Irrelevant. There are a lot of traditions in the Bible that we now deem barbaric or unnecessary.
Not really. Such as? Even where it deals with things like slavery or rape, Christians believe the bible provides a just framework for dealing with the fallen human condition.
There of plenty of links that say the exact opposite too. Links are a game of back and forth.
True. But when there clearly exists such doubt even among experts, its immature and tyrannical to ban something just because you believe the other side to be wrong.
Most circumcised people don't even know what its like to have foreskin since it was taken at a young age, so how can they 'prefer' it?
You can be glad for a decision your parents made for you, without knowing what exactly what it would be like had they not made the decision. That's what this means.
Yes, but that is through a CHOICE they made. No problem if they actually chose it.
Its a choice their parents made. Had they been circumcised at birth, its an issue they wouldn't have even have known about.
Blame society for that. There is an arrogance and superiority complex among many circumcised people or women who have only been with circumcised men. I personally have been told how disgusting and ugly uncircumcised penis' are and thanks to inappropriate contentography, this has had an effect on many men who therefore feel inadequate until they get the procedure. not something to boast about really.
I think the arrogance actually goes the other way, with thinking that circumcised men and their wives are missing out, as if something like the penis, rather than just an excess skin flap had been removed.
Right, because women actually matter when it comes to mens bits? I don't think so. Men shouldn't have to cut off parts of their genitals so that some shallow woman can feel better during sex.
Call me a feminist, but I consider sexual relationships to be a 2 way thing. If a simple procedure like circumcision can improve satisfaction for women, in addition to the health benefits it gives both, you must surely agree this is another justification to allow it? I know your argument hinges on the importance of foreskin (which I dispute), but if this is left out of the equation, I think you would agree.