*Sigh* I've explained my position quite clearly and this Strawman is how you choose to characterize it? You are not a seeker of truth.
You've stopped thinking now and are simply wanting to categorize and label. I'm not going to help you do that.
LOL. OSAS believers do not know what the OSAS doctrine is.Then you don't know what OSAS is.
It would seem we agree...But any capacity to respond positively to God and to obey His commands is something He has, by His Spirit, enabled. We work out only what God has first worked in. Read Philippians 2:12-13. Really, this is true even in our physical life. Were it not for God, we would not even exist; we are totally contingent in our existence upon God. If He were to cease to exist in the next moment, so would everything else. So, Christ is entirely right when he says, "For without me you can nothing." (John 15:4-5)
We are cleansed of our sin by the shed blood of Christ. We are saved by his atoning work on the cross of Calvary, not by baptism.
We are only able to "put on Christ" (Romans 13:14) because of God. If He does not bring us to the place where we see why and how to do so, we will remain lost in sin.
We walk in newness of life and obey God's commands because we are His children, not in order to be His children. An apple tree bears apples because it is an apple tree, not in order to be an apple tree.
But as Ephesians 2:1 makes clear, the lost are spiritual corpses who cannot do anything. They are dead, without life, and thus utterly unable to act toward God in any way at all. So, no one saves themself by anything they do, but are saved entirely and only by the grace and work of God.
That is a good point.
Not that it absolves of a need to have good works for one of the things Christ said concerning how to see and believe who he is, was as follows:
"But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works: that ye may know, and believe, that the Father is in me, and I in him." John 10:38
Thus rather than our faith being based in our own works, our faith is based on spiritually discerning the message spoken of the works of God which is all his creation according to Romans 1:17-20 and Psalms 19:1-4.
It is like David declared to the seed of Abraham:
Psalms 105:5-7 "Remember his marvellous works that he hath done; his wonders, and the judgments of his mouth; O ye seed of Abraham his servant, ye children of Jacob his chosen. He is the LORD our God: his judgments are in all the earth."
And to help strengthen Job's faith to listen to sound counsel, young Elihu told him:
Job 37:14 "Hearken unto this, O Job: stand still, and consider the wondrous works of God."
That works born of the spirit of faith are a very important part of salvation is quite obvious. For such works are the works God would have us do in his image. It is only works which have been born of our flesh independent of having been inspired by God's goodness, that mean nothing. And a rote command of written law does nothing to inspire. Therefore by a written code of laws we obey as a work of our flesh.
But contrast that to a law written in the heart by love and obeyed by love. It is inspired from beginning to end by God's goodness which led us to repentance in the first place.
That is the key. Are we inspired of God's love and other precious qualities to serve or are we just performing an obligation because a law told us we must?
DeepYou are bound up in complexity.
I will speak to this in a moment, but I looked up my notes on the Nicolaitans (the sect of Nicolous) and found that it is not what you say. Little is really even known about the sect but the best evidence we have is that the sect dabbled in Baal type practices. And the fact that Revelation 2:6 says quite clearly, "But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate", shows this was not a problem for the Ephesian congregation. The Nicolaitans have nothing whatsoever to do with ones who try to work their way to righteousness. Quite the opposite. They engaged in sins of of the flesh which God hated.
You are repeating yourself and just continuing the same old logic rather than trying to progress to try to see what you are being told. Being born is just a way of saying that what was inspired to develop in you through the power of God's knowledge and wisdom being built up in you has developed. And it has developed in you because your mind and heart are being cleared up so that they can function more in God's image as they were meant to do when God created man.
What sin?Well, sorry, but how do you explain this statement:
"No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day" - Martin Luther
If that's not OSAS then I don't know what is.
The Romans 5 quote needs to read in context with the next chapter.
Romans 6:15 What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? Certainly not! 16 Do you not know that to whom you present yourselves slaves to obey, you are that one’s slaves whom you obey, whether of sin leading to death, or of obedience leading to righteousness?
And Romans 8:38-39 says nothing about sin. Sin WILL separate you from God even it you don't want to believe that.
I'm not really here to win or lose arguments. That's pointless. I'm here to try to convince you and everyone else to make sure they are baptized in the Holy Spirit.
That is not just something believed by faith. It is an experience you can't miss. Anymore than consummating a marriage can't be missed. You KNOW when you've consummated a marriage. Likewise, you also experience the baptism of the Holy Spirit. For you shall receive power once the Holy Spirit has fallen upon you.
Now come the classic put down *You don't have the higher knowledge that we have"
I have told you the truth, put it right there in front of you,
So explain all you like...that doesn't change the truth.
Thanks, I thought so.
LOL. OSAS believers do not know what the OSAS doctrine is.
I know, because I get around to all of the different churches and the churches which embrace OSAS all explain it differently.
Basically, when trying to defend that belief they end up saying what ever comes into their head.
That is why they all teach that belief differently. None of them really understand it and that is because it is false doctrine.
You miss my point.Yes, I get this a lot - from those who haven't really thought carefully about what the Bible has to say about the eternal security of the born-again believer.
Uh huh. This hasn't been my experience.
Yeah, the usual rhetoric. If you can't deal with the arguments, go for ad hominem.
Well, unless you know personally all those who hold to the doctrine of eternal security and have evaluated all their arguments, it's a lot of baloney to make the sort of sweeping generalizations you've just made here. But this is the sort of facile reasoning I usually have to put up with from the other side of this argument.
That is a pouting sort of conclusion one usually gets from children who are angry that they were told that they were wrong.Alright, then salvation depends not on God's grace and Christ's saving work on the cross, but our being perfect.
When I said Baal, that was a glitch. I meant Balaam per a theory developed based off of Revelation 2:14-15. Balaam's sin was certainly not the sin of trying to work ones way to righteousness. There are three groups causing trouble to the church in Pergamos. The synogogue of Satan are thought to be the remaining organized faction of Judaism which Paul once was a member of when he was persecuting the church. And it is thought that these of the synagogue of Satan also devised to corrupt the doctrine of Christ, entering into the sheepfold by climbing up over the wall instead of entering through the door by real faith in Christ who is that door. And so once inside they began to push the works of that Old Law Covenant as necessary to salvation. And Paul in having to speak against their heresy left the untaught and unsteady something to twist in their imaginations so as to think that Paul meant that law is not necessary to salvation. That is in fact exactly what Peter was referring to at 2 Peter 3:15-16 concerning Paul's writings.Deep
Regardless, your response here is a deflection of what I pointed out about your Strawman arguing.
Stephen R. Covey in his original book, 'The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People', has an interesting discussion of that mindset.Did you give any details on the straw man argument you claim?
If you think in anyway that because I choose to not take some of your comments seriously, that means I'm deflecting anything, or that which I ignore was because you had any kind of viable point, you should probably rethink things. I say that because those who believe this type thing tend to have a same mindset that sees what they believe and not the other way around.
But whatever it takes, all I can do is warn you, what you believe is up to you.
Did you give any details on the straw man argument you claim?
If you think in anyway that because I choose to not take some of your comments seriously, that means I'm deflecting anything,
or that which I ignore was because you had any kind of viable point, you should probably rethink things.
I say that because those who believe this type thing tend to have a same mindset that sees what they believe and not the other way around.
You don't really understand what I'm talking about, do you?
Stephen R. Covey in his original book, 'The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People', has an interesting discussion of that mindset.
It is good to see that someone else knows about that.
http://www.stafforini.com/docs/Covey - The 7 habits of highly effective people.pdf
If explaining your thoughts one way does not work effectively, why not just explain them another way? Would that be better than getting locked into a mode of judgments as to the defects of each other?You don't really understand what I'm talking about, do you?
That is exactly what you're doing. It's rather obvious, you know.
No, I don't think I should.
Uh huh. Pot and kettle.
That is a pouting sort of conclusion one usually gets from children who are angry that they were told that they were wrong.
Christ's work on the cross was finished for Christ but not for us. His finish was our beginning because now it was up to up to learn from and follow his righteous example.