I do not agree with you about the spiritual meat and spiritual drink by the way it is not referring to physical bread and wine we literally eatWhere did I say "sacraments". You said that Communion is "spiritual meat and spiritual drink". I agreed with you and showed you the Scriptures that also say that it is "spiritual meat and spiritual drink". That's all that was needed to be said at the time, because of the ridiculously slanderous insinuations you made towards Communion. You made these slanderous insinuations because you lack the understanding that only the Holy Spirit can give. This is not an understanding that can be read in a book or expressed with sentence combinations, not even in the Bible where the understanding given only by the Holy Spirit is absent in they who read it. This is knowledge of God that comes only through the experience of Communion with God in the Holy Spirit. They who lack the knowledge of God in the Holy Spirit are without understanding, and so they "slander what they do not understand". (Jude 1:10) On the basis of everything you have stated about Communion, and all of the Scriptural quotes you've included in support of your attitude towards Communion, it is painfully clear to me that you are not nearly capable of conversing about such things. So I repeat: let's not.
"Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned." (1 Cor 2:13,14 KJV)
You're defining the profound mystery of Communion as a natural man would, through the power of your intellect and not by the knowledge that only comes from the Spirit of God. Your theology and spirituality has much more to do with "conceptualization" than actual Heavenly Experience in the Holy Spirit. For this reason, the above quoted Scripture describes you, not the ancient Church. There isn't anything "natural" about the "profound mysteries". These "mysteries" are "foolishness" to the natural man, "neither can you know them", because "they are spiritually discerned."
I have shown you clearly that you have another gospel and you add many things to the gospel
I am so opposed to your Eastrrn Orthadix religion I see some things that are common to many churches but there is a great conflict against truth in your religion from the true faith
This is very serious
And like I said I see your Easyern Orthadix religion as only slieghtly different in form and practice from the Roman Catholic Church
You say I slander your views etc I am trying to be as gracious as I can but the words I want to use I hold back from to be more gentle.
But it is very serious .
God has shown me many things in the truth and the word and this is not from my natural intellect as you can see many scriptures give the answers I share.
I think your mind is already made up no matter what truth you would hear you would not accept even the strongest evidence from scripture if it exposes your wrong stance and your entire Eastern Orthadix views,
If you do hear things that challenge you you simply have your mind made up that I must be wrong by even if you cannot show me anything that I have said is wrong
Do you believe in sacraments and that the church dispenses these so called “sacraments and grace to those who do such things? As far as I understand there are things called “sacraments” in the Eastern Orthadix church .
Last edited:
Upvote
0