- Jul 22, 2014
- 41,502
- 7,861
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
A New Biblical & Scientific Refutation of a Flat Earth!
The Bible Refutes a Flat Earth:
1. Sunset
The Bible talks about the sun setting (Genesis 28:11) (Mark 1:32). This is clearly something we can observe without our own two eyes. The sun sets on the horizon line from our perspective or vantage point. However, the Flat Earth Sun Model ignores the true setting of the sun.
Here is a Picture of an Overview Head View of a Flat Earth (with their version of the sun):
Here is a Video Simulation From Ground Level if The Earth Were Flat With the Sun Making a Circle (Skip to 1 Minute and 9 seconds within the following video to see this):
But is this Flat Earth Ground Simulation what we see in the Real World? No. We see a sunset. If the sun setted on a Flat Earth, it would go down below the edge of the Flat disk and underneath it and the whole world would be in darkness for a time.
2. Three Heavens.
The Bible describes three Heavens (Sky, Outer space, and Paradise). Yet, how does three heavens work with a Flat Earth model? Genesis talks about one Heaven (singular) in the beginning (Genesis 1:1), and concludes the creation account with talking about Heavens (plural) (Genesis 2:1). That is because the Bible starts out describing the creation of Earth and it's atmosphere (Genesis 1:1-13), and it concludes with the creation of the host of Heavens (i.e. the planets, and stars, etc.) (Genesis 1:14-19) (Genesis 2:1). Here is an explanation on the three Heavens:
3. The World Wide Flood.
The Flat Earth model does not work because the waters in a world wide flood would pour off the ends of the Earth. On top of that, the waters were supposed to be 22 feet and 6 inches higher than the tallest mountains. Here is a Video Illustrating the different Flat Earth Models and how they would not work during a World Wide Flood:
Key passage of study from the video:
19 "And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died"
(Genesis 7:19-22).
4. South is down according to the Bible (See Acts of the Apostles 8:26).
Is this just a coincidence that just so happens to match up with the reality of our spherical Earth? Maps show North as up and South as down on the map (Which also fits the reality of a spherical Earth). True North should be up and true South should be down. Granted, the Bible does use the words "down" or "up" in relation to elevation sometimes. But the context and map making should determine the use of that word.
5. The 9th commandment (Exodus 20:16 cf. Revelation 21:8).
You shall not bear false witness. Some of things I have heard by Flat Earthers sound more like lies or bearing false witness than they do facts. Can we imagine calling a Christian brother a liar who gave his testimony of going into space and said the Earth is round and he brought back photos showing that fact? No people can go to Antarctica? Yet, you can book your next vacation there and people have posted videos and photos of going there. Gunships prevent people from going to Antarctica? Planes do not have enough fuel capacity to fly far enough to reach the edge of the Earth? Yet, we can send rockets into space. Satellites are not true? The list of lies against many people goes on and on. It seeks to cause harm upon others that is not true and or believable. The Bible says we are to pray and to do good towards our enemies. We are not to spread lies or bear false witness against our fellow neighbor or brother based upon some kind of unbelievable set of conspiracy theories.
Science Refutes a Flat Earth:
1. Ships and Buildings go down into the distance as you get farther away from them.
Note: Flat Earth theorists object that these things reappear back into view with a high powered telescope or binoculars. This is clearly false. They are more than likely standing up or going to a high elevation to see the ship reappear. Stand up and you will see the sun set again. Note: see: Help with a debate about curvature and distance calculations. Also, there are underground miles long linear accelerators and the Lake Pontchartrain Power Lines which proves that the Earth is curved, as well. Check out the Spoiler:
2. Sunset.
The claims by the proponents of the flat earth model that what looks like a sunset is actually due to perspective from the sun moving farther away in its "orbit" above the flat earth. This can be shown with simple trigonometry to be completely false; in fact, the trigonometry shows you that in the flat earth model, the sun never gets close to the horizon, and thus viewing a sunset at all proves the flat earth claim false.
I have read debunks of the claim, but they focus more on the angular size changes of the Sun that would result from the flat earth model, but I've been surprised that I've yet to find a presentation of the actual trigonometry that shows a flat Earth sunset never happens.
I submit the following scenario, with diagram and calculation: Imagine standing on the equator at solar noon on the day of the equinox. In both the globe earth and the flat earth models, the sun will be directly above you. However, this is where the similarity ends. Six hours later, on the globe earth, the sun will have descended to the horizon at a position due West. On the flat earth, the sun will have gone one quarter around its "orbit" and will be seen to be 19.5 degrees above the horizon in a northwest direction.
Even when the sun is 12 hours around its orbit, it won't be lower than about 14 degrees (atan(3000/12000)), though magically it will be unobservable and your surroundings will be dark.
It is disingenuous to present the setting sun as a "perspective effect" when it is so easy to show how high up in the sky the sun should be as a function of time. This perspective effect only works with objects with a very small ratio of height above the ground to distance from the viewer.
This is sufficient to disprove the flat earth model presented above. The setting sun disproves the flat earth model. Source:Sunset on globe earth versus flat earth
3. You can see certain constellations only from certain parts of the Earth.
The Southern Cross Constellation cannot be seen in the higher part of the Northern Hemisphere. The North Star and the Big Dipper cannot be seen in the lower Southern Hemisphere, etc.
4. Solar and Lunar Eclipses also disprove a Flat Earth:
Click on the following Spoiler button if you want to see the difference between a Lunar and a Solar eclipse.
5. People live in the South Pole, and can provide 24 hours of video footage of daylight (Which is not possible on a Flat Earth because the Flat Earth sun goes around the crust of the pizza or what Flat Earthers believe is the South pole). Please see the very 1st image within this post. You will see the white outer edge of their flat disc is what they believe is the South pole. You will notice that the sun does not illuminate the entire outer white ring on their Flat Earth map. This is why do not believe the South pole can have 24 hours of daylight (Despite video footage and eye witness account proving otherwise).
Flat Earthers claim we cannot visit Antarctica, and yet, we can travel there: 3 Ways to Travel to Antarctica - wikiHow
6. We are able to go high above the atmosphere with rockets, weather balloons, satellites and take pictures and video footage of the Earth and see that it is round.
7. Shadows on the Earth.
Imagine the Sun's rays (represented by yellow lines) hitting two sticks (white lines) some distance apart. If the Earth were flat, the resulting shadows would be the same length, no matter how far apart you place the sticks. Check out the following Spoiler:
However, we do not see shadows at the same length on our Earth.
This is because the Earth is round, and not flat:
8. Stars can be seen in outer-space in low Earth orbit at night time with a camera on a weather balloon.
This proves that the stars are not embedded in the atmosphere as Flat Earthers claim. Also, no flat Earth sun was visibly shining like a spotlight up in Earth’s orbit, either. Why? Because the sun is on the other side of a spherical Earth.
9. Planes can Fly Long Distances (and would have no trouble reaching the Edges of a Flat Earth):
The flight from Dubai to New Zealand is 16 hours and 24 minutes of travel for 8,824 miles. This disproves the idea that planes do not have enough fuel capacity to travel the distance to the outer edge of the imaginary flat Earth drop off points. We also have space shuttles with airplanes on them. So crossing distances is not a problem. In fact, we sent rockets to outer space, too. There are also cargo planes that can hold massive trucks. Could we not take snow vehicles and drive through the snow to discover the edge, as well? Also, compasses sometimes fail. It would be odd that no pilot in human history has never accidentally ran into this outer drop off point of the Earth when their compass failed.
The problem with believing in a Flat Earth:
It adds an offense that can turn away a person from Christianity. The gospel is already an offense enough as it is. To add even more of an offense is a problem.
It is a belief that is set out to call other people liars without good reason or proof. It is not focused on loving your enemy as Christ commands us.
Flat Earth is also not founded upon any major evidence showing us that the Earth is flat like pictures or video footage of the drop off points of the Earth, either. It is based upon an unfounded web of conspiracy theories and unproven Fringe Science. It seeks to create outrageous theories so as to defend a theory that is denies basic Science.
The Bible Refutes a Flat Earth:
1. Sunset
The Bible talks about the sun setting (Genesis 28:11) (Mark 1:32). This is clearly something we can observe without our own two eyes. The sun sets on the horizon line from our perspective or vantage point. However, the Flat Earth Sun Model ignores the true setting of the sun.
Here is a Picture of an Overview Head View of a Flat Earth (with their version of the sun):
Here is a Video Simulation From Ground Level if The Earth Were Flat With the Sun Making a Circle (Skip to 1 Minute and 9 seconds within the following video to see this):
But is this Flat Earth Ground Simulation what we see in the Real World? No. We see a sunset. If the sun setted on a Flat Earth, it would go down below the edge of the Flat disk and underneath it and the whole world would be in darkness for a time.
2. Three Heavens.
The Bible describes three Heavens (Sky, Outer space, and Paradise). Yet, how does three heavens work with a Flat Earth model? Genesis talks about one Heaven (singular) in the beginning (Genesis 1:1), and concludes the creation account with talking about Heavens (plural) (Genesis 2:1). That is because the Bible starts out describing the creation of Earth and it's atmosphere (Genesis 1:1-13), and it concludes with the creation of the host of Heavens (i.e. the planets, and stars, etc.) (Genesis 1:14-19) (Genesis 2:1). Here is an explanation on the three Heavens:
The Bible mentions that there are three heavens.
Jesus said that no man ascends to Heaven except Himself, when He said,
In other words, no man has ascended physically to Heaven but Jesus (i.e. the Son of Man).
Yeah, but what about Elijah?
I believe confusion arises on this point because people do not understand that there are:
The Scripture mentions three heavens (2 Corinthians 12:2), not just one!
The First Heaven:
The first heaven is earth's atmosphere where birds fly (Genesis 1:20, Jeremiah 4:25;34:20,Lamentations 4:19, Zephaniah 1:3). One of the Hebrew words for 'heaven' is shamayim. This same word is translated as 'sky' in the Scripture, as can be seen by comparing Genesis 7:3, "fowls also of the air," with Genesis 7:23, "fowl of the heaven." The word 'sky' and 'heaven' are used interchangeably from the same Hebrew word (Psalm 8:8). So the first heaven is synonymous with 'heights' or 'elevations.'
Here are other examples to illustrate the first heaven. Exodus 19:20 says the Lord was on top of Mount Sinai when he called Moses up there, and God describes Mount Sinai as 'heaven' (Exodus 20:22, Deuteronomy 4:36). Here, everything above the ground is called 'heaven'.
Another example of the first heaven is in Amos 9:1-3, where God states that at the time of this judgment, nobody will be able to flee away (verse 1), even "though they climb up to heaven" (verse 2). This "heaven" is defined in the next verse, verse 3, as climbing to the top of Mount Carmel.
Another example is where the Scripture speaks of the "dew of heaven" (Genesis 27:28,39,Deuteronomy 33:28, Daniel 4:15-33; 5:21). The first heaven, from which dew comes, means the atmosphere, where the clouds and the wind roam. Therefore, everything above the ground is called 'heaven."
Another Hebrew word for the first heaven is 'shachaq.' This same word for heaven (Psalm 89:6,37) is also translated as 'sky' or 'skies' (Deuteronomy 33:26; Job 37:18; Psalm 18:11), and as 'clouds' (Job 35:5; 36:28; Psalm 36:5; 68:34, Pro. 3:20; 8:28).
The Second Heaven:
The second heaven is outer space where the planets and stars exist (Genesis 1:14-17; 15:5;22:17;26:4, Deuteronomy 1:10; 17:3; Psalm 8:3, Jeremiah 8:2; Matthew 24:29). Usually the term "host of heaven" or "firmament of the heaven" is used to describe this second heaven.
The Third Heaven:
The third heaven is literally called "the third heaven" in 2 Corinthians 12:2. This third heaven is what Christ calls his "Father's house" (John 14:2), and both Christ and the Apostle Paul calls it "paradise" (Luke 23:43, 2 Corinthians 12:2-4, Revelation 2:7). This is where God and the heavenly sanctuary exist (1 Peter 3:22). This third heaven is also known as the "heaven of heavens" (Deuteronomy 10:14; 1 Kings 8:27, 2 Chronicles 2:6; 6:18, Nehemiah 9:6, Psalms 148:4), "The heavenly Jerusalem" (Galatians 4: 26; Hebrews 12:22; Revelation 3:12), the "kingdom of heaven" (Matthew 25:1, James 2:5), the "eternal kingdom" (2 Peter 1:11), the "eternal inheritance" (1 Peter. 1:4,Hebrews 9:15), and the "better country" (Hebrews 11:14,16). The fact that there are more than one 'heaven' can be shown by Psalm 115:16, "The heaven, even the heavens, are the LORD'S." There are obviously two different 'heavens' being addressed in this one verse.
Since Elijah could not have gone to the heaven of God's throne, then to which heaven did he go? He was not taken to God's heavenly throne (as some imagine). He was actually taken into this earth's atmosphere, the first heaven. There could be no whirlwind in any other place but in the atmosphere surrounding this earth.
Source:
Elijah, Enoch, and Moses
Important Note: Although I quoted part of this article to help explain the three heavens, I do not agree with their interpretation of on Enoch. I believe Enoch was translated or spiritually taken by God and did not see death (as the Scriptures say). So not all the views expressed at this website reflect my views on the Scriptures.
Jesus said that no man ascends to Heaven except Himself, when He said,
"And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven."
John 3:13 KJV
John 3:13 KJV
In other words, no man has ascended physically to Heaven but Jesus (i.e. the Son of Man).
Yeah, but what about Elijah?
I believe confusion arises on this point because people do not understand that there are:
Three Heavens
The Scripture mentions three heavens (2 Corinthians 12:2), not just one!
The First Heaven:
The first heaven is earth's atmosphere where birds fly (Genesis 1:20, Jeremiah 4:25;34:20,Lamentations 4:19, Zephaniah 1:3). One of the Hebrew words for 'heaven' is shamayim. This same word is translated as 'sky' in the Scripture, as can be seen by comparing Genesis 7:3, "fowls also of the air," with Genesis 7:23, "fowl of the heaven." The word 'sky' and 'heaven' are used interchangeably from the same Hebrew word (Psalm 8:8). So the first heaven is synonymous with 'heights' or 'elevations.'
Here are other examples to illustrate the first heaven. Exodus 19:20 says the Lord was on top of Mount Sinai when he called Moses up there, and God describes Mount Sinai as 'heaven' (Exodus 20:22, Deuteronomy 4:36). Here, everything above the ground is called 'heaven'.
Another example of the first heaven is in Amos 9:1-3, where God states that at the time of this judgment, nobody will be able to flee away (verse 1), even "though they climb up to heaven" (verse 2). This "heaven" is defined in the next verse, verse 3, as climbing to the top of Mount Carmel.
Another example is where the Scripture speaks of the "dew of heaven" (Genesis 27:28,39,Deuteronomy 33:28, Daniel 4:15-33; 5:21). The first heaven, from which dew comes, means the atmosphere, where the clouds and the wind roam. Therefore, everything above the ground is called 'heaven."
Another Hebrew word for the first heaven is 'shachaq.' This same word for heaven (Psalm 89:6,37) is also translated as 'sky' or 'skies' (Deuteronomy 33:26; Job 37:18; Psalm 18:11), and as 'clouds' (Job 35:5; 36:28; Psalm 36:5; 68:34, Pro. 3:20; 8:28).
The Second Heaven:
The second heaven is outer space where the planets and stars exist (Genesis 1:14-17; 15:5;22:17;26:4, Deuteronomy 1:10; 17:3; Psalm 8:3, Jeremiah 8:2; Matthew 24:29). Usually the term "host of heaven" or "firmament of the heaven" is used to describe this second heaven.
The Third Heaven:
The third heaven is literally called "the third heaven" in 2 Corinthians 12:2. This third heaven is what Christ calls his "Father's house" (John 14:2), and both Christ and the Apostle Paul calls it "paradise" (Luke 23:43, 2 Corinthians 12:2-4, Revelation 2:7). This is where God and the heavenly sanctuary exist (1 Peter 3:22). This third heaven is also known as the "heaven of heavens" (Deuteronomy 10:14; 1 Kings 8:27, 2 Chronicles 2:6; 6:18, Nehemiah 9:6, Psalms 148:4), "The heavenly Jerusalem" (Galatians 4: 26; Hebrews 12:22; Revelation 3:12), the "kingdom of heaven" (Matthew 25:1, James 2:5), the "eternal kingdom" (2 Peter 1:11), the "eternal inheritance" (1 Peter. 1:4,Hebrews 9:15), and the "better country" (Hebrews 11:14,16). The fact that there are more than one 'heaven' can be shown by Psalm 115:16, "The heaven, even the heavens, are the LORD'S." There are obviously two different 'heavens' being addressed in this one verse.
Since Elijah could not have gone to the heaven of God's throne, then to which heaven did he go? He was not taken to God's heavenly throne (as some imagine). He was actually taken into this earth's atmosphere, the first heaven. There could be no whirlwind in any other place but in the atmosphere surrounding this earth.
Source:
Elijah, Enoch, and Moses
Important Note: Although I quoted part of this article to help explain the three heavens, I do not agree with their interpretation of on Enoch. I believe Enoch was translated or spiritually taken by God and did not see death (as the Scriptures say). So not all the views expressed at this website reflect my views on the Scriptures.
3. The World Wide Flood.
The Flat Earth model does not work because the waters in a world wide flood would pour off the ends of the Earth. On top of that, the waters were supposed to be 22 feet and 6 inches higher than the tallest mountains. Here is a Video Illustrating the different Flat Earth Models and how they would not work during a World Wide Flood:
Key passage of study from the video:
19 "And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.
21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died"
(Genesis 7:19-22).
4. South is down according to the Bible (See Acts of the Apostles 8:26).
Is this just a coincidence that just so happens to match up with the reality of our spherical Earth? Maps show North as up and South as down on the map (Which also fits the reality of a spherical Earth). True North should be up and true South should be down. Granted, the Bible does use the words "down" or "up" in relation to elevation sometimes. But the context and map making should determine the use of that word.
5. The 9th commandment (Exodus 20:16 cf. Revelation 21:8).
You shall not bear false witness. Some of things I have heard by Flat Earthers sound more like lies or bearing false witness than they do facts. Can we imagine calling a Christian brother a liar who gave his testimony of going into space and said the Earth is round and he brought back photos showing that fact? No people can go to Antarctica? Yet, you can book your next vacation there and people have posted videos and photos of going there. Gunships prevent people from going to Antarctica? Planes do not have enough fuel capacity to fly far enough to reach the edge of the Earth? Yet, we can send rockets into space. Satellites are not true? The list of lies against many people goes on and on. It seeks to cause harm upon others that is not true and or believable. The Bible says we are to pray and to do good towards our enemies. We are not to spread lies or bear false witness against our fellow neighbor or brother based upon some kind of unbelievable set of conspiracy theories.
Science Refutes a Flat Earth:
1. Ships and Buildings go down into the distance as you get farther away from them.
Note: Flat Earth theorists object that these things reappear back into view with a high powered telescope or binoculars. This is clearly false. They are more than likely standing up or going to a high elevation to see the ship reappear. Stand up and you will see the sun set again. Note: see: Help with a debate about curvature and distance calculations. Also, there are underground miles long linear accelerators and the Lake Pontchartrain Power Lines which proves that the Earth is curved, as well. Check out the Spoiler:
The linear accelerator in the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory is 2 miles long and it needs to be actually straight and not follow the curvature of the earth, otherwise the electrons will hit into the walls and the whole thing won't work. The curvature of the Earth is something like "8 inches a mile". Therefore the center of the accelerator is in fact closer to the Earth's center than the edges by about 8 inches.
This is also true for J-PARC (Japan Proton Accelerator Complex). Here's some documents on how curvature does matter while building that facility:
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C06092511/presents/TU004_PPT.PDF
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C04100411/papers/010.PDF
Source:
Why do bridge designs account for the Earth's curvature?
A classic experiment to demonstrate the curvature of a body of water is to place markers (like flags) a fixed distance above the water in a straight line, and then view them along that line in a telescope. If the water surface is flat then the markers will appear also in a straight line. If the surface of the water is curved (as it is here on Earth) then the markers in the middle will appear higher than the markers at the ends. Here's a highly exaggerated diagram of the effect by Alfred Russel Wallace in 1870:
This is a difficult experiment to do as you need a few miles for the curvature to be apparent. You also need the markers to be quite high above the surface of the water, as temperature differences between the water and the air tend to create significant refraction effects close to the water.
However Youtuber Soundly has found a spot where there's a very long line of markers permanently fixed at constant heights above the water line, clearly demonstrating the curve. It's a line of power transmission towers at Lake Pontchartrain, near New Orleans, Louisiana.
One objection you might make is that the towers could be curving to the right. However the same curve is apparent from both sides, so it can only be curving over the horizon.
Source:
Soundly Proving the Curvature of the Earth at Lake Pontchartrain
This is also true for J-PARC (Japan Proton Accelerator Complex). Here's some documents on how curvature does matter while building that facility:
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C06092511/presents/TU004_PPT.PDF
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C04100411/papers/010.PDF
Source:
Why do bridge designs account for the Earth's curvature?
A classic experiment to demonstrate the curvature of a body of water is to place markers (like flags) a fixed distance above the water in a straight line, and then view them along that line in a telescope. If the water surface is flat then the markers will appear also in a straight line. If the surface of the water is curved (as it is here on Earth) then the markers in the middle will appear higher than the markers at the ends. Here's a highly exaggerated diagram of the effect by Alfred Russel Wallace in 1870:
This is a difficult experiment to do as you need a few miles for the curvature to be apparent. You also need the markers to be quite high above the surface of the water, as temperature differences between the water and the air tend to create significant refraction effects close to the water.
However Youtuber Soundly has found a spot where there's a very long line of markers permanently fixed at constant heights above the water line, clearly demonstrating the curve. It's a line of power transmission towers at Lake Pontchartrain, near New Orleans, Louisiana.
One objection you might make is that the towers could be curving to the right. However the same curve is apparent from both sides, so it can only be curving over the horizon.
Source:
Soundly Proving the Curvature of the Earth at Lake Pontchartrain
2. Sunset.
The claims by the proponents of the flat earth model that what looks like a sunset is actually due to perspective from the sun moving farther away in its "orbit" above the flat earth. This can be shown with simple trigonometry to be completely false; in fact, the trigonometry shows you that in the flat earth model, the sun never gets close to the horizon, and thus viewing a sunset at all proves the flat earth claim false.
I have read debunks of the claim, but they focus more on the angular size changes of the Sun that would result from the flat earth model, but I've been surprised that I've yet to find a presentation of the actual trigonometry that shows a flat Earth sunset never happens.
I submit the following scenario, with diagram and calculation: Imagine standing on the equator at solar noon on the day of the equinox. In both the globe earth and the flat earth models, the sun will be directly above you. However, this is where the similarity ends. Six hours later, on the globe earth, the sun will have descended to the horizon at a position due West. On the flat earth, the sun will have gone one quarter around its "orbit" and will be seen to be 19.5 degrees above the horizon in a northwest direction.
Even when the sun is 12 hours around its orbit, it won't be lower than about 14 degrees (atan(3000/12000)), though magically it will be unobservable and your surroundings will be dark.
It is disingenuous to present the setting sun as a "perspective effect" when it is so easy to show how high up in the sky the sun should be as a function of time. This perspective effect only works with objects with a very small ratio of height above the ground to distance from the viewer.
This is sufficient to disprove the flat earth model presented above. The setting sun disproves the flat earth model. Source:Sunset on globe earth versus flat earth
3. You can see certain constellations only from certain parts of the Earth.
The Southern Cross Constellation cannot be seen in the higher part of the Northern Hemisphere. The North Star and the Big Dipper cannot be seen in the lower Southern Hemisphere, etc.
4. Solar and Lunar Eclipses also disprove a Flat Earth:
Click on the following Spoiler button if you want to see the difference between a Lunar and a Solar eclipse.
5. People live in the South Pole, and can provide 24 hours of video footage of daylight (Which is not possible on a Flat Earth because the Flat Earth sun goes around the crust of the pizza or what Flat Earthers believe is the South pole). Please see the very 1st image within this post. You will see the white outer edge of their flat disc is what they believe is the South pole. You will notice that the sun does not illuminate the entire outer white ring on their Flat Earth map. This is why do not believe the South pole can have 24 hours of daylight (Despite video footage and eye witness account proving otherwise).
Flat Earthers claim we cannot visit Antarctica, and yet, we can travel there: 3 Ways to Travel to Antarctica - wikiHow
6. We are able to go high above the atmosphere with rockets, weather balloons, satellites and take pictures and video footage of the Earth and see that it is round.
7. Shadows on the Earth.
Imagine the Sun's rays (represented by yellow lines) hitting two sticks (white lines) some distance apart. If the Earth were flat, the resulting shadows would be the same length, no matter how far apart you place the sticks. Check out the following Spoiler:
However, we do not see shadows at the same length on our Earth.
This is because the Earth is round, and not flat:
8. Stars can be seen in outer-space in low Earth orbit at night time with a camera on a weather balloon.
This proves that the stars are not embedded in the atmosphere as Flat Earthers claim. Also, no flat Earth sun was visibly shining like a spotlight up in Earth’s orbit, either. Why? Because the sun is on the other side of a spherical Earth.
9. Planes can Fly Long Distances (and would have no trouble reaching the Edges of a Flat Earth):
The flight from Dubai to New Zealand is 16 hours and 24 minutes of travel for 8,824 miles. This disproves the idea that planes do not have enough fuel capacity to travel the distance to the outer edge of the imaginary flat Earth drop off points. We also have space shuttles with airplanes on them. So crossing distances is not a problem. In fact, we sent rockets to outer space, too. There are also cargo planes that can hold massive trucks. Could we not take snow vehicles and drive through the snow to discover the edge, as well? Also, compasses sometimes fail. It would be odd that no pilot in human history has never accidentally ran into this outer drop off point of the Earth when their compass failed.
The problem with believing in a Flat Earth:
It adds an offense that can turn away a person from Christianity. The gospel is already an offense enough as it is. To add even more of an offense is a problem.
It is a belief that is set out to call other people liars without good reason or proof. It is not focused on loving your enemy as Christ commands us.
Flat Earth is also not founded upon any major evidence showing us that the Earth is flat like pictures or video footage of the drop off points of the Earth, either. It is based upon an unfounded web of conspiracy theories and unproven Fringe Science. It seeks to create outrageous theories so as to defend a theory that is denies basic Science.
Attachments
Last edited: