Just give your short explanation, I don't read minds?Did you do any research on John 10:22 and Hanukkah?
.
I don't see how the three events can be separated, they are all in the same context in the chapter?
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Just give your short explanation, I don't read minds?Did you do any research on John 10:22 and Hanukkah?
.
I strongly disagree.This is not hard to understand. The AOD was a prior event that was first committed by Antiochus IV Epiphanes when he defiled the temple. This is why the passage of Matthew 24:15 has the parenthesized statement "let the reader understand". If the reader doesn't understand the AOD of Antiochus, they will not know what it is.
Luke 21:20 simplifies it as Luke's writing doesn't identify the AOD but makes it plain saying:
20 “But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then recognize that her desolation is near.
The AOD is the defiling of the temple, as the temple contained the "Holy Place" and "The Most Holy Place" which only the Levitical priests were allowed to enter. In AD 70 when the Romans finally breached the walls and enter the city they eventually entered the temple. From the writings of Josephus it is recorded that when the Romans entered the temple and began to destroy it, flames shot out, and the Jews screamed and fought even harder. Many to their own death.
That was the AOD repeated by the Romans, as they not only defiled the temple...but completely destroyed it , just as Jesus prophesied. This is what the reader needs to understand of Matthew 24:15. The disciples clearly understood what Jesus meant as Hanukkah is a celebration of the cleansing of temple that Antiochus IV defiled it. The temple was reclaimed in Maccabean revolt. Something the Jews have always celebrated since the temple was retaken from Antiochus and finally rededicated to God after being cleansed.
Here's a nice reference to the history of Hanukkah:
The Story of Chanukah
The clue Jesus gave Peter, James and John was when they see the Abomination of Desolation which Daniel had prophesied, they were to flee the city. At that point the destruction of the temple was imminent! Jerusalem would be destroyed and the temple defiled.
;
Just give your short explanation, I don't read minds?
I don't see how the three events can be separated, they are all in the same context in the chapter?
Jerusalem would be destroyed and the temple defiled.
FulfilledWe agree exactly on this.
Do you believe Matthew 24:15 & Matthew 24:21 "Abomination Of Desolation and Great Tribulation are fulfilled or future?
please explain, I don't recall your position?
If yes explain
"Immediately after the tribulation of those days"
"They shall see the Son of Man"?
Really? Start with why Jesus even did the Olivet Discourse. You may say you strongly disagree but it's the questions the disciples asked to which Jesus responded.I strongly disagree.
1. Jesus isn't going to speak prophetically all through Matthew 24, and reference your claimed Antiochus that was fulfilled as he spoke.
2. The Abomination Of Desolation and Great Tribe are in the same time frame, you believewere fulfilled in 66-70AD.
Matthew 24:29-31 clearly shows the "Future Second Advent" and direct association to the Great Tribulation in verse 21
"Immediately after the tribulation of those days"
"They shall see the Son of Man coming"
You can't have a future second advent, and 66-70AD Great Tribulation.
I guess you deny the second advent is seen in the verses, to lay a false foundation for 66-70AD fulfillment?
You should be looking at this from the Jewish mind. Remember they don't think Christ is Messiah, therefore to them the temple is of great significance. They continue to sacrifice because to them, the temple is still holy.Once Christ died and rose though, wasn't the temple at that point, obsolete? How does one defile a temple no longer serving a useful purpose?
This is not Christ's 2nd Advent...it's Christ coming in judgement. You can't or don't want to see it.
Hello Truth7t7.I strongly disagree.
1. Jesus isn't going to speak prophetically all through Matthew 24, and reference your claimed Antiochus that was fulfilled as he spoke.
2. The Abomination Of Desolation and Great Tribe are in the same time frame, you believewere fulfilled in 66-70AD.
Matthew 24:29-31 clearly shows the "Future Second Advent" and direct association to the Great Tribulation in verse 21
"Immediately after the tribulation of those days"
"They shall see the Son of Man coming"
You can't have a future second advent, and 66-70AD Great Tribulation.
I guess you deny the second advent is seen in the verses, to lay a false foundation for 66-70AD fulfillment?
That's your new avatar? You're Catholic. Get something that represents Catholics and in a positive way.
Hello Truth7t7.
Just look at the two passages below, they are identical. Matthew just compresses the two events together, the end of Israel and the end of the world.
Matthew 24
15 “Therefore when you see the abomination of desolation which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), 16 then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains. 17 Whoever is on the housetop must not go down to get the things out that are in his house. 18 Whoever is in the field must not turn back to get his cloak. 19 But woe to those who are pregnant and to those who are nursing babies in those days! 20 But pray that your flight will not be in the winter, or on a Sabbath. 21 For then there will be a great tribulation, such as has not occurred since the beginning of the world until now, nor ever will. 22 Unless those days had been cut short, no life would have been saved; but for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short.
Luke 21
20 “But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then recognize that her desolation is near. 21 Then those who are in Judea must flee to the mountains, and those who are in the midst of the city must leave, and those who are in the country must not enter the city; 22 because these are days of vengeance, so that all things which are written will be fulfilled. 23 Woe to those who are pregnant and to those who are nursing babies in those days; for there will be great distress upon the land and wrath to this people; 24 and they will fall by the edge of the sword, and will be led captive into all the nations; and Jerusalem will be trampled under foot by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.
okay, I will just put you on ignore instead.I'm going to report you for harassment if you keep this up friend.
If you are going to quote my post, then ADDRESS MY POST IN YOUR REPLY.
Thats how it works round these parts. It's really quite simple.
Personal attacks are against forum rules.
You are not my father, not my boss, not the "CF Catholic Cop" and clearly do not respect my right to express myself however I choose, the way Christian Forums respects my (and your) right to express myself (and yourself) however I (or you) choose.
I demanded you change your nauseating eyesore of an avatar tongue in cheek the other day in response to your ridiculous demands of me to change mine, and then I simly let it go.
I also changed my avatar to something less "loud" the other day as it pleased me to do. I may keep it for a year. I may change it to something completely different and decidely un catholic tomorrow, If I choose to.
I like Motorcycles and Guitars. Maybe I'll find an avatar of one of those to use.
Neither of which are Catholic in nature. Both of which catholics like myself all over the world enjoy freely, without fear of reprisal for not being "catholic enough" by nosey, self serving protestants who have no business telling Catholics how to be Catholic.
Quit being a jerk.
Go Kick Rocks.
Mind your own business.
Once Christ died and rose though, wasn't the temple at that point, obsolete? How does one defile a temple no longer serving a useful purpose?
okay, I will just put you on ignore instead.
Do you believe Daniel 9:27 & Matthew 24:15 are the same event?If you are not willing to do your own homework on John 10:22 and Hanukkah and you want me to agree with what you are saying, it would be a waste of time.
Your viewpoint of the "Abomination of Desolation" must be built on historical facts, instead of opinion.
I presented the historical evidence to you in the past, and you did not want to hear it.
I have shown how Luke's Gospel reveals the timeline of the Olivet Discourse, and you did not want to hear it either, because it destroys your viewpoint.
Arguing based only on opinion is like arguing over the color of bigfoot, without any evidence that bigfoot actually exists.
Each year millions of hunters take to the forests of the world to harvest game, and not one of them has ever killed a bigfoot, and presented the evidence for the world to see.
When you find a stuffed bigfoot, let me know because I want to see the evidence. Also, be ready to submit a DNA sample to confirm the new species.
.
Do you believe Daniel 9:27, Matthew 24:15, and Mark 13:14, are the same event?Indeed.
These are two separate accounts of the EXACT SAME DISCOURSE Given by Jesus, covering the EXACT SAME TOPIC.
In both passages we have the Exact Same "WHEN", the exact same "DESOLATION", the exact same time to "THEN FLEE TO THE MOUNTAINS", the exact same "TRIBULATION/DISTRESS UPON THE LAND AND PEOPLE" that took place on the exact same "THOSE DAYS".
Parallel passages such as these can not be interpreted to have polar opposite fulfillments from one another. Such is purely a man made invention and can be found nowhere in the pages of Holy Scripture.
Ok your a Roman Catholic.I'm going to report you for harassment if you keep this up friend.
If you are going to quote my post, then ADDRESS MY POST IN YOUR REPLY.
Thats how it works round these parts. It's really quite simple.
Personal attacks are against forum rules.
You are not my father, not my boss, not the "CF Catholic Cop" and clearly do not respect my right to express myself however I choose, the way Christian Forums respects my (and your) right to express myself (and yourself) however I (or you) choose.
I demanded you change your nauseating eyesore of an avatar tongue in cheek the other day in response to your ridiculous demands of me to change mine, and then I simly let it go.
I also changed my avatar to something less "loud" the other day as it pleased me to do. I may keep it for a year. I may change it to something completely different and decidely un catholic tomorrow, If I choose to.
I like Motorcycles and Guitars. Maybe I'll find an avatar of one of those to use.
Neither of which are Catholic in nature. Both of which catholics like myself all over the world enjoy freely, without fear of reprisal for not being "catholic enough" by nosey, self serving protestants who have no business telling Catholics how to be Catholic.
Quit being a jerk.
Go Kick Rocks.
Mind your own business.