justbyfaith
justified sinner
- May 19, 2017
- 3,461
- 572
- 51
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Calvary Chapel
- Marital Status
- Married
I BELIEVE IN eternal security; but for the saint, not the sinner.
Upvote
0
Water baptism by itself does not save a person.I haven’t read a lot of his writings. I was unaware of those beliefs. As for the baptism of babies I’m not aware of Bible verses that deal with what happens to children who are too young to believe. I don’t believe water baptism by itself can save a person. They must be baptized with the Holy Spirit. But children can be too young to understand. I’ll have to recheck what Jesus said about believing as children. Perhaps there’s something there.
There is an age of reason at which time we become responsible for our sins and for what we know. It changes for each person, but is usually considered to be about the age of 13 or 14. Some never reach the age of reason (retardation, down, autism, etc) so we just trust them to God's mercy and love for His most important creation made in His image...man.
GodsGrace101 said in post #312:
Jesus was returning the divorce certificate civil law back to the original - no divorce except in cases of adultery.
GodsGrace101 said in post #383:
The idea Augustine came up with is that we are born with original sin.
Doug Melven said in post #322:
People just don't understand God's love.
They see a Scripture like
He that loves God will keep His commandments.
And then they interpret it to say
If you aren't keeping the commandments, you must not love God. This is wrong.
Doug Melven said in post #360:
This denies Hebrews 13:5
He will never leave us or forsake us.
Freedom~Sprite said in post #337:
2 Timothy 2:13 If we are faithless, he remains faithful, for he cannot disown himself.
Freedom~Sprite said in post #337:
Ephesians 1:13 And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit,
Freedom~Sprite said in post #337:
John 6:37-40 All those the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away . . .
Freedom~Sprite said in post #342:
The apostle Paul addresses this issue in Galatians 3:3 when he asks, "Are you so foolish? After beginning with the Spirit, are you now trying to attain your goal by human effort?
Freedom~Sprite said in post #342:
It is God who maintains our salvation (Jude 24).
Freedom~Sprite said in post #342:
It is God's love that nothing can separate us from (Romans 8:38-39).
Freedom~Sprite said in post #342:
"No one who lives in him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to sin has either seen him or known him" (1 John 3:6).
Peter denied Jesus 3 times and there is no record of his repenting.
And Jesus did not deny him.
Did Jesus lie, or maybe we don't know what Jesus meant about denying Him.
If He had just said "I will not leave you" you would have a point. But that is not what it says.
He says in addition to not leaving us, He won't forsake us. That is He won't leave us to our own devices.
Being born-again is not just getting a new standing. We are new creations.
We have been sealed with the Holy Spirit till the day of redemption.
Strong's No.: G4972
Greek: σφραγίζω
Transliteration: sphragizō
Pronunciation: sfrag-id'-zo
Definition:
From G4973; to stamp (with a signet or private mark) for security or preservation (literally or figuratively); by implication to keep secret to attest: - (set a set to) seal up stop.
If we lost our salvation, the Holy Spirit would have failed to seal us until the day of redemption.
John 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:
10:28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand
Did Jesus give us eternal life for following Him, or for believing in Him as our Savior?
For believing, then we follow. It can't be for following as then we would be getting eternal life as a reward.
A child certainly does sin,,,The bible says nothing of age of reason, I think you have put in too much theories into this. We don't know exactly why a baby is saved. To give numbers like 13-14 or any other number for that matter I believe is wrong.
My belief is as a young child can't sin he/she is saved because of that. As soon as a person sins that person is responsible to God. But the bible isn't clear on the matter. We have to believe in our loving God and savior Jesus Christ to deal with this the right and just way, as he certainly does.
Ok your example of Peter is a bad explanation. Did Peter turn to God and away from sin? Yes absolutely which is repentance. Repentance is not confession they are two different things. Just because the Bible didn’t record Peter confessing doesn’t mean he didn’t confess. Actually it is clear what Jesus meant by denying someone.
““Everyone who acknowledges me publicly here on earth, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven. But everyone who denies me here on earth, I will also deny before my Father in heaven.”
Matthew 10:32-33
The word deny means to refuse or not accept. Here’s strong’s definition of the Greek word arnéomai.
But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.
deny
G720
Lemma:
ἀρνέομαι
Transliteration:
arnéomai
Pronounce:
ar-neh'-om-ahee
Part of Speech:
Verb
Language:
greek
Description:
1) to deny
2) to deny someone a) to deny one's self
1) to disregard his own interests or to prove false to himself
2) act entirely unlike himself
3) to deny, abnegate, abjure
4) not to accept, to reject, to refuse something offered
Grammar:
perhaps from Α (as a negative particle) and the middle voice of ῥέω; to contradict, i.e. disavow, reject, abnegate:--deny, refuse.
Occurrences in Bible:
33
Occurrences in Verses:
28
KJV usage:
deny (29x), refuse (2x).
Surely this wasn’t necessary to understand what Jesus was saying.
You have to stop looking for single verses to support your beliefs and look at the entire teachings of the Bible as a whole. I think you are acting in denial of the truth my friend. All the evidence is clear. OSAS does not coincide with all the scriptures it only seems to fit some of them. I’ve given example after example of explaining every single verse you’ve quoted to support OSAS and my examples are very clear and biblical. None of my examples are in any way ambiguous or a stretch of imagination. They are directly connected. Please don’t turn your eyes away just because it doesn’t support your beliefs. Let the scriptures do the teaching. I’ve even shown that the early church fathers taught that eternal security is not biblical. Remember that Paul said we must test our beliefs and hold to that which is good.
Even if you are correct in saying this is a denial of Peter's love, it is still not Jesus denying Peter.esus asked Peter if he really loved Him three times. This was a denial of Peter's love for the Lord, which he previously had prided himself on (i.e. "everyone else might fall away, but I won't"). The third time Jesus asked whether Peter actually phileo-ed Him, which was to say, do you even love me with a brotherly love? Which Peter had just affirmed twice, not being able to honestly say that he agapeo-ed Him. And the third time Peter was even grieved by the Lord's denial of Peter's love for Him.
So do I.I BELIEVE IN eternal security; but for the saint, not the sinner.
Fine by me if you want to use this verse for the church. Let's look at it again.There is only ONE New and Everlasting Covenant: the one Jesus ratified by dying on a Cross. It applies to Jews and Gentiles; not just Jews.
As you said, some of the promises given to Israel can be claimed by the church.
After all, we were graffed into the olive tree.
1 John 4:18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.Christians obey God out of both their love for Him (John 14:21-24; 1 John 5:3), and their fear of Him (Romans 11:20-22; 1 Peter 1:17, Philippians 2:12), their fear of ultimately losing their salvation from hell if
If that is the way it is used, it becomes a worthless promise. Why would God promise not to forsake if they were doing everything right? No, this is for imperfect people who need to know God is there regardless.Hebrews 13:5b applies to Christians only if they remain faithful to Jesus Christ. For "if we deny him, he also will deny us" (2 Timothy 2:12b).
So, let's just ignore Scripture to support our doctrine.Ok your example of Peter is a bad explanation
Peter denied Jesus 3 times and there is no record of his repenting.
And Jesus did not deny him.
Did Jesus lie, or maybe we don't know what Jesus meant about denying Him
So, let's just ignore Scripture to support our doctrine.
Remember what you said about Peter repenting?““Everyone who acknowledges me publicly here on earth, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven. But everyone who denies me here on earth, I will also deny before my Father in heaven.”
Matthew 10:32-33
10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Oh so guilt isn’t applied unless one “understands” his sins? So where does your reasoning of the age of accountability of a child in the Bible backed up? I’ll tell you NOWHERE! You really ought to study Pelagius. Because pelagianism is what all you free willers pushA child certainly does sin,,,
Lying
Calling other children bad names
Hitting them
Disobeying parents
Coveting
Etc.
It's just that they don't understand that it's "sinning" so God does not hold them accountable until the age of reason. Which I said is different for everyone.
I believe the word of God has to back up everything we say, however don't you agree that we get help from theologians?
Oh so guilt isn’t applied unless one “understands” his sins? So where does your reasoning of the age of accountability of a child in the Bible backed up? I’ll tell you NOWHERE! You really ought to study Pelagius. Because pelagianism is what all you free willers push
How is that?
Choices have consequences.
Once we chose to believe, the consequence was eternal life. We became His child.
Free will doesn't say that if I don't like the consequences I can just not have to be subject to them.
If somebody commits a felony worthy of prison time, and then they tell the judge I don't like the sentence, do you really think the judge will say ok you can go because I don't want to violate your free will?
I understand with today's ethics that if a child is conceived and she doesn't want the child she can have an abortion. But this is not true in God's way of doing things. When God conceives a child, He brings it forth. He doesn't ever leave or forsake His child.
Just because some will take advantage does that mean we should stop preaching the Truth?
Somehow, I don't think anyone will actually take advantage of God.
Depend on or completely trust.
We don't just believe that Jesus exists. No, we believe He died in our place for our sins.
You could look at it as OSAS 101 showed or you could look at the Scripture and see that they become offended.
Yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while: for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended.
Where does it say they turn away and lose there salvation?
What world do you live in where this is possible?
Maybe an adult could do this, but not a child.
Who is taking about intellectual assent?
No, we are talking about believing with the heart.
I must say I am a little confused by this.
What does the rich man and Lazarus have to do with losing salvation?
What does growing into maturity have to do with losing salvation?
Or do you think that if someone does not mature quick enough they are not saved?
What do the children of darkness or light have to do with losing salvation?
Since you may not believe that God is a loving God, you probably find it easy to believe that God will not hold a person guilty of his sins UNLESS that person is aware of having sinned.Oh so guilt isn’t applied unless one “understands” his sins? So where does your reasoning of the age of accountability of a child in the Bible backed up? I’ll tell you NOWHERE! You really ought to study Pelagius. Because pelagianism is what all you free willers push
I gave you a winner because I've noticed that you put a lot of work into your posts and are extremely familiar with the bible and this is to be commended.Note that Jesus Christ made no exception for adultery.
Instead, under Jesus Christ's New Covenant/New Testament, a husband is not to divorce his wife (1 Corinthians 7:11b), and a wife is not to divorce her husband (1 Corinthians 7:10). And if a wife does divorce her husband, she must remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband (1 Corinthians 7:11). Regarding becoming reconciled, a Christian must always completely forgive everyone who has wronged him or her in any way (Mark 11:25), no matter how great the wrong, and no matter how many times a wrong has been committed (Matthew 18:21-35). For if a Christian refuses to forgive anyone for anything, God will refuse to forgive that Christian for his or her own sins (Mark 11:26).
If a husband divorces a valid wife and marries another woman, he is committing adultery (Mark 10:11). And if a wife divorces a valid husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery (Mark 10:12). The exception for fornication (as distinguished from adultery) in Matthew 19:9 permits a husband to divorce a valid wife for having had pre-marital sex, and to marry another woman without his committing adultery. But this applies only to cases where a husband does not discover until after he is married that his newlywed wife is not a virgin (cf. Deuteronomy 22:14, Matthew 1:19). There is no such pre-marital-sex exception granted to a wife. Also, there is no pre-marital-sex exception granted to a man who marries a divorced woman. If a man marries a woman divorced from a valid husband for any reason, he is committing adultery (Luke 16:18b).
1 Corinthians 7:15 means that a Christian spouse is not under the bondage of having to keep together a valid marriage to a non-Christian when the non-Christian is determined to get a divorce. But 1 Corinthians 7:15 does not mean that a Christian wife, after being divorced by a non-Christian, yet valid, husband, can then marry someone else. For if a man marries a woman divorced from a valid husband, he is committing adultery (Luke 16:18b). But the Bible does not forbid a man divorced from a valid wife to marry a second, single woman who is not divorced from a valid husband, so long as it was his first wife (whether a non-Christian or Christian) who divorced him. But then in God's eyes, he will be married to two women at the same time (so long as both remain alive), which, while the Bible does not require is a sin in itself, because it is not the best situation, it disqualifies him from taking any leadership positions in the Church (1 Timothy 3:2,12).
The now-abolished letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law (Ephesians 2:15-16, Colossians 2:14-17, Romans 7:6) permitted a divorced woman to marry someone else (Deuteronomy 24:2). But if her second marriage ended, the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law forbade her to remarry her first husband (Deuteronomy 24:4). The New Covenant rules turn this on its head. For now a woman divorced from a valid husband cannot marry anyone else (Mark 10:12, Luke 16:18b), but she can remarry her valid husband (1 Corinthians 7:11). It was because the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law permitted a divorced woman to marry someone else, that Jesus Christ, while the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law was still in effect, could acknowledge the woman of Samaria's five marriages (John 4:18, assuming that all five did not end in the death of her husband: cf. Luke 20:29-31). The New Covenant rules forbidding a woman divorced from a valid husband to marry anyone else did not come into legal effect until Jesus' death on the Cross brought the New Covenant into legal effect (Hebrews 9:16-17, Matthew 26:28), and abolished the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law (Ephesians 2:15-16, Colossians 2:14-17, Romans 7:6).
God never said that marriage would be easy. And He has set such strict, New Covenant rules regarding divorce and second marriages (Matthew 19:9, Mark 10:12) that His apostles said that it is better not to get married at all (Matthew 19:10). He answered by saying that whoever can accept not getting married, and remaining celibate, should accept it (Matthew 19:11-12). The apostle Paul said the same thing, that unmarried celibacy is the best thing for a Christian if he or she can handle it (1 Corinthians 7:1,7-8,32-35). But if someone who has not been married cannot contain himself or herself sexually, then he or she should get married in order to avoid fornication (1 Corinthians 7:2,9).
The strict, New Covenant rules regarding divorce and second marriages cut both ways, in that if Christians find themselves in a miserable marriage which is an adulterous affair in God's eyes (Mark 10:11-12), they can escape their misery and their unrepentant sin at the same time by divorcing their invalid spouse. But if they find themselves in a very pleasant marriage which is an adulterous affair in God's eyes, then they have to be willing to give it up in order to escape their unrepentant sin, and thereby avoid ultimately losing their salvation due to unrepentant sin (Hebrews 10:26-29, Galatians 5:19-21, Luke 12:45-46).
The only unforgivable sin is blaspheming God's Holy Spirit (Mark 3:28-29), such as ascribing a work of the Holy Spirit to Satan (Mark 3:22-30). Any other sin can be forgiven if it is repented from and confessed to God (1 John 1:9). Just as if Christians find themselves living in the sin of an adulterous affair, they cannot continue in that sin, so if they find themselves living in the sin of second-marriage adultery (Mark 10:12, Matthew 19:9), they cannot continue in that sin (or any other sin) and expect God's grace to forgive them (Hebrews 10:26-29, Galatians 5:19-21; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10). Instead, they must break off with the second, invalid spouse, even if they have had children with the second spouse, just as married people must break off an adulterous affair even if they have had children as a result of that affair.
After breaking off an adulterous second marriage, a wife must remain unmarried or be reconciled to her first, valid husband (1 Corinthians 7:11), if she has one. And if she does have one, she cannot marry someone else, even if, for example, that would help her and her children to escape poverty. For just as escaping poverty would not justify the wife continuing in the sin of an adulterous affair with a man who financially supports her and her children (or would not justify the sin of her becoming and remaining a well-paid prostitute), so escaping poverty would not justify the sin of her entering into another case of second-marriage adultery (Mark 10:12) with a man who financially supports her and her children.
Romans 3:31 means that Christians establish the Old Covenant Mosaic law not in its letter, but in its spirit (Romans 7:6), by loving others (Romans 13:8-10, Galatians 5:14, Matthew 7:12). Part of loving others is warning them if they are living in sin (Revelation 3:19; 2 Thessalonians 3:15, Hebrews 3:13, James 5:19-20). The worst thing that a Christian can do is to coddle people who are living in sin, instead of sharing with them the hard (yet saving) truths of God's Word the Holy Bible (2 Timothy 4:2-4, cf. Jeremiah 23:14,22,29). Telling the truth to people can sometimes hurt them, but that is better than deceiving them with something which makes them feel good (Proverbs 27:6, Proverbs 28:23). The reason that second-marriage adultery (or any other sin) is so common in the Church today is because so much of the Church has stopped teaching and believing the hard truths of God's Word the Holy Bible (2 Timothy 4:2-4, cf. Jeremiah 23:14,22,29).
*******
Note that Romans 5:19a is the doctrine of original sin, which could be based on everyone having been in some way in "the loins" of Adam when he sinned, so that everyone in some way committed sin when Adam sinned; just as Levi had been in some way in "the loins" of Abraham when Abraham gave a tithe to Melchisedec, so that Levi in some way gave a tithe to Melchisedec when Abraham did (Hebrews 7:9-10).
Because of original sin, we are all guilty as individuals as soon as we are conceived in the womb (Psalms 51:5). So even as babies, we are sinful (Psalms 58:3, Romans 3:10). But original sin is not our only guiltiness before God. For we have all as individuals committed our own sins by our own free will (Romans 3:23,9-12). No one can master sin (Genesis 4:7b), or put to death the lusts of the flesh (Galatians 5:24), without the miraculous help of God's Holy Spirit (Romans 8:13b), who is given to Christians (1 Corinthians 2:12-16).
If original sin is genetic, could it be passed on only through the male "seed", so that Jesus Christ could be conceived without original sin by being conceived without any human father (Luke 1:34-35)?
See Job 28:28. 1 John 4:18. 3 is not talking about THE FEAR OF THE LORD; unless you want to say that perfect love casts out wisdom ans understanding...which you would have to say if you properly connect the dots.Even if you are correct in saying this is a denial of Peter's love, it is still not Jesus denying Peter.
So do I.
2 Cor 5:16-21 We are not to know people after the flesh, because we are new creations
in Christ Jesus. Old things have passed away, all things are become new.
Our old man (the sinner) is dead, all things are new.
in :21 it says that Jesus was made to be sin, that we might be made righteous in
Christ. Jesus never sinned even once, He did nothing to become sin, we did nothing to
be made righteous. So why would our committing a sin make us a sinner?
Fine by me if you want to use this verse for the church. Let's look at it again.
32:36 And now therefore thus saith the LORD, the God of Israel, concerning this city, whereof ye say, It shall be delivered into the hand of the king of Babylon by the sword, and by the famine, and by the pestilence;
32:37 Behold, I will gather them out of all countries, whither I have driven them in mine anger, and in my fury, and in great wrath; and I will bring them again unto this place, and I will cause them to dwell safely:
32:38 And they shall be my people, and I will be their God:
32:39 And I will give them one heart, and one way, that they may fear me for ever, for the good of them, and of their children after them:
32:40 And I will make an everlasting covenant with them, that I will not turn away from them, to do them good; but I will put my fear in their hearts, that they shall not depart from me.
God says of this covenant, that He will not turn way from them.
Then He says, that He will put His fear in us, and we will not depart from Him.
Completely against those who say, "We can depart from Him".
No, this says we will not depart from Him.
1 John 4:18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.
If that is the way it is used, it becomes a worthless promise. Why would God promise not to forsake if they were doing everything right? No, this is for imperfect people who need to know God is there regardless.
But then you would say, "But people would take advantage and go live in sin".
Why would someone want to do that, when God is our fulfilment?
People who would say this, they clearly don't understand how much God loves them.
And do you really think someone is going to take advantage of God?
So, let's just ignore Scripture to support our doctrine.