Could bitterness be the food of cancer?

Actually sweet foods feed cancer cells indirectly by making you fat and can make you get all sorts of diseases. So be more concerned about too much sugar in your food.
The Sugar Cancer Connection Doctors Aren't Telling You

By 1940 the drug manufacturers and other big money in bed with them, under the control/ direction/ (according to Scripture ) of the prince of the power of the air
knew how to cause each specific cancer 'easily', and how to stop it likewise,
by changing the availability of minerals and vitamins and enzymes etc (nutritional fuel for all the cells of the body).

"Bitterness" and other sin (lying spirit, envy, covetousness, greed, adultery, thievery, sexual perversion, idolatry (even unknowingly), etc ) can have an immediate and/or long term effect on almost any aspect of a person's health (spiritual, mental, physical, physiological, metabolism, etc) ....

But remember as Jesus Said when He was asked - this person's disease/suffering was not caused by their sin nor by their parent's sin,
but so Yahweh would receive glory !

Yahweh (G-d) has provided super-abundantly extravagantly generously for the repair / healing/ recovery , (though man's agencies OPPOSE health-truth) ....

Cancer is not a single disease or disorder; there are hundreds of different kinds with different causes.

For instance, childhood aplastic leukemia is now thought to have two necessary triggers - a genetic mutation that predisposes the person to get it and, somewhat ironically, an infancy without exposure to infection (undeveloped immune response), then a subsequent infection during toddler years. Nothing to do with "bitterness" at all.

Asbestos can cause mesothelioma and lung cancer, not bitterness. HPV can cause cancer of the cervix, penis and rectum; bitterness does not.

Warburg came up with his hypothesis in 1924. While it was revolutionary at the time, science and medicine have advanced a long ways since then.

Wikipedia said:

Therefore, the metabolic change observed by Warburg is not so much the cause of cancer, as he claimed, but rather, it is one of the characteristic effects of cancer-causing mutations.

Source

Click to expand...

Many people interpret this life through the lens of science, which is the belief that all things are explainable through a physical process. The problem with this is that you are now explaining things only with physical processes.

I believe in God. I believe that God uses the natural world and can superimpose it also. Remember the story of the Palestinians:

The ark of the Lord was in the country of the Philistines seven months. And the Philistines called for the priests and the diviners and said, “What shall we do with the ark of the Lord? Tell us with what we shall send it to its place.” They said, “If you send away the ark of the God of Israel, do not send it empty, but by all means return him a guilt offering. Then you will be healed, and it will be known to you why his hand does not turn away from you.” And they said, “What is the guilt offering that we shall return to him?” They answered, “Five golden tumors and five golden mice, according to the number of the lords of the Philistines, for the same plague was on all of you and on your lords. So you must make images of your tumors and images of your mice that ravage the land, and give glory to the God of Israel. Perhaps he will lighten his hand from off you and your gods and your land. Why should you harden your hearts as the Egyptians and Pharaoh hardened their hearts? After he had dealt severely with them, did they not send the people away, and they departed?
~1 Samuel 6:1-6

So I believe that guilt is the major cause of cancer but specifically in terms of the holy things of God.

Now let's say someone spends all day every day outside in the sun and say they get skin cancer for it. Here, we see someone getting cancer as a sign of sin but not their own. The sins of the people of the earth have tampered with the holy things of God causing the sky to no longer protect us from the harmful aspects of the sun's rays. So cancer is a sign of sin and an imbalance toward God, especially on the big picture scale, us humans as a whole.

Kevin Snow said:

Many people interpret this life through the lens of science, which is the belief that all things are explainable through a physical process. The problem with this is that you are now explaining things only with physical processes.

I believe in God. I believe that God uses the natural world and can superimpose it also. Remember the story of the Palestinians:

The ark of the Lord was in the country of the Philistines seven months. And the Philistines called for the priests and the diviners and said, “What shall we do with the ark of the Lord? Tell us with what we shall send it to its place.” They said, “If you send away the ark of the God of Israel, do not send it empty, but by all means return him a guilt offering. Then you will be healed, and it will be known to you why his hand does not turn away from you.” And they said, “What is the guilt offering that we shall return to him?” They answered, “Five golden tumors and five golden mice, according to the number of the lords of the Philistines, for the same plague was on all of you and on your lords. So you must make images of your tumors and images of your mice that ravage the land, and give glory to the God of Israel. Perhaps he will lighten his hand from off you and your gods and your land. Why should you harden your hearts as the Egyptians and Pharaoh hardened their hearts? After he had dealt severely with them, did they not send the people away, and they departed?
~1 Samuel 6:1-6

So I believe that guilt is the major cause of cancer but specifically in terms of the holy things of God.

Now let's say someone spends all day every day outside in the sun and say they get skin cancer for it. Here, we see someone getting cancer as a sign of sin but not their own. The sins of the people of the earth have tampered with the holy things of God causing the sky to no longer protect us from the harmful aspects of the sun's rays. So cancer is a sign of sin and an imbalance toward God, especially on the big picture scale, us humans as a whole.

Click to expand...

Many people try and interpret the natural world through their obsession with the bible and end up with some real morally reprehensible theology.

Jimmy D said:

Many people try and interpret the natural world through their obsession with the bible and end up with some real morally reprehensible theology.

Click to expand...

Not to mention completely incorrect ideas about the physical world.

DennisTate said:

If so... could un-forgiveness in our hearts......
be a major cause of cancer?

Click to expand...

Kevin Snow said:

So I believe that guilt is the major cause of cancer but specifically in terms of the holy things of God.

Click to expand...

What guilt or unforgiveness in her heart was my 2 year old niece feeling when she got leukaemia?

DennisTate said:

If so…

Click to expand...

No.

could un-forgiveness in our hearts......
be a major cause of cancer?

Click to expand...

No.

Henry Gruver makes a rather powerful statement about this at the 1:09 mark in this video...... .it does sound logical to me!

Click to expand...

no.

Tanj said:

What guilt or unforgiveness in her heart was my 2 year old niece feeling when she got [ sick ]?

Click to expand...

Maybe as written and spoken by Jesus, it was not because of sin, but for God's Glory (and might yet be seen for this cause).
Did she get sick AFTER receiving a shot ? Did she have a severe vitamin A deficiency ?

yeshuaslavejeff said:

Maybe as written and spoken by Jesus, it was not because of sin, but for God's Glory (and might yet be seen for this cause).
Did she get sick AFTER receiving a shot ? Did she have a severe vitamin A deficiency ?

Click to expand...

No and no.

When you have worked out what glory there is in killing a 2 year old after 6 months of suffering, do feel free to get back to me.

Tanj said:

No and no.

When you have worked out what glory there is in killing a 2 year old after 6 months of suffering, do feel free to get back to me.

Click to expand...

My condolences to you and the family for that un-necessary loss.

God's Glory would be in the future then, if you turn to help others and they don't have to suffer such loss.

yeshuaslavejeff said:

My condolences to you and the family for that un-necessary loss.

God's Glory would be in the future then, if you turn to help others and they don't have to suffer such loss.

Click to expand...

Whilst I can not conceive of any future help I do outweighing the death of an infant that's actually not a bad answer.

Let's see why Mr Bitterness and Mr Guilt have to say.

Tanj said:

What guilt or unforgiveness in her heart was my 2 year old niece feeling when she got leukaemia?

Click to expand...

It is the presence of the disease that is the sign of sin for our people. The cause of leukemia in the earth is unknown but understand that it is a symptom of a greater disease in our people today. Who gets leukemia is not always who does the sin but in some way, your family is in connection with that disease as there is belief that you are more likely to get it if you are predisposed genetically.

Do you understand that fire came out from God and devoured the two sons of Aaron? Do you remember how leprosy stole over the face of the Jewish King Uzziah ONLY when he became angry while he was offering unauthorized fire before God in the temple?

But the nature of our sin is inconspicuous as we do not directly understand from where we have fallen. It could have come from your family, some disobedience that creates this genetic weakness or it could have come from your people, some disobedience that creates this genetic weakness from the people as a whole.

God has been known to take children away from their fathers who have sinned against him: David and Jeroboam.

Since Christ came, the people had this question also about the state of health for the people and asked, "Who sinned?" But Christ pointed them to what truly mattered in this moment. It's not about who sinned and putting the blame, but it was for the glory of God that he would be healed, since he was going to heal him.

This does not nullify the principle that sin creates disease. For Christ himself said, "Sin no more that nothing worse may happen to you." So we know that as we, the people, continue in sin and continue to break all bounds against nature through technology, we know that we are only creating more diseases for ourselves.

Kevin Snow said:

It is the presence of the disease that is the sign of sin for our people. The cause of leukemia in the earth is unknown but understand that it is a symptom of a greater disease in our people today. Who gets leukemia is not always who does the sin but in some way, your family is in connection with that disease as there is belief that you are more likely to get it if you are predisposed genetically.

Do you understand that fire came out from God and devoured the two sons of Aaron? Do you remember how leprosy stole over the face of the Jewish King Uzziah ONLY when he became angry while he was offering unauthorized fire before God in the temple?

Click to expand...

Do you understand how utterly damaging, irresponsible and immoral it is to say such things?
Do you also remember that the dark ages are over and that today we have modern medicine?

It sounds like you don't, on both points.

But the nature of our sin is inconspicuous as we do not directly understand from where we have fallen. It could have come from your family, some disobedience that creates this genetic weakness or it could have come from your people, some disobedience that creates this genetic weakness from the people as a whole.

Click to expand...

Or it could just be biological and unrelated to your nonsense.

God has been known to take children away from their fathers who have sinned against him: David and Jeroboam.

Since Christ came, the people had this question also about the state of health for the people and asked, "Who sinned?" But Christ pointed them to what truly mattered in this moment. It's not about who sinned and putting the blame, but it was for the glory of God that he would be healed, since he was going to heal him.

This does not nullify the principle that sin creates disease. For Christ himself said, "Sin no more that nothing worse may happen to you." So we know that as we, the people, continue in sin and continue to break all bounds against nature through technology, we know that we are only creating more diseases for ourselves.

Click to expand...

Is that why modern medicine and technology, trippled life expectancy and made sure that infants no longer die from the common flu, for example?

If I could, I'ld send you to time-out, to reflect and think about all the horrible stuff you just said.

But I fear that you don't even realize how horrible it really was....

DogmaHunter said:

Do you understand how utterly damaging, irresponsible and immoral it is to say such things?
Do you also remember that the dark ages are over and that today we have modern medicine?

It sounds like you don't, on both points.
Or it could just be biological and unrelated to your nonsense.
Is that why modern medicine and technology, trippled life expectancy and made sure that infants no longer die from the common flu, for example?

If I could, I'ld send you to time-out, to reflect and think about all the horrible stuff you just said.

But I fear that you don't even realize how horrible it really was....

Click to expand...

And what is wrong with the truth sir? Did I ever say anything against modern medicine? No. So don't get your skibbies in a bunch.

Kevin Snow said:

And what is wrong with the truth sir?

Click to expand...

Calling your religious opinion "truth", does not make it so.

Did I ever say anything against modern medicine? No.

Click to expand...

Yes.

You inferred "magical" causes of desease. That pretty much flies in the face of modern medicine, yes.