I did read the context . . . I believe the context of Luke 16:18 was about serial marriages they were doing in that day that were basically the same as sleeping around. (see the ridiculous question the pharisees ask in Matthew 19:3 which shows this and is also part of the context for the same statement in Matthew 19:9) You can also see this in Hillel on divorce:
Babylonian Talmud: Gittin 90 If you take the verse as meaning that literally there would be no point of Deuteronomy 24:4 in light of Leviticus 20:10 because they should have been stoned before that. More obviously Exodus 22:16-17 is a problem for sex-is-marriage-view since the father could break up a sexual union that had already happened which would contradict: Mark 10:9
↑
"The truth is already shown. Stop arguing it with words. The commitment IS the sexual union:"
Oh . . . sorry so I'm not supposed to use words. Oh man, I used them again. Oh no, I used them again. Oh no . . .
↑
"But because you don't perceive reality well doesn't change reality."
Oh man, well if I can't perceive reality well I guess there is no hope for me. Funny you are still arguing with me then. Does this say something about you?
Try being more respectful to me otherwise I'm not going to talk to you anymore.