GOD'S LAW AND JUDGEMENT TIME - ARE YOU READY?

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,991
5,854
Visit site
✟876,452.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You seem to be ignoring everying posted to you. Maybe you can start be addressing post # 489 and show why you disagree with it.

Your question has nothing to do with the topic of discussion. Once again Hebrews 9 cannot help you. It is only a comparison of the earthly Sanctuary with the heavenly and Christs perfect sacrifice. It is not saying that the day of atonement has started.

Sorry tall Hebrews 9 does not help you here. Please re-read the linked post or re-read the whole Chapter 9 for context.

Hope this helps.


Unbelievable.

But if you won't answer, then that is the answer.

I will just leave this here so folks can see what you are not responding to:

as the high priest enters the Holy Places every year with blood
 
  • Winner
Reactions: bugkiller
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Unbelievable.

But if you won't answer, then that is the answer.

I will just leave this here so folks can see what you are not responding to:

as the high priest enters the Holy Places every year with blood

Arr but I have indeed asnwered you with God's WORD in detail you have chosen to ignore the scriptures and the context provided to you in post # 489 either do you wish to discuss it for some reason. I guess because it disagrees with your claim that the day of atonement has already started when you have no scripture to prove this as highlighted in post # 489 linked above.

Hope this helps. :)
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Now, I went through your entire rubric of the Day of Atonement, and no where did it show the high priest going into the sanctuary and looking at books. Please show that in the type.

So let's make this clear, your wanting to change the topic now away from Hebrews 9:23-25?

Also stating that I am saying things that I am not means you have possibly misunderstood what I have posted earlier. Happy to talk about the above if you want to move on from Hebrews 9. I have never posted that the books are a part of the Sanctuary. They are a part of God's judgment however.

I am quite comfortable talking about Hebrews 9. It seems you are not.

Let me know what direction you wish to take?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,991
5,854
Visit site
✟876,452.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So let's make this clear, your wanting to change the topic now?

Also stating that I am saying things that I am not means you misunderstand what I have posted or you a misleading. Happy to talk about the above if you want to move on from Hebrews 9.

I am quite comfortable talking about Hebrews 9. It seems you are not.

Let me know what direction you wish to take?

Oh, yes, you are so comfortable you directly avoided answering a question about chapter 9 multiple times.

When else did the high priest enter into God's presence with blood, YEARLY?


Scripture was quoted but let's put them down again here and make it simple..

Your claim is that Hebrews 9:23-25 demonstrate that the day of atonement had already started at the resurrection of Christ right?

Context here is comparing the earthly Sanctuary with the heavenly Sanctuary

v1-7 The first covenant and the earthly Sanctuary describing all the sanctuary furniture and the two apartments with the day of atonement happening once a year not without blood for the cleansing the sins of the people

Yes, it references the once per year cleansing with blood by the high priest. Which is exactly what is referenced in 9:25.

v8-9 Says the way into the G39 heavenly Sanctuary was not yet made manifest while the earthly Sanctuary was still standing. Which was a figure (pattern/shadow) for the time present.

v10 Many of the ordinances listed in the earthly Sanctuary were only temporary

v11 Christ is the true high priest of good things to come under the heavenly Sanctuary which is perfect and not made with hands like the earthly.

v12-22 Now the main focus of conversation is a comparison on the earthly sacrifices and the blood of the covenants and how Christs sacrifice and blood is prefect and all sufficient for all sin to obtain redemption for us in the ministration of the heavenly Sanctuary under the new covenant.

Now the context has been established...

The context which talked about how the earthly type culminated in the entry with blood by the high priest. And then goes on to picture that:

HEBREWS 9:23-25 [23], It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.

The patterns of things in heaven must also be purified with blood and sacrifice (Context)

Yes, and the Day of Atonement, as you have said many times, is about cleansing the sanctuary. And here it discusses it. Just as verse 7 mentioned it as the culmination of the earthly type.

[24], For Christ has not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:

Entered.
Now to appear in God's presence.'

What did the high priest do in the type?
Entered into God's presence.


Now Christ has not entered into the holy places (G39 Sanctuary) made with hands (earthly) but into heaven itself to appear in the presence of God for us. This is application once again to the work of Christ in the heavenly Sanctuary as our mediator and high priest to atone for our sins.

And it mirrors the type. In the context of the statement just made of the need for cleansing of the heavenly things it shows Him entering God's presence. Attached to the foregoing thought by "for" because it is explaining verse 23.

[25], Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the high priest enters into the holy place every year with blood of others

Chists perfect sacrifice is once and for all sin not needing to do multiple sacrifices for sin like the earthly Sanctuary we are under a new and better covenant with Christs sacrifice being sufficient once and for all.

Offer Himself often is not talking about the death of Christ. It is talking about the entry, and is compared to the entry of the high priest with blood, YEARLY. and then it says if He had to offer often He would also have to suffer often.

Now as you can see here the context and topic of discussion is not the starting of the day of atonement but the differences between the earthly and the heavenly Sanctuary and ministration for sin provided by Christs perfect sacrifice.

Of course it is. It is comparing His entry into God's presence with the yearly entry with blood by the high priest, in connection to the need for the cleansing of the heavenly things, after referencing the same entry being the high point of the earthly sanctuary arrangement.

Now please answer the question:

When else did the high priest enter with blood yearly?
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,991
5,854
Visit site
✟876,452.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Incidentally, verse 11-12 is also parallel to 7:

7 But into the second part the high priest went alone once a year, not without blood, which he offered for himself and for the people’s sins committed in ignorance;

11 But Christ came as High Priest of the good things to come, with the greater and more perfect tabernacle not made with hands, that is, not of this creation. 12 Not with the blood of goats and calves, but with His own blood He entered the Holy Places once for all, having obtained eternal redemption.

- High Priest
- compared to blood of goats and calves, goat blood only taken in to Most Holy Place

- He entered by means of His own blood, dia is the preposition. Blood was not required to enter the first compartment.
- The result of the entry is eternal redemption.

 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,991
5,854
Visit site
✟876,452.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A reminder of what Adventists scholars have acknowledged:

Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary on Hebrews 10:1:

Compare ch. 9:25, 26, where the work of Christ is again contrasted with that of the earthly high priest on the Day of Atonement.

M.L. Andreasen in The Book of Hebrews:

Verses 25, 26. The priests entered the first apartment daily, the high priest once every year when he went into the most holy with the blood of the bullock and the goat. (127)

William Johnsson in his essay "Day of Atonement Allusions," which can be found in the DARCOM volume on Hebrews, lists 9:25 as clearly alluding to the Day of Atonement.

The context clearly points to a Day of Atonement allusion (high priest . . . yearly . . . blood [cf. 9:7]) (113)

Alwyn Salom in his appendix article in the Daniel and Revelation committee series, speaking of verse 24, 25:

The reference in the context of the Day of Atonement service of the earthly high priest is not to the outer compartment of the sanctuary. (227)

Richard Davidson, notes that vs. 25 is an unmistakable reference to the Day of Atonement:

I agree with Young that Hebrews 9:7 and 9:25 refer to Day of Atonement, because of the clear references to “once a year” and “every year” respectively. ("Inauguration or Day of Atonement?" Andrews University Seminary Studies, Spring 2002, 79)

Felix Cortez states in his article "From the Holy to the Most Holy Place: The Period of Hebrews 9:6-10 and the Day of Atonement as a Metaphor of Transition" in the Journal of Biblical Literature, 125.3, Fall 2006, 527 (footnote):

Unchallenged references to the Day of Atonement in the central section include 9:7, 25

Notice this last one in particular. An Adventist scholar, writing in journal with an audience from various backgrounds, acknowledges that there is no challenge that vs. 25 is a reference to the Day of Atonement.


Apparently they found enough context to figure it out. And nearly all of them picked up on vs. 7 setting the stage.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,991
5,854
Visit site
✟876,452.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
11 But Christ came as High Priest of the good things to come, with the greater and more perfect tabernacle not made with hands, that is, not of this creation. 12 Not with the blood of goats and calves, but with His own blood He entered the Holy Places once for all, having obtained eternal redemption.

The entry is said to be once for all. This fulfilled all the entry's and the Day of Atonement notably included entry.


This entry, as noted previously, extends to the second compartment as it is referenced in comparison to the blood of bulls and goats, and goat blood was only taken into the second when it went into the sanctuary, in the inauguration, and Day of Atonement. We also know that He inaugurated, which means it had to extend to the second compartment as inauguration required this.

Also, He entered by means of blood, and blood is not needed for entry in to the first compartment.

So this rules out Ellen White's vision of a later entry in 1844.

The Day of Atonement entry happened then or never. It was once for all entry.

 
  • Agree
Reactions: bugkiller
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Oh, yes, you are so comfortable you directly avoided answering a question about chapter 9 multiple times.

Sorry tall I have not avoided answering your questions in Hebrews 9 at all I posted on this in detail and you were asking questions not relavent that were already answered in post # 489

When else did the high priest enter into God's presence with blood, YEARLY? Yes, it references the once per year cleansing with blood by the high priest. Which is exactly what is referenced in 9:25.

In relation to Hebrews 9 post # 489 show that the context and topic odf discussion is comparing the earthly and heavenly Sanctuary's and the content and ministration between them both.

There is no scripture provided here whatsoever that states in any way that the day of atonement has started. Simply that Christs perfect sacrifice is sufficient for all sin and the heavenly ministration.

The context which talked about how the earthly type culminated in the entry with blood by the high priest.

No need to guess here please read post # 489 as we have gone through the whole chapter context prior to Hebrews 9:23-25 and there is no scripture that agrees with your teaching that the day of atonement has started.

And then goes on to picture that:

HEBREWS 9:23-25 [23], It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.

The patterns of things in heaven must also be purified with blood and sacrifice (Context)

Sorry tall, the context of v23-25 as shown in post # 489 is v12-22. Now the main focus of conversation is a comparison on the earthly sacrifices and the blood of the covenants and how Christs sacrifice and blood is prefect and all sufficient for all sin to obtain redemption for us in the ministration of the heavenly Sanctuary under the new covenant. Just as the blood and animal sacrifices were used in the earthly Christs perfect sacrifice given once and for all is sufficient for all sin.

Actually this same discussion of Christs perfect sacrifice is continued into Hebrews 10.

HEBREW 10.
[1], For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the ones approaching perfect.
[2], For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because the worshipers once purged should have had no more consciousness of sins.
[3], But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year.
[4], For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
[5], Therefore when he comes into the world, he says, Sacrifice and offering you desired not, but a body have you prepared me:
[6], In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin you have had no pleasure.
[7], Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do your will, O God.
[8], Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and offering for sin you desired not, neither had pleasure in them; which are offered by the law;
[9], Then said he, Lo, I come to do your will, O God. He takes away the first, that he may establish the second (Covenants and Sanctury's).
[10], By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.
[11], And every priest stands daily ministering and offering frequently the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins: (earthly)
[12], But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down on the right hand of God;

So NO Hebrews 9:23-25 is not talking about the day of atonement starting. It is simply comparing the earthly and the Heavenly Sanctuaries and the ministration between both of them with Christ's perfect sacrifice and ministration in the Heavenly.

Yes, and the Day of Atonement, as you have said many times, is about cleansing the sanctuary. And here it discusses it. Just as verse 7 mentioned it as the culmination of the earthly type.

[24], For Christ has not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us Entered.Now to appear in God's presence.' What did the high priest do in the type? Entered into God's presence.

Now tall, be nice, I have never said that Hebrews 9 does not discuss the day of atonement. It is discussing ALL of the Sanctuary ministration comparing the earlthy with the heavenly.

This is shown in post # 489 and the context of Hebrews 9 when Paul is comparing both the earthly and heavenly Sanctuary and ministration between both the earthly and heavenly.

What the chapter shows and the linked post # 489, is that this chapter is in no way saying whatsoever that the day of atonement has started. It is simply discussing the earthly ministration and comparing it to the heavenly nothing more.

This post pretty much answers all your smaller posts above as well ;)

Let me know if you would like to discusss any of the smaller once. They seem to be pretty much repetition and to an argument of something that you think I believe but do not (saying Hebrews is not referring to the day of atonement).

I have already said it is referring to the day of atonement. What I think you do not understand that I am saying is that these scriptures are not a reference to the commencement of the day of atonement.

Hebrews 8-10 are simply comparing of the earthly and heavenly ministrations. They are not saying the day of atonement has started.

Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,991
5,854
Visit site
✟876,452.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Now tall, be nice, I have never said that Hebrews 9 does not discuss the day of atonement. It is discussing ALL of the Sanctuary ministration comparing the earlthy with the heavenly.

And it discusses the need to cleanse the sanctuary then describes the past tense entry into God's presence, directly compared to the Day of Atonement entry.

Vs. 12 notes it is a once for all entry. It either happened here or it never will.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,991
5,854
Visit site
✟876,452.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sorry tall, the context of v23-25 as shown in post # 489 is v12-22. Now the main focus of conversation is a comparison on the earthly sacrifices and the blood of the covenants and how Christs sacrifice and blood is prefect and all sufficient for all sin to obtain redemption for us in the ministration of the heavenly Sanctuary under the new covenant. Just as the blood and animal sacrifices were used in the earthly Christs perfect sacrifice given once and for all is sufficient for all sin.
Vs. 22 is the blood rule summing up all the various blood rites. But then 23 indicates the necessity of the cleansing of the heavenly things.

And of course, you just said be nice, you don't deny reference to the Day of Atonement.

Well there it is. And the Adventist and non-Adventist scholars admit it.

The problem for you is that after describing the need for cleansing of the heavenly things it describes in the past tense how this happened.
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
And it discusses the need to cleanse the sanctuary then describes the past tense entry into God's presence, directly compared to the Day of Atonement entry.

Vs. 12 notes it is a once for all entry. It either happened here or it never will.

Ideed but as stated earlier here is where your interpretation goes out. Your take on this is that Hebrews 9:23-25 is talking about the day of atonement starting correct?

I do not see this in the scriptures and context of the chapters. Hebrews 9 is simply comparing of the earthly and heavenly ministrations. They are not saying the day of atonement has started. That is what post post # 489 discusses in a bit more detail.

Hope this helps.
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Vs. 22 is the blood rule summing up all the various blood rites. But then 23 indicates the necessity of the cleansing of the heavenly things.

And of course, you just said be nice, you don't deny reference to the Day of Atonement.

Well there it is. And the Adventist and non-Adventist scholars admit it.

The problem for you is that after describing the need for cleansing of the heavenly things it describes in the past tense how this happened.

I think you have missed the point of my posts again :)

Your take on this is that Hebrews 9:23-25 is that it is talking about the day of atonement starting.

This is not talked about in any of these scritures neither is it the main topic of conversation within these scriptures and context of the chapters.

Hebrews 9 is simply comparing of the earthly and heavenly ministrations. They are not saying the day of atonement has started. That is what post post # 489 discusses in a bit more detail.

You may need to re-read the chapter if you believe otherwise my friend.

Hope this helps.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,991
5,854
Visit site
✟876,452.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Seeing as you just admitted that the Day of Atonement entry happened then or never, I would say it did start. Or else it never will. And that certainly rules out Ellen White's later entry.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Seeing as you just admitted that the Day of Atonement entry happened then or never, I would say it did start. Or else it never will. And that certainly rules out Ellen White's later entry.

You are welcome to say whatever you wish but the scriptures in Hebrews 9:23-25 do not teach that the day of atonement has started.

I have also never denied that Hebrews discusses the day of atonement but not in the context and interpretation you have provided.

That is why the context and topic of conversation was post for Hebrews 9 in post # 489 which discusses all of these scriptures in a bit more detail.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,991
5,854
Visit site
✟876,452.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You are welcome to say whatever you wish but the scriptures in Hebrews 9:23-25 do not teach this. That is why the context and topic of conversation was post for Hebrews 9 in post # 489 which discusses all of these scriptures in a bit more detail.

So the indeed did not refer to the once for all entry?

Because that was the thing you quoted, then said "indeed"

And if it was the once for all entry, then that was the start.
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
So the indeed did not refer to the once for all entry? Because that was the thing you quoted, then said "indeed"
And if it was the once for all entry, then that was the start.

Not at all the scriptures Hebrews 9 are saying that Christs sacrifice is sufficient once and for all sin. No more sacrifices required.

Matches nicely here..

HEBREWS 10:10 [10], By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

Ok my friend I have to go for now. Excercise time. My prayer is that you may take some time to re-read Hebrews 9. It is not teaching and there is no scripture that tells us anywhere there that the day of atonement has started.

Let's chat more latter :wave:
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
31,991
5,854
Visit site
✟876,452.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Not at all the scriptures Hebrews 9 are saying that Christs sacrifice is sufficient once and for all sin. No more sacrifices required.

Matches nicely here..

HEBREWS 10:10 [10], By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

Verse 12 says the ENTRY was once for all. It is not parallel to the sacrifice being once for all.

12 Not with the blood of goats and calves, but with His own blood He entered the Holy Places once for all, having obtained eternal redemption.

So again, how can the entry happen later for the Day of Atonement if the entry is once for all?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Verse 12 says the ENTRY was once for all. It is not parallel to the sacrifice being once for all.

12 Not with the blood of goats and calves, but with His own blood He entered the Holy Places once for all, having obtained eternal redemption.

So again, how can the entry happen later for the Day of Atonement if the entry is once for all?

Look up your words here you have made a mistake G39 HOLY PLACES = ALL THE SANCTUARY

Maybe get some sleep you seem tired. We can talk more about it more latter. Nice talking to you. 99 :wave:
 
Upvote 0