Is there a difference in knowingly promoting herecy and mistakenly promoting heresy? Ultimately the result is the same. Misinformation, misdirection, and possible eternal damnation. So I think we need to take our advice and our research of scripture seriously. Let the Holy Spirit speak through us.
Thoughts?
but who defines what is heretical or not?
The conventional Christianity we have today was compiled, with the help of reason and prayer, by early leaders of the church, from the scripture available to them and the traditions that they inherited from the Apostles.
This underwent change and adaptation, to a considerable extent through the middle ages, and to a lesser extent into modern times.
From the time of the enlightenment very many new denominations have formed, and a lot of re-examination has taken place, but very few new heresies have been forthcoming. Largely it has been about the reappraisal of old concepts, that had been part of the earliest thoughts and practices of the earliest years of Christianity, some of which have been in dispute right up to the present day.
We have no undisputed, definitive and universal Christianity.
Differences in practice and belief are not necessarily heretical. Heretical and heterodox are terms describing differences between beliefs, they are a two way street where both sets of beliefs are in dispute by opposing sides in the argument. To declare something to be Heretical is to hold heretical counter beliefs your self, when seen by the opposing standpoint.
It seems almost certain, that when we take advice and research the scriptures seriously, and let the Holy Spirit speak through us, we are not all led to the same conclusions.
The Scriptures and the Holy spirit are not false, there must be a reason God chooses to guide us to differing paths to his Glory. Eternal damnation is unlikely to be any part of it.
It is more likely that we must learn to accept our differences, and that they are more a lesson in humility than heresy on anyone's part.