I will add a commentary within the verse to help you understand.
Your novel and unorthodox interpretation is not going to convince me.
Upvote
0
I will add a commentary within the verse to help you understand.
Your novel and unorthodox interpretation is not going to convince me.
Does not 1 John 1:8 say that if we have no sin we deceive ourselves?
Answer: Well, what is helpful in understanding 1 John 1:8 is looking at it's immediate context. 1 John 1:10 says if we say we have not sinned. 1 John 1:10 moves verse 8 (which is present tense) into a past declaration (with verse 10). Verse 10 is saying there are people who said they have not sinned (past tense). This is clearly a gnostic belief. Most believers today hold to the idea that they have sinned at some point in their life (Regardless of whether they are an OSAS believer or a Conditional Salvationist). 1 John 1:8 is a present declaration of sin. It is saying if we say we have no sin when we do sin (present tense). This has to be the interpretative understanding of this verse because 1 John 2:4 says if we say we know Him and do not keep His commandments we are a liar and the truth is not in us. The OSAS's interpretation on 1 John 1:8 does not work because it conflicts with a normal reading on 1 John 2:3-4. You cannot always be in sin (breaking God's commands) as a part of 1 John 1:8 and yet also fulfill 1 John 2:3 that says we can have an assurance of knowing Him if we keep His commandments. Especially when 1 John 2:4 says we are a liar and the truth is not in us if we break his commandments. In other words, if the OSAS interpretation on 1 John 1:8 was true, then I would be damned if I do by obeying God's commands (1 John 1:8) and yet I would be damned if I don't by not obeying God's commands (1 John 2:4).
In fact, the New English Translation says this for 1 John 1:8,
"If we say we do not bear the guilt of sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us." (1 John 1:8 NET).
In other words, this verse is saying that if a person sins and says they do not bear the guilt of sin (in the sense that they will not have to face any wrath or Judgment from God over their sin) then they would be deceiving themselves and the truth would not be in them. This is exactly what the Eternal Security proposes. They are saying that they do not bear the guilt of any sin (destruction of their soul and body in hell fire) if they do sin because they believe their sins are paid for: Past, present, and future by Jesus. They are saying, they do not bear the guilt or the punishment of sin at the final Judgment because of their belief on Jesus. In short, 1 John 1:8 is a denial of the existence of sin on some level. “If we say we have no sin (in the sense that it does not exist) we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.” (1 John 1:8). Christian Scientists think sin is an illusion and does not exist at all. So this verse would apply to them. Eternal Security Proponents and those who deny that “Sin Can Separate a Believer from God” deny the existence of sin partially. They believe sin exists physically but they do not believe sin exists for them on a spiritual level because Jesus has forgiven them of all their sin by their belief on Jesus. In fact, to see just how silly your argument actually is for 1 John 1:8, you would have to believe that you are sinning right now at this very moment in order for such a verse to be true because 1 John 1:8 is speaking in the present tense.
While new believers may stumble into sin on occasion, nowhere does 1 John 1:8 and 1 John 2:1 teach that we sin 24/7 or every second of every day. On the contrary, 1 John 2:4 says that if we say we know Him [Jesus] and do not keep His commandments we are a liar and the truth is not in us.
I just plant seeds and another waters, but it is God who gives the increase.
Also, Jesus said narrow is the way. So it is not the popular belief that is always right.
How about what it says in Hebrews 9:13-14 Dan?
It says exactly what it says.
Adding volumes to scripture that is razor sharp doesn’t change a thing.
1 John 1:8 does mean exactly what it says. However, you and others here are reading it wrong. For example: People (even self professing believers) wrongfully think that God directly creates evil in Isaiah 45:7.
"I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things." (Isaiah 45:7).
It seems to me people want to justify the wrong type of thinking when they read the Bible plainly for whatever their agenda might be. It doesn't really matter what 1 John 1:8 says in light of your belief. For you already start off with the wrong presuppositional belief that says you can sin and still be saved. So the Bible has to fit that view or thinking (even when you may run into many verses or passages that contradict that kind of belief).
Again, 1 John 1:8 says if we say we have no sin, it is referencing the fact that we have no sin even when we may sin.
"If we say that we have no sin [when or if we do sin], we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us." (1 John 1:8).
It is a denial of sin's existence. For 1 John 1:10 moves this denial of sin into a past declaration. It is saying if we say we have not sinned (past tense). Now look, friend. I believe we have sinned in the past alright. You believe we have sinned in the past as a part of our old life. So this is talking about a false gnostic belief that denies sin as a warning to the brethren.
It says exactly what it says.
Adding volumes to scripture that is razor sharp doesn’t change a thing.
The Sinless crew is so vain it would rather make God a liar than admit their humanity with humility.
Okay. So if you believe 1 John 1:8 is a license for you to sin and still be saved, then how do you interpret 1 John 2:4?
1 John 2:4 says,
"He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him."
This verse above here essentially says if we say we know him [Christ] and we do not keep his commandments, we are a liar and the truth is not in us.
1 John 3:4 says sin is the breaking of the Law (i.e. the commandments).
Yet, you are saying we will always sin (i.e. not keep His commandments).
The Bible tells me that if a person says they know Jesus and yet they do not keeping His commandments, they are a liar and the truth is not in them. How does this work with your interpretation of 1 John 1:8?
It doesn't.
How about 1 John 3:10?
It says he that does not righteousness is not of God.
1 John 3:15 says if anyone hates his brother he has no eternal life abiding in him.
Is this the only argument you have?
Please. Let's use some Scripture and steer clear from any use of an ad hominem.
I just plant seeds and another waters, but it is God who gives the increase.
Also, Jesus said narrow is the way. So it is not the popular belief that is always right.
No. We as believers are decrepit in the flesh.
You said:The Spirit is willing but the flesh is weak.
You said:His strength is perfected in our weakness.
You said:Sin occasionally?!?
Down play much?!?
You said:Total dependence on what Jesus did is a good idea! To even suggest that a single human being isn’t riddled with bullet holes in the flesh is utter nonsense. (Only one walked a single hour / eternal lifetime without sinning in any way)
You said:We either need His Blood constantly or we don’t.
You said:Shall we sin that grace may abound? Absolutely Not!
You said:But Love covers a multitude of sin!
You said:It’s our job to focus on what He did and not what we do.
You said:We Love because we are Loved...
You said:Complication of this leads to arrogance, hypocrisy and even an attitude that drives people away from Jesus Christ that spot double speak a million miles away.
You said:Sugar coat it? Nope. We’re Gritty and the Gospel is Grittier...
You said:If I white the outside of a sepulcher... dead, rotten bones are still within it...
You said:That’s a biblical point to understand!
A cloak isn’t our new bodies... we don’t have those yet. Can you run and not grow weary?
End of line.
Narrow way... as in all that enter any other way are thieves and robbers...
As in... He alone saves.
As in... He alone is Savior... not you or your filthy rags.
As in... You lock up the kingdom with your interpretation and invalidate the need for His Death, Burial and Ressurection with your dishonesty.
Narrow way... Literal Meaning is a Jewish refrence to the temple or tabrinacle gate.
Yeah, but OSAS is not the narrow way. It is the easy and wide gate path that everyone else is on. Most churches belief in OSAS these days. It is the popular belief because it makes an allowance for a believer to think they can do evil and be in God's good graces. For it is easy to do the wrong thing.
Do you still sin and repent? Do you have sins you repent of on a daily basis? Are you without sin in your flesh...
Spoiler alert... I do... and you will refuse to answer with the use of “deflection”.
Gee... I wonder why?