SPF

Well-Known Member
Feb 7, 2017
3,594
1,984
ATL
✟142,081.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Personally, I don't think you have any business posting on this forum if you intend on using it as a platform to proselytize. If you have no intention on engaging in discussion with people beyond simply referencing them to other, outside material that you've written, then there's no reason for you to be here. I am more than willing to actually engage with you in conversation. That is the point of this forum, to engage with people in conversation.

So that being said. I'm a Christian. I do my best to base my beliefs upon a foundation of Scripture. I believe that both science and philosophy "done right" lead us to the Gospel and the Truth of Scripture.

I don't know what common ground we actually have in discussing this issue after learning about your religion which does not seem Christian in the least. But if you're willing to engage in discussion than I am.

So my questions are fairly straight forward. First, can you actually define life? Life as I understand it begins at conception. Conception represents the point when a unique human being physically begins to exist. I don't see anything in Scripture that teaches the pre-existence of humans. There are verses that reference the omniscience of God, but they aren't to be taken literally to mean that I existed prior to my birth.

Can you provide Scriptural support for my existing prior to birth? Can you explain what my existence, prior to birth actually looked like? Can I ever be aware of that existence, or was it only in the mind of God?
 
Upvote 0

Founder

Newbie
Apr 21, 2009
181
5
Washington DC Area
✟17,234.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Here is your list of other laws you must obey or you go to Hell.
In some cases immediately....


1. Burning any yeast or honey in offerings to God Lev(2:11)

2. Failing to include salt in the offering plate (2:13)

3. Eating french fries or snacks (3:17)

4. Eating sausages (3:17)

5. Failing to report cars speeding or people not crossing in the crosswalk (5:1)

6. Failing to testify against any wrongdoing you’ve been told about (5:1)

7. Touching an unclean animal (5:2)

8. Carelessly making an oath (5:4)

9. Deceiving a neighbour about something trusted to them (6:2)

10. Finding lost property and lying about it (6:3)

11. Bringing unauthorised fire before God (10:1)

12. Letting your hair become unkempt (10:6)

13. Tearing your clothes (10:6)

14. Drinking Communion Wine in church (10:9)

15. Eating an animal which doesn’t both chew cud and has a divided hoof (cf: camel, rabbit, pig) (11:4-7)

16. Touching the carcass of any of the above (problems here for rugby) (11:8)

17. Eating – or touching the carcass of – any seafood without fins or scales (11:10-12)

18. Eating – or touching the carcass of - eagle, the vulture, the black vulture, the red kite, any kind of black kite, any kind of raven, the horned owl, the screech owl, the gull, any kind of hawk, the little owl, the cormorant, the great owl, the white owl, the desert owl, the osprey, the stork, any kind of heron, the hoopoe and the bat. (11:13-19)

19. Eating – or touching the carcass of – flying insects with four legs, unless those legs are jointed (11:20-22)

20. Eating any animal which walks on all four and has paws (good news for cats) (11:27)

21. Eating – or touching the carcass of – the weasel, the rat, any kind of great lizard, the gecko, the monitor lizard, the wall lizard, the skink and the chameleon (11:29)

22. Eating – or touching the carcass of – any creature which crawls on many legs, or its belly (11:41-42)

23. Going to church within 33 days after giving birth to a boy (12:4)

24. Going to church within 66 days after giving birth to a girl (12:5)

25. Having sex with your mother (18:7)

26. Having sex with your father’s wife (18:8)

27. Having sex with your sister (18:9)

28. Having sex with your granddaughter (18:10)

29. Having sex with your half-sister (18:11)

30. Having sex with your biological aunt (18:12-13)

31. Having sex with your uncle’s wife (18:14)

32. Having sex with your daughter-in-law (18:15)

33. Having sex with your sister-in-law (18:16)

34. Having sex with a woman and also having sex with her daughter or granddaughter (18:17)

35. Marrying your wife’s sister while your wife still lives (18:18)

36. Having sex with a woman during her period (18:19)

37. Having sex with your neighbour’s wife (18:20)

38. Giving your children to be sacrificed to Molek (18:21)

39. Having sex with a man “as one does with a woman” (18:22)

40. Having sex with an animal (18:23)

41. Making idols or “metal gods” (19:4)

42. Reaping to the very edges of a field (19:9)

43. Picking up grapes that have fallen in your vineyard (19:10)

44. Stealing (19:11)

45. Lying (19:11)

46. Swearing falsely on God’s name (19:12)

47. Defrauding your neighbour (19:13)

48. Holding back the wages of an employee overnight (19:13)

49. Cursing the deaf or abusing the blind (19:14)

50. Perverting justice, showing partiality to either the poor or the rich (19:15)

51. Spreading slander (19:16)

52. Doing anything to endanger a neighbour’s life (19:16)

53. Seeking revenge or bearing a grudge (19:18)

54. Mixing fabrics in clothing (19:19)

55. Cross-breeding animals (19:19)

56. Planting different seeds in the same field (19:19)

57. Sleeping with another man’s slave (19:20)

58. Eating fruit from a tree within four years of planting it (19:23)

59. Practising divination or seeking omens (19:26)

60. Trimming your beard (19:27)

61. Cutting your hair at the sides (19:27)

62. Getting tattoos (19:28)

63. Making your daughter prostitute herself (19:29)

64. Turning to mediums or spiritualists (19:31)

65. Not standing in the presence of the elderly (19:32)

66. Mistreating foreigners – “the foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born” (19:33-34)

67. Using dishonest weights and scales (19:35-36)

68. Cursing your father or mother (punishable by death) (20:9)

69. Marrying a prostitute, divorcee or widow if you are a priest (21:7,13)

70. Entering a place where there’s a dead body as a priest (21:11)

71. Slaughtering a cow/sheep and its young on the same day (22:28)

72. Working on the Sabbath (23:3)

73. Blasphemy (punishable by stoning to death) (24:14)

74. Inflicting an injury; killing someone else’s animal; killing a person must be punished in kind (24:17-22)

75. Selling land permanently (25:23)






You must have lost your New Testament?

For sin is the sting that results in death, and the law gives sin its power. ...
Now death's stinger is sin, and sin's power is the Law

I not only have no problem obeying these Old Testament Laws you list, but there are many others that you neglect to list that I also agree with, and try my best to follow. Jesus said there is not one word, or even a single comma in the Old testament that is not completely and totally good, and He Himself followed every single one of them throughout His life.

You so-called Christians who constantly say you believe and follow the Bible, and yet instead practice the Major, Major Heresy of constantly attacking the Old Testament.

Jesus came to correct the Rabbi preachers who had over the years distorted and misinterpreted the OT. He did not come to complain about the OT, but to protect it from the perverters of the Word who were harming it, like you.

When I fail to do and say as I would and as I should, I repent, and am forgiven. Please note: Hell will be exclusively populated not by sinners, but by those who have refused to repent certain sins they should have repented, like for example, writing denunciations of the Bible in whole or in part. For shame.
 
Upvote 0

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
What is to be confused about here. I said what I mean and mean what I said. Deal with it as you wish. A child is just as dead if the parents kill the child one second before it can be conceived or one second after it was conceived. "LIFE DOES NOT BEGIN AT CONCEPTION, PERIOD BUT SOMETIME BEFORE."
This is not true. If it is one second before it is conceived, then there is no child to be killed.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Strong in Him
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
27,863
7,973
NW England
✟1,050,634.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus said there is not one word, or even a single comma in the Old testament that is not completely and totally good, and He Himself followed every single one of them throughout His life.

No, that is a misquote. Jesus told the Pharisees that not one jot or tittle would disappear from the law. He also said that he had come to fulfill the law.

As far as the religious leaders were concerned, however, he did break the laws - he healed on the Sabbath and touched unclean people.
This obviously doesn't mean that he made a mistake or was a sinner - but in their eyes, he did not keep the law perfectly.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Philip_B
Upvote 0

Founder

Newbie
Apr 21, 2009
181
5
Washington DC Area
✟17,234.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I have read all the posts answering my posts, and while I respect everyone's opinion, none of these other posts convince me my judgment is in error. Four authorities agree with me.
1. The Bible says God knew us all from the foundations of the earth, which is surely before we were "conceived".
2. Science says, life begins when conditions favor and allow its existence, not at the time when conception takes place.
3. The law says, life begins when when possibilities allow or prevent its existence.
4. Business says, life begins with the expectation becomes a reality. (For example you can buy an insurance policy on your horse that pays off if the horse has less than a certain number of offspring.) So, God, Science, the Law, and Business all agree that life can and does exist before conception, and can be ended before conception as well.


I did not willing come to this conclusion but was driven to it by the facts I researched.


Only official religious bodies disagree with all of these authorities, and stubbornly insist, against all evidence, of other authorities, including God, that life begins ONLY at conception and therefore cannot be ended or begun BEFORE Conception.
 
Upvote 0

BukiRob

Newbie
Dec 14, 2012
2,766
991
Columbus, Ohio
✟50,619.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I have read all the posts answering my posts, and while I respect everyone's opinion, none of these other posts convince me my judgment is in error. Four authorities agree with me.
1. The Bible says God knew us all from the foundations of the earth, which is surely before we were "conceived".
2. Science says life begins when conditions favor and allow its existence, not at the time when conception takes place.
3. The law says, life begins when when possibilities allow or prevent its existence.
4. Business says, life begins with the expectation becomes a reality. (For example you can buy an insurance policy on your horse that pays off if the horse has less than a certain number of offspring.) So, God, Science, the Law, and Business all agree that life can and does exist before conception, and can be ended before conception as well.


I did not willing come to this conclusion but was driven to it by the facts I researched.


Only official religious bodies disagree with all of these authorities and stubbornly insist, against all evidence, of other authorities, including God, that life begins ONLY at conception and therefore cannot be ended or begun BEFORE Conception.


#2 Is logically invalid. Conditions ALWAYS exist (on this planet) that are favorable and allow for its existence.
Using #2 I could argue that whenever I am in the presence of a female who is ovulating if I do not copulate with her I am preventing life. (Clearly, there are ethical, moral and religious reasons to not do this...)

I don't care what science, law (whatever4 that may mean) or business say... I care what scripture says.

G-d told mankind to be fruitful and multiply. The rest of your post is full of traditions of man.
 
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
27,863
7,973
NW England
✟1,050,634.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I have read all the posts answering my posts, and while I respect everyone's opinion, none of these other posts convince me my judgment is in error. Four authorities agree with me.
1. The Bible says God knew us all from the foundations of the earth, which is surely before we were "conceived".

Yes, he knew us then.
That doesn't mean that we were alive then; only that God sees, and knows, everything from beginning to end and knew that one day, we would be.

2. Science says, life begins when conditions favor and allow its existence, not at the time when conception takes place.

I don't know about science, and understand even less. But if doctors didn't believe that babies in the womb were alive; a) they wouldn't give the mothers pregnancy advice for delivering healthy babies and b) all the pre birth scans would show nothing; no heartbeat, no baby. Some babies have had ops in the womb. What did the doctors operate on - a lifeless collection of cells?

3. The law says, life begins when when possibilities allow or prevent its existence.

Which is at conception.
Sperm fertilises egg and creates a new life. It doesn't always happen, but that is the possibility.

4. Business says, life begins with the expectation becomes a reality.

Yes a couple who want children have sex, and there is the expectation that a pregnancy will result. Then in many cases, it does. The pregnancy can be discovered by means of a test - so conception has taken place. The foetus can be seen, heard and measured; and in some cases, operated on or delivered early.
If a woman thinks she is pregnant and goes for a scan, it will soon be seen if she is, or isn't. If she has a miscarriage, a scan will show that there is no longer a baby. If there is nothing in the womb, there is no child; no life.
Otherwise, any doctor who had to perform a hysterectomy would be guilty of murder.

You can believe what you like; it doesn't mean that you are correct, nor that the rest of us have to agree with you.
 
Upvote 0

Open Heart

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2014
18,521
4,393
62
Southern California
✟49,214.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Celibate
2. Science says, life begins when conditions favor and allow its existence, not at the time when conception takes place.
No it doesn't. Science says that life begins when the molecule or cell becomes self replicating, meaning it has a full set of DNA, which happens at conception.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Strong in Him
Upvote 0

BukiRob

Newbie
Dec 14, 2012
2,766
991
Columbus, Ohio
✟50,619.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Yes, he knew us then.
That doesn't mean that we were alive then; only that God sees, and knows, everything from beginning to end and knew that one day, we would be.



I don't know about science, and understand even less. But if doctors didn't believe that babies in the womb were alive; a) they wouldn't give the mothers pregnancy advice for delivering healthy babies and b) all the pre birth scans would show nothing; no heartbeat, no baby. Some babies have had ops in the womb. What did the doctors operate on - a lifeless collection of cells?



Which is at conception.
Sperm fertilises egg and creates a new life. It doesn't always happen, but that is the possibility.



Yes a couple who want children have sex, and there is the expectation that a pregnancy will result. Then in many cases, it does. The pregnancy can be discovered by means of a test - so conception has taken place. The foetus can be seen, heard and measured; and in some cases, operated on or delivered early.
If a woman thinks she is pregnant and goes for a scan, it will soon be seen if she is, or isn't. If she has a miscarriage, a scan will show that there is no longer a baby. If there is nothing in the womb, there is no child; no life.
Otherwise, any doctor who had to perform a hysterectomy would be guilty of murder.

You can believe what you like; it doesn't mean that you are correct, nor that the rest of us have to agree with you.

Anyone trying to argue that life begins before conception is an idiot.
 
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
27,863
7,973
NW England
✟1,050,634.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Anyone trying to argue that life begins before conception is an idiot.

Well, yes; it's hard to see how any kind of argument could be put forward for life before life.
The OP previously mentioned the law. I'm pretty sure that if I went to the police and said that I'd committed hundreds of murders, because I didn't have children and so I'd prevented lives from existing; they'd either ignore me or make a suggestion that involved a padded cell. Either way there would be no crime to investigate.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BukiRob

Newbie
Dec 14, 2012
2,766
991
Columbus, Ohio
✟50,619.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Well, yes; it's hard to see how any kind of argument could be put forward for life before life.
The OP previously mentioned the law. I'm pretty sure that if I went to the police and said that I'd committed hundreds of murders, because I didn't have children and so I'd prevented lives from existing; they'd either ignore me or make a suggestion that involved a padded cell. Either way there would be no crime to investigate.


At the root of this problem is running amuck with the decree G-d gave to Mankind. Be FRUITFUL and Multiply. If you have children at all, you are doing just that. The very idea that preventing conception is somehow killing babies is FRUITLOOPS thinking
 
Upvote 0

Philip_B

Bread is Blessed & Broken Wine is Blessed & Poured
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2016
5,412
5,519
72
Swansea, NSW, Australia
Visit site
✟609,647.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Anyone trying to argue that life begins before conception is an idiot.
An ingracious remark at best and unworthy of this forum. The bigger question is to do with the nature of life.
 
Upvote 0

Founder

Newbie
Apr 21, 2009
181
5
Washington DC Area
✟17,234.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Fundamentally what I am saying here is that birth control reduces the number of children that people have. And America's number one problem is immigration which is tearing our nation apart and the reason we have this immigration problem is because by using birth control we have prevented ourselves from having enough children to do our own work in our own country. This is creates a labor vacuum which is being filled by legal and illegal immigrants from all over the world. This is not healthy. We are robbing other countries of their children and their families to fill our need for children to do our work for us. It is God's desire that we do our own work with our own children not import slave labor by enticing these unfortunate people to leave their homes, leave their country to leave often their religion. To make America great again we need to be producing more children than we are presently producing and I might add that Christians and conservatives are producing children at half of replacement. Now you can argue all you want about when life begins but I'll tell you when life ends, that is when you use massive amounts of birth control you're not going to have any children. End of subject, whereas if you do not use birth control you're going to on average have a lot of children which America needs and what you should want. No one is talking here about unfortunate people who have bad health no education no job no home and perhaps don't even know the father of the child they're carrying. We're not talking about them we're talking about young couples who are in good health who would make good parents who often are Christians, go to church, have jobs and own homes such that they would be good parents. But instead of that they are having children at the rate of one or two or often none. This is not even replacing themselves as it takes 2.2 children to barely replace a couple under the very best of circumstances. People who Advocate and practice unlimited birth control whether natural or artificial are not doing America any favor and are at variance with scripture as I read it and understand it. Jesus said I came to bring you life and life more abundantly.
 
Upvote 0

Philip_B

Bread is Blessed & Broken Wine is Blessed & Poured
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2016
5,412
5,519
72
Swansea, NSW, Australia
Visit site
✟609,647.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Fundamentally what I am saying here is that birth control reduces the number of children that people have. And America's number one problem is immigration which is tearing our nation apart and the reason we have this immigration problem is because by using birth control we have prevented ourselves from having enough children to do our own work in our own country. This is creates a labor vacuum which is being filled by legal and illegal immigrants from all over the world. This is not healthy. We are robbing other countries of their children and their families to fill our need for children to do our work for us. It is God's desire that we do our own work with our own children not import slave labor by enticing these unfortunate people to leave their homes, leave their country to leave often their religion. To make America great again we need to be producing more children than we are presently producing and I might add that Christians and conservatives are producing children at half of replacement. Now you can argue all you want about when life begins but I'll tell you when life ends, that is when you use massive amounts of birth control you're not going to have any children. End of subject, whereas if you do not use birth control you're going to on average have a lot of children which America needs and what you should want. No one is talking here about unfortunate people who have bad health no education no job no home and perhaps don't even know the father of the child they're carrying. We're not talking about them we're talking about young couples who are in good health who would make good parents who often are Christians, go to church, have jobs and own homes such that they would be good parents. But instead of that they are having children at the rate of one or two or often none. This is not even replacing themselves as it takes 2.2 children to barely replace a couple under the very best of circumstances. People who Advocate and practice unlimited birth control whether natural or artificial are not doing America any favor and are at variance with scripture as I read it and understand it. Jesus said I came to bring you life and life more abundantly.
Thank you for your response to this thread. I am not sure if you thought about how a citizen of a country other than the USA might respond. From where I am it reads as an amerio-centric world view. I think as Christians our views on moral and ethical questions should be founded in our understanding of God and what has been revealed, in terms of love, justice and equity. I am not certain how your argument sits in that context, but superficially it seems to be an argument for the economic well being of the citizens of one of the most financially prosperous nations without regard to the rest of the people on the planet.

I take it that the scripture you are Referring to is John 10:10 (emboldened below) which is centered in the Good Shepherd passage in the fourth gospel.

Jesus the Good Shepherd
‘Very truly, I tell you, anyone who does not enter the sheepfold by the gate but climbs in by another way is a thief and a bandit. The one who enters by the gate is the shepherd of the sheep. The gatekeeper opens the gate for him, and the sheep hear his voice. He calls his own sheep by name and leads them out. When he has brought out all his own, he goes ahead of them, and the sheep follow him because they know his voice. They will not follow a stranger, but they will run from him because they do not know the voice of strangers.’ Jesus used this figure of speech with them, but they did not understand what he was saying to them.

So again Jesus said to them, ‘Very truly, I tell you, I am the gate for the sheep. All who came before me are thieves and bandits; but the sheep did not listen to them. I am the gate. Whoever enters by me will be saved, and will come in and go out and find pasture. The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy. I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly.

‘I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. The hired hand, who is not the shepherd and does not own the sheep, sees the wolf coming and leaves the sheep and runs away—and the wolf snatches them and scatters them. The hired hand runs away because a hired hand does not care for the sheep. I am the good shepherd. I know my own and my own know me, just as the Father knows me and I know the Father. And I lay down my life for the sheep. I have other sheep that do not belong to this fold. I must bring them also, and they will listen to my voice. So there will be one flock, one shepherd. For this reason the Father loves me, because I lay down my life in order to take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it up again. I have received this command from my Father.’​

Placing the text in context I find it hard to take the view that it is speaking against birth control.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AceHero

Veteran
Sep 10, 2005
4,469
451
36
✟21,933.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
In this case, It has not yet been proved that using contraception is a sin.
There is a commandment, "Be fruitful and multiply, filling up the earth." To violate that commandment is sin.

That said, there are some significant differences between than and now.

Back then, human beings were scarce. Children were blessings and the more children you had, the more blessed you were. Because there was no medical science, children often didn't make it to adulthood, so it was necessary to have a great many children just to have surviving offspring. Only in this way could mankind "fill up the earth."

Today, the earth is full. Indeed, it is overflowing. Because of Medicine, the children we have are in all likelihood going to survive to have children of their own. Even the Pope says that we don't need to breed like rabbits.

But that doesn't mean children aren't still blessings or that there isn't still a commandment to keep. The question is, HOW DO WE BE FRUITFUL AND MULTIPLY WITHOUT DESTROYING THE EARTH FROM OVERPOPULATION? The answer is, childspacing/limiting children.

Choosing not to have children at all is another great way to reduce overpopulation.

So...... The marital relationship MUST include an openness to children, no different now than thousands of years ago.

Artificial Birth Control violates that openness to children, as it allows for sex acts that are divorced from the possibility of conception.

Natural Family Planning has no such violation, and yet allows for child spacing and limitation.

How is that not birth control? You're controlling whether birth will occur or not.

The commandment to be fruitful and multiply is for those bound in marriage, not those who are single or infertile. And I don't see how you can get around it being a commandment as it is grammatically written in the imperative. Whenever God states something in the imperative, it is a commandment.

Married Christian couples can faithfully serve God throughout their lives while still using birth control or even by not having any children at all.

No one is talking here about unfortunate people who have bad health no education no job no home and perhaps don't even know the father of the child they're carrying. We're not talking about them we're talking about young couples who are in good health who would make good parents who often are Christians, go to church, have jobs and own homes such that they would be good parents. But instead of that they are having children at the rate of one or two or often none.

If God has called them to only have two children or one child or none at all, then that's okay. God uses us in different ways. Some are called to be parents and some aren't.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Strong in Him
Upvote 0

Founder

Newbie
Apr 21, 2009
181
5
Washington DC Area
✟17,234.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Many Christians violate the (Commonly Misinterpreted) 3rd Commandment wherein they "Take God's name in vain" by means of constantly excusing their own sins and the sins of other by the devious euphemistic device of blaming their sin on "God's Will." It is not God's will EVER that we sin nor that He causes us to sin in any way, or that He wants us to use Him as an excuse our, or others sins. Blaming God in any way is "Taking the name of the Lord in Vain."

Asking God to damn some inanimate object or some person for harming us is "profane speaking," and "careless speaking" and so forth which definitely is a sin, but it does not rise to the level of a violation of the 3rd Commandment.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Strong in Him

Great is thy faithfulness
Site Supporter
Mar 4, 2005
27,863
7,973
NW England
✟1,050,634.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Fundamentally what I am saying here is that birth control reduces the number of children that people have.

Well yes; that's its purpose - although it doesn't always work.
But that is not what you said in the OP; you said that,
It is just to state a simple fact that Any sort of premeditated interference with a child being born is taking a child's life.
There is a big difference between taking the life of a child, and preventing one from being born; as most of us have been trying to point out to you.

And America's number one problem is immigration which is tearing our nation apart and the reason we have this immigration problem is because by using birth control we have prevented ourselves from having enough children to do our own work in our own country.

Well maybe; I'm not American, so I can't say.
But I would think that people go to another country for a variety of reasons. Getting better jobs may be only a fraction of it; there are no doubt a variety of things to weigh up. For example, for some people in the UK, the pay may be better in the US, and petrol, and maybe houses, cheaper - but there is no NHS, and the things you hear about gun crime and earthquakes, are enough to put anyone off.

This is creates a labor vacuum which is being filled by legal and illegal immigrants from all over the world. This is not healthy. We are robbing other countries of their children and their families to fill our need for children to do our work for us.

I doubt that you're robbing other countries of their children, unless you forcibly take them into slavery. It's likely you are giving many a better quality of life, with better paid jobs.

It is God's desire that we do our own work with our own children not import slave labor by enticing these unfortunate people to leave their homes, leave their country to leave often their religion.

Like I said, you may be giving many a better quality of life.
Are you now saying that people should have children just so that they can work in the country and keep America going? What of those whose parents may be of other nationalities, and they decide they want to work elsewhere?

To make America great again we need to be producing more children than we are presently producing and I might add that Christians and conservatives are producing children at half of replacement.

Right - so apart from the fact that these comments clear don't apply to those of us of other nationalities; a Christian's main aim in having children is not out of love, or because they believe that children are a gift from God, and they want to have a family, but to keep up America's work force?

Now you can argue all you want about when life begins but I'll tell you when life ends, that is when you use massive amounts of birth control you're not going to have any children.

Life doesn't END with the use of birth control - in most cases, and most of the time, life is prevented from beginning; big difference. Though as I said, birth control doesn't always work, and if God really wants you to have a family, you will.

End of subject,

No, because life cannot end, or be taken, if it has not begun - end of.
Previously, you mentioned the law. What do you think the police response would be if you confessed to dozens of "murders", they asked you for details and where the bodies were buried, and you said, "nowhere; I used contraception and they were never born."?

whereas if you do not use birth control you're going to on average have a lot of children which America needs and what you should want.

Erm, no.
1. A couple may never use birth control and later discover that they can't have children.
2. A woman may have several pregnancies, many miscarriages and then the couple decide they don't want to keep on trying.
3. There may be a medical reason, such as cancer, why a couple cannot have children.
4. A couple may marry late - say, after 45 - and then discover the age for bearing children is past.
5. A woman may have medical issues after the birth of one child, and decide it is too dangerous to have any more. That child may grow up with their own fertility issues or decide they never want to marry and therefore don't have children. They might, sadly, die before they can do so.
6. A couple should never be told to have, or coerced into having, children because "America needs them"! I would have said that was a terrible reason for having children - what about love, or God's plan for your life?
7. No one should tell anyone else what they should WANT to do. We're all different, and some people just don't want children. To say that they should have children, is to i) get involved in something which is none of your business, ii) lay a burden of guilt upon them.

No one is talking here about unfortunate people who have bad health no education no job no home and perhaps don't even know the father of the child they're carrying.

Oh, so if a woman is pregnant through rape, or a one night stand and has twins who will grow up to be hard working Americans and add to your workforce, that's different?
Why?
Why are homeless, unemployed pregnant women excluded from your argument? Or are you saying that if a woman is homeless it's acceptable if she doesn't have children??

we're talking about young couples who are in good health who would make good parents who often are Christians, go to church, have jobs and own homes such that they would be good parents.

Well YOU seem to be talking about that now, but your OP was on the subject of life beginning before conception and therefore not allowing someone to be born, is to kill them.

who often are Christians, go to church, have jobs and own homes such that they would be good parents.

I've read testimonies from people whose parents were good, middle class, wealthy, intelligent, faithful and committed church goers - maybe even pastors - who were beaten and abused/neglected by them.
Money, education, possessions etc does not guarantee someone will be a good parent.

This is not even replacing themselves as it takes 2.2 children to barely replace a couple under the very best of circumstances. People who Advocate and practice unlimited birth control whether natural or artificial are not doing America any favor

Only if America is becoming the sort of country which says, "no" to any foreigners, takes away its citizens' passports so they can't go and work elsewhere, and passes a law insisting on how many children a couple should have. I don't think it is; last time I checked, it stood for freedom.

and are at variance with scripture as I read it and understand it.

So what's your main point here? That no one should use birth control because,
1. it is murder - there is life before conception?
2. America, and its economy will suffer - because you are trying to stop foreigners from coming into your country?
Or 3. That you genuinely believe that using birth control is against Scripture, and you are concerned that no one should disobey Scripture?
If the latter, then I should say that 99% of this thread, and your last post, is redundant.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Philip_B
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Founder

Newbie
Apr 21, 2009
181
5
Washington DC Area
✟17,234.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I am never talking about those many exceptions where taking life is justified. For example I totally support Capital Punishment, contrary to some Christian Denominations, and in fact advocate that many more crimes should be punished by taking the criminal's life.

So, there are many many situations where it is totally proper to lawfully take human life. Rape being one of them and there are many others.

I'm exclusively talking here about married couples who have good educations, good homes, good jobs, good health and many times are good religious believers and even good conservatives.

I'm talking exclusively here about these couples premeditatedly going out and buying at great expense and trouble all kinds of pills, condoms and other potions and devices and using them with the single minded purpose of killing their own children by killing the egg and or the sperm just before or just after they come together.

And also those who do the same thing by intentionally having intercourse during the woman's infertile period while intentionally not having intercourse during the woman's fertile time of the month as some denominations advocate, calling it "Natural" Birth Control, or euphemistically calling it "Natural Family Planning". Whatever fancy words are used, the children that would likely be here are made not to be here. I call that taking human life.

Disguising all this killing by calling it "Preventing" Children, doesn't cut it either with reason, logic, truth, or GOD. When you Spay your cat you are NOT "Preventing" Kittens, you are actually killing Kittens. Face it, Repent and change your witness. It's what I have done.
 
Upvote 0