Dear Jerry:
You did not answer me before. Did Christ empty Himself of His powers in the sense that He did not have those powers anymore or did Jesus have power and He simply did not use those powers?
Nowhere does John 5:19 say that Jesus did not use His own powers or abilities. On the contrary, Jesus says He can only do what He sees His father doing. This lines up with Jesus saying that He can raise the dead just as the Father can raise up the dead in John 5:21. This means Jesus copies what the Father does (vs. 19) and he can raise the dead himself just as the Father can also raise the dead (vs. 21). I do not see how you cannot see this. It is plain as day. Jesus has power just as the Father has power.
I believe John 14:10 is saying that when Jesus did works openly before others, these works were primarily the works of God the Father working through Him. However, we cannot conclude that this was exclusively the Father alone in all instances because we also see that the Holy Spirit also had worked through Jesus to work miracles, too (See Matthew 12:28) (Romans 8:11).
I do not see how that makes any sense. John 14:12 is simply talking about how the miracles we do would be even greater than what Jesus did. Whether Christ had powers, used them or not would not change what this John 14:12 says.
Which is refuted because Jesus also did work by the Holy Spirit and He said He would raise up His own body (along with the Father, and the Holy Spirit). Jesus also held all things together by the word of His power when he was purging us of our sins on the cross. If Jesus did not have power, He could not do this. Jesus also said where two or more are gathered in my name, there I am among them. He literally means that. He is among all believers in the spirit (even during His Earthly ministry). To suggest otherwise is to change the text of the Bible because we are uncomfortable with that idea or we are accustomed to believing a certain way.
No. Jesus was not lying. He said that He can indeed do what He sees the Father doing. You are saying Jesus cannot do what the Father does but Jesus says that He can do it. This means Jesus still has power as the Father has power as He says in verse 21 (When He said that He can raise the dead to life just as the Father can raise the dead to life).
Christ used His divine powers, but it was very limited. Why? Because of Philippians 2:6-9. He had to humble himself as a servant and make himself of no reputation to the point of death. He had to be like a man so as to be our substitute so to bear our sins within his body. In the Garden of Gethsemane, he took upon our sins within the cup the Father gave to him. Then he was whipped and beaten. He was wounded for our transgressions and crushed for our iniquities and by his stripe marks (whip marks) we are healed. Jesus is our substitute. But Jesus is also God, as well. His mission was to carry our sins within his body and pay the penalty for our sins. There is nothing said in Scripture that He had to be perfectly human in every possible way in order for Him to save us. If such were the case, then He wouldn't have been able to been God at the core of His being then. But Jesus is God at the core of His being. This is not just in His existence of who He is but Jesus is God in power, as well. Why? Because He is God. It's very simple.
jason0047,
1. I answered your question.
2. The basis you are using is that Jesus had his powers, which is fine, but you believe he had to use his divine attributes in order to retain him being God.
3. The other view is that the deity of Christ was retained is that
a). Divine names and titles are ascribed to him.
b). Divine attributes are ascribed to him which were limited to become a man.
c). Divine offices are ascribed to him.
d). The works of God are ascribed to him.
e). Divine worship was given to him.
f). His name is associated with that of the Father and the Holy Spirit as being one of the three Divine persons in the deity.
g). Equality with God in divinity is definitely stated.
h). Divine characteristics are ascribed to him.
Dake’s God’s Plan For Man Lesson 21 The Truth About Jesus Christ of. 370-371. He has plenty of scriptures with these.
4. You haven’t addressed the Old Testament scriptures I gave Isaiah 11:2; and the Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the Lord.
V3, And shall make him of quick understanding in the fear of the Lord; and he shall not judge after the sight of his eyes, neither reprove after the hearing of his ears:
Vs. 4; But with righteousness shall he judge the poor and reprove with equity for the meek of the earth: and he shall smite the earth with the rod of his mouth and with the breath of his lips shall he slay the wicked.
Isaiah 42:1; I have put my spirit on him: he shall bring forth judgement to the Gentiles.
5. John 5:19; The son of God can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father doeth. This means that whether or not he used his own divine power or not he never moved without the Father’s approval.
Verse 21 is true about the Son quickening whom he he will but it was because of being in subjection to the Father and what the Father doeth vs. 20. This reconciles with John 14:10; the Father that dwelled in Christ did the works.
As a human he was in complete submission to the Father. The Father would approve Christ raising people from the dead.
Also, Luke 4:18 says; The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor, he hath sent me to heal the broken-hearted. to preach deliverance to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, to preach the acceptable year of the Lord.
6. Now how is this reconciled with
John 14:10?
Your opinion about the Father doing the works only in the open is not mentioned or implied.
Jesus said he was in the Father and the Father in him.
He said the words he spoke was not of himself but the Father that dwelleth in me, HE DOETH THE WORKS!
Vs. 11; Jesus told the Jewish disciples; Believe me that I am in the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works sake.
The works sake is because the Jews require a sign.
Vs. 12: Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; BECAUSE I GO TO MY FATHER.
Vs. 13: And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name that will I do, that the Father may be glorified.
The Son is in submission to the father as a human as our human example not the unity of the trinity.
7. We know that he was limited in the days of his flesh. He did everything by voluntary action, but not without the Father doing them.
Whether Christ retained all his divine powers and attributes in his person and chose to limit their use for his earthly life; the fact remains that he was limited as a man and if his choice was so powerful as to do away with all use of them, what is the difference between laying them aside and still retaining them without power to use them.
Most of what we were talking about his wisdom, knowledge, miracles and sufferings and we know he was tempted every way man ever was.
I would agree that he had to be the Savior being the ransom for the penalty of sin.
Bearing the sins of the world would have to be according to the Savior of the world for he was the ransom for sins penalty. We could logically believe that he was the ransom as Christ, suffered physically like man, and bear the sins because of being the Savior.
8. Concerning daily life as a human life and even the miracles the scriptures seem to show he limited his divine attributes to show that we could do the same things in his name because he goes to the father.
9. Where Jesus and redemption are concerned that man cannot fulfill is true just like him being the sinless and spotless Lamb Of God. But this is not using his divine attributes, but who he is.
10. Jesus did not lose his deity according to the things said of him as being deity that Dake shows up above.
Do you disagree with this?
This is why Christ didn’t have to use his divine attributes to prove his deity.
Jesus made himself of no reputation and was neglectful in saying he was deity but he was still deity.
So we do agree that Jesus was limited by means of becoming human.
I do not believe Christ had to do works apart from the Father and anointing of the Holy Spirit concerning human life on earth to show he was deity.
Scriptures show he was deity in conjunction with the Old Testament scriptures.
Remember, even plain statements have a context as well as comparing and reconciling with all the scriptures on the subject.
If you could show in every case where Christ used his divine attributes. Jerry kelso