MJ Only How the Bible is divided in Judaism

Lulav said:

I once read a fictional book that postulated that the 'Q' was actually a present day man that went back in time and was eye witness to what happened during that time.

Click to expand...

Did he look like John de Lancie?

Lulav said:

If I were to put it in the order of the OP I would put

Revelation first
then the
Gospels
Then it's up in the air after that.

If it were chronological @Heber Book List it wouldn't be as the list in the OP. Job is said to be the oldest written.

Click to expand...

The revelation message came last, perhaps around 96 AD , or a little before.

Lulav said:

Ah,,yeah, that is why I said Luke was the Gentile version of him, Josephus was a historian who was born a Jew, tried out all the various sects and eventually went to Rome (Gentiles). Luke is about the opposite of that

Click to expand...

I do not think a person stops being a Hebrew because they live elsewhere.

Lulav said:

I had to look that up though, funny

Click to expand...

After playing Q the all powerful on STNG, he played Bekka Valentine's Uncle Sid on Adromeda.

I once wrote a fan fic Andromeda story where Uncle Sid was Q.

Lulav said:

Well aware, but it has the most first hand words of Yeshua in it.

Click to expand...

To each his own!

Dave-W said:

Another mistake. Bad misuse of "day of the Lord" which signifies death and destruction

Click to expand...

"The Lord's Day" and "the day of the Lord" are completely different things.

Open Heart said:

"The Lord's Day" and "the day of the Lord" are completely different things.

Click to expand...

Only in English.

CherubRam said:

What does the 'Q' stand for?

Click to expand...

It means Quelle - German for 'source'. It relates to an unknown source that the gospel writers used.

CherubRam said:

All of the first disciples were Hebrew, because there message went to the Hebrews first.

Click to expand...

They didn't. Luke was not a Jew.

Open Heart said:

"The Lord's Day" and "the day of the Lord" are completely different things.

Click to expand...

When John was in the spirit the last days were revealed to him on the Lord's Day; that is "the day of the Lord."

CherubRam said:

Lord’s Day. Day of the Lord.

Click to expand...

They aren't even close to the same thing.

Heber Book List said:

They didn't. Luke was not a Jew.

Click to expand...

Do you have any facts to back that up?

Open Heart said:

They aren't even close to the same thing.

Click to expand...

And why not?

Lulav said:

If I were to put it in the order of the OP I would put

Revelation first
then the
Gospels
Then it's up in the air after that.

If it were chronological @Heber Book List it wouldn't be as the list in the OP. Job is said to be the oldest written.

Click to expand...

Not sure what you are saying here?

Open Heart said:

They aren't even close to the same thing.

Click to expand...

I'm sorry, but that does not count as a fact. Try again.

CherubRam said:

Do you have any facts to back that up?

Click to expand...

As many facts as we have that John wrote the 4th gospel. It is an issue of some debate with no acceptable proof as an answer. However, the larger number of scholars accept that he was a Gentile, writing to another Gentile. There is nothing in his writings to support the view that he was a Jew. In fact, his need to carefully investigate everything would appear to mean that he could not have written, as he did, without the major research that he did to produce both books. We read little, if anything, extra in his writings as we read in the other three gospels, although we know he, like Matthew, borrowed a lot from Mark and also a significant amount from 'Q'. He is included in the bible because he tells us about Yeshua's birth in some detail - without that we would only have Matthew's exceptionally brief account, and he bridges the gap from gospel to Paul. Paul, who wrote before the gospels were written, tells us nothing about Yeshua's actual birth, surprisingly; even though he wasn't there one might think he would 'justify' his works by including that matter!

Heber Book List said:

As many facts as we have that John wrote the 4th gospel. It is issue of some debate with no acceptable proof as an answer. However, the larger number of scholars accept that he was a Gentile, writing to another Gentile. There is nothing in his writings to support the view that he was a Jew. In fact, his need to carefully investigate everything would appear to mean that he could not have written, as he did, without the major research that he did to produce both books. We read little, if anything, in his writings as we read in the other three gospels, although we know he, like Matthew, borrowed a lot from Mark and also a significant amount from 'Q'. He is included in the bible because he tells us about Yeshua's birth in some detail - without that we would only have Matthew, exceptionally brief account, and bridges the gap from gospel to Paul. Paul, who wrote before the gospels were written, tells us nothing about Yeshua's actual birth, surprisingly, even though he was't there; one might think he would 'justify' his works by including that matter!

Click to expand...

Thank you for your reply.