On Qur'an 2:193, Tafsir Al-Qurtubi

Isaiah60

Anglican
May 30, 2018
141
65
53
Janesville
✟13,235.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Prince of peace says:
"Do not suppose that I(Jesus) have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.
Matthew 10:34

The sword which divides the spirit of men, separating the sheep from the wolves. We see this verse in action today when we see how people oppose Christ and His people. The Christians on the other hand are armed with the sword of truth.


Hebrews 4:12 King James Version (KJV)
12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

These is a spiritual warfare that is being addressed.

Jesus also said
But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them--bring them here and kill them in front of me.'
Luke 19:27

Its a parable about how Jesus will deal with the wicked on the Day of Judgment. It has nothing to do with a command from Christ to murder unbelievers. Muslims are refuted all the time about this passage but do any of you actually learn from being constantly refuted? Read the parable for yourself and know your Imams are complete liars.


Luke 19:11-27 Modern English Version (MEV)
The Parable of the Ten Pounds and said to them, ‘Trade until I come.’

14 “But his citizens hated him and sent a delegation after him, saying, ‘We do not want this man to reign over us.’

15 “When he returned, having received the kingdom, he summoned these servants, to whom he had entrusted the money, that he might know what everyone gained by trading.

16 “The first came, saying, ‘Master, your pound has made ten pounds more.’

17 “He said to him, ‘Well done, good servant! Because you have been faithful in very little, take authority over ten cities.’

18 “The second came, saying, ‘Master, your pound has made five pounds more.’

19 “He said in like manner to him, ‘You, take authority over five cities.’

20 “Then another came, saying, ‘Master, look, here is your pound, which I have kept put away in a napkin. 21 For I feared you, because you are an exacting man. You collect what you did not deposit, and reap what you did not sow.’

22 “He said to him, ‘Out of your own mouth will I judge you, you wicked servant. You knew that I was an exacting man, collecting what I did not deposit and reaping what I did not sow. 23 Why then did you not deposit my money in the bank, so that at my coming I might have collected it with interest?’

24 “Then he said to those who stood by, ‘Take the pound from him and give it to him who has ten pounds.’

25 “They said to him, ‘Master, he has ten pounds.’

26 “ ‘I tell you that to everyone who has will be given. But from him who has not, even what he has will be taken away from him. 27 But as for those enemies of mine, who would not let me reign over them, bring them here and slay them before me.’ ”

 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,553
13,712
✟429,057.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Again, the word used in 2:193, which also applies to 190-192--is fitnah. The word fitnah is disbelief.

Sorry to butt in here, but fitna does not mean disbelief. Disbelief is kufr, from the root K-F-R meaning something like "cover". It is used once with this meaning in the Qur'an itself, in Surat al Hadid (57:20), where it talks about el kuffāra 'the tillers', not the disbelievers ("...like the example of the rain whose [resulting] plant growth pleases the tillers").

Fitna has many different meanings, and it is often translated as strife, temptation, trial, dissent, persecution, etc. This is why the first Islamic civil wars (7th-9th centuries AD) are referred to as fitna, as they were major disruptions and revolts within the caliphates of those times (the Rashidun, the Umayyads, and the Abbasids) .
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Barney2.0
Upvote 0

Isaiah60

Anglican
May 30, 2018
141
65
53
Janesville
✟13,235.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Sorry to butt in here, but fitna does not mean disbelief. Disbelief is kufr, from the root K-F-R meaning something like "cover". It is used once with this meaning in the Qur'an itself, in Surat al Hadid (57:20), where it talks about el kuffāra 'the tillers', not the disbelievers ("...like the example of the rain whose [resulting] plant growth pleases the tillers").

Fitna has many different meanings, and it is often translated as strife, temptation, trial, dissent, persecution, etc. This is why the first Islamic civil wars (7th-9th centuries AD) are referred to as fitna, as they were major disruptions and revolts within the caliphates of those times (the Rashidun, the Umayyads, and the Abbasids) .

Part of being a muslim is worshiping scholars as the gods. When a well known scholar speaks, muslims must listen or be killed. So lets look at the most scholarly English translation of the Qur'an, the Muhsin Khan, which no muslims is allowed to disagree with.


Noble Qur'an 2:193, Madinah Period

"And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allah (Alone).* But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"

"disbelief" The word is associated with the mischief of unbelievers. Tafsir Al-Qurtubi also says this and no muslims is allowed to disagree with Tafsir Al-Qurtubi without being killed and here's the proof:


Islamic Jurisprudence:

Reliance of the Traveller,

APOSTASY IN ISLAM
o8.1 "When a person who has reached the age of puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed."
o8.2 "In such case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representative) to ask him to repent to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed."
08.4 "There is no indemnity for killing an apostate (O: or any expiation, since it is killing someone who deserves to die).
Then there are things attributed to the actions of an apostate:
08.7 (7), "to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong to it;"

As you can see, "08.7 (7), "to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong to it;"

This means what Tafsir said of the verse is not to be challenged by any muslim or the punishment is death.

Now lets look at various words used from other translations which will help us under the word.

The word "Fitna" is used to describe the crime committed against the muslims. But this word translates into other words in English. Lets have a recap of the translations cited so the reader can better understand what "Fitna" means.

Muhsin Khan: Fitnah
Mawdudi: mischief
Saheeh International: fitnah
Bewley: fitna
Yusuf Ali: Tumult or oppression
Pickthall: persecution
Dr.Salafi: Fitnah
Daryabadi: mischief
Sarwar: disbelief
Arberry: persecution
Shakir: persecution
Malik: disorder
Mufti Usmani: Fitnah
Asad: oppression

So "Fitnah" can mean mischief, tumult or oppression, persecution, disbelief, and disorder. Now when you read the Tafsir scholars interpret the verse (ayat) you get a clear picture that Fitnah is disbelief and that, to any muslim, is mischief, oppression and persecution. This is why muslims are so easily offended at anything that does not conform to their Islamic views. This is why they seek to change our culture and turn it into the Islamic culture they sought to escape from (or supposedly so). Fitnah (unbelief) is the worse crime in Islam. This verse is about the mass extermination of over 5-billion non-muslims in the world!
 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,553
13,712
✟429,057.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Alright. Cool. I'm not saying Muslims can't listen to whoever they want, I'm just saying that in terms of the actual language, that's not what it means. That's probably why it's put in parenthesis, because that's not what the actual word as it is otherwise used means. "Fitna" (dissent, rebellion) as characterized by the worship of others besides Allah, or whatever. That doesn't mean that that's what the word itself actually means.

This is a common tactic of Arabic-speaking Muslims, by the way. Because so much of the understanding of the Qur'an as a text involves understanding these related contextual meanings (NB: it's actually not all that easy to understand in a narrative sense just by itself as a text, hence there aren't very many "Qur'an only" Muslims out there; this is why the hadith and tafsir are so necessary and argued over), whereby fitna means something other than what it means within the context of the revelation of the verse, there's essentially an unlimited variation of possible meanings (thanks in large part to the way that Arabic forms words as Semitic language, which they trust that you will not know as a non-Muslim), and then they can pick the scholar and/or explanation that suits whatever meaning they themselves prefer.

Consider, for example, the arguments we sometimes see about the Arabic word ولي wali, which appears in the plural (awliya') in Qur'an 5:51, the infamous verse that says in part "O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as awliya'". Depending on which translation you prefer, awliya' is either "allies" (Sahih International translation), "friends" (Pickthall, Shakir), "protectors" (Yusuf Ali), "intimate friends" (Muhammad Sarwar), etc. The actual meaning of the word can encompass all of those things, depending on the context, so it really depends on how you want to present it to your audience. You can be 'hard' about it and say that it means that you shouldn't have Jews or Christians as friends, or you can claim that it means that in this or that particular context (usually if they fight you because of your religion...I wonder if things like this thread would count), you shouldn't be friends with them. Certainly this is a popular question on Islamic websites themselves, as here. It is precisely because of this multivalent property of the Qur'an and the Arabic language itself that you can't really say that it means this or that full-stop, only that it can be taken to mean a particular thing, in accordance with a particular understanding, etc (a bit like the Bible in that way, in that there are many different interpretive/hermeneutical traditions or approaches to it; but we do not claim that God has declared that our scriptures are mobeen, or 'clear').
 
Upvote 0

Isaiah60

Anglican
May 30, 2018
141
65
53
Janesville
✟13,235.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Qur'an 2:191-192 tafisr

Tafsir Al-Qurtubi,

"Kill them wherever you come across them
This is evidence for killing captives, and that topic will be explained in Surat al-Anfah, Allah willing.

....But if they cease,
If they stop fighting you because they believe and become Muslims, then Allah will forgive them all that they did before and show mercy to all of them by pardoning them."

Tafsir Al-Jalalayn (Aisha Bewley translation):

Verse 192: "But if they cease disbelieving and become Muslim, Allah is Ever-Forgiving towards them, Most Merciful towards them."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Qur'an 2:193 tafsir,


Tafsir Ibn Kathir,

"{Fitnah} meaning, disbelief and worshipping of others with Allah. {and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allah (Alone).} It refers to the fact that the Religion of Allah (Islam) must be prevalent over other religions. {But if they cease,} meaning, you are stop fighting them the moment they stop fighting the believers, and thereto Islam they turned; for whoever fights them after that, he is then a transgressor; and that there should be no transgression except against the polytheists and wrongdoers. Narrated Nafi' that Ibn 'Umar said that two men there came to him during the dispute of Ibn Az-Zubayr and said: "People are fighting each others. What keeps you from taking part in the fighting despite your being Ibn 'Umar and the Companion of the Prophet (PBUH)?" He said: "What keeps me as such is that Allah prohibited the killing of a Muslim." They said: "Has not Allah said: {And fight them until there is no more Fitnah}?" Ibn 'Umar said: "We fought until there were no more Fitnah and all the religion (worship) was for Allah and you want to fight till the Fitnah befalls and not to let the religion be for Allah."

Tafsir Al-Qurtubi,

"Fight them until there is no more fitna and the deen belongs to Allah alone.
This is a command to fight every idolater in every place according to those who say that it abrogates the previous ayats. According to those who say that it does not abrogate other ayats, it means: fight those about whom Allah says, "if they fight you". The former is the more likely meaning. It is an unqualified command to fight without any precondition of hostilities being initiated by the unbelievers. The evidence for that is in the words of Allah, "and the din belongs to Allah alone." The Prophet said, " I was commanded to fight people until they say, 'There is no god but Allah.' The ayat and hadith both indicate that the reason for fighting is disbelief because Allah says, "until there is no more fitna," meaning disbelief in this case. So the goal is to abolish disbelief and that is clear.
Ibn 'Abbas, Qatada, ar-Rabi', as-Suddi and others said that fitna here means shirk and the subsequent injury to the believers caused by it. The root of fitna is testing and trial, derived from the term for testing silver when it is put in the fire to separate the impurities from the pure metal.

If they cease, there should be no enmity towards any but wrongdoers.
If they stop and become Muslim or submit by paying jizya in the case of the people of the Book. Otherwise they should be fought and they are wrongdoers and only transgress against themselves. What is done to the wrongdoers is called enmity since it is the repayment of enmity. Wrongdoing and injustice involve enmity and repayment of enmity is also called enmity. The wrongdoers are either those who initiate fighting or those who remain entrenched in disbelief and fitna."

Tafsir Al-Jalalayn (Aisha Bewley translation):

"Fight them until there is no more fitna (shirk) in existence and the din (worship) belongs to Allah alone and none but Him is worshipped. If they cease committing shirk there should be no enmity by killing or in any other way towards any but wrongdoers. If someone is not a wrongdoer, there must be no aggression against him."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hadith,

Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol.1, Book 2, Chapter 26, Hadith No. 36,

"(26) CHAPTER. Al-Jihad (holy fighting in Allah's Cause) is part of the faith.
36.Narrated Abu Hurairah: The Prophet said, "Allah assigns for a person who participates in (holy battles) in Allah's Cause and nothing causes him to do so except belief in Allah and in His Messengers, that he will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty (if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise (if he is killed in battle as a martyr)" The Prophet added: "Had I not found it difficult for my followers, then I would not remain behind any Sariya (an army-unit) going for Jihad and I would have loved to be martyred in Allah's Cause and then made alive, and then martyred and then made alive, and then again martyred in His Cause."

Comment: "Al-Jihad (Holy Fighting) in Allah's Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of it's pillars (on which it stands). By Jihad Islam is established, Allah's Word is made superior. (His Word - La ilaha illallah - none has a right to be worshipped but Allah), and His Religion Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad (may Allah protect us from that) Islam is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanishes. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim, and he who tries escape from his duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite."

Sunan An-Nasa'i, Vol.4, Book 25, Chapter 2, Hadith 3099,

"Chapter 2. Stern Warning Against Forsaking Jihad

3099. It was narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Prophet said, "Whoever dies without having fought or having thought of fighting, he dies on one of the branches of hypocrisy ." (Sahih)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Noble Qur'an 57:25,

"Indeed We have sent Our Messengers with clear proofs, and revealed with them the Scripture and the Balance (justice) that mankind may keep up justice. And We brought forth iron wherein is mighty power (in matters of war*), as well as many benefits for mankind, that Allah may test who it is that will help Him (His religion) and His Messengers in the unseen. Verily, Allah is All-Strong, All-Mighty."

*Footnote: "(V.57:25) Paradise is under the blades of swords (Jihad in Allah's Cause).
a) Narrated Al-Mughirah bin Shu'bah: Our Prophet told us about the Message of our Lord that..."Whoever amongst us is killed (in Jihad in Allah's Cause) will go to Paradise." 'Umar asked the Prophet, "Is it not true that our men who are killed (in Jihad in Allah's Cause) will go to Paradise and their's (i.e. those of the pagan's) will go to the (Hell) Fire?" The Prophet said, "Yes."
b) Narrated 'Abdullah bin Abi Aufa, ! Allah's Messenger said. "Know that Paradise is under the shades of the sword (Jihad in Allah's cause)." (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Vol.4, Hadith No.73 and its chapter No.22)."
 
Upvote 0

football5680

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2013
4,138
1,516
Georgia
✟90,322.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Again, the word used in 2:193, which also applies to 190-192--is fitnah. The word fitnah is disbelief. Qurtubi made it clear that fitna is unbelief. So a disbeliever is fighting Islam by being believers. So lets look at the most reputable English Qur'an in existence--the Muhsin Khan--and see again what it says:

Noble Qur'an 2:193, Madinah Period

"And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allah (Alone).* But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"

Fight until there is no more...Fitnah (disbelief). But if they cease (fighting) and become Muslims, then let there be no transgression.
In regards to the meaning of the word "Fitnah," dzheremi already covered pretty much everything that I would have said and they went in to much greater detail than I would have been able to so just refer to what they said.

What some American muslim says has no weight against the Saudi line. Living in denial is what liberals do. But none of their reputable muslims books support their delusions.
No argument here. Muslims in the Middle East are not afraid to tell the truth about Islam but these are not the people who we are dealing with in our countries. We are dealing with deceptive Muslims who quote verses they know are abrogated and no longer apply and they are relying on the West's complete ignorance of Islam to get by.

My whole argument is not that this verse actually refers to fighting in self-defense, I am simply saying that a viable argument can be made in an attempt to show this so I would not use this particular verse to prove my point.

Like I have said many times, if you want to prove Islam teaches violence, then use what has been said in Surah 9 because no argument can be made to stand against it. The context does not save it because it is clearly calling for offensive attacks without provocation. Abrogation does not save it because it is the last Surah with any actual substance, and the scholars can't save it because they all affirm that it is offensive and is based on the fact that the people who you are attacking are unbelievers.

Also, everything that Muhammad said and did is for all times and for all places, as he is believed by muslims to be the prophet of the world. So all acts he did while alive are acts that are Sunnah and to be repeated by future generations of muslims. If a muslim says that fighting disbelievers was just a localized event limited to 7th century Arabia then such a muslim is saying Muhammad was the prophet of Arabia and not the world. So all actions of Muhammad, being of the sunnah, are for all times and in all places and not just for Arabia.

If Muhammad was just the prophet of Arabia then a good question to ask is why there are 54 Islamic states? Why do muslims commit terrorism in countries outside Arabia if Muhammad was just the prophet of Arabia?

So these question could be challenged to a muslim who wants to deny his own scholars. Nowhere in any of the Islamic beliefs does it say that Nancy Pelosi and other progressives have more authority over doctrinal matters of Islam than Muhammad and his companions.
Again, I agree and have no argument with this. It is just important to understand the tactics of the people who will attempt to defend it and claim Islam is peaceful.
 
Upvote 0

Isaiah60

Anglican
May 30, 2018
141
65
53
Janesville
✟13,235.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Fighting in self-dense. I've read the Seerah which is the background of the Qur'an. Muslims always drew first blood. Fighting in self-defense happens when a muslim cannot convert an unbeliever. No violent attack is necessary as fitnah is worse than killing. If muslims are in the presence of disbelievers they feel oppressed at the mischief of disbelief and will fight them until the disbelievers become muslim. This is also what Ibn Kathir and Al-Qurtubi are saying and they have authority over the interpretation as not just any muslim is allowed to interpret the Qur'an. So the most reputable tafsir scholars of Islam agree fitnah is associated with disbelief and fighting disbelief is a self-defense against those who do not believe. They are to fight disbelief until there is no more disbelievers. This is what both Kathir and Qurtubi write and they were muslims of the classical period, long long before 9-11. What explanations are not acceptable are those coming from post 9-11 muslims who will deliberately compromise the meaning, trying to avoid the more trusted scholarship of Kathir, Qurtubi, Jalalayn and others.
 
Upvote 0

Barney2.0

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2017
6,003
2,336
Los Angeles
✟451,221.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The English translations of the Quran are so deceptive, I’ve seen translation of when Muslim scholars shamelessly altered the text to make it look better. For example the word قتل was translated to mean fight, however قتل really means kill or murder not fight.
 
Upvote 0

dqhall

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2015
7,547
4,171
Florida
Visit site
✟766,603.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I was hoping after you read it that you would accept Islam LOL!
Seriously, we have so many people who are clueless about the teachings of Islam and this particular verse tends to stand out as one of the most clear verses in the Qur'an when speaking about killing all unbelievers until none are left. Some may say, 'Oh, but you are interpreting it wrong!' But classical tafsir holds more weight in authority than the emotions of liberals. So I posted this with the intention of bringing some informative information to the forum which will get people to think. But perhaps I should have given it a better title.
After seeing ISIS genocide thousands of Christians, Shiites and Yazidis in Iraq, I cannot think Islam is a good religion. The Islamic Jihad is murdering Christians to this day. Christians in Africa fear for their lives. The terrorist group Al Shabaab has killed and kidnapped thousands. They have forcibly married and raped school children. They burned down Christian's houses. They found clues in the Koran.

Starting in 1914 the Muslims of Turkey began to kill their Christian neighbors. Over a million Christians of Armenian descent were killed. The genocide was coordinated by rulers of mosques. They were proud of their knowledge of the Koran.
 
Upvote 0

dqhall

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2015
7,547
4,171
Florida
Visit site
✟766,603.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Swaths of violence in Qur'an. You made a mistake by saying that.
Someone analysed the Bible and Quran to see which is more violent
See what Jesus has to say in OT:
10. 2 Kings 2:23-24
He [Elisha] went up from there to Bethel; and while he was going up on the way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him, saying, “Go away, baldhead! Go away, baldhead!” When he turned around and saw them, he cursed them in the name of the LORD. Then two she-bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the boys. (NRSV)

9. Exodus 32:27-29
Then he said to them, "This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: 'Each man strap a sword to his side. Go back and forth through the camp from one end to the other, each killing his brother and friend and neighbor.' "The Levites did as Moses commanded, and that day about three thousand of the people died. Then Moses said, "You have been set apart to the LORD today, for you were against your own sons and brothers, and he has blessed you this day."(NIV)

8. 2 Chronicles 25:12
The sons of Judah also captured 10,000 alive and brought them to the top of the cliff and threw them down from the top of the cliff, so that they were all dashed to pieces.(NASB)

7. Judges 12:5-6
Then the Gileadites took the fords of the Jordan against the Ephraimites. Whenever one of the fugitives of Ephraim said, “Let me go over,” the men of Gilead would say to him, “Are you an Ephraimite?” When he said, “No” they said to him, “Then say Shibboleth” and he said, “Sibboleth,” for he could not pronounce it right. Then they seized him and killed him at the fords of the Jordan. Forty-two thousand of the Ephraimites fell at that time. (NRSV)

6. 1 Kings 20:28-30
Then a man of God came and spoke to the king of Israel, and said, “Thus says the LORD: 'Because the Syrians have said, “The LORD is God of the hills, but He is not God of the valleys,” therefore I will deliver all this great multitude into your hand, and you shall know that I am the LORD.’” And they encamped opposite each other for seven days.

So it was that on the seventh day the battle was joined; and the children of Israel killed one hundred thousand foot soldiers of the Syrians in one day. But the rest fled to Aphek, into the city; then a wall fell on twenty-seven thousand of the men who were left. (NKJV)

5. Joshua 8:24-26
When the Israelite army finished chasing and killing all the men of Ai in the open fields, they went back and finished off everyone inside. So the entire population of Ai, including men and women, was wiped out that day—12,000 in all. For Joshua kept holding out his spear until everyone who had lived in Ai was completely destroyed. (NLT)

4. Deuteronomy 2:32-34
Then Sihon came out against us, he and all his people, unto battle at Jahaz. And Jehovah our God delivered him up before us; and we smote him, and his sons, and all his people. And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed every inhabited city, with the women and the little ones; we left none remaining. (ASV)

3. Deuteronomy 3:3-6
So the LORD our God delivered Og also, king of Bashan, with all his people into our hand, and we smote them until no survivor was left. We captured all his cities at that time; there was not a city which we did not take from them: sixty cities, all the region of Argob, the kingdom of Og in Bashan. All these were cities fortified with high walls, gates and bars, besides a great many unwalled towns. We utterly destroyed them, as we did to Sihon king of Heshbon, utterly destroying the men, women and children of every city. (NASB)

2. 1 Samuel 15:3,8
Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.' " … He took Agag king of the Amalekites alive, and all his people he totally destroyed with the sword.(NIV)

1. Hosea 13:16
Samaria shall bear her guilt, because she has rebelled against her God; they shall fall by the sword, their little ones shall be dashed in pieces, and their pregnant women ripped open. (NRSV)
You quoted Hebrew scriptures of the Jewish religion. Some Christians looked to the New Testament and teaching of Christ where murder and violence are forbidden. That is why the word Christ is in Christian. Jesus did not organize an army like Mohammed did.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Godistruth1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 9, 2018
1,781
183
32
Somewhere
✟97,167.00
Country
India
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Single
You quoted Hebrew scriptures of the Jewish religion. Some Christians looked to the New Testament and teaching of Christ where murder and violence are forbidden. That is why the word Christ is in Christian. Jesus did not organize an army like Mohammed did.
Isn't Jesus God of old testament?
 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,553
13,712
✟429,057.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Jesus is God even before the Old Testament, but that doesn't change the fact that we read the Old in light of the New, in view of the fact that the One our fathers the Hebrew patriarchs waited for at that time has come and saved us.
 
Upvote 0