Very long lived if not immortal. But not saying whether destroyable.No, I had no hidden thoughts. I just wanted to know how you came to the conclusion that the devil and his angels are immortal beings.
Well aren't all angels created immortal? It's a thought.
I believe the event that takes place in Revelation 7:9-17 takes place at the beginning of the Millennium here on this Earth (after it is purified by fire and renewed).
#1. There are still nations and different tongues (Which plays a key role at the end of the Millennium or the 1,000 year reign of Christ).
#2. It is emphasized that there are saints that just came out of the Tribulation (Which is the event that took place before the Millennium).
#3. The Tribulation saints will serve the Lord day and night within the temple. In Revelation 21:22, it says there will be no more temple because the Lord God and or the Lamb is the temple thereof. Yet, here in Revelation 7 there is a temple.
Some have suggested that Revelation 7:9-17 takes place in Heaven, but verse 16 says,
"They shall hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall the sun light on them, nor any heat." (Revelation 7:16).
While angels have been known to eat (like with Abraham and his three visitors), it does not makes sense to talk about the sun and stuff in Heaven.
The resurrection hasn't happened yet, since they are separated from their bodies they have no need of food and in no danger of exposure. After the 1000 year reign of Christ it says there will be no need of a sun because God will be their light, not that there will be no sun. They will return to a pristine earth, after the resurrection and want for nothing, never to suffer bodily discomforts of any kind again.Some have suggested that Revelation 7:9-17 takes place in Heaven, but verse 16 says,
"They shall hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall the sun light on them, nor any heat." (Revelation 7:16).While angels have been known to eat (like with Abraham and his three visitors), it does not makes sense to talk about the sun and stuff in Heaven.
Great observations and points in this post.
"Annihilationism" cannot be married to the concept of an afterlife at all, it is incompatible--though you will find many who use the language "the soul is annihilated" they are simply not understanding their own supposed logic...
The ancients did not understand the concept of 'heaven' and 'hell' the way we do today, from a Pagan Greek and Roman mindset. The early Hebrews, and indeed, all of the ancient Mesopotamian cultures did not believe in an afterlife at all. They actually believed in death--that it was real. Whenever the bible talks about "Heaven", it's not talking about some 'place' that one can 'travel to' or that one can 'dwell'...
Afterlife, or to be more specific, consciousness after bodily death is not compatible with scripture at all. For starters, it's not compatible with the very earliest doctrines established in Genesis, namely:
1) "God breathed the breath of life into man, and man because a living soul"
* This means that Body + Spirit (Life: the state of breathing) = Soul. Soul is a "Living Creature", it is not some metaphysical aspect of your consciousness, it's simply a breathing body.
2) "..you will surely die"
* This means that any 'living creature' that sins shall die. If you are conscious after 'death', you are not dead. Christ came to conquer death, if death wasn't a real thing, why a Messiah?
The picture in the last chapter of the Bible seems clear that, even after the Millennium, after the Great White Throne (final) Judgement, there are still sinners alive and well and are able to enter the "city" any time they so choose... I'll try to take the time to actually argue some of the scriptures that people use to push physical hell, I've spent a lot of time on the subject. The arguments seem to all be centered on semantics---people just don't seem to understand figurative language and the more primitive and ancient, the more figurative the language. To sum-up, Sheol/Hades/Hell is the state of a) a low estate in life (poor, destitute)--- b) emotional/mental conviction (a "burning conscience")--- c) After death, your memory is held in contempt by society at large.
You are comparing the tribulation saints described in Revelation 7, to the eternal state in Revelation 22 where there is no Temple. Revelation 7 is after the seals and before the Trumpets, Vials and the Millennial Kingdom. You do know that a lot happened in that space of time?
The resurrection hasn't happened yet, since they are separated from their bodies they have no need of food and in no danger of exposure. After the 1000 year reign of Christ it says there will be no need of a sun because God will be their light, not that there will be no sun. They will return to a pristine earth, after the resurrection and want for nothing, never to suffer bodily discomforts of any kind again.
Grace and peace,
Mark
Well aren't all angels created immortal? It's a thought.
Very long lived if not immortal. But not saying whether destroyable.
About "immortal" angels:
Hebrews 1:7 can be interpreted to mean quite the opposite - that they are rather ephemeral. Both "winds" and "flames" are relatively short-lived as individual entities. It would not surprise me to learn that God creates a "new" angel/spirit to do a single task and nothing more. Puff! a wind-born tongue of fire to convey a message to a person at a particular moment in life. God can do as He likes.
MSG
Regarding angels he says, The messengers are winds, the servants are tongues of fire.
CJB
Indeed, when speaking of angels, he says, “. . . who makes his angels winds and his servants fiery flames”
RSV
Of the angels he says, “Who makes his angels winds, and his servants flames of fire.”
There are some individual angels that make several appearances in the scriptures (Gabriel, who appeared to Daniel and Mary; Michael, who "contended" for the body of Moses, is mentioned in Daniel as "your prince," in Jude, and in Revelation), and the image given in Daniel calls angels princes linked to nations - e,g, the prince of the kingdom of Persia (Dan 10:13). These specific cases don't necessarily mean that all angels are immortal. And I'm still looking/asking for any scriptural evidence that these spirit-beings are "created immortal." If the Devil is destroyed, he is hardly immortal.
According to the Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud, among the Jews in Israel before and during the time of Jesus was a belief in a place of everlasting torment of the wicked and they called it both sheol and gehinnom.The ancients did not understand the concept of 'heaven' and 'hell' the way we do today, from a Pagan Greek and Roman mindset. The early Hebrews, and indeed, all of the ancient Mesopotamian cultures did not believe in an afterlife at all. They actually believed in death--that it was real. Whenever the bible talks about "Heaven", it's not talking about some 'place' that one can 'travel to' or that one can 'dwell'...
In Isa 14 there is a long passage about the king of Babylon dying, according to many the dead know nothing. They are supposedly annihilated, destroyed, pfft, gone! But God, Himself, speaking, these dead people in שאול/sheol, know something, they move, meet the dead coming to sheol, stir up, raise up, speak and say, etc.Afterlife, or to be more specific, consciousness after bodily death is not compatible with scripture at all. For starters, it's not compatible with the very earliest doctrines established in Genesis, namely:
But what about Matthew 25:46?
In Matthew 25:46:
Everlasting is the parallel (which speak of the eternal consequences).
Both life and death (destruction, i.e. the punishment) have eternal consequences or effects.
But life and death (punishment) is the contrast.
So the verse is one part parallel and one part contrast.
Now, the "everlasting punishment" is said to be "everlasting destruction" in 2 Thessalonians 1:9, which is death.
So the contrast is life (reward) and death (punishment).
And everlasting is the parallel.
Anyways, if ECT was true, the verse would say,
"And these shall go away into everlasting life to be tortured in flames: but the righteous into life eternal to be in peaceful bliss."But the verse doesn't really say that, though. In fact, no verse in Scripture says that the wicked have eternal life or immortality. But assumptions are made whereby it turns God into being some kind of non-stop angry kind of God who is beyond any kind of fair justice. But what about the loving God who is long suffering and not willing that any should PERISH? What about the God who so loved the world?
(Matthew 25:46 ECT Influenced Translation).
When we read this verse we will understand it through our 21st century assumptions/presuppositions. How did the 1st century Jews, Jesus was talking to, understand it?This is one verse that interests me.
Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life. (NIV)I had always thought that the two parallels were "eternal" and "punishment/life". If I am understanding you, there's one parallel and one contrast. This is an interesting view, thanks - going to study this some more
And they will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous will go into eternal life. (NLT)
And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life. (ESV)
In Isa 14 there is a long passage about the king of Babylon dying, according to many the dead know nothing. They are supposedly annihilated, destroyed, pfft, gone! But God, Himself, speaking, these dead people in שאול/sheol, know something, they move, meet the dead coming to sheol, stir up, raise up, speak and say, etc.
Isa 14:9-11 (KJV)In this passage God, himself is speaking, and I see a whole lot of shaking going on, moving, rising up, and speaking in . These dead people seem to know something, about something. We know that verses 11 through 14 describe actual historical events, the death of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon.
9) Hell [שאול ] from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming: it stirreth up the dead for thee, even all the chief ones of the earth; it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations.
10) All they shall speak and say unto thee, Art thou also become weak as we? art thou become like unto us?
11) Thy pomp is brought down to the grave, [שאול] and the noise of thy viols: the worm is spread under thee, and the worms cover thee.
[ . . . ]
22) For I will rise up against them, saith the LORD of hosts, and cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant, and son, and nephew, saith the LORD.
Some will try to argue that this passage is figurative because fir trees don’t literally rejoice, vs. 8. They will try to argue that the passage must be figurative since God told Israel “take up this proverb against the king of Babylon.” vs. 4. The occurrence of one figurative expression in a passage does not prove that anything else in the passage is figurative. The Hebrew word שאול/mashal translated “proverb” does not necessarily mean something is fictional. For example, Israel did not become fictional when God made them a mashal/proverb in 2 Chronicles 7:20, Psalms 44:14, and Jeremiah 24:9.
Here is another passage where God Himself is speaking and people who are dead in sheol, speaking, being ashamed, comforted, etc.
Ezek 32:18-22, 30-31 (KJV)Then in the NT we have the story of Lazarus and the rich man. After death a person having eyes and a tongue suffering in flames, speaking.
18) Son of man, [Ezekiel] wail for the multitude of Egypt, and cast them down, even her, and the daughters of the famous nations, unto the nether parts of the earth, with them that go down into the pit.
19) Whom dost thou pass in beauty? go down, and be thou laid with the uncircumcised.
20) They shall fall in the midst of them that are slain by the sword: she is delivered to the sword: draw her and all her multitudes.
21) The strong among the mighty shall speak to him out of the midst of hell [שאול] with them that help him: they are gone down, they lie uncircumcised, slain by the sword.
22) Asshur is there and all her company: his graves are about him: all of them slain, fallen by the sword::[ . . . ]
Eze 32:30-31
(30) There be the princes of the north, all of them, and all the Zidonians, which are gone down with the slain; with their terror they are ashamed of their might; and they lie uncircumcised with them that be slain by the sword, and bear their shame with them that go down to the pit.
(31) Pharaoh shall see them, and shall be comforted over all his multitude, even Pharaoh and all his army slain by the sword, saith the Lord GOD.
Luke 16:19
(19) There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day:
Luke 16:22
(22) And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;
Luke 16:23-24
(23) And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
(24) And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.
I certainly thank you for this imaginative interpretation of scripture. This seems to be a common ploy of contentious unscriptural later theological systems, whenever scripture as written contradicts one's biblical assumptions/presuppositions simply dismiss it as SPAM-Fig, symbolic, poetic, allegory, metaphor, figurative. That way one can make the Bible say almost anything they want it to. There are a bunch of heterodox groups around doing that very thing. LDS, JW, WWCG, OP, UPCI etc.The "King of Babylon" that the scriptures above are referring, not only to the king in Babylon at the time, but to a spiritual being---that same "Babylon" mentioned in Revelation. It is a glimpse of the Great White Throne Judgement. That great spirit of 'Babylon', who is associated with the "Beast", is to become mortal (having an end of it's lifespan) and cast into the lake of fire.
In the parable about the beggar taken to Abraham's bosom...
Spirits are principals. They're not creatures or persons who can "carry" any one or any thing any where... Spirits are emotions, ideas, principles, concepts, and other 'forces' which influence the behavior of individuals and groups. Jesus is speaking a parable. Why is this parable "literal" but the others are not? In the other parables of Jesus (and prophetic orations from other authors of scripture), the "earth" represents the people therein and the condition of the earth represents the spiritual condition of the people (rocky, weeds, barren, fertile, etc.)... The underworld, with it's various 'chasms' is underneath and inside the people and is figuratively ruled by terrestrial spirits that are associated with animals such as the 'serpent'... But at the end of the day, these 'beings' exist within the mind/heart/spirit/psyche. The core principle of the parable is: once you're dead, there is no more going "back"... There is an 'impassable separation' between the state of the saved dead, and the convicted dead. The saved dead cannot effect the state of the convicted dead. I believe the whole thing is figurative. How can a dead person experience anything? You can't see without eyes, hear without ears, process language into a cognitive thought-form without a brain... etc...
Hi
I am curious about how people who support annihilation rather than an eternal conscious hell read the Bible. For example, a pastor of a Church I used to attend said while he believed in a conscious eternal hell, it was possible to read the Bible in a way that supported annihilation. I am curious about this.
There are a few threads on this already but a lot contain things like "I don't think that God would...". It would be good if we could keep this to the Bible with just brief explanations of relevant verses.
There is a reason I am asking this, I'll explain - my dad was not a Christian when he died. Obviously I don't like the idea of my dad burning in hell for eternity - but I do trust God, I know He will do the right thing. I don't believe hell is literal fire, but I do think it is eternal and conscious. That said, annihilation seems kinder (by human standards) and I know some Christians do believe that. I'd like to understand how you get to that from the Bible, especially if you're an Evangelical Christian who holds that view.
- If you believe that hell is not a place of conscious punishment, what verses in the Bible teach this?
- How do you understand verses that do seem to teach eternal conscious punishment?
Thanks
(Referring to what GUANO wrote about Babylon) I certainly thank you for this imaginative interpretation of scripture. This seems to be a common ploy of contentious unscriptural later theological systems, whenever scripture as written contradicts one's biblical assumptions/presuppositions simply dismiss it as SPAM-Fig, symbolic, poetic, allegory, metaphor, figurative. That way one can make the Bible say almost anything they want it to. There are a bunch of heterodox groups around doing that very thing. LDS, JW, WWCG, OP, UPCI etc
How did the first century Jews that Jesus was addressing understand the story of Lazarus and the rich man? Why is it that none of this fanciful speculation is ever explained anywhere in the Bible? All of the early church fathers who quoted or referred Lazarus and the rich man considered it factual.
I hold the view of annihilation and have studied it extensively. It is what the Bible teaches. Eternal Conscious Torment is not taught in the Scriptures. It is "inferred" from a few misunderstood passages.
And for me there is a further question. If godly people who have studied the scriptures longer and more deeply than I am likely ever to achieve arrive at such opposite views, and if the sciptures are supposed to present "the truth" why is such a question so unclear or disputed? (Obviously, it is not to either of you, as you have already made up your respective minds - I'm sure you would say, 'through much prayer and meditation and study' but you apparently disagree.) I am left with possibly two alternatives: one - we shouldn't put so much emphasis on the after-world, slipping thereby into the sin of Egypt - but rather on bringing the kingdom of God to reality in the here and now, as in the prayer Jesus taught us; two - (simply a different angle of the first, really) it is left unclear for the same reason Jesus told parables ... a challenge to our commitment to gaining insight into what is important, a distraction for those all too willing to get caught up in divisive issues, or to leave the door open to use the fear of eternal torture as a tool to "win souls for Christ."
I may never make up my mind about the issue. It shouldn't matter to me. What should matter to me is to trust God to do (and judge) rightly, to seek his kingdom and his righteousness first and foremost in my daily walk here and now. But thank you both for presentation of the basis for your views. God bless.
Hi DW1980,
I hold the view of annihilation and have studied it extensively. It is what the Bible teaches. Eternal Conscious Torment is not taught in the Scriptures. It is "inferred" from a few misunderstood passages. It's also based on the unbiblical doctrine of the "immortal Soul". When writing to Timothy Paul said that the Father alone has immortality. That means that only the Father is immortal. People are not immortal. The Scriptures say that eternal life is given to the Believer, not the unbeliever. Paul also said, 'the wages of sin is death." God said, 'the soul that sins shall die'. The idea that eternal conscious torment is based on the idea that man is some sort of immaterial being that can exist apart from the body. However, this is not from the Bible but rather from Greek philosophy. In Gen. 2 Moses recorded that God created man from the dust of the earth. That means that man is a physical being, not an immaterial being. He recorded that God breathed His breath or spirit of life into the man and the man became a living soul. A soul is a physical being. The spirit in man is God's breath or spirit of life. After Adam sinned God told him, 'dust you are and to dust you shall return.'
Genesis 3:19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return. (Gen. 3:19 KJV)
Notice that God said "dust thou art". God said that Adam was dust and that he would return to dust. The only way anything lives is because God is giving it live. Paul said that God gives life. He used the present tense. He didn't say God gave life. In Job we find it recorded that if God was to retrieve His breath or spirit all flesh would die. That tells us that God is continually giving life to all things. And that all things require His breath or spirit to live. Apart from God's breath or spirit man is not a living soul. We find in Ecclesiastes that when a man dies the breath of spirit returns to God and man returns to the dust. There are plenty of verses in the Scriptures that speak of the dead and their state. David in the Psalms said the dead know nothing, that they cannot praise God, that at death their thoughts perish. Paul when writing to the Corinthians said about Christians who had died, if there is no resurrection then those who have died in Christ have perished. He didn't say they were with God, or with Jesus, or anywhere else. The only hope Paul holds out for dead believers is the resurrection. There is quite a lot on this subject in the Scriptures and I can give you some very good teaching on this subject that is great depth and detail if you'd like.
I certainly thank you for this imaginative interpretation of scripture. This seems to be a common ploy of contentious unscriptural later theological systems, whenever scripture as written contradicts one's biblical assumptions/presuppositions simply dismiss it as SPAM-Fig, symbolic, poetic, allegory, metaphor, figurative. That way one can make the Bible say almost anything they want it to. There are a bunch of heterodox groups around doing that very thing. LDS, JW, WWCG, OP, UPCI etc.
.....How did the first century Jews that Jesus was addressing understand the story of Lazarus and the rich man? Why is it that none of this fanciful speculation is ever explained anywhere in the Bible? All of the early church fathers who quoted or referred Lazarus and the rich man considered it factual.
• Irenaeus Against Heresies Book II Chapter XXXIV.-Souls Can Be Recognised in the Separate State, and are Immortal Although They Once Had a Beginning.
Ireneaeus, 120-202 AD, was a disciple of Polycarp, who was a disciple of John.
1. The Lord has taught with very great fulness, that souls not only continue to exist, not by passing from body to body, but that they preserve the same form [in their separate state] as the body had to which they were adapted, and that they remember the deeds which they did in this state of existence, and from which they have now ceased,-in that narrative which is recorded respecting the rich man and that Lazarus who found repose in the bosom of Abraham. In this account He states that Dives [=Latin for rich] knew Lazarus after death, and Abraham in like manner, and that each one of these persons continued in his own proper position , and that [Dives] requested Lazarus to be sent to relieve him-[Lazarus], on whom he did not [formerly] bestow even the crumbs [which fell] from his table.
ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus | Christian Classics Ethereal Library
• Clement of Alexandria [A.D. 153-193-217] The Instructor [Paedagogus] Book 1
On the Resurrection.
This was the day. “And a certain poor man named Lazarus was laid at the rich man’s gate, full of sores, desiring to be filled with the crumbs which fell from the rich man’s table.” This is the grass. Well, the rich man was punished in Hades, being made partaker of the fire; while the other flourished again in the Father’s bosom.
• Tertullian A Treatise On The Soul [A.D. 145-220.]
In hell the soul of a certain man is in torment, punished in flames, suffering excruciating thirst, and imploring from the finger of a happier soul, for his tongue, the solace of a drop of water. Do you suppose that this end of the blessed poor man and the miserable rich man is only imaginary? Then why the name of Lazarus in this narrative, if the circumstance is not in (the category of) a real occurrence? But even if it is to be regarded as imaginary, it will still be a testimony to truth and reality . For unless the soul possessed corporeality, the image of a soul could not possibly contain a finger of a bodily substance; nor would the Scripture feign a statement about the limbs of a body, if these had no existence.
• Tertullian Part First [A.D. 145-220.]
9. A Treatise On The Soul Chapter 57
Moreover, the fact that Hades is not in any case opened for (the escape of) any soul , has been firmly established by the Lord in the person of Abraham, in His representation of the poor man at rest and the rich man in torment.
• The Epistles Of Cyprian [A.D. 200-258] Epistle 54 To Cornelius, Concerning Fortunatus And Felicissimus, Or Against The Heretics
Whence also that rich sinner who implores help from Lazarus, then laid in Abraham’s bosom, and established in a place of comfort, while he, writhing in torments, is consumed by the heats of burning flame, suffers most punishment of all parts of his body in his mouth and his tongue, because doubtless in his mouth and his tongue he had most sinned.
• Methodius Fragments On The History Of Jonah [A.D. 260-312]
But souls, being rational bodies, are arranged by the Maker and Father of all things into members which are visible to reason, having received this impression. Whence, also, in Hades, as in the case of Lazarus and the rich man, they are spoken of as having a tongue, and a finger, and the other members; not as though they had with them another invisible body, but that the souls themselves, naturally, when entirely stripped of their covering, are such according to their essence.