Those migrants are going to try and cross, water stations or no water stations, they were doing it before anybody built these stations and would continue to do it even if the stations were banned.
Its not encouraging them, they're not even thinking about these water stations when they try to cross over, the stations are irrelevant to "migrant traffic".
So these people are going to be out there anyway, as they're desperate.
So perhaps people create these water stations, because the idea of somebody dying out in the desert of exposure, troubles them, thinking of the human suffering rather than the "criminal intent".
What is more "immoral" here, people breaking immigration law or denying water that could save a life because those people are "idiots breaking the law at their own risk"
The thought of somebody entering my nation illegally is of mild annoyance, not something I would lose sleep over, not that I agree with illegal immigration, but in the grand scheme of things is nothing. But the thought of somebody dying of exposure, slowly out in the wilderness, even if they knew the risk they were taking, bothers me, if I think about such things I would lose sleep.
"Upholding the law" and showing zero tolerance to "law breakers", but at what cost?
The loss of our humanity.
I know which one I see as the "real crime"
