Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,508
7,861
...
✟1,194,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
This is where you and I may disagree. I can't worship someone who would torture me forever for the crime of not loving him back. Because that is wrong. That is the most EVIL thing anyone or anything could possibly do. No amount of "God is amazing and perfect" will ever convince me that torturing people with the most painful form of torture possible for trillions of trillions of years is OK. I can't reconcile "I will burn you forever if you don't love me" and "God is love". Those two things are mutually exclusive. You can't be the epitome of love and torture people forever at the same time. It just doesn't work. And "God is so amazing and is just so much wiser than us puny humans" just doesn't cut it. Torturing people forever for ANY reason is BAD. That is NOT OK.
But the bible doesn't teach that this is who God is.
He isn't going to torture people forever.

You didn't read my post correctly. I agree. I said the God of ECT is not the God of the Bible. It is for the very reasons you mentioned which show the truth that God (Who is love) would never torture anyone for all eternity.

My point was that we should not be quick to judge God and we cannot put God on trial when it comes to temporal and earthly things. God allows the temporary suffering of his saints for a greater good that we cannot see. But yes, the eternal suffering of the wicked is not consistent with the God of the Bible.

You said:
ECT is a lie that came from Satan himself in the garden.

And Eternal Security is another lie by the devil in the garden, too.

You said:
And the only person who will defend ECT on this forum still blatantly refuses to answer extremely simple, easy questions.

We cannot change people, friend. We can only planet seeds, and let another water and allow God to give the increase. I know it can be frustrating sometimes when people cannot see the obvious. I find it odd that folks would believe in a Flat Earth. In fact, I am arguing with them in another thread. It's crazy and madness for them not see the obvious. But people see things that are not true for their own reasons or agenda. We can only lovingly point them the way to the truth and pray for them (even when we know they are not thinking logically).

I mean, the fact that somebody is not willing to answer a question shows the weakness in their own position. So do not be frustrated about that, my friend. You should rejoice instead in the truth.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It is your assumption that it is talking future tense here with the words "for ever and ever."
I believe that in order to be consistent with the rest of Scripture, it is highly likely that Revelation 20:10 says this,
"And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone,
where the beast and the false prophet are [i.e. where the beast and the false prophet are in the form of the existence of ashes], and [they] shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever [i.e. for the purpose of the ages of the ages that are past]." (Revelation 20:10).
Note: My commentary is in the blue brackets.
Anyways, may God bless you
.
Note this is your second different argument trying to prove Rev 20:10 doesn't say what it says, First you claimed that the vs. didn't say anything about the beast and the false prophet being tormented. I proved that it did. How many semesters, if any, of Koine Greek did you say you have? To me this is deliberately, with malice aforethought, wresting scripture to make it support one's assumptions and presuppositions. Please read and be informed?
Revelation 14:11
(11) And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: [εις αιωνας αιωνων/eis aionas aionon] and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.

G1519 εις eis ice

A primary preposition; to or into (indicating the point reached or entered), of place, time, or (figuratively) purpose

αιωνας /aionas noun, accusative, plural, masculine

αιωνων/aionon, noun, genitive, plural, masculine

The Greek word which equates to “for,” γάρ, does not occur in the phrase εις αιωνας αιωνων

G1063 γάρ gar
A primary particle; properly assigning a reason (used in argument, explanation or intensification; often with other particles): - and, as, because (that), but, even, for indeed, no doubt, seeing, then, therefore, verily, what, why, yet.


 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,508
7,861
...
✟1,194,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Note this is your second different argument trying to prove Rev 20:10 doesn't say what it says, First you claimed that the vs. didn't say anything about the beast and the false prophet being tormented. I proved that it did. How many semesters, if any, of Koine Greek did you say you have? To me this is deliberately, with malice aforethought, wresting scripture to make it support one's assumptions and presuppositions. Please read and be informed?
Revelation 14:11
(11) And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: [εις αιωνας αιωνων/eis aionas aionon] and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.

G1519 εις eis ice
A primary preposition; to or into (indicating the point reached or entered), of place, time, or (figuratively) purpose

αιωνας /aionas noun, accusative, plural, masculine
αιωνων/aionon, noun, genitive, plural, masculine

The Greek word which equates to “for,” γάρ, does not occur in the phrase εις αιωνας αιωνων

G1063 γάρ gar
A primary particle; properly assigning a reason (used in argument, explanation or intensification; often with other particles): - and, as, because (that), but, even, for indeed, no doubt, seeing, then, therefore, verily, what, why, yet.

You misunderstood what I said about Revelation 20:10. I believe the devil, the beast and the false prophet will be tormented but it will be for day(s) and night(s) for the purpose that they tormented mankind for the past ages and ages. This is consistent with the GNT and DBT translations among others that say the same thing on Revelation 20:10. It if they were tormented forever, it would be a different Greek word so as to make no mistake that it is eternal. Again, words like "forever" does not always mean "forever" in the Bible. I have already given illustrations to show you this. Can the word "forever" mean "forever"? Yes, but it is the context and other cross references that determines this to be the case. Revelation 21:4 says, "And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away." The Lord says in Revelation 21:5, "Behold, I make all things new." 1 Corinthians 15:26 says that the last enemy to be destroyed is death. This means that there other enemies of God that were destroyed. Is the devil, his minions, and wicked men the enemies of God? Surely yes. So this means that they will be destroyed just as "death" will be destroyed.

As for Revelation 14:11:

This is a metaphorical phrase "smoke of their torment ascends up forever" taken from Isaiah 34:10. Surely you do not think the city mentioned in Isaiah is still burning today do you? Scripture has to be compared with Scripture, friend.

As for studying a dead language as the only way to understand God's Word:

#1. Nobody can truly know what a dead language says with 100% certainty (Unless it was translated under the inspiration of God in a language that does exist today). That would be like me trying to study Brazillian Portuguese thousands of years now from a text book and expect them to understand me perfectly in the future. No doubt they would correct me on my grammar, spelling, and on certain words according to the cultural use. Then there is the slang, as well.

#2. Looking to a dead language in order to understand God's Word is not a position that we can see in the Scriptures. Nowhere does Jesus, Peter, or Paul say, "Well, look son, you do not understand, what the original Word of God says in the ancient language. You cannot trust the plainess of speech that we say. What the Word of God really says is this...." On the contrary we see God translate people's languages in Acts 2 just fine with no problem by His power.

#3. Jesus said beware of the Scribes. The Scribes are those who tran-Scribe the Law or the Scriptures. Basically any person who is into the translation of the languages is a scholar and Jesus says we are to not just implicitly trust them but we are to beware of them.

I believe God's Word is taught by the Spirit (1 John 2:27) and not in the wisdom of men.

Anyways, getting back to ECT:
Well, another problem that you are going to run into with ECT that you will never be able to explain is the moral issue. It's why you ignored my other post, my friend. It is why you are ignoring to answer the question in regards to the Tree of Life provided by another poster. Truth should not be avoided if we are on the side of the truth, friend.

In any event, may God's love shine upon you today;
And may you please be well.

With loving kindness to you in Christ,

Sincerely,

~ Jason.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You misunderstood what I said about Revelation 20:10. I believe the devil, the beast and the false prophet will be tormented but it will be for day(s) and night(s) for the purpose that they tormented mankind for the past ages and ages. This is consistent with the GNT and DBT translations among others that say the same thing on Revelation 20:10. It if they were tormented forever, it would be a different Greek word so as to make no mistake that it is eternal. Again, words like "forever" does not always mean "forever" in the Bible. I have already given illustrations to show you this. Can the word "forever" mean "forever"? Yes, but it is the context and other cross references that determines this to be the case. Revelation 21:4 says, "And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away." The Lord says in Revelation 21:5, "Behold, I make all things new." 1 Corinthians 15:26 says that the last enemy to be destroyed is death. This means that there other enemies of God that were destroyed. Is the devil, his minions, and wicked men the enemies of God? Surely yes. So this means that they will be destroyed just as "death" will be destroyed.
Revelation 21:4, yet another out-of-context proof text which I have proved earlier in this thread.
Rev 21:4-8
(4) And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
(5) And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.
(6) And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
(7) He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.
(8) But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Vss. 4-8 are a continuous narrative, there is no grammatical, or any other credible, way that any part of this narrative can be yanked out of its context and placed in an earlier verse or chapter.
Vs 4. "there shall be no more death"
Vs. 5 God speaking "I make all things new."
Vs. 6 "It is done."
Vs. 7. "He that overcometh shall inherit all things..."
Vs. 8 "But the fearful, and unbelieving" and 5 other groups of people, "shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death."
Although I showed you that "eis aionias aionion" cannot be translated "for the purpose that they tormented mankind for the past ages and ages" you insist on posting this false interpretation.
.....Yes, you can find various "translations" which support your assumptions/presuppositions. But as I have shown they are deliberately false "translations" written to support the writer's assumptions/presuppositions.
....You claim "if they were tormented forever, it would be a different Greek word so as to make no mistake that it is eternal." But you didn't say which word that would be. Let me clarify it for you.

Romans 1:20
(20) For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal [ἀΐ́διος/aidios] power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

Romans 16:26
(26) But now is made manifest, and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the everlasting [αἰώνιος/aionios] God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith:
In Romans 1:20 Paul refers to God’s power and Godhead as “aidios.” Scholars agree “aidios” unquestionably means eternal, everlasting, unending etc. In Rom 16:26 Paul refers to God as “aionios,” therefore Paul considers “aidios” and “aionios” to be synonymous.




 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
... As for studying a dead language as the only way to understand God's Word:
#1. Nobody can truly know what a dead language says with 100% certainty (Unless it was translated under the inspiration of God in a language that does exist today). That would be like me trying to study Brazillian Portuguese thousands of years now from a text book and expect them to understand me perfectly in the future. No doubt they would correct me on my grammar, spelling, and on certain words according to the cultural use. Then there is the slang, as well.
#2. Looking to a dead language in order to understand God's Word is not a position that we can see in the Scriptures. Nowhere does Jesus, Peter, or Paul say, "Well, look son, you do not understand, what the original Word of God says in the ancient language. You cannot trust the plainess of speech that we say. What the Word of God really says is this...." On the contrary we see God translate people's languages in Acts 2 just fine with no problem by His power.
Your argument is invalid! Greek has never been a dead language. Unlike Hebrew, Sanskrit, Egyptian hieroglyphics etc. The nation of Greece has never ceased to exist and Greek has always been their language.
#3. Jesus said beware of the Scribes. The Scribes are those who tran-Scribe the Law or the Scriptures. Basically any person who is into the translation of the languages is a scholar and Jesus says we are to not just implicitly trust them but we are to beware of them
What we have instead are a bunch of would-be "scribes," who probably couldn't conjugate a Greek verb if their life depended on it, wresting scripture willy-nilly ignoring grammar, context etc. trying to force it to fit their assumptions/presuppositions. Just as I have shown with the Greek word "eis" in Rev 14:11 which means "to or into" trying to make it read "for the purpose."
The correct definition can be verified in the online BAGD lexicon at this link. A Greek-English Lexicon Gingrich & Danker
 
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,932
768
62
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟308,557.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
All I can tell you is I have been through the proof texts and this is consistent with all but one of the texts. I was like you, I read it and took it at face value, those in hell suffer forever. Speaking of consistency being consistent with the OT treatment of death and the grave is important to. Hell as we understand it in the Old Testament is virtually unknown. The word for Hell, γέεννα (geenna), is introduced by the Lord during the Sermon on the Mount. It is used 12 times in the New Testament, 11 times in the synoptic gospels by the Lord himself. The word is actually the name for a valley where the children of Israel used to toss their infant children as a sacrifice to Molech, the practice was known as making your children pass through the fire.
Hell is the place of the future punishment called "Gehenna" or "Gehenna of fire". This was originally the valley of Hinnom, south of Jerusalem, where the filth and dead animals of the city were cast out and burned; a fit symbol of the wicked and their future destruction. (Outline of Biblical Usage)...
Mark
You might wish to familiarize yourself with the difference between a "proof text" and "scripture which supports an argument." The first is usually out-of-context. I note you have quoted the standard internet explanation for "Gehenna."
According to the Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud, among the Jews in Israel before and during the time of Jesus was a belief in a place of everlasting torment of the wicked and they called it both sheol and gehinnom.
Clarification: There were different groups within Judaism; Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes etc. and there were different beliefs about resurrection, hell etc. I am addressing only the belief stated above, Any other beliefs are not relevant to this response.

Jewish Encyclopedia, Gehenna
The place where children were sacrificed to the god Moloch … in the "valley of the son of Hinnom," to the south of Jerusalem (Josh. xv. 8, passim; II Kings xxiii. 10; Jer. ii. 23; vii. 31-32; xix. 6, 13-14). … the valley was deemed to be accursed, and "Gehenna" therefore soon became a figurative equivalent for "hell." Hell, like paradise, was created by God (Sotah 22a);
Note, this is according to the ancient Jews, long before the Christian era, NOT any supposed bias of Christian translators.
(I)n general …sinners go to hell immediately after their death. The famous teacher Johanan b. Zakkai wept before his death because he did not know whether he would go to paradise or to hell (Ber. 28b). The pious go to paradise, and sinners to hell (B.M. 83b).
But as regards the heretics, etc., and Jeroboam, Nebat's son, hell shall pass away, but they shall not pass away" (R. H. 17a; comp. Shab. 33b). All that descend into Gehenna shall come up again, with the exception of three classes of men: those who have committed adultery, or shamed their neighbors, or vilified them (B. M. 58b).[/i]
… heretics and the Roman oppressors go to Gehenna, and the same fate awaits the Persians, the oppressors of the Babylonian Jews (Ber. 8b). When Nebuchadnezzar descended into hell, [ שׁאול /Sheol]] all its inhabitants were afraid that he was coming to rule over them (Shab. 149a; comp. Isa. xiv. 9-10). The Book of Enoch also says that it is chiefly the heathen who are to be cast into the fiery pool on the Day of Judgment (x. 6, xci. 9, et al). "The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity" (Judith xvi. 17). The sinners in Gehenna will be filled with pain when God puts back the souls into the dead bodies on the Day of Judgment, according to Isa. xxxiii. 11 (Sanh. 108b).

Link:Jewish Encyclopedia Online
Encyclopedia Judaica:
Gehinnom (Heb. גֵּי בֶן־הִנֹּם, גֵּי בְנֵי הִנֹּם, גֵּיא בֶן־הִנֹּם, גֵּיא הִנֹּם; Gr. Γέεννα; "Valley of Ben-Hinnom, Valley of [the Son (s) of] Hinnom," Gehenna), a valley south of Jerusalem on one of the borders between the territories of Judah and Benjamin, between the Valley of *Rephaim and *En-Rogel (Josh. 15:8; 18:16). It is identified with Wadi er-Rababi.

During the time of the Monarchy, Gehinnom, at a place called Topheth, was the site of a cult which involved the burning of children (II Kings 23:10; Jer. 7:31; 32:35 et al.; see *Moloch). Jeremiah repeatedly condemned this cult and predicted that on its account Topheth and the Valley of the Son of Hinnom would be called the Valley of the "Slaughter" (Jer. 19:5–6).
In Judaism the name Gehinnom is generally used as an appellation of the place of torment reserved for the wicked after death. The New Testament used the Greek form Gehenna in the same sense.
Gehinnom
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Talmud -Tractate Rosh Hashanah Chapter 1.
The school of Hillel says: . . . but as for Minim, [follower of Jesus] informers and disbelievers, who deny the Torah, or Resurrection, or separate themselves from the congregation, or who inspire their fellowmen with dread of them, or who sin and cause others to sin, as did Jeroboam the son of Nebat and his followers, they all descend to Gehenna, and are judged there from generation to generation, as it is said [Isa. lxvi. 24]: "And they shall go forth and look upon the carcases of the men who have transgressed against Me; for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched." Even when Gehenna will be destroyed, they will not be consumed, as it is written [Psalms, xlix. 15]: "And their forms wasteth away in the nether world," which the sages comment upon to mean that their forms shall endure even when the grave is no more. Concerning them Hannah says [I Sam. ii. 10]: "The adversaries of the Lord shall be broken to pieces."
Link:Tract Rosh Hashana: Chapter I.
When Jesus taught about,
• “Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:” Matthew 25:41
• "these shall go away into eternal punishment, Matthew 25:46"
• "the fire of hell where the fire is not quenched and the worm does not die, Mark 9:43-48"
• "cast into a fiery furnace where there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth,” Matthew 13:42, Matthew 13:50
• “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” Matthew 18:6
• “And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” Matthew 7:23
• “woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born. ” Matthew 26:24
These teachings tacitly reaffirmed and sanctioned the existing Jewish view of eternal hell, outlined above. In Matt. 18:6, 26:24, see above, Jesus teaches that there is a fate worse than death or nonexistence. A fate worse than death is also mentioned in Hebrews 10:28-31.
Heb 10:28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.
31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
Jesus is quoted as using the word death 17 times in the gospels, if He wanted to say eternal death in Matt 25:46, that is what He would have said but He didn’t, He said “eternal punishment.” The Sadducees did not believe in the resurrection, they knew that everybody died; rich, poor, young, old, good, bad, men, women, children, infants and knew that it had nothing to do with punishment and was permanent. When Jesus taught “eternal punishment” they would not have understood it as death, it would have meant something worse to them.
…..Jesus knew what the Jews, believed about hell. If the Jews were wrong, when Jesus taught about man’s eternal fate, such as eternal punishment, He would have corrected them. Jesus did not correct them, thus their teaching on hell must have been correct.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

The traditional explanation that a burning rubbish heap in the Valley of Hinnom south of Jerusalem gave rise to the idea of a fiery Gehenna of judgment is attributed to Rabbi David Kimhi's commentary on Psalm 27:13 (ca. A.D. 1200). He maintained that in this loathsome valley fires were kept burning perpetually to consume the filth and cadavers thrown into it. However, Strack and Billerbeck state that there is neither archaeological nor literary evidence in support of this claim, in either the earlier intertestamental or the later rabbinic sources (Hermann L. Strack and Paul Billerbeck, Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud and Midrasch, 5 vols. [Munich: Beck, 1922-56], 4:2:1030). Also a more recent author holds a similar view (Lloyd R. Bailey, "Gehenna: The Topography of Hell," Biblical Archeologist 49 [1986]: 189.
Source, Bibliotheca Sacra / July–September 1992
Scharen: Gehenna in the Synoptics Pt. 1
Note there is no “archaeological nor literary evidence in support of this claim, [that Gehenna was ever used as a garbage dump] in either the earlier intertestamental or the later rabbinic sources” If Gehenna was ever used as a garbage dump there should be broken pottery, tools, utensils, bones, etc. but there is no such evidence.
“Gehenna is presented as diametrically opposed to ‘life’: it is better to enter life than to go to Gehenna. . .It is common practice, both in scholarly and less technical works, to associate the description of Gehenna with the supposedly contemporary garbage dump in the valley of Hinnom. This association often leads scholars to emphasize the destructive aspects of the judgment here depicted: fire burns until the object is completely consumed. Two particular problems may be noted in connection with this approach. First, there is no convincing evidence in the primary sources for the existence of a fiery rubbish dump in this location (in any case, a thorough investigation would be appreciated). Secondly, the significant background to this passage more probably lies in Jesus’ allusion to Isaiah 66:24.”
(“The Duration of Divine Judgment in the New Testament” in The Reader Must Understand edited by K. Brower and M. W. Ellion, p. 223, emphasis mine)
G. R. Beasley-Murray in Jesus and the Kingdom of God:
“Ge-Hinnom (Aramaic Ge-hinnam, hence the Greek Geenna), ‘The Valley of Hinnom,’ lay south of Jerusalem, immediately outside its walls. The notion, still referred to by some commentators, that the city’s rubbish was burned in this valley, has no further basis than a statement by the Jewish scholar Kimchi (sic) made about A.D. 1200; it is not attested in any ancient source.” (p. 376n.92)
The Burning Garbage Dump of Gehenna is a myth - Archaeology, Biblical History & Textual Criticism

Apart from the fallacies contained here, what have you proven?
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Apart from the fallacies contained here, what have you proven?
If there are fallacies then prove it, making unsupported accusations does not make it so. What have I proven? Very simple, actually read my posts. I make declarative statements and provide grammatical, lexical and historical evidence to support those statements and mostly in response I get "I'm right and you're wrong! Am too Nuh huh!"
 
Upvote 0

briank7

New Member
Mar 10, 2018
1
0
33
Walnut Creek
✟15,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
"She is a tree of life to them that lay hold upon her: and happy is every one that retaineth her." Proverbs 3:18 KJV

I know this isn't talking about the tree of life in the garden of Eden. But just something to consider. Another thing if you go back and read proverbs 3:17 could life mean the good things in life and death the bad things?

Another verse to consider. Psalm 49:19
"He shall go to the generation of his fathers; they shall never see light"
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,932
768
62
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟308,557.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Apart from the fallacies contained here, what have you proven?

This is the OP "Annihilationism Is Actually...Biblical". How does posting what the Jews believed have any bearing on the OP.

As for the fallacies, you said

"Jesus is quoted as using the word death 17 times in the gospels, if He wanted to say eternal death in Matt 25:46, that is what He would have said but He didn’t, He said “eternal punishment.” The Sadducees did not believe in the resurrection, they knew that everybody died; rich, poor, young, old, good, bad, men, women, children, infants and knew that it had nothing to do with punishment and was permanent. When Jesus taught “eternal punishment” they would not have understood it as death, it would have meant something worse to them.
…..Jesus knew what the Jews, believed about hell. If the Jews were wrong, when Jesus taught about man’s eternal fate, such as eternal punishment, He would have corrected them. Jesus did not correct them, thus their teaching on hell must have been correct."

I bolded the above sections. The first section in black is an argument from silence. You have no way to know how they would have understood it.

The section in red is also an argument from silence. You have simply assumed that Jesus would have corrected them. Maybe He didn't want to.

The section in blue is a False Dichotomy. You only give two options, either Jesus had to correct them, or their teaching was correct. However, there is another option. Their teaching was wrong and Jesus didn't want to correct them.
 
Upvote 0

Shempster

ImJustMe
Site Supporter
Dec 28, 2014
1,560
786
✟258,881.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
DER Alter said:
Jewish Encyclopedia, Gehenna
The place where children were sacrificed to the god Moloch … in the "valley of the son of Hinnom," to the south of Jerusalem.

Now I looked into it and saw something incredible. In Jeremiah 32 when he was referring to this valley he said:
Young's Literal Translation
And they build the high places of Baal, that are in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through to Molech, which I did not command them, nor did it come up on my heart to do this abomination, so as to cause Judah to sin.

So....in this place where supposedly God will torture us with unending fire, YHVH says that burning ones own child is a detestable abomination, and that he himself WOULD NEVER EVEN CONSIDER such a thing!
So how can we say God will torture us for all of eternity when he clearly says he would never even think of such a thing? And he is doing it all in the context of this valley called Gehinnom. How clever!!!

Am I the only one that just sees it plainly? (Obviously, many even on this site do as well)
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Revelation 19:20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
And 1000 years later, the beast and the false prophet, who is a person, are still in the lake of fire.
Revelation 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

Can you prove from Rev.20:10 & the Greek that all 3 beings will be tormented? Or is it only referring to the devil getting torments?

Where is there any proof in the book of Revelation, besides 20:10, that anyone else will be tormented in the lake of fire?

Is there any proof the beast & false prophet are conscious or being tormented before Rev.20:10 & after they are in the lake of fire?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jordan Henshaw

Active Member
Jan 14, 2018
345
66
26
PA
✟25,072.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
This is the OP "Annihilationism Is Actually...Biblical". How does posting what the Jews believed have any bearing on the OP.

As for the fallacies, you said

"Jesus is quoted as using the word death 17 times in the gospels, if He wanted to say eternal death in Matt 25:46, that is what He would have said but He didn’t, He said “eternal punishment.” The Sadducees did not believe in the resurrection, they knew that everybody died; rich, poor, young, old, good, bad, men, women, children, infants and knew that it had nothing to do with punishment and was permanent. When Jesus taught “eternal punishment” they would not have understood it as death, it would have meant something worse to them.
…..Jesus knew what the Jews, believed about hell. If the Jews were wrong, when Jesus taught about man’s eternal fate, such as eternal punishment, He would have corrected them. Jesus did not correct them, thus their teaching on hell must have been correct."

I bolded the above sections. The first section in black is an argument from silence. You have no way to know how they would have understood it.

The section in red is also an argument from silence. You have simply assumed that Jesus would have corrected them. Maybe He didn't want to.

The section in blue is a False Dichotomy. You only give two options, either Jesus had to correct them, or their teaching was correct. However, there is another option. Their teaching was wrong and Jesus didn't want to correct them.
You know, the funny thing is, the phrase, "eternal death" doesn't even make sense.

Because "death" is when you pass being alive to not being alive. It is a process with a start and with and end. You can't be forever in the process of dying if you will never ever actually die. Because then you're not dying at all. You're living.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, (1Th. 1:9)
As I have pointed out elsewhere in this thread the word translated "destruction" does not necessarily mean to cease to exist. Something that does not exist cannot be "from the presence of the Lord" or anything else.

Why is that? Why can't the means of destruction(ceasing to exist) be the presence of the Lord, or from the presence of the Lord? Is His presence not powerful enough to cause to cease to exist, if Love Omnipotent so wills it?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Jordan Henshaw

Active Member
Jan 14, 2018
345
66
26
PA
✟25,072.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
Can you prove from Rev.20:10 & the Greek that all 3 beings will be tormented? Or is it only referring to the devil getting torments?

Where is there any proof in the book of Revelation, besides 20:10, that anyone else will be tormented in the lake of fire?

Is there any proof the beast & false prophet are conscious or being tormented before Rev.20:10 & after they are in the lake of fire?
ECT supporter proof texts:
Luke 13:28; Matthew 26:24; Mathew 25:46; John 3:36; 2 Thessalonians 1:9

errr... that's about it, folks!

Annihilationism supporter proof texts:
1 John 3:15; Mark 10:17; Mark 10:30; Luke 18:18; John 3:16; John 5:39; John 6:54; John 6:68; John 10:28; John 17:2; John 17:3; Acts 13:48; Romans 2:7; Romans 5:21; Romans 6:23; 1 Timothy 6:19; Titus 1:2; Titus 3:7; 1 John 1:2; 1 John 2:25; 1 John 3:15; 1 John 5:11; 1 John 5:13; 1 John 5:20; Jude 1:21; Genesis 3:22; Revelation 2:7; Revelation 22:2; Revelation 22:14; John 4:14; Revelation 21:6; 1 Corinthians 15:53; 1 Corinthians 15:54; 1 Timothy 6:16; Mathew 10:28; Romans 6:23; James 1:15; 2 Corinthians 7:10; 1 John 5:16; Revelation 20:14; Revelation 21:8; Philippians 3:19; Psalm 145:20; Mathew 7:13; Psalm 68:2; John 3:16; John 10:28; Jude 1:7; Isaiah 53:5-6; John 10:11; 1 Peter 2:24; Mark 10:45; Hebrews 10:9; Romans 3:25; 1 Peter 3:18; Ephesians 5:25; Leviticus 16:10; 1 John 3:16; Deuteronomy 21:22; Mathew 7:13; John 17:12; Acts 8:20; Romans 9:22-23; Philippians 1:28; Philippians 3:19; 1 Timothy 6:9; Hebrews 10:39; 2 Peter 2:1; 1 Thessalonians 5:3; 2 Thessalonians 1:9; 1 Timothy 6:9; Romans 1:32; Romans 6:21; Romans 7:5; Romans 8:6; 2 Corinthians 7:10; James 1:15; James 5:20; 1 John 5:16; Revelation 2:11; Revelation 20:6; Revelation 14; Revelation 21:8; 2 Corinthians 11:15; Philippians 3:19; 1 Peter 4:17; Galatians 6:8; 2 Peter 2:12; Mathew 3:12; Mathew 7:19; Mathew 13:40; John 15:6; Mathew 7:27; Mathew 13:48; Mathew 15:13; Luke 13:7; Luke 17:27; Luke 17:29; Luke 17:32; Mathew 21:41

[EDIT: Does anyone know why only some of them are blue?]
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,508
7,861
...
✟1,194,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
ECT supporter proof texts:
Luke 13:28; Mathew 26:24; Mathew 25:46; John 3:36; 2 Thessalonians 1:9

errr... that's about it, folks!

Annihilationism supporter proof texts:
1 John 3:15; Mark 10:17; Mark 10:30; Luke 18:18; John 3:16; John 5:39; John 6:54; John 6:68; John 10:28; John 17:2; John 17:3; Acts 13:48; Romans 2:7; Romans 5:21; Romans 6:23; 1 Timothy 6:19; Titus 1:2; Titus 3:7; 1 John 1:2; 1 John 2:25; 1 John 3:15; 1 John 5:11; 1 John 5:13; 1 John 5:20; Jude 1:21; Genesis 3:22; Revelation 2:7; Revelation 22:2; Revelation 22:14; John 4:14; Revelation 21:6; 1 Corinthians 15:53; 1 Corinthians 15:54; 1 Timothy 6:16; Mathew 10:28; Romans 6:23; James 1:15; 2 Corinthians 7:10; 1 John 5:16; Revelation 20:14; Revelation 21:8; Philippians 3:19; Psalm 145:20; Mathew 7:13; Psalm 68:2; John 3:16; John 10:28; Jude 1:7; Isaiah 53:5-6; John 10:11; 1 Peter 2:24; Mark 10:45; Hebrews 10:9; Romans 3:25; 1 Peter 3:18; Ephesians 5:25; Leviticus 16:10; 1 John 3:16; Deuteronomy 21:22; Mathew 7:13; John 17:12; Acts 8:20; Romans 9:22-23; Philippians 1:28; Philippians 3:19; 1 Timothy 6:9; Hebrews 10:39; 2 Peter 2:1; 1 Thessalonians 5:3; 2 Thessalonians 1:9; 1 Timothy 6:9; Romans 1:32; Romans 6:21; Romans 7:5; Romans 8:6; 2 Corinthians 7:10; James 1:15; James 5:20; 1 John 5:16; Revelation 2:11; Revelation 20:6; Revelation 14; Revelation 21:8; 2 Corinthians 11:15; Philippians 3:19; 1 Peter 4:17; Galatians 6:8; 2 Peter 2:12; Mathew 3:12; Mathew 7:19; Mathew 13:40; John 15:6; Mathew 7:27; Mathew 13:48; Mathew 15:13; Luke 13:7; Luke 17:27; Luke 17:29; Luke 17:32; Mathew 21:41

[EDIT: Does anyone know why only some of them are blue?]

Matthew is misspelled. It should be two “t”’s.
Psalm should be “Psalms.”
Acts should be “Acts of the Apostles.”
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,508
7,861
...
✟1,194,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Your argument is invalid! Greek has never been a dead language. Unlike Hebrew, Sanskrit, Egyptian hieroglyphics etc. The nation of Greece has never ceased to exist and Greek has always been their language.

What we have instead are a bunch of would-be "scribes," who probably couldn't conjugate a Greek verb if their life depended on it, wresting scripture willy-nilly ignoring grammar, context etc. trying to force it to fit their assumptions/presuppositions. Just as I have shown with the Greek word "eis" in Rev 14:11 which means "to or into" trying to make it read "for the purpose."
The correct definition can be verified in the online BAGD lexicon at this link. A Greek-English Lexicon Gingrich & Danker

I am beginning to realize that you are not open to what other believers have to say with God’s Word. It sounds like every time you post something, it sounds like:

“You are always right, and you can’t make mistakes in interpreting Gods Word.”

I asked questions that you didn’t answer and you expect me to answer your questions? Yeah, that doesn’t seem fair.

So I am moving beyond our conversation and I will strive not to directly reply to your posts or quote them, friend.

May God”s love shine upon you today.
I hope one day you will see where I am coming from.

Blessings to you and your family.
 
Upvote 0

Jordan Henshaw

Active Member
Jan 14, 2018
345
66
26
PA
✟25,072.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
Matthew is misspelled. It should be two “t”’s.
Psalm should be “Psalms.”
Acts should be “Acts of the Apostles.”
Oh. Duh. Thank you.

Wait a second... in what parallel universe is Mathew spelled with 2 t's?

I'm pretty sure I warped into a different world or something because 5 seconds ago I would have bet my life on Mathew being spelled with 1 t.

It's gotta be the Russians! :ebil:
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I am beginning to realize that you are not open to what other believers have to say with God’s Word. It sounds like every time you post something, it sounds like:
“You are always right, and you can’t make mistakes in interpreting Gods Word.”
What I am not open to is deliberate wresting scripture to make it fit one's assumptions/presupposition as I pointed out with the phrase "eis aionas aionion" in Rev 14:11. As I said, there is no way it can be interpreted "for the purpose of." Please consult credible grammars and lexicons rather than anonymous websites just because they say what you want to hear..
So I am moving beyond our conversation and I will strive not to directly reply to your posts or quote them, friend.
Excellent. That will not deter me from pointing out errors and mistranslations.

I asked questions that you didn’t answer and you expect me to answer your questions? Yeah, that doesn’t seem fair.
The difference is I ONLY ask questions about what you have actually said in a post on this forum. I do not post a laundry list of gotcha questions. This is a discussion forum, so discuss not twenty questions
 
Upvote 0