Poking holes in your theology isn’t goading.
you have been shown what is goading and refused to take responsibility for it...now you are doing it again by trying to make claims that you can not back up and accuse me of accusing you of goading for something that never happened.
In fact, this whole time I have secretly been hoping you would give me an argument that actually challenges what I have been saying because standing up to challenge is how we know we have truth....but instead all you do is reinvent what is being said which isn't challenge or poking holes...instead it is just another form of goading.
I get you do not like the words scripture uses and I get that the fleshly reasoning cannot grasp it but you did not show it to be faulty, heck, you didn't even go to the lexicon to try to prove translational issues...I can do better than that with my own understanding as far as questioning it and putting forth challenge to it .
I’m asking when does He forget because it goes back to the claim that started this whole thing that we repent because we’ve been forgiven, not to obtain forgiveness.
you have been ask several times now by at least two different posters how one can repent of something that is already forgiven and you refuse to answer....you have been shown by at least two different posters on multiple occasions where scripture says God forgets our sins when we are forgiven....you have been shown by at least one poster where the passage you are trying to make an issue of the word "for" for doesn't mean what you are trying to claim it does...and all you can do is claim that you are being accused of goading because you poked holes in my theology....so let me ask you this...if you want to make the above claim, then do what I have done and actually outline what "holes' you think you have poked and how you think you did so....for example...
Using reason you have been shown that it is not logical to repent of something that is no longer existing.
Using the Lexicon you have been shown that the word "for" is not being used properly by you to come to the conclusion you do.
Using scripture you have been shown that God claims to forget sins that He has forgiven.
Using everyday examples you have been shown how it is possible to know something and still forget it.
Using scripture you have been shown how God tells us to forget things.
This is what I want you to do with your claims of holes to my theology...anything that stands up to more than just "cause I say so" arguments will be addressed yet again, all others will be considered to be goading.
But you are certainly free to not engage.
see above.