PeaceByJesus
Unworthy servant for the Worthy Lord + Savior
- Feb 20, 2013
- 2,775
- 2,095
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
That is due to deficient software on the hosts part, which insists on placing font codes on some pasted text, and which i did not see since i needed to leave, but i just went and removed the tags.Your post above is a bit difficult to read because of the formatting. Could you please fix the formatting?
No, since we both agree that whatever is Scripture is the word of God, even though based upon the weight of evidence, Catholicism had added writings to that class which do not correspond to the most ancient canon, and which were rejected by notable Catholic scholars before and in Trent, thus Luther had freedom and scholarly Catholic support for his non-binding judgment on the canon, as well as for his inclusion of apocryphal books in his translation. Which is not the type of honest history you typically get from Catholics.You wrote that "we both both affirm Scripture as being the word of God", but from my perspective that is a false statement. From my perspective, you reject Sacred Scripture as the word of God, because you do not accept all of the books of Sacred Scripture as the word of God.
Which "discussion" can hardly avoid debate, which you yourself have provoked. How can a position that holds that the RCC is uniquely the one true church, and that whatever declares is the word of God is indeed just that, and requires believe in this in order to be a faithful RC, and has posters attacking SS and rejecting such as Bible Christians, not be provocative of debate?As I wrote before, I did not come here to attempt to convince you or anyone else of the truth of Sacred Tradition. I do not believe that I am capable of doing that, even if I tried. I came here to discuss issues in a civil manner.
Upvote
0