Soyeong
Well-Known Member
- Mar 10, 2015
- 12,433
- 4,605
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Single
First, I thank you in advance for your response to this question. It may seem elementary to some, but this came up tonight in our class for the youth and I'm not sure how strong I feel about my answer afterwards.
My friend asked the question to the class *hypothetically* "If you were harboring innocent people in your house, and a gangster came looking for them, should you tell this gangster yes I am harboring these people and lead them to him OR should you say no I am not harboring any people and lie?" ...
Now, while she was asking this question I thought about Corrie Ten Booms story about her hiding Jews in her family home in order to protect them. Surely she couldn't say to the German soldiers yes I am harboring fugitives, you caught me? Right? My response is to think that if one is preserving life then it is okay to lie, but now I don't know.
We were talking about the story of Rahab, and the two spies that she lied to protect. The question was asked, was she wrong for lying in order to protect the two spies. My instinct was to say no, because (once again) she was preserving life, BUT there are a few things that make me doubt that answer and through my little bit of research tonight there seems to be an equal division on the answer to this question.
Here are my thoughts that make me wonder:
1. It is a commandment to not lie.
2. There are countless verses that talk about how serious lying is.
3. God doesn't contradict Himself, so why would He say do not lie, but then lying in this circumstance is okay?
On the other hand:
1. I read that Rahab made a covenant to protect the people of God and was lying in order to do so.
2. I also read that the enemy has his own truth and that in order to combat that we could lie. So when the enemy came against Rahab he was in the wrong even though Rahab lied because he put her in a situation where her answer was that or violate the covenant.
Christianity Today says "In a broken world, sometimes a lie is justifiable, but every lie, even the justifiable one, is a sad reminder of our brokenness."
Bonhoeffer said "A teacher asks a child in front of the class whether it is true that his Father often comes home drunk. It is true, but the child denies it.' He says the teacher is at fault and not the child because they abused the relationship and the expectation that the truth be told in the relationship. The teacher exploits the obligation to tell the truth to force the student to reveal his Fathers weakness in front of the class and to violate his covenanted identity."
Is this in fact covenanted self-defense, or just a plain old lie?
Once again thank you for your responses. Me and my friend have been placed over our youth at church, and I never want to mislead or teach a false Gospel to them. It is my desire to please the Lord however I can and serve Him in every area He will allow.
There are a number of God's laws that appear to contradict each other, such as what happens when someone wanted to obey to circumcise their baby boy on the 8th day and it happened to fall on the Sabbath. However, it was not the case that they were forced to sin by breaking one of the two commands no matter what they chose to do, but that one of the commands was never intended to prevent the other from being obeyed, and in this case the command not to work on the Sabbath was never intended to prevent circumcision on the 8th day. This is why priests were held innocent for performing their duties on the Sabbath or why David and his men were held innocent for eating the showbread even though they broke the letter of the Law. In general, all of God's commands are intended to teach us how to obey the greatest two commands, so no command was ever intended to be used as an excuse to avoid loving God or our neighbor. So the command not bear false witness was never intended to cause us to refrain from loving our neighbor.
Upvote
0