesus answered, “See to it that no one deceives YOU. At that time, if anyone says to YOU, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There He is,’ do not believe it. See, I have told YOU in advance. So if they tell YOU, ‘There He is in the wilderness,’ do not go out; or, ‘Here He is in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it

b.) Wars and rumors of wars
YOU will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that YOU are not alarmed. These things must happen

c.) persecution
Matthew 24:9 Then they will hand YOU over to be persecuted and killed, and YOU will be hated by all nations on account of My name

d.) Abomination of Desolation
Matthew 24:15 So when YOU see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination of desolation

e.) fleeing Jerusalem's destruction
matthew 24:20 Pray that YOUR flight will not occur in the winter or on the Sabbath

f.) All these things
Matthew 24:33 also, when YOU see all these things, YOU know that He isd near, right at the door.

4.) Jesus then states:
Matthew 24:34 I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened


As paul states in 1 Corinthians 10:11, he believed they were living at the end of the ages, of which the disciples asked when the end of the age would occur in Matthew 24:3. Jesus tells the disciples in Matthew 24:33 that when you see all these, he is near, RIGHT AT THE DOOR, just as James states in James 5:8-9, that Jesus' coming was at hand, and the JUDGE was AT THE DOOR. Additionally, the temple was destroyed in 70AD just as Jesus predicted within their generation.


Noticing that the only thing that is ever talked about is the temple that was destroyed and your refusal to acknowledge that Gods Word speaks of another temple -

Please enlighten me on where the new testament states that a '3rd' earthly temple building will be rebuilt and then destroyed again. Because clearly in the olivet discourse it is about the '2nd' temple. Saying the temple in the olivet discourse is not the 2nd temple that existed during the apostles generation a complete distortion of scripture.

and you do not acknowledge the events that focus on Jesus return and that is why you fail to understand this - in the preterist and amil view Everything is centered on focused on the temple that was destroyed and disregarding everything else regarding Jesus return

Pot calling the kettle black just a little.

Which events specifically have I ignored, this might help me instead of just making a generic statement.

So none of the events leading up to the 2nd temple destruction, as predicted in the olivet discourse, occurred in the apostle's (this) generation?

**borrowing from parousia70 previous post:
False messianic movements-- Dositheus the Samaritan, Simon Magus deified in Rome, Theudas (Acts 5:36-37), Manahem and, under the government of Felix, "deceivers rose up daily in Judea, and persuaded the people to follow them into the wilderness, assuring them that they should there behold conspicuous signs and wonders performed by the ALMIGHTY" (Josephus). Felix, from time to time, apprehended many and put them to death. About this period (A.D. 55) arose another Felix, the celebrated Egyptian impostor, who collected thirty-thousand followers, and persuaded them to accompany him to the Mount of Olives, telling, them that from thence they should see the walls of Jerusalem fall down at his command as a prelude to the capture of the Roman garrison, and to their obtaining the sovereignty of the city. Partial list: Judas, son of Hezekiah (4 BCE); Simon of Peraea (4 BCE); Athronges, the shepherd (4 BCE); Judas, the Galilean (6 CE); The Samaritan prophet (36 CE); King Herod Agrippa (44 CE); Theudas (? CE); The Egyptian prophet (52-58 CE); Menahem, the son of Judas the Galilean (66 CE); John of Gischala (67-70 CE); Vespasian (67 CE); Simon bar Giora (69-70 CE)

WARS -- Claudius' Roman war with Britain/East Anglia, at least three Jewish insurrections against Rome prior to the 60s AD -- one was violently put down by Cuspius Fadus. The Jewish/Alexandrian revolt upon Caligula's death, Claudius' martial law declared in Palestine after the jewish insurrection at the death of Agrippa I. The Germanic tribes in present-day Belgium and Germany made perpetual trouble for the legions throughout the reign. A smouldering Balkan war was in continuous progress. All this, of course only escalated, and Rome in 68-70 began its own Civil Wars that nearly toppled the empire. As Tacitus wrote, " Four princes [Galba, Otho, Vitellius, Domitian] killed by the sword; three civil wars, several foreign wars; and mostly raging at the same time. Favorable events in the East [the subjection of the Jews], unfortunate ones in the West. Illyria disturbed, Gaul uneasy; Britain conquered and soon relinquished; the nations of Sarmatia and Suevia rising against us; the Parthians excited by the deception of a pseudo-Nero."

FAMINES/PESTILENCE -- Acts 11:28 records the worldwide famine. Josephus reports the famine in Jerusalem in the 60s AD which killed hundreds of thousands during the Jewish War (AD 66-70). Accounts of infanticide and cannibalism as foretold in Deuteronomy 28:53,57 -- women cooked and ate their babies (Josephus; Wars 6:3:3-4; Wars 5:1:4). Read more on wars of this time and false prophets -- (Josephus: Antiq. 20:5:1-4; 20:8:5-10; Wars 2:10:1; 2:13:4-7; 6:5:2)

PERSECUTION -- Persecution of the early church by the Jews and later by Nero as he blames the Christian sect for the burning of Rome. This went on the entire AD 30-66 by the Jews, and Nero's persecution was 3.5 years from 64-68AD. Matthew 24:9-13 is exactly parallel to Matthew 10:16-23 which all scholars assign to a 1st century fulfillment. Also the Jewish Civil War occurred in 66-69AD (Josephus; Wars, 2:17:1-10; 2:18:1-11; 4:6:2-3; 5:1:2-5; 5:6:1; 5:13:6; 6:2:1)

EARTHQUAKE -- destroyed Laodicea, Colossae, and Hierapolis in around 61-62 AD

TEMPLE DESTRUCTION -- occurred in 70 AD by the roman armies.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Satanic Power indwells the man of lawlessness it is very very clear in scripture - yet you choose to ignore it altogether ,

Again another false accusation.

You originally stated that Satan is the man of sin:
The one who is being restrained is satan , not just some human , satan will be released onto the world
I responded with:
Just as Judas Iscariot ( son of perdition) was a man, influenced by Satan, so to is the man of sin.
And I also stated:
I agree that Jesus destroys the man of lawlessness as scripture states this.

So I don't know if your not reading my responses, but I did not 'ignore' that the man of sin is influenced by satan and also destroyed by Jesus.

when Jesus returns he destroys the man of lawlessness by casting him into the lake of fire , and at that time satan is cast into the abyss where he is imprisoned for 1000 years , just as scripture plainly says

you stated the man of sin is "satan, not just some human, satan is released onto the world." Now you say when Jesus comes, he throws the man of lawlessness into the lake of fire, but satan is not destroyed. So are you changing your belief? is the man of sin satan or human influenced by satan?


such as saying there will not be a another temple after the temple in 70 AD was destroyed . That is a false statement as Gods Word say outright there will be another temple - in fact 2 more

There is no new testament scripture that states a '3rd' earthly temple building will be rebuilt. That is a fact. You think it would have been important for Jesus or the disciples to mention the destruction of the 2nd temple followed by a long period of time and then a '3rd' earthly temple building will be rebuilt? But no they didn't.

Of Course Gods Word Trumps them all , Seriously ?? you did not know this ? Theology is just mans Interpretation of Gods Word , just as denominations are started by men and Not God

I'm not disagreeing with you, Just want to make it clear that God's word also trumps the theology of dispensationalism, as well.
 
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There is so much error here it would take 2 days to fix it

Which part was error, my assertion that historically the temple fell in 70 ad? the bible verses I quoted? my claim that the disciples' generation saw persecution, famine, earthquakes, pestilence, wars, false messiahs, and the temple destruction?

Every scripture of the many many many many scriptures that speak of Jesus return to earth states Clearly that Jesus will remain on earth after he comes , he establishes HIS Kingdom on earth - that Has not happened yet - AND IT HAS nothing at all to do with the temple in 70 AD -

And for some reason, you did not provide these 'many many many many' scriptures that states jesus will remain on earth and establish his kingdom earth when returns. Nor will you acknowledge that the
disciples' generation saw persecution, famine, earthquakes, pestilence, wars, false messiahs, and the temple destruction?

But let me guess, you will pull scripture from promises out from under the old covenant and use the symbolic language of revelation to show that Jesus will return to earth to set up a 1000 year reign earthly reign in an earthly temple, where animal sacrifices will resume again.

just as Jesus spoke of the temple that will be destroyed - then his topic changed to address the other 2 questions - the temple being destroyed in 70 AD has as much to do with Jesus return to earth as painting the house has to do with going to grandmas house as they are entirely different topics -

So, at which verse does the topic change from the disciples generation to a future 2000 year later generation?

3 questions in one sentence - but painting the house has nothing at all to do with going to grandma's house for dinner

Let's use scripture to interpret scripture instead of an analogy:

Matthew 24:3: when will this happen? = Mark 13:4 Tell us, when will these things happen? = Luke 21:7 Teacher,” they asked, “when will these things happen?

Matthew 23:3 and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?” = Mark 13:4 And what will be the sign that they are all about to be fulfilled?” = Luke 21:7 And what will be the sign that they are about to take place?”

"the SIGN of the your coming and end of the age" means the same thing as "what will be the SIGN they are about to take place"

This is all in regards to the original context: the temple being destroyed.


and Jesus said outright that when he does return that EVERY EYE shall see him return

What scripture is Jesus quoting from in Revelation 1:7?

IF he had returned in the time of 70 AD or at any time at all there would be some form of verifiable evidence of it happening

When a thief comes in the night, you do not see the thief. but in the morning you can see that a thief did come during the night when you notice that you have been robbed.

Can we provide verifiable evidence when God came down from heaven to defeat David's enemies (2 Samuel 22)? or how about when God came down from heaven to destroy Samaria (Micah 1)? or when God rode on a cloud to defeat Egypt (Isaiah 13)? Yes, king saul was defeated, samaria was destroyed by Assyria, and Egypt was destroyed. So to, Jerusalem and the temple were destroyed in 70 ad.

it has not happened yet which is why there is no evidence of it happening - repeatedly you disregard all the things that Jesus said would happen that leads to his return
but yet again you focus on the temple of 70 AD - EVERYTHING in the preterist view seems to hinge exclusively on that temple that has NOTHING to do with Jesus return

And everything in the dispensational view seems to hinge on old covenant promises, even though the old covenant no longer exists, and a literal view of revelation, a very symbolic book.......

you have no proof , no real evidence that supports that idea , Example is an analogy - if you take a job that pays $1000 per week - you fully expect $1000 per week , if you get $ 800 you gonna complain that you did not get what was agreed upon - Prophecy is the same it MUST BE EXACT - not similar - not something you say is "close enough " as that is what you are saying - Prophets of OT HAD to be 100% accurate

I agree.

Jesus was always holding to how the prophetic scriptures had to be fulfilled 100% exactly as written - not just approximately close enough as preterist/amil view teaches



Matthew 11:13-14 For all the prophets and the Law prophesied until John. And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come.

Matthew 17:11-12 Jesus replied, “Elijah does indeed come, and he will restore all things. But I tell you that Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but have done to him whatever they wished. In the same way, the Son of Man will suffer at their hands.”

Luke 1:17 And he will go on before the Lord in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to their children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the righteous—to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.”
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: jgr
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,713
2,493
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟293,817.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Heb_8:8 Because finding fault with them, He says: "BEHOLD, THE DAYS ARE COMING, SAYS THE LORD, WHEN I WILL MAKE A NEW COVENANT WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AND WITH THE HOUSE OF JUDAH—
Isn't it kind of obvious that those days have not come yet?
We await the rejoining of Judah and Israel, as described in Ezekiel 37. That has NOT happened yet.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Isn't it kind of obvious that those days have not come yet?
We await the rejoining of Judah and Israel, as described in Ezekiel 37. That has NOT happened yet.

Act 2:36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ.


2Co 3:6 who also made us sufficient as ministers of the new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.
2Co 3:7 But if the ministry of death, written and engraved on stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of the glory of his countenance, which glory was passing away,
2Co 3:8 how will the ministry of the Spirit not be more glorious?


Heb 8:6 But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises.
Heb 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second.
Heb 8:8 Because finding fault with them, He says: "BEHOLD, THE DAYS ARE COMING, SAYS THE LORD, WHEN I WILL MAKE A NEW COVENANT WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AND WITH THE HOUSE OF JUDAH—
Heb 8:9 NOT ACCORDING TO THE COVENANT THAT I MADE WITH THEIR FATHERS IN THE DAY WHEN I TOOK THEM BY THE HAND TO LEAD THEM OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT; BECAUSE THEY DID NOT CONTINUE IN MY COVENANT, AND I DISREGARDED THEM, SAYS THE LORD.
Heb 8:10 FOR THIS IS THE COVENANT THAT I WILL MAKE WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AFTER THOSE DAYS, SAYS THE LORD: I WILL PUT MY LAWS IN THEIR MIND AND WRITE THEM ON THEIR HEARTS; AND I WILL BE THEIR GOD, AND THEY SHALL BE MY PEOPLE.
Heb 8:11 NONE OF THEM SHALL TEACH HIS NEIGHBOR, AND NONE HIS BROTHER, SAYING, 'KNOW THE LORD,' FOR ALL SHALL KNOW ME, FROM THE LEAST OF THEM TO THE GREATEST OF THEM.
Heb 8:12 FOR I WILL BE MERCIFUL TO THEIR UNRIGHTEOUSNESS, AND THEIR SINS AND THEIR LAWLESS DEEDS I WILL REMEMBER NO MORE."
Heb 8:13 In that He says, "A NEW COVENANT," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.


Heb 10:16 "THIS IS THE COVENANT THAT I WILL MAKE WITH THEM AFTER THOSE DAYS, SAYS THE LORD: I WILL PUT MY LAWS INTO THEIR HEARTS, AND IN THEIR MINDS I WILL WRITE THEM,"
Heb 10:17 then He adds, "THEIR SINS AND THEIR LAWLESS DEEDS I WILL REMEMBER NO MORE."
Heb 10:18 Now where there is remission of these, there is no longer an offering for sin.


Heb 12:22 But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,
Heb 12:23 To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,
Heb 12:24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.

.

Jas 1:1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting.
Jas 1:2 My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations;
Jas 1:3 Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience.


.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

seventysevens

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2017
3,207
844
USA
✟38,043.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Which part was error, my assertion that historically the temple fell in 70 ad? the bible verses I quoted? my claim that the disciples' generation saw persecution, famine, earthquakes, pestilence, wars, false messiahs, and the temple destruction?



And for some reason, you did not provide these 'many many many many' scriptures that states jesus will remain on earth and establish his kingdom earth when returns. Nor will you acknowledge that the
disciples' generation saw persecution, famine, earthquakes, pestilence, wars, false messiahs, and the temple destruction?

But let me guess, you will pull scripture from promises out from under the old covenant and use the symbolic language of revelation to show that Jesus will return to earth to set up a 1000 year reign earthly reign in an earthly temple, where animal sacrifices will resume again.



So, at which verse does the topic change from the disciples generation to a future 2000 year later generation?



Let's use scripture to interpret scripture instead of an analogy:

Matthew 24:3: when will this happen? = Mark 13:4 Tell us, when will these things happen? = Luke 21:7 Teacher,” they asked, “when will these things happen?

Matthew 23:3 and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?” = Mark 13:4 And what will be the sign that they are all about to be fulfilled?” = Luke 21:7 And what will be the sign that they are about to take place?”

"the SIGN of the your coming and end of the age" means the same thing as "what will be the SIGN they are about to take place"

This is all in regards to the original context: the temple being destroyed.




What scripture is Jesus quoting from in Revelation 1:7?



When a thief comes in the night, you do not see the thief. but in the morning you can see that a thief did come during the night when you notice that you have been robbed.

Can we provide verifiable evidence when God came down from heaven to defeat David's enemies (2 Samuel 22)? or how about when God came down from heaven to destroy Samaria (Micah 1)? or when God rode on a cloud to defeat Egypt (Isaiah 13)? Yes, king saul was defeated, samaria was destroyed by Assyria, and Egypt was destroyed. So to, Jerusalem and the temple were destroyed in 70 ad.



And everything in the dispensational view seems to hinge on old covenant promises, even though the old covenant no longer exists, and a literal view of revelation, a very symbolic book.......



I agree.





Matthew 11:13-14 For all the prophets and the Law prophesied until John. And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come.

Matthew 17:11-12 Jesus replied, “Elijah does indeed come, and he will restore all things. But I tell you that Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but have done to him whatever they wished. In the same way, the Son of Man will suffer at their hands.”

Luke 1:17 And he will go on before the Lord in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to their children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the righteous—to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.”
Like I have told you several times I DO NOT HAVE THE TIME TO SPEND HOURS RESPONDING TO ALL YOU SAY - LIMIT YOUR RESPONSES SO WE CAN BE ON THE SAME PAGE AT THE SAME TIME
I have to scroll my mouse wheel a dozen times from the start of your responses to the end of them - as such I cannot respond to all you say because you choose to go full speed ahead - until I have the time to respond I won't

Paul taught the very same thing in his day as what has been taught ever since -
Paul taught that Jesus could return at any time - it could be that day or the next day -= it is known as the imminent return of Jesus - It could happen at any time - and it still holds true today - Jesus could return today or tomorrow Until he does return !

But since Jesus will return to save ISRAEL from destruction - ISRAEL has to be a nation in existence for Jesus to return to and save - can't save a nation that does not exist and for 2000 years it did not exist - but NOW it does !
It exists because the WORD of God said it would return as a nation and it has happened Exactly as God said it would and happened exactly as God said it would .
There is no new testament scripture that states a '3rd' earthly temple building will be rebuilt. That is a fact.
Are you trying to find the word "3rd" somewhere - are you good enough in math to know 3rd comes after 2nd ? so if you know a 2nd temple has been built and is destroyed - and another temple is built would you call it a 2nd temple ?
People who understand math will call it a 3rd simply because what is known as the 2nd has come and gone so it would not be correct to call any temple built afterward as the 2nd - it is only correct to call it by the next succeeding number which would naturally be 3rd , but the word 3rd is not used in scripture and nor does it need to be as anyone would know that any temple built after the 2nd one would naturally be called the third
I should not have to type all that out - but since refuse to acknowledge basics I had to

Evidence of scripture point blank stating a Temple of God in the FUTURE

Rev 11
I was given a reed like a measuring rod and was told, “Go and measure the temple of God and the altar, with its worshipers.
2 But exclude the outer court; do not measure it, because it has been given to the Gentiles. They will trample on the holy city for 42 months.
3 And I will appoint my two witnesses, and they will prophesy for 1,260 days, clothed in sackcloth.” 4 They are “the two olive trees” and the two lampstands, and “they stand before the Lord of the earth.

11 But after the three and a half days the breath of life from God entered them, and they stood on their feet, and terror struck those who saw them. 12 Then they heard a loud voice from heaven saying to them, “Come up here.” And they went up to heaven in a cloud, while their enemies looked on.

You probably think this has happened - even though it has not happened yet

unless you really think that Gentile people can go to heaven without accepting Jesus and being fully human and fully alive go into heaven and trample the Temple in heaven - then you would be hallucinating because there is no way at all any human will go to heaven and trample on the temple for 42 months
This Temple is on Earth that the Gentiles will trample for 42 months in the Future

after scanning your posts there are multiple errors , but I don't have time to address them
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ebedmelech

My dog Micah in the pic
Site Supporter
Jul 3, 2012
8,998
678
✟187,689.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
You are entitled to your opinion just as everyone is , even though there has been no real substantial proof of anything , just merely an opinion , anytime anyone selectively picks and chooses which scripture or even which words of a scripture they will acknowledge and disregard that which goes against their theology it reveals they subscribe to a view that it not fully supported by scripture - half-truths are just as false as fabricated truths
disregarding that Jesus return has nothing to do with the temple that was destroyed in 70 AD and has no merit about what Jesus taught about HIS Return
Seventysevens, I've gone through this with you before so I won't even do it again. It's basically you that picks and chooses what scripture you will follow...and I agree...you're entitled to do that even if it goes against comparing scripture with scripture.

If you don't think Jesus returned in judgment of Jerusalem and destroying the temple, you're simply blind to the teachings of scripture because He clearly did. Just as he revealed in Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21 and Revelation. When Jesus comes again it will be final judgement...that is clearly in Matthew 25 also. One must take ALL of scripture.

We will all stand before Christ...and how we followed His word will also be weighed in the balance...and we will ALL be wrong about something we believed...but when it comes to eschatology, you'll be stunned at how much in error you were.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: claninja
Upvote 0

seventysevens

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2017
3,207
844
USA
✟38,043.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Seventysevens, I've gone through this with you before so I won't even do it again.

If you don't think Jesus returned in judgment of Jerusalem and destroying the temple, you're simply blind to the teachings of scripture because He clearly did. Just as he revealed in Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21 and Revelation. When Jesus comes again it will be final judgement...that is clearly in Matthew 25 also. One must take ALL of scripture.

We will all stand before Christ...and how we followed His word will also be weighed in the balance...and we will ALL be wrong about something we believed...but when it comes to eschatology, you'll be stunned at how much in error you were.
As already said you have your personal interpretation , but upon close evaluation it simply fails to be supported by scripture - Jesus did not destroy the temple and he did not give any command to destroy the temple in 70 AD , Matt 24 , Mark 13 etc have not yet happened in regards to Jesus return and judgment upon the world -

Regarding the temple that was destroyed - Jesus simply gave a prophecy stating that particular temple would be destroyed - there is no evidence in writing or physical that says Jesus returned or destroyed the temple in 70 AD - that notion is entirely based on your incorrect interpretation - simply how you choose to interpret it -

you obviously do not understand why Jesus will return and what he will do when he does as it will be far far more than just judging those wicked people - If you cannot find scripture that state outright that Jesus will establish HIS Kingdom on earth then you have not read the bible as it is there in several places
You should read it - if you do not know where to look just ask google and it will show many scriptures for you to study - it can be your gps to find scripture - then you can find them in your own bible :)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If you cannot find scripture that state outright that Jesus will establish HIS Kingdom on earth then you have not read the bible as it is there in several places

Christ returns "in flaming fire" taking "vengeance" on those who do not know God in 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10.

The same is found in 2 Peter 3:10-13.

Peter was looking for the New Heavens and the New Earth. I am looking for the same thing.



You are agreeing with the woman at the well.
You must have missed the part where Jesus corrected her.

Joh 4:20 Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship.

Joh 4:21 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.


Joh 4:22 Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.


Joh 4:23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.


Joh 4:24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.




.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

seventysevens

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2017
3,207
844
USA
✟38,043.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Christ returns "in flaming fire" taking "vengeance" on those who do not know God in 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10.

The same is found in 2 Peter 3:10-13.

Peter was looking for the New Heavens and the New Earth. I am looking for the same thing.



You are agreeing with the woman at the well.
You must have missed the part where Jesus corrected her.

Joh 4:20 Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship.


Joh 4:21 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.

Joh 4:22 Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

Joh 4:23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.

Joh 4:24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.




.



Total nonsense - absolute and total failure you need to read the WORD of GOD -as you continue to follow a doctrine that is proven false - if you cannot find the scriptures that explicitly state that Jesus will establish HIS Kingdom on earth at His return then you are not reading the Holy Bible but merely following false interpretations - the new earth does not appear until after satan is cast into the lake of fire
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
the new earth does not appear until after satan is cast into the lake of fire


Rev 11:15 And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.


Rev 11:18 And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth.


The time of the judgment of the dead occurs right after the 7th trumpet.
Your Bible says the same thing.

The Book of Revelation is not in chronological order.


.
 
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Like I have told you several times I DO NOT HAVE THE TIME TO SPEND HOURS RESPONDING TO ALL YOU SAY - LIMIT YOUR RESPONSES SO WE CAN BE ON THE SAME PAGE AT THE SAME TIME
I have to scroll my mouse wheel a dozen times from the start of your responses to the end of them - as such I cannot respond to all you say because you choose to go full speed ahead - until I have the time to respond I won't

This is a debate and discussion. Posts can be as little or long as the writer intends them to be. If your having a hard time keeping up or reading posts, maybe don’t respond out of frustration right away. No one is forcing or expecting you to respond right away. Take a couple days and think on the posts and then respond with an appropriate response, in a time you believe that best suits you. We are discussing very deep theology that requires a lot of scripture to back up claims. Don’t expect these posts to be short.

Paul taught the very same thing in his day as what has been taught ever since -
Paul taught that Jesus could return at any time - it could be that day or the next day -= it is known as the imminent return of Jesus - It could happen at any time - and it still holds true today - Jesus could return today or tomorrow Until he does return !

So now you believe that Paul taught Jesus could return in his lifetime? because you at first You stated this:

Paul taught that Jesus return to earth will be in the future and not his lifetime

So why did Paul believe that Jesus could return in his lifetime?

Why did James 5:8-9 say the judge is at the door, quoting Jesus’ Olivet Discourse, that when the apostles saw “all these things” it is near, at the door?

Did someone tell them that Jesus would come in their generation?

But since Jesus will return to save ISRAEL from destruction - ISRAEL has to be a nation in existence for Jesus to return to and save - can't save a nation that does not exist and for 2000 years it did not exist - but NOW it does !
It exists because the WORD of God said it would return as a nation and it has happened Exactly as God said it would and happened exactly as God said it would .

Jesus did Save true Israel from destruction. He saved the remnant, which was true Israel.

And Isaiah cries out concerning Israel: “Though the number of the sons of Israel be as the sand of the sea, only a remnant of them will be saved,
Romans 9:27 - Bible Gateway passage: Romans 9:27 - English Standard Version

Because not all israel is true Israel

But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel,
Romans 9:6 - Bible Gateway passage: Romans 9:6 - English Standard Version

Are you trying to find the word "3rd" somewhere - are you good enough in math to know 3rd comes after 2nd ? so if you know a 2nd temple has been built and is destroyed - and another temple is built would you call it a 2nd temple ?
People who understand math will call it a 3rd simply because what is known as the 2nd has come and gone so it would not be correct to call any temple built afterward as the 2nd - it is only correct to call it by the next succeeding number which would naturally be 3rd , but the word 3rd is not used in scripture and nor does it need to be as anyone would know that any temple built after the 2nd one would naturally be called the third
I should not have to type all that out - but since refuse to acknowledge basics I had to

Temples are not built of themselves, without any command from God. A temple can only be built if God allows it. God commanded Moses to build the tabernacle. God allowed Solomon to build a temple for the tabernacle of God at David’s request. God commanded for the rebuilding of a 2nd temple. All of these commands were done under the old covenant. They are only a shadow of the true realities. Please provide scripture that God commands an earthly temple building under the new covenant.

I suggest looking up what happened when an attempt to build a 3rd temple, without the command of God, occurred in 363 ad.

Evidence of scripture point blank stating a Temple of God in the FUTURE

Evidence of a rebuilt temple? Revelation 11 just states there is a standing temple. I could just as well state that this is evidence of the 1st century temple that was standing.

after scanning your posts there are multiple errors , but I don't have time to address them

Exactly the response i expected. Throw out a claim that there a multiple errors and yet provide no evidence to support it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus did not destroy the temple and he did not give any command to destroy the

1. Is Jesus, God? Yes
2. Who came to destroy the wicked tenants (unfaithful Israel ) in Mathew 21? God
2. Who sent an army to destroy the original wedding (unfaithful Israel) guests in Matthew 22? God?
3. Why was unfaithful israel destroyed? Because they did not recognize Gods visitation through Christ (Luke 19:41-44)

Matt 24 , Mark 13 etc have not yet happened in regards to Jesus return and judgment upon the world -

Nothing in the Olivet Discourse has happened yet? The apostles’ generation did not see wars, persecution, false messiahs, earthquakes, famines, pestilence, Jerusalem’s siege, or the temple destruction?

If your answer is no, it is clear you put your end times theology above God’s word.

if you do not know where to look just ask google and it will show many scriptures for you to study - it can be your gps to find scripture - then you can find them in your own bible :)

if you don’t want to provide scriptural support for your claims, I’m not sure why you are on here.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0